i think you need the virtue of hindsight in that situation.he is not a great authority on what is interesting or revolutionary. i talk about the sketch he wrote in 1865 when he is here in san francisco and i feel it was a birth moment for his style and later literary renovation. he doesn't see it that way, though. it is really only with decades of hindsight and later works like huckleberry fin and tom swayer that you can track it back and say this is where it began. so in terms of the contemporary scene we won't know. >> how do you think of the history of what they are writing relates to the history of vigilante in san francisco? >> well, it was a major force in san francisco history particularly in the 1850's. there were two uprisings in the 1850s that the respectable citizens of san francisco cleaning up the town by taking justice into their own hands and lynching criminals and they hang two noted criminals in 1856 and control the city for a period of time. by the time these writers are

talking about hindsight in dealing with benghazi.hat enough from her here on this subject or does she need to dive into this more with less caution as you say? >> i think it depends, john. if she runs, it's definitely not enough. if she's running in large part on her record as secretary of state and the choices she has made. the actions she has taken. the policies she's advocated as secretary of state are going to be fully scrutinized much more so than her shaping her own narrative and her own choices in this book. so if she doesn't run, this may do it. if she does run, there's going to be a lot more explaining to do. >> so i can tell you one person i do not think will like this book and that is karl rove, who just called hillary clinton old and stale. what does he mean and what does it mean for mrs. clinton? we'll discuss that when we come back. it starts with little things. tiny changes in the brain. little things, anyone can do. it steals your memories. your independence. insures support. a breakthrough. and sooner than you'd like

on the goddamned the test if any could be the fifth sixth i might be too many draws the day with hindsight out to trick the contract to command a fee despite rising temperatures. the six fl to spend to lose its value a tax dodge and flew into london on the mental discipline and you can see beyond that it's june and the entertainment aspect in mumbai. the tent on top of being fought. it's the fence she was happy in the second was going. the program. with that. i use mine. i mean i get the fence and pakistani accent events he said the pistons down and actually did sleep number bed any team that was a noble cause the day. the ticket. in particular. the system completely the disease and fencing. she likes and is looking for some on the kids the youngster was the fish and i'd start of the national basketball association. i will be actively dating events in mumbai. enthusiast the dividend to be the envy of much in the eyes of the two nd in fact. i know it is. you know. i know. if the accident happened at the end of the nbn much and that makes it all but two hundred knots in socks just eat and ea

>> sean, hindsight is always 20/20. winston churchill in world war ii said this guy is not a criminal and he was -- >> no, it was churchill who warned of the dangers of nazis. >> he said this is -- there is no danger here. >> you see -- >> hindsight and foreign -- >> they justify, thread the needle, there is always a reason not to stand up for evil. jay leno compared this to germany. late to the game but right. >> this gentleman is being intellectually dishonest. obama sided with jihadest very early on and invited the muslim brotherhood to his speech in 2009. mubarak couldn't attend. don't get me wrong, gaddafi was a monster but there is worse. >> but -- >> excuse me -- >> one second, man. >> i didn't interrupt you, sir. islamic is spreading and becoming terrorist states. >> we got these 300 girls being held by boca hard ram, and hill clinton defined them as radical terrorists and told what these groups were about and didn't want to offend them. >> i have written over 400 posts on the most agreeingous boca haram. they w

he said, hindsight is all 20/20.here's the man who invented the initial combination of drugs that were used for lethal injection. here he is saying that he wishes he could go back and change the proposed combination, to the specific drugs. but for a number of reasons in the last new years, states across the country have been doing just that. they've been tinkering with the exact combination of drugs. they've even been tinkering with the exact number of drugs. they've been killing people not with three drugs, but in some cases, maybe two or just one. they've been trying to make the process work better, but it does not seem like tinkering with lethal injections is making anything better. over time, we've executed people by a number of different methods in this country. and every time, we evolve out of one old method and into a new one we tell ourselves that the new one is a more humane way of doing it, a more sanitized way of doing it. it's a more certain way of killing people. and then, eventually, to use a legal term

