it's amazing you get a smaller window to push her own agenda and hindsight. barack obama will sit there and say i should have done immigration early and in the should have done cap and trade early. you overload the system. >> host: you write at one point that the oil spill in the gulf has a quote fascinating lesson in what obama is and isn't as a leader. what do you mean by that? >> guest: the product is a success. the oil spill got cleaned up. bp paid, not the american taxpayer, the gulf we are still trying to measure and it's remarkable where the oil went so job well done. what we learned is he doesn't do theatrics very well. there's a great early story where people are angry. you know these guys in louisiana, there are some really colorful politicians who aren't afraid of the tv camera and perhaps even seek out the tv cameras. remember all the different parishes have their own guy who aren't afraid of the press and they were certainly dominating the narrative and the storyline. they were looking at where is the calvary? what is bp doing and where is the fe

but truman's decision is is in hindsight far more wrenching than it really was at the time. not to say that the ethics and morality of using this kind of a weapon on japan would have zero ramifications and zero impact on any decision maker or on the world. but we couldn't really anticipate necessarily sort of what letting this cat out of the bag would do for the entire planet. once we drop a nuclear weapon on somebody, the world knows what it is. in fact, when truman is asked to make this decision or needs to make this decision, essentially nobody knows what it is. nobody can say, like we all can, oh, this is what a nuclear weapon is going to do. so truman has to weigh the factors. those in the military command are saying if you can end the war with a bomb, do it tomorrow, obviously. while others are still planning for an invasion of the home islands of japan. my history professional in grad school was on that planning commission. they said we were still preparing to go to wore when we heard the bomb was dropped. but we have a lot of experience behind us as well. it's not si

in hindsight obama is probably saying i should have done immigration and cap-and-trade earlier and not been afraid to overload the system. >> host: you write the oil spill in the gulf is a great example of what obama is and isn't as a leader. what do you mean? >> mr. todd: the product cleanup was a success. bp paid. the gulf, we are trying to measure. it is remarkable where that oil went. job well down. what we learned is he doesn't do th theatrics well. people were angry. and you know the guys in louisiana. there are colorful politicians there. and they were dominating the story line and they were looking angry and upset like what is bp doing. where is the federal government? let's not pretend it is anything else. this president, the least p political guy we have had. he is not a political animal in that respect. so robert, the press secretary at the time, goes into him and says mr. president you need to look angry about this oil stuff. you need to show anger. and his response was how much oil is that kombic going to clean up? and he said it isn't going to clean up any oil but it is g

so, nevertheless, something became clear, more evident, only in hindsight. was not considered particularly persuasive in 1950. so why not? let me provide a quick answer. so first, the timing. it was significant, world war ii ending only five years earlier. for many people at the time, world war ii was not a merry event. it was rather an image of the future which could bring the ways in which people observed their future of the war. simply put, to put it simply, memories of the war drove many people to interpret the korean war as the beginning of world war iii. and this specific belief, the moment was at the moratorium, a transitional period before the event of world war iii. the era of the cold war. so in part, this was reality in quotation marks of the cold war obtained its highest level in europe, east asia, and the united states. that is area that were involved in the world war ii. but it didn't seem such a degree of plausibility, the other area, at least at this point. in places like africa or latin america. which are not relatively speaking not pleased

she said that in hindsight -- a few years later, she wrote that in hindsight, she found the proposal monstrous. a times editorial on the same day proposed -- that the proposal was announced, possibly also written by huxtable, states that as architecture of the new tower soaring over the classical terminal like a skyscraper on a base of french pastry has the bizarre quality of a nightmare. a food analogy also appeared in a talk of the town piece in "the refers to theat building as an elongated meat standing on a prune souffle. this is interesting because i what know if anybody knows a prune souffle is. the writer thought the project would be impossible to stop. it's interesting that the writer thought it would be impossible to stop this project, noting that their small hope that they would be any immediate reversal of the attitude now prevalent among urban officials that the right of real estate owners to make money when coupled with architectural and engineering genius outweighs the right of city residents and workers not .o be driven batty ironically, the design was made public only