i think you really need the virtue of hindsight in that situation. as i mentioned before, you know, the writer himself or herself is not a great authority on subject of what's most interesting or revolutionary about their work. twain himself, i talk a lot about jim smiley and his jumping frog which is a sketch that twain writes in 1865 when he's here in san francisco, and i feel is really a kind of birth moment for his style and for his later literary innovations. but he himself has a very conflicted kind of ambivalent relationship towards it. he doesn't really see it necessarily that way, and it's really only with decades of hindsight and later works like huckleberry finn and tom sawyer that you can kind of track back and say this is actually where it began. so in terms of the contemporary scene, i think we probably won't know for 30 years, unfortunately. we'll have to wait. any other questions? yes. >> how do you think the whole history of the literature and what they were writing relates to the history or the evolution of vigilantism in san franci

we have the benefit of hindsight, 20/20 hindsight is perfect, and at this point, we're looking for all the people who perhaps missed an opportunity, who didn't do what they should have done. this is a common scapegoating effort. but it's -- it's misinformed. there's no way that they could have anticipated what he was about to do. >> pam, can i just jump in on this? >> sure. >> the complexity of this is much greater than is even being reported. you know, one of the things i do, i represent psychiatrists when they get sued. you know what they get sued for? they get sued for admitting people to psychiatric facilities without adequate grounds. and they get sued for not admitting people. so you have to be very careful when you're going to lock somebody up in a psychiatric facility. it's easy, now, to look back and say he should have been locked up, but it's a more complex question than it appeared. >> absolutely, it is. and what does it tell you, in light of that, paul that apparently it was the therapist who ended up contacting this mental health hot line, who then contacted police, how co

>> well, hindsight is 20/20. so yes, there were red flags. >> starting a family in paradise was a nightmare. >> the clinic pulled out and we had to switch clinics and we ended up with a u.s. egg donor and they were homo foebic. >> after spending tens of thousands of dollars the company failed to deliver. >> we lost over a $20,000. >> jonathan is a d. c. trial lawyer and would be father, also burned in cancun. he spent $30 with the hospital. >> i have never seen the level of victimization and taking someone whose hopes and dreams of childhood so imperative and private and outright steal their money and provide nothing in return. i have never seen that level of fraud. >> he launched an investigation and stunned another 40 couples, just like him, people left with a pile of bills and no babies. >> they came from australia, canada, england and the united states. >> he faukt back. >> it was my goal to put an end to this. >> the efforts may have paid off the u.s. attorney's office is launching an investigation. they hav

and in hindsight you could look at that and conclude that. i respectfully disagree that that means there was one on the evening in question. that's a factual question. was there in fact -- >> you say in your complaint e defendant's claim that the secret service agent told the police that the reason for the secret service's request or direction was that they did not want anyone within handgun or explosive range of the president. to the extent the agents in fact made such an assertion, the assertion was false. and the defendant and police defendants knew or should have known that it was false. so you think it's false, they think it's true, that's called a dispute of fact. and the normal circumstance is that the judge has various weapons at his disposal, legal apons, to try to prevent courts' time being wasted, officers' time being wasted and others' time being wasted on factual allegations that are unlikely true. that was true before ichbal as well as after. that's your position. >> yes and no. i think unlikely maybe the -- may be the wrong wor

"in hindsight, i should have used different examples. i didn't consider the trayvon martin family and i apologize for that." >> he also said if he saw a white guy tatted up, he'll cross the street. >> yeah, and shaved head, he'd cross the street. he was saying you can't pretend you don't have conceptions, misconceptions about people and he's struggled with that and tries to teach his children about that, but that's not what everyone's talking about. they're talking about his bold examples. >> and it was in the context of a two-minute example about we need to talk about race and do more to understand our prejudices. so, the context there very, very important, even if the words, that one sentence, may be very insensitive. >>> coming up for us, pope francis preparing for an historic trip to the holy land, already making waves with some of his plans. we're live after the break. ago, "wow, how is there no way to tell the good from the bad?" so we gave people the power of the review. and now angie's list is revolutionizing local service again.

blair do you think it was a mistake in hindsight to invest all of that money on trade in iraq and iraq is a mess? so was it a mistake and why did you make it? that's legitimate but to bring all of this oh it's not obama's fault it's their fault. >> but the way he framed the question. >> he's a pinhead. are you happy? >> yeah. colbert and john stewart. >> colbert is another guy like gregory who is just a left wing -- just admit it. just admit. so don't hide behind this i get everybody. he doesn't get everybody. stewart does. he'll go after you no matter where you are. both liberal guys. both play to their audience but a lot of right wingers do that too so i don't have a beef with that. but i don't like colbert kind of hiding, you know? so that's what i said. he has to be better than fallon and kimmel. i don't think he is better. i could be wrong and if he isn't better, he's not going to do well. >> can we give him pinhead? >> not yet. let's see what he's got. >> really? >> i'm not going to give him a pinhead yet. i don't like the fact he won't admit what he is. >> i don't mind he makes

you may, in hindsight, judge "that just doesn't seem right." may judge in hindsight, although i don't, that that just doesn't seem right. but that's the deal bp asked for; that's the deal bp got. and the deal bp got was for the entire states of mississippi, louisiana and alabama. >> pelley: claims administrator pat juneau is rejecting about 40% of claims when companies can't prove an economic loss of some kind. but he has approved more than $3 billion in claims so far, so, in a nutshell, if they've got the right numbers, they get a check? >> juneau: i'm obliged to pay... honor and pay those claims. >> pelley: bp essentially is saying that you're facilitating fraud. >> juneau: i have never in my life... i'm 76 years old, i've been to a lot of rodeos in my life. i don't facilitate fraud. fraud offends me. >> pelley: but doesn't this do violence to common sense when you're paying claims to people who have no loss associated with the spill? how could that possibly be the intent of the agreement? >> juneau: you do understand that i wasn't there when

it's hard to go back, as michaela said, hindsight's always better.at the same time, there's going to be some big questions to ask and some answers that i'm not sure they have as to why they continued the search as long as they did. and these questions will come out when it's time to pay the bill. and those are going to be hard questions. you know, as far as whether they were wasted, i don't think so. >> mary, when both john and i spoke to sara bajc earlier, she talked about the fact that they had spoken. the family members had spoken with many aviation experts and that they didn't have much credence in those pings. are you one of those aviation experts that feels that way, that there wasn't a lot to be said for these pings, the wrong frequency, et cetera? why was so much put on them if those were not the right -- that wasn't the right intelligence? >> well, and i was one of those people to say why don't we test them? it was amazing to me that we didn't have data that would show what would happen to the pingers when they're under water and under the p

hindsight often distorts the situation more than it clarifies. faced veryges we early on legally and logistically and politically were quite profound. we had no idea who it was we were going to meet. we had no idea what he had done to get these documents were with the legal ramifications were or what the risks were going to hong kong. in fact, "washington post" actually said they were unwilling to send any of their journalist to hong kong because they were so worried about the risks. "the guardian" understandably was worried about that and i had only worked for them for eight months. my deal was, i write whatever i want and i post it directly to the internet and you don't interfere in any way. so i had barely worked with any "guardian" editors at all, let alone on a story this size. there was a lot of trust issues. i did not fully trust them and how they would handle a story like this and they did not fully trust me that they could essentially stake to 190-year history of the newspaper on a story based on what i was telling them, given we had no

in your opinion in hindsight, i know hindsight is 20/20, was it a mistake not to designate this organization senator, as i explained, i think we had a healthy debate. we are respectful of the nigerian attitude. boko haram and the fear of designating the organization would bring it more publicity, in retrospect, we might have done it earlier. i think the important thing is we have done it and we've offered a reward for the leadership of boko haram's rockies. >> for future reference, do you think there is a lesson here when we make decisions about designating groups as terrorists, it shouldn't simply be