looking back in hindsight it would have been great if saddam hussein was still there. iran has become the mud dominant forces and a fair amount of truth to that. we could have prevented iran from gaining its dominant position had we not pull out in 2011 because that opened the door and that will be hard for us to get away from and now you have 100,000 iraqi troops trained by iranians and a small number we have trained but in the long term what we have -- there is still a hope that we can keep it from becoming completely pro iranian because that is the only way you can have a unified iraqi government trying to to do three separate governments. you have a problem with the kurds, turkey is saying they will go in militarily because they don't want the kurdish nation having sunni state is also workable but sunnis, there's not a good way to engage them because we let them down repeatedly and trying to rehabilitate them will be problematic. we have to be in iraq for a long time. >> then we will come forward. just behind you. >> thank you. my affiliation is not relevant to thi

in hindsight as an educational process and i think we are still learning the full dimensions of all the aspects of this decision. >> thank you. on big science, here in washington dc, one of the organization supporting big science, you mentioned nih. what are some of the other ones? >> the national science foundation's, the nih, the national science foundation's, the nih, i think those are the biggest ones that are government-funded. $40 billion a year is a big source of funds. nasa, noel, all of these agencies that put satellites into space and that fund important research in earth sciences and space science, underwater, what have you. these are all really involved in earth science in one way or another. >> thank you for this very interesting talk. in this book, you seem to characterize big science as this unstoppable freight train. i'm concerned you might be missing a certain crucial characteristic which is big science personalities. for these projects to exist it needed people to be household names but now who runs these. you needed people with political influence to make these happen

it looks short in hindsight. >> jimmy: it was short. it doesn't just look short in hindsight. >> it seemed really long. >> jimmy: playing that in slow motion would last 40 seconds. it was a very short fight. do you ever talk to -- did you talk to your opponent after that fight? >> yeah. >> jimmy: did she go, oh, boy, i didn't expect that? >> well, of course she didn't expect it. but i mean, i actually -- i really like her. she's one of the girls that i really had a lot of respect for. and i just told her, we could do this again any time. >> jimmy: do you take it easier when you like somebody? >> well, if i make the fight fast, that means i like you. that's me at my most merciful. she got to go home. do whatever, like the payment to go buy a house. she had a great night if you think about it. but like with this next chick that i don't like, it's not going to be like that. she's going to walk out looking different than she did walking in. [ cheers and applause ] >> jimmy: when we get in a -- somebody in a submission hold like that, do you

like i said, we all have this 20/20 hindsight. there are a lot of combative people in workplaces, especially high pressure workplaces like newsrooms. we can reconstruct it backwards. there are often people who get into rages. i think it was probably written off as rage. that's the key red flag. >> jeff, i want to ask you a similar question. which are the -- the burpi inbud flags -- to be fair to the station, the station took steps while he was there. they didn't sort of sweep this under the rug. clearly, he had bigger problems than an anger management class could take care of. >> we're not talking about one temper tantrum. it seems like a lot of temper tantrums. not getting into a conflict with one person but being in conflict with almost everyone there at that station. >> he was very much a me against the world mentality. >> isolating oneself. i think more than anything else, it's the consistency of his inappropriate behaviors to me is that burning red flag there is something wrong. again, hindsight 20/20 as my colleague has said

>> in hindsight we should have. >> decades. >> i have acknowledged in hindsight with this organism inthe vulnerability we should have done this before >> the federal government has not known what constitutes dead anthrax until this came up? i just don't -- >> the reliance -- [inaudible conversations] >> testing the material in the lab to see if there is growth, and that process in this instance failed. >> i yield back. >> five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chairman. it is unfortunate we have to have another oversight hearing. continue along the vein that doctor bouchard raised. there was a quote in "usa today" that says,says, the root cause of all of this is the lack of accountability. incidents don't get reported and consequences don't occur. i think that many of us have expressed that frustration, not only in the agencies represented here, the two agencies that are subject to the problems, but across the government and va, for instance that have allowed a cover-up of waiting lists and only three people have been fired. it gets back to one of the root causes. it is too hard to fire a fe

and in hindsight after i did a lot of research on the subject of teens and suicide, she had some reluctanceo go to school in that week. there was some instances of behavior, which i thought was -- and sleeping more than normal and retreating to her room, not necessarily wanting to go out for activities like sports and things like that. >> so your foundation tries to address a lot of these issues. so tell us a little bit about that. >> so initially when we were in the hospital, knowing that audrie wasn't going to survive, we wanted to do something to make a difference in her memory. and she was always very passionate about the arts. so we thought we would start a foundation that would raise money and give it back to young artists in the community, both for the art and music. and then of course, when we learned about the sexual assault and the bullying that ensues often with these types of cases we thought we needed to bring awareness on these issues. >> and so what's the website? >> it's audrie pott foundation and we also have a facebook page where we share several links to articles that are

>> i don't think we failed, i do, in hindsight, believe that we could have seen it sooner. this change in relationship, the change in the compact between the utility and its customers. >> reporter: the number of solar panel permits in hawaii is up, compared to a year ago, and heco says it hopes to triple rooftop solar capacity in 15 years. but heco may not be in a position to decide that. it is being sold to next era, a florida based utility giant. if the deal with next era does go through, hawaii's electricity consumers will be serviced by a company that says it is committed to renewable energy sources. but that commitment has come under scrutiny from hawaii's governor, energy organizations, and the state's consumer advocate. they say next era has not yet shown how it plans to fulfill the state's initiative to move toward 100% renewable energy by the year 2045. to hit that target, state regulators have approved construction of four new utility-scale solar farms on oahu, with three more farms proposed. it says off here and on here. >> once we get this thing powered, yeah. a

. >> you-- y-- you could have hindsight about that, yeah. and i-- and i would understand that. i mean, when i was seven, i didn't know it was a near-death experience. it was just absolute torture to not know who i was or know anybody or anything around me, to be so completely in isolation. to this day, that is the worst torture that i've ever, ever endured, ever. and-- i still find it hard to sleep at night because i'm still-- it's back in the back of my head worrying that i'll wake up and not remember who i am. i never wanna go through that again. >> yeah. yeah, yeah. >> all right. and the second near death-- >> the experience of the lockerbie flight, the-- >> the lockerbie flight, yes. so me and my wife, nora, we were booked on the-- the panam lockerbie flight and but for my missus being really slow and unable to pack a suitcase in time, we decided to change the flight, but we didn't tell any of our friends and relatives. and so everybody presumed we were dead. and that was-- a terrifically-- emotional phone call, when my brother f-- finally rang through, just in the hope we

in hindsight you could say wise move, prices are trending lower, why buy into it?will be a strong signal for the sector. we have seen it pick up and gold. -- in gold. jonathan: to talk about another company glencore though stocks are trading at a record low. we have a trading arm when commodities fall, this will offset us. kind of like the energy business. has that happened? jesse: it is hard to say. we will know into weeks. you can get a bit of a read through from the share price. perhaps the market expects they will not outperform. it has been a tough market for all commodities. we have seen some commodity trading companies share prices be hammered -- get hammered. jonathan: if we have the opportunity to talk to them in last number -- glastonbury i'm sure we would know. how long can sam walsh do that? jesse: as he talks about the new normal for commodities, the higher cost producers will exit the market. jonathan: when you see the market share, what are we pushing, 70%? jesse: yes. we will see higher prices in china, australia, perhaps with america -- north ameri

. >> now, in hindsight, i definitely realize there were lots of obstacles. there were lots of incidents that i just chose to ignore. i had to work much harder to get noticed for my work. i have to work harder to figure out how to interrupt people but be really polite about it. >> i'm always keenly observing when i say i'm actually a software engineer and you can see them for a second and then you're like, oh that's cool. it's always like a positive reaction but there's a moment of surprise. >> women are more than men and if you bring tupit up it's something that nobody has noticed before and it's a weird conversation to had e. >> there are other diversity issues that might be even more, you know problematic, like where are all of the old people go. >> the secret in hiring more women is keeping the ones that you have. a lot of women want to work with other software engineers. nobody wants to be the first engineer out of 20 who is a woman. >> all right. i want to ask our panel now about what they just heard. joining me are rupert, founder of codechicks.org, a

those were sort of the two with the benefit of hindsight may have faults some investors.ncials peak out in advance. erik: we have to leave it there. doug ramsey, michael, lisa, and joseph here with me. we end the show that the s&p 500 is down the most since 2011. the nasdaq down the most since 2011. ♪ olivia: good morning. it is 10:00 p.m. in shanghai. welcome to "bloomberg market day." ♪ olivia: good morning. we have to get you straight to a market check. there is no stop to the bloodletting. stocks, commodities, current cies plunging worldwide. at one point in the open, the dow was more than 1000 points down. 500 down 82 points or not. the nasdaq off more than 200 points. all the main u.s. that smart indexes officially in correction territory. that they are often percent from the most recent peaks. the selling started overnight in asia with the shanghai composite fell for the single biggest a drop since 2007. the emerging markets index off the most since 2011. in europe, the stoxx 600 heading toward its