hindsight is always 20/20. >> of course they are saying aliewm niewm tubes saying it's not nuclear material and others saying it is. >> it's a matter aassumption. >> but not a question of lying. >> jon: no, it's not a question of lying it's a statement of lying. it's not an assumption because -- let me explain what you assume -- [ applause ] -- all i know when you assume it makes an ass out of -- they were lying and they knew they were lying when they said that. withbut now benghazi and the ste department and the c.i.a. had information things were dangerous. should have had more protection. should have. that would be like sending soldiers to war without uparmorred vehicles and not only taking too long to fix the problem but answering a question about that problem like this. >> as you know you go to war with the army you have and not the army you might want. >> jon: zing. i forgot how much catch phrases came out of iraq. that was the like steve erkel of wars. if you were upset about benghazi that rumsfeld thing must have really massaged your o spot. your outrage spot which totally doesn't ex

magazine got instant reaction on social media and tonight he tweeted in hindsight i should have used different examples. i didn't consider the trayvon martin family and i apologize to them for that, but beyond that he stands by his words. cuban called donald sterling's racist rants abhorrent but he says forcing him to sell the team would be a very slippery slope. he tonight civil rights pioneer harvey milk is honored with a stamp. it was unveiled at the white house today. it features an iconic black and white photo when milk was elected to san francisco's board of supervisors. he was one of the first openly gay elected officials in the country. the stamps were going fast at the castro post office today. >>> a huge insurance fraud case revealed, tonight how prosecutors say hundreds of bay area women got free manicures. >> and a dead whale washes ashore in the bay area tonight, what happens next is kind of strange. ,,,,,,,, afternoon had be rescued. ty got stuck and couldn't get . crews came in with a helico them to safety. >>> three people attempting to climb a dem near morgan hill th

and in hindsight it was regretful that i didn't. >> last year the supreme court issued an important ruling on marriage equality in the windsor case. how would your personal views impact your decisions as a judge? >> they would not. i'm faithful to the obligation to follow stare decisis and i would follow windsor and any of the cases out of the supreme court, including rome or and the lord's. >> when you commit to following supreme court precedent in this area when it comes to marriage equality? >> absolutely. >> all right. i know that there've also been some -- while running to be a state court judge. it confirmed what role do you think your personal opinions about women's reproductive rights should have on the cases before you? >> my personal opinion on women's reproductive rights has no role as to how we decide legal issues or decide cases or analyze issues were i to be confirmed as a dish court judge. >> one of the things that has been brought to my attention, i think what concern a lot of people but not as much as the amendment on the doctors boasting, but you cosponsored a bill that t

earlier we asked about the technology that originally impressed but new hindsight seems kind of lame.ducer justine has some of the best responses. justine? >> good morning. so we have a tweet from your sister. she says who remembers "alfie." love all the -- >> yeah, yeah. my mom still has the alfie in the laundry room. >> there's the actual robot. >> it was great, though. >> awesome. >> yeah. >> we had some fun with in this morning. i'm sorry. coming up next on "way too early," the stories you'll be talking about in the day ahead. it will probably include a white batman suit. "morning joe" just moments away. i dbefore i dosearch any projects on my home. i love my contractor, and i am so thankful to angie's list for bringing us together. find out why more than two million members count on angie's list. angie's list -- reviews you can trust. but they don't yet know we're a family. we're right where you need us. at the next job, next adventure or at the next exit helping you explore super destinations and do everything under the sun. 12 brands. more hotels than anyone else in the world.