. >> and they recognize that joking about it, was a decision that in hindsight maybe we shouldn't have. but the problem is the candidate herself is driving this, as maggie pointed out this week in her story, and when she's pressed her true emotions come out and she doesn't want to really engage, and she doesn't want to sort of take it in a way that legitimizes it. and so, it's fascinating to see those clips side by side. because the first one is what the campaign wants. and the second one is when she's pressed a little bit how she acts. >> it's also who she's pressed by. and henry does get under her skin. we saw that in the press conference which i think was just four questions from ed henry before she left. she, i think, does not think she did anything wrong. and we don't actually know what happened. so i mean it is too early to say whether she did or doesn't. a lot of her critics want to say she did. the problem is to the point she said in that earlier answer, there are legitimate questions about this. there are reasons people have questions about this. and as jonathan said you have

these rules don't look so great in hindsight. >> i think who gets in affects the dynamic. rick perry from the start of this trump boomlet has been one of the most aggressive republicans going after him. he wants to be on the stage. he wants to be the aggressive. chris christie, think about where we were in the 2012 campaign talking about chris christie, having the possibility of being nominee. now he may not be on the stage for the first debate. >> not to mention the folks who are definitely not going to make it, bobby jibdal, lindsey graham, these are serious guys with serious policy and they're not going to be there. they're not going to be a part of the conversation. >> one group i'm matching on that stage, ben carson, mike huckabee, ted cruz. all those on the hard right of the gop. ted cruz has even gone up to trump tower to sit with trump to kiss the ring. they're all waiting to see, maybe trump is a summer fling for the gop, but they want his bloc, if he gets out of the race. whether they're combative or not, that's going to be something i'm watching, because those c

didn't we have strict instructions not to say -- tom: i'm saying it in hindsight of the meeting.e and 12 minutes. brendan: if you find that, it is not super-thursday. until tom declares it super thursday. tom: this is serious. there is a press conference in 12 minutes, what do we listen for? vonnie: inflation. brendan: i do not know. justin: he will try to confuse us. what has the world come to? tom: justin fox with us, the sterling weaker this morning. brendan: i am brendan greeley with tom keene. tom: the bank of england today, american jobs report tomorrow. it is a tale of two americas, is not to united kingdom's, a tale of prosperity and a bit of austerity no one mentioned possible. i think of olivia blanchard and larry summers, their iconic work on long-term unemployed. this is key issues. front on thatout american angst. it is still out there? justin: we have a lower labor force participation than we did 10 or 15 years ago. a lot of people who would have thought -- would have wanted to look for jobs who are not in the u.s. brendan: can you fix labor force participation with

the website explains how to do it, but hindsight is little help to eric. >> i really believe that i should have paid that ticket, i wish i had the first time around. i didn't know that at the age of 24 aisled do something to mess me up when i was 56. >> and after all that he says the whole thing cost him about a hundred dollars to clear it up. he lost a job in the process, insurance rates nearly doubled. to check your name on the national driver rejected the city, you have to mail a notarized -- registry, you have to pail a notarized letter, not over the phone. we have instructions on kutv.com. >> okay thank you. >>> if you have a tip for 2 investigates we'd like to hear from you, e-mail us at kutv.com or call us. >>> caitlyn jenner could be charged with involuntary manslaughter for a wreck. the district attorney is expected to review the report next week. the accident happened while jonathan pollard was -- jenner was transitioning from bruce. >>> and today kids who couldn't afford a hair cut got to go to the urban barber college and get a free hair cut for school. the number was way up. 1