in sad hient -- hindsight, police, families and friends of rodger are left with pieces of a puzzle no one put together in time. >> you forced me to suffer all my life. >> reporter: we have learned at least one therapist who received his manifesto did call police as soon as it was read, but by then, the massacre was over. mental health professionals have a duty to warn police if someone threatens violence against themselves or others. just weeks before the shooting rodger's parents themselves made that call alarmed over videos like these. >> girls are not sexually attracted to me. that's a problem. and i intend to rectify. >> reporter: deputies went to his apartment but found him polite and had no reason to take action. but in that manifesto, rodgers gloats he fooled police writing if they demanded to search my room that would have ended everything. those missed opportunities now magnifying families pain. >> we're trying to understand why chris died. and try to make it mean something. because otherwise, it just seems so hard. >> reporter: so much grief and sorrow around this campus. to

and in hindsight i'd is an identity and can be out for a muslim identity card. irish people and for learning the defense contends the case the thieves the this evening six wings with ppd carefully taking citizens but for now. i mean i was. using. he reinstated if that's not the negatives of age. gage is one of the season. it's the busy don't try to copy that there are you'll be beyond on a human being human and i gave you time to be a kind of existing code that time he did not suffer. i did two things happened. that's on the podium. it's late. they cost me just to india. it's not that into the years. so that's what the founders me to get into a blast making them fighting for his team are hindus and muslims are packing it seemed like half the contestants up liking the direction of the man and told it may not be they see it has been going on. i did not. i mean i did not speak to you tied to things happening just down right to stay behind the security deed and what it was abandoning its common name in vain to tingle. i don't spend much of the night last night not t

i think you need the virtue of hindsight in that situation. she is not a great authority on what is interesting or revolutionary. i talk about the sketch he wrote in 1865 when he is here in san francisco and i feel it was a birth moment for his style and later literary renovation. he doesn't see it that way, though. it is really only with decades of hindsight and later works like huckleberry fin and tom swayer that you can track it back and say this is where it began. so in terms of the contemporary scene we won't know. >> how do you think of the history of what they are writing relates to the history of vigilante in san francisco? >> well it was a major force in san francisco history particularly in the 1850's. there were two uprisings in the 1850s that the respectable citizens of san francisco cleaning up the town by taking justice into their own hands and lynching criminals and they hang two noted criminals in 1856 and control the city for a period of time. by the time these writers are working that phase is behind san francisco. 1860 san f

in hindsight, you could conclude that. i respectfully disagree that that means there was one on the evening in question. claim thatndant's secret service agents told them the reason the secret service's request was that they did not want anyone within handgun or explosive range of the president. madee extent the agents such an assertion, the assertion was false. the defendant and police defendants knew or should have known it was false. you think it was false. they think it was true. that is: dispute of fact. the normal circumstance is that the judge has various weapons at his disposal, legal weapons to time beingent courts wasted, officers time being on factual allegations that are unlikely to be true. that is your position. >> yes and no. case, a court said it doesn't matter -- it is not a question of whether the case is likely to be proven true. iqbal didn't precipitate the change. we believe we have pled enough facts to create a basis for the inference of intent. case but not your exactly the same, you don't plead any

tonight, so many clues in hindsight -- puzzle pieces put together too late. >> elliot rodger here. >> reporter: elliot rodger left disturbing hints, starting with those chilling youtube videos. >> i'll be a god. exacting my retribution on all those who deserve it. >> reporter: and this 141-page manifesto, detailing the troubled life of an alleged killer. from childhood bullying, sibiling rivalry, fantasies about killing his father and stepmother. and his most repeated grievance -- being rejected by women. >> girls gave their affection and sex and love to other men, but never to me. i'm 22 years old and i'm still a virgin. >> he was really, really upset about, why is the world so unfair to him? and, oh, i'm a good-looking guy and why are girls falling for those ugly fat guys? that's what he mentioned. and i told him, appearance is not everything. >> reporter: rodger's family says their son was already being treated by multiple therapists. >> nobody would do the types of things that happened last night unless there was some form of mental illness. >> reporter: but because rodger was nev