in hindsight, john, is two months too long? >> it's crazy. this race changes by the day let alone the month. carly fiorina was the star that night. she was the break-out star. she belongs. if we polled republicans afternoaround the country, 85% would say carly fiorina should be in the main debate september 16th. she should be in there. >> if they need to have 11, have 11 if that's what they needs to do. >> some say this isn't hurting her at all. look how much attention she's getting. we're talking about her now. is she using this to her benefit? >> she is using this to her benefit. if she's exclude ed from the cnn debate as appear others certain is ll -- certainly possible now that will hurt her. if she's at the children's table again in the debate they're going to hold. the real issue here which pat is underscoring and john has too, american people want diversity of voices, opinions, fresh faces and new ideas. they're not looking for warmed-over establishment rhetoric policies or politics which is why joe biden's candidacy is less than it mi

i ever loved that i still love and it is hard to match those two kinds of knowledge and look in hindsight act "to kill a mockingbird" and what do we make of it now? one thing, the different age of the point of view character which is to say in "to kill a mockingbird" scouts is young looking at her father through the point of view of a girl and she does see it more simply and the older spouse is looking at the point of view as an adult and is more nuanced and i don't think atticus seems mortal. the dog is dead in the street, he can do anything. gregory peck who apparently harper lee call yummy adds to the way we view him and it is hard to wrap our new knowledge around. >> speaking of "go set a watchman" let's talk about the release of that novel. the official story is atticus at -- harper lee's and lawyers founded in a safe deposit box and it is a first draft of "to kill a mockingbird" better editor said pull out some aspects and it took two years to turn "go set a watchman" into "to kill a mockingbird" and there have been a lot of thick pieces about whether harper lee is able to consent t

it is easy to say with hindsight. why is it easy to say?hindsight, there was a moment where domestic data was ready to be strong and international data is okay. now, the international data is pretty scary. therefore, the fed has lost the opportunity when it had some alignment. if the minutes are correct from yesterday, july 28th, 29th, almost all members needed more evidence on higher inflal mags. i paraphrase. why on earth would they lock out within four business days. it seems as far as he was concerned, they were very high to not raising rates. they went out and put a message to the markets that would not have reflected where they were at the center. >> it is hard. there are so many different views and so many different nuances. this whole community element becomes really difficult. you end up having difficulty conveying it clear. the fed wants national optionality. the market wants clarity. that contrast is what's going to play out for a while. >> it is interesting, most economists on wall street expect a september rate hike when the ma

>> and harte -- hindsight. and i couldn't fully implicate that process i did not know if and when. i didn't know at the time with the determination she conveyed to my father the every wednesday no matter what will the with the passage of time nothing would make her bed and somehow in us she saw something that led us to believe despite the obstacles to transition that we could overcome with the help of the educational opportunities to forge a new life that alliance the provision of all we could accomplish. >> host: at the same time you were in shelters at chinatown at every turn you are finding books to make them part of your world whether dumpsters or finding books that was life changing. talk about how we lived in ancient greece and rome. what did that say to you as a nine year-old child? >> as you mentioned i have the attachment for books for the field of books and reading them from an early age my parents were insistence that their children read but it began to manifest itself in a curious way when i was six years old because he didn't have money to balance the books are on the

a lot of thinking that was done on the ground that's very hard to really appreciate, i think, in hindsight hand sight -- hind height >> thank you, big organizations supporting. you said the nih, what are the others? >> nih, those are the biggest ones that are government funded. nasa, noa, all of these -- all of these agencies that put satellites into space and that fund important research, scientists, what have you. these are all really involved in big science one way or the other. >> in this spoke you seem to characterize this siens as this unstoppable freight train. i'm concerned, household names, now who runs the lhc? you needed people to make the projects happen. with modern science you don't need -- >> in fact, in my book i do address that question. the generation of high-profile scientists xemple -- you can add many others to that list. of course, was the -- in a sense the government supervisor of the man manhattan project. they were thick on the ground in 1940s, 1950s. they began to leave the scene on 1970s. he put his personal reputation at stake before congress to get that done. a

ethin >> hindsight is a wonderful thing. i can answer that with a ooki categorica categorical, yes, we blew it. the wjrs, the tigers and jp mccarthy, and all of this great talent and this wonderful place where people would meet on the radio and discuss all things important in greater detroit and the world and what have you, he that was a wonderful position to be in. for some reason, we all get howp that kind of works. if something new happens, more of that is a good thing. we are all part of an nment entertainment eco system that is very formulatic driven. it is not a knock on our form business. it's just the realityven. of ouu business. it happens in the filmlity busi. it happens in audio entertainment. it happens in anything in life. it happens in the music business. if something is working, you ges five or six artists that roll out fast with the same kind of twist. if that's hitting on a sweet now tooth, let's keep going. i don't know if blowing is the right characterization. back to what i was saying in the conversation

>> hindsight is a wonderful thing, right? i can answer that with a categorical yes, we blew it. that's the benefit of looking back and saying, you know, the wjrs of the world, the muddy voice of the great lakes with the tigers and j.p. mccarthy and all of this great talent and this wonderful place where people would meet on the radio and discuss all things important in greater detroit and the world and, you know, what have you. that was a wonderful position to be in. for some reason, and i think we all get how that works, something new happens. if something new is working, more of that is a good thing. we are all part of, you know, an entertainment ecosystem that is very formuladic driven. it's not a knock on our business, it's the reality of the business. it happens in film business, audio entertainment, it happens in anything in life. it happens in the music business. if something is working, you get five or six artists and bands rolled out fast with the same sort of twist, if that's hitting on a sweet tooth, less keep going. yeah, i think blowing it probably -- i don't know i

all agree markets have had a big move up from trading lows that were due for a correction but in hindsight the philosophical approach. the fact is the volatility is breathtaking and i think it scares people to death. >> what do you say? you are listening to ted is saying it like it is. wall street is basically told the individual investor to go to hello because they are not protecting the fcc. the regulators are really, really abandoning what was the great chief attraction of american markets. first liquidity security. >> yeah and i do have the individual investor, i work with him every single day and i've worked with them for over 30 years so it's not like this is my first rodeo, okay? the bottom line is this is the greatest wealth creation tool in the history of the world and individuals get that hot i think it's the advisers responsibility to educate and to coach them along. that's what i have done with my clients. >>> ted what do you expect to happen here? you deal with those issues, security and liquidity. are you saying liquidity in this market? >> it's interesting there's plenty of

jeff: i was surprised and how it happened, but in hindsight it is easy to see the brilliance of it.e was being typecast as a search engine company, and for a long time it has been much more than a search engine company. it is a personal services company, and to maximize that value, the other thing that larry page is doing, it is hard to find a connection there. to separate them off makes sense. matt: why do investors like the move today? >> the one word moving through all of the research is transparency. we will get more detail on how google is spending his money, where is the profit coming from, where are the sales coming from? that is definitely a theme. the other thing you need to focus on is the idea that now you have a bunch of new businesses that are going to be easier to set apart and possibly , ipo, unlock sell the value of these businesses. if you are a google shareholder, you have not just court businesses, but other businesses. some will fail miserably, but some will do really well. that is an investment opportunity down the road. what things can see are worth and how thi

says that in criminal cases or if it were a civil case, the courts cannot use the lens of 20/20 hindsightrmine whether or not the officer's actions were reasonable. however, when it comes to making a firing decision, the chief was well within his rights to terminate him if he believed that the officer even so much as failed to follow the restraining policy. >> do we know -- we know there was some kind of altercation that led to this. do we know if it was a verbal altercati altercation? i'm wondering how would the officer feel like his life was in danger? >> look, it ultimately everything will develop and we'll get a full picture of exactly what happened but there are things that are known now. it's know that they never got to be a physical confrontation. number two, that apparently officer miller felt it could become physical by virtue of taylor approaching him. now to holloway's point on the issue of the law, it turns into if the officer in fact is reasonably in belief that he's going to be emnantly threatened or harmed. >> then the officer who pulls out the taser. >> exactly. that hurts

i think that would be differently in hindsight. >> thank you very much. >> thank you for having me. >e's always next debate for republicans. you know, it's going to be the democrats turn. they're going to have some debates. too few, too late to make too much of a difference. one of those democrats who hopes to top hillary clinton joining me next. sometimes romantic. there were tears in my eyes. and tears in my eyes. and so many little things that we learned were really the biggest things. through it all, we saved and had a retirement plan. and someone who listened and helped us along the way. because we always knew that someday the future would be the present. every someday needs a plan. talk with us about your retirement today. >>> all right. you have probably heard that republicans are fighting with themselves and the republican party is a mess. all are fighting each other. the truth is that happens in the reelection. the democrats are hardry the ones to talk because they have their own problems as well. the latest to question. the legality of the democratic committee debate schedul