in hindsight it seems clear that he was a time bomb. he wasn't to avenge his social isolation. his family's concern eventually did bring the police but they saw no sign of a threat. just three weeks before his rampage, sheriff deputies met rodger at his door. his family notified a social worker who notified police. deputies say he was polite and courteous. >> he just didn't meet the criteria for any further intervention that the point. >> reporter: but the deputies never went inside rodger's apartment and there was no indication he had purchased three handguns and ammunition. >> he apparently had never been either institutionalized or committed for an involuntary hold of any kind. those are the two triggers that actually make -- would have made him a prohibited person in terms of a firearms purchase. >> reporter: while the encounter did not alarm the officer, it alarmed rodger. rodger wrote "if they had demanded to search my room that, would have ended everything. for a few horrible seconds i thought it was all over. when they left the biggest wave of relief swept over me." in

after the fact, hindsight is 20/20, we can say the police should have done something.fy this individual or others like him as being a danger. >> one of the things that when we talk about, mike, you were talking about this, the folks that went, the sheriff's deputies that went and talked to him and they said he was polite, is acting or being able to cover up what's going on, i have to think, one of the characteristics of these kinds of mental issues, and is there any way to recognize somebody's saying one thing and doing another, or to hone in on the fact that they're acting and maybe they don't really believe what they're putting out there? james? >> no. some individuals in this situation will be visibly angry. you can't necessarily arrest hem because they're angry or disrespectful to the police and others will be very skillful at presentation of self. this is obviously a bright individual. you can see that from his writing. we'd like to call him a madman, but hardly the ravings of a madman. it's the rantings of someone who feels angry. but not crazy, and i think we ha

we did a good job in hindsight last year not being short on much of these.he environment was beginning to turn and things were headed towards a peek. we shortened a whole bunch of them. >> want to talk about athena? walk us through the idea behind it. >> look, athena is a very good example of this. a good business with a good strategy, a good product and good management doing good things for the world, but the stock is just at the wrong price. it is as simple as that. what happened was a few weeks ago morgan stanley came out with conventional valuation where they projected out the results to 2030 and we just look at that and said -- wow, how are you going to get from a 10% margin to a 30% margin? we thought about the business. we just don't think that the assumptions they are using are plausible. >> you said in your presentation that there were not any cloud companies. what would constitute a cloud company, then? >> the way i look at it, there are two types of these internet companies. one that has sort of a network effect. there are others that don't have n

in hindsight i should have used different examples and i didn't consider the trayvon martin family and i apologize to them for. that beyond apologizing to the martin family, i stand by the words and substance of the interview and given the situation with the la clipper owner donald sterling tis not surprising race and comments by race by an nba owner would attract a lot of attention. i commend everybody, jon to get on line and google and watch the whole interview and make up your own mind. >> john. thanks. >> the va scandal dominated the head leans and it will be the big topic. we have the host here on fox news channel and hi, there. howard. and let's start with talking about the va scandal. it is focused on shinseki and whether or not he will step down and if the president will ask him to lead. and not so much emphasis on president obama himself. >> why is that? >> that is a washington game and will the cabinet member resign and sure, that is an important question to ask. but it is a beltway parlor game. and whether shinseki steps down or not. the man responsible is president obama, h

in hindsight, it appeared he was correct. >> historian rick atkinson is the best selling author of the book "the guns at last light." >> the invasion plan known as operation over lord would land thousands of allied troops on the beaches of normandy. utah and omaha were the american beaches. >> it was delayed until june 5th and then bad weather caused it to be delayed yet again one day. >> southern england and eastern england would have resembled almost a vast stockyard, an industrial parking lot filled with every imaginable weapon. >> all along the coast there were a couple of dozen encampments where the americans were staging. >> this was the landing craft that carried our soldiers to the beaches of normandy. >> the average american g.i. was 5'9", he weighed 144 pounds. we have just over a million still alive. >> that is the cemetery. on the morning of june 6th, 1944, here are your orders. you will take to the bridge before daylight. >> on the early morning of june 6th, the first in the fight were paratroopers like tom blakey. >> it took four days. 500 casualties. >> we got in the lan

. >> with the benefit of hindsight, and i know that's easy, should you have gone to this meeting with a guy who said he was a rich middle east oil person? >> first of all, i've got to tell you, i didn't even know he was a rich middle east oil person. i knew that he was somebody from the middle east. that's all i knew. and i was doing this for a friend. i was going to help a friend. and to get money for a documentary about anti-fracking. and i thought, oh, okay, i'd help a friend. and that's -- you know, i'm that person. i help people. and i happen to love the earth and the environment. so i said sure, i'll show up. but should i have done my due diligence and figured out who this guy was? probably yes. and i shouldn't have trusted that my friends had actually vetted this guy properly. >> when you walked into this meeting in the beverly hills hotel, ed begley was there and you met the guy who said his name was muhammad. were you suspicious what was going on? >> well, first of all, he was an hour and a half late. he showed up, and he wasn't at all what i expected. i thought, you know, mi

in your opinion in hindsight, i know hindsight is 20/20, was it a mistake not to designate this organization as a terrorist organization earlier? >> senator, as i explained, i think we had a healthy debate. we are respectful of the nigerian attitude. boko haram and the fear of designating the organization would bring it more publicity, in retrospect, we might have done it earlier. i think the important thing is we have done it and we've offered a reward for the leadership of boko haram's rockies. >> for future reference, do you think there is a lesson here when we make decisions about designating groups as terrorists, it shouldn't simply be -- either you're a terrorist group or not and in the future we should not so heavily rely upon some government's input with regards to whether an organization that happens to be operating within their territory should be designated or no. >> i think there is definitely a lesson here. i think we will be quicker to act to make designations based on our own assessments earlier on based on this. >> my last question has to do with a broader theme regard to the

. >> cuban said in hindsight he should have used different examples. some u.s.enators are using the racist comments to call for change in the nfl. the issue, the name washington red skins. 478 democratic senators the two independents have sign add letter the nfl commissioner urging the league to drop the name that is angered native americans for decades. the senators wrote this. the comments made by mr. sterling have opened up a national conversation about race relations. we believe this conversation is an opportunity for the nfl to take action, to remove the racial slur from the name of one of it's marque franchises. and here is the response from the nfl. the intended name has always been to present a strong positive and respectful image, the team name is not used by the team, or the nfl in any context. in any context, though, we respect those that view it differently. up next, how safe is still flying but the government says there's one part that needs more testing. what scientists hope to learn from a special underwater robot. ♪ we begin with with government

. >> in hindsight, it sounds pretty good, but also looking back, was their political will at the timeo get those things done? >> i think there certainly was. you look at dodd frank, and there were strong efforts to break up the banks when it was happening. there were amendments that a officialonly -- bragged that it would have passed if they supported it. they ended up killing it. that was the brown kaufman amendment or the was political well but there was no interest. some things mr. geithner has said referring to too big to fail as moby dick, as something he was not even terribly desirable to end too big to fail. that reflect the policy disagreements we had. >> we have about one minute left. we have heard it time and again since the official end of the recession that for all its good intentions, regulatory oversight is strangling free committee and hampering growth. can we have both, the regulation that is needed to keep the playing field level and at the same time the room to allow the engine of growth to begin firing on all cylinders finally? >> i think our regulatory system is ov

. >> hindsight is always 20/20. remained the darling of the middle classes until 2009, and in 2009, when all of the seats of the majority won by the congress party, because of the him, so we have to say he was dull, and became dull in the second incarnation as prime minister. >> he was an economist, and supervised the downward turn of a the economy. >> i don't know downward turn is the correct way to describe it, the whole world economy was taking a downturn, so they also got affected. he didn't will it. >> okay. for now, thank you very much. we are going to look more closely at the affect of this new appointment to be with international relations and the united states, of course, the united states has had a frosty relationship with him until now. his application for the u.s. visas were rejected nine years ago and not even able to visit. we have more. >> this was the ultimate show of respect from newly elected president obama. the u.s. exporting 5 billion more since 2009 and india doing much better increasing the ex

. >> reporter: with the benefit of hindsight the clues appeared to be everywhere.e posted disturbing video on youtube. concerning enough that his own family asked police to check on him a month ago. they did, and after finding him polite and lucid, they left. in his meandering 140-page manifesto, roger wrote about the visit, quote . . . we now know roger has legally bought three handguns. >> if a person has not been institutionalized or taken against their will and put on a hold, that information is not entered into a database, and is not disqualifying information for someone purchasing a firearm. >> reporter: roger would have to be a threat himself and meet strict criteria. meantal illness is itself not a reason to detain someone or prevent the purchase of a weapon. the diagnosis of meantal health problems is an inexact sig signs -- science. >> there's no way to predict this. we were able to see what happens in connecticut and virginia tech and other places. but these are rare occurrences, even though they are catastrophic occurrences, and there's no way to predic

in hindsight i should have used different examples. i didn't consider the trayvon martin family.ond apologizing the martin family i stand by the words and substance of the interview. >> can a company blame old glory for voiding our warrantee? harley davidson says yes. lawmaker david dean says harley davidson voided the repair warrantee because of the patriotic flag he let fly from the back of his chopper. the company says the bike was not made to handle the wind resistance for multiple flags at high besides. therefore the claim on his power train was denied. >>> before you grill out this memorial day weekend we now know which stores sold beef contained wi -- contaminated with e coli. >> if you are grilling burgers be sure you know the source of the ground beef. the food safety inspection service is recalling 1.8 million pounds of ground beef for fear it is contaminated with e coli. so where is the beef? ten states including florida, illinois, pennsylvania, ohio, michigan, indiana, wisconsin, tennessee, kentucky and north dakota. among the large er retailers selling the potentiall

. >> hindsight is 20/20. there were red flags. >> it turned out starting a family in paradise was a nightmare. >> the clinic pulled out. we had to switch clinics. then we ended up with the u.s. egg donor who turned out to be homophobic and basically left us in the lurch. >> they say after sending planet hospital tens of thousands of dollars, the company failed to deliver. >> we lost over $20,000 from planet hospital trying to do sur gassy in mexico. it was devastating. >> you put so much funny and emotion into the whole process, and you're so close, so close. then it just explodes. >> who do you guys blame for the problems? >> rudy rupax. >> absolutely. >> he was the cap tape at the helm who -- captain at the helm who went into the iceberg. >> he was the c.e.o. of planet hospitals. headquarters is a po box in a strip mall near los angeles. "america tonight" exchanged numerous emails with the california businessman trying to arrange an on-camera interview. in the end he declined citing scheduling contacts. >>

sean, hindsight is always 20/20. winston churchill in world war ii with adolf hitler said this guy is not a criminal. >> it was churchill who warned of the dangers of nazism. >> he said, there's no danger here the first time he landed in germany. >> you see? they justify. they thread the needle. there's always a reason not to stand up for evil in our time. leno is right. >> this individual is being intellectually dishonest. obama was against mubarek early on. there's worse. excuse me. islamic -- i didn't interrupt you, sir. these have now become terror states. he sided with al qaeda and the muslim brotherhood in syria. >> now we learn in the last 36 hours that hillary clinton resisted efforts to define them as they are, as radical terrorists. she was told everything these groups were about. they didn't want to offend them. >> it was a reflection of obama's policy. i have written over 400 posts on the most a egregious boca haram -- they would lock a school and set it on fire and when the children tried to escape from

obviously hindsight is 20/20.hould have done more. but in a college town where you get these types of calls i'm sure on a regular basis, there are so many resources -- of course, if we could rewind type, we would love the police officers to have done things more thoroughly. but elisabeth, we also on a regular basis fight for our own privacy. should the cops have gone in and searched his whole house? did they have probable cause to go find the guns and find the ammunition? that's a question of law that is very narrow and if the kid had cut marks on his wrist and it was obvious he tried to kill himself, a judge would say he had the right -- they had the right to go in. but if he said i'm okay. then they can't go through the guy's house because he has constitutional right >> sadly we know the posts and the deaths of others including his own, the signs were there. but this welfare check, the police go up, it gives someone an opportunity to be do you police to us, right? >> this was a lay-up. arthur may want to run for