i'm not_ hindsight, which is the luxury of... i'm not going — hindsight, which is the luxury of... not going to start.— i'm not going to start. people with weakened immune _ i'm not going to start. people with weakened immune systems - i'm not going to start. people with weakened immune systems are i i'm not going to start. people with i weakened immune systems are being advised to have a third covid vaccine. if you want to party, you'll need a vaccine passport. scotland is set to become the first uk nation to make proof of jabs compulsory. covid vaccine. calling fixed pork has been released from prison —— colin pitchfork. no more e5, it's all about e10. you're not alone if you're confused about what you'll be putting into your petrol tank. the taliban have mounted a victory parade complete with the us military hardware they've inherited. it was pure theatre, but we're also beginning to see the reality of what a taliban government would look like. in an interview with the bbc, a senior leader continued to insist that afghans with the right documents could leave the country, despite

. deal, could be proven right in hindsight-— hindsight.ght. thank you for your thoughts. there _ hindsight. thank you for your thoughts. there is _ hindsight. thank you for your thoughts. there is more - hindsight. thank you for your. thoughts. there is more detail on that story on the website. let's get some of the day's other news: the uk government says it has secured an agreement with the fertiliser company cf industries which will allow one of its uk plants to resume operations for the next three weeks, this in a bid to protect commercial supplies of carbon dioxide. the company usually produces some 60% of the uk's c02, which is widely used in food and drink production, as well as in the civil nuclear industry and the nhs. china's evergrande will, according to media reports, make the interest payment on its shenzhen—traded bond on time on thursday. this is separate though, as we understand it, from the $8lim offshore bond payment which the firm is also due to make on thursday. still, the move is lifting sentiment on chinese markets, w

when did ou no with the benefit of hindsight. when did you go on _ with the benefit of hindsight.day? _ with the benefit of hindsight. when did you go on holiday? i'm - with the benefit of hindsight. when did you go on holiday? i'm not - with the benefit of hindsight. when l did you go on holiday? i'm not going to start adding _ did you go on holiday? i'm not going to start adding to _ did you go on holiday? i'm not going to start adding to the _ did you go on holiday? i'm not going to start adding to the facts - did you go on holiday? i'm not going to start adding to the facts of - to start adding to the facts of the fishing _ to start adding to the facts of the fishing expedition beyond the facts i fishing expedition beyond the facts i have _ fishing expedition beyond the facts i have articulated and having answered questions continually about that. answered questions continually about that its _ answered questions continually about that. �* , ., answered questions continually about that. ~ , ., ., that. as you heard, there, no sort of specific — that. as you heard, there, no so

we can hope that hindsight and perspective will play a role in our most important debates.ed to do for us. we can see through history that each of us who experienced 9/11 was changed by it. 9/11 changed our world so that even if you weren't there, your life is different because of it. the war that came so quickly afterwards will be with us in its consequences for years to come. maybe for generations. how long does it take for an event to take its place in history, for us to understand its meaning? maybe that depends on where you were sitting. i'm michael beschloss. thank you for watching "fireside history." t it's mostly water. so, we switched back to tide. one wash, stains are gone. [daughter] slurping don't pay for water. pay for clean. it's got to be tide. ♪ ayy, ayy, ayy ♪ ♪ yeah, we fancy like applebee's on a date night ♪ ♪ got that bourbon street steak with the oreo shake ♪ ♪ get some whipped cream on the top too ♪ ♪ two straws, one check, girl, i got you ♪ ♪ bougie like natty in the styrofoam ♪ ♪ squeak-squeakin' in the truck bed all the way home ♪ ♪ some alabama-jam

i am not surprised that james is, in hindsight, very worried and inches about— hindsight, very worriedappened to him, and is dimly not good _ happened to him, and is dimly not good enough, sol happened to him, and is dimly not good enough, so i think you've got to stop _ good enough, so i think you've got to stop this— good enough, so i think you've got to stop this spirit of a live lane. when _ to stop this spirit of a live lane. when you — to stop this spirit of a live lane. when you hear one in ten cameras according — when you hear one in ten cameras according to — when you hear one in ten cameras according to this investigation are either— according to this investigation are either misted up, broken or facing the wrong — either misted up, broken or facing the wrong way, no, stop the experiment, have a hard shoulder for emergency— experiment, have a hard shoulder for emergency vehicles only and for people — emergency vehicles only and for people of— emergency vehicles only and for people of a broken down. don't make it into _ people of a broken down. don't make it into a _ people of

i realize in hindsight it's absolutely perfect and no one would ever claim that they got anything rightbut as you go back on the last 20 years and you look at the world to date in the state of afghanistan and the state of the middle east and america's broader position in the world do you think basically we make the right decisions it did the right thing in particular those decisions in 2001, 2002, 2003 to not just topple the taliban but to try to stabilize those countries, do you think that was really the right decision? >> is a complicated question with a long answer but let me start by saying you don't land in airplane looking in the rearview mirror and you don't make policy by looking backwards. what people fail to understand how much is known when you're confronted especially with a massive surprise like pearl harbor and 9/11. much of what we ended up doing turned out much better than anyone could've expected no one had a plan for going 7000 miles around the world and toppling the taliban with six weeks, that was not conceived before 9/11 and when president bush made the decision to

he said with the luxury of hindsight he _ he went.he said with the luxury of hindsight he wouldn't have - he went. he said with the luxury of hindsight he wouldn't have gone. l he went. he said with the luxury of. hindsight he wouldn't have gone. he asked why he didn't call ambassadors in the region of visited since he became foreign secretary? mit? in the region of visited since he became foreign secretary? why did we aet it so became foreign secretary? why did we get it so badly — became foreign secretary? why did we get it so badly wrong? _ became foreign secretary? why did we get it so badly wrong? i _ became foreign secretary? why did we get it so badly wrong? i think— became foreign secretary? why did we get it so badly wrong? i think there - get it so badly wrong? i think there is a sense. — get it so badly wrong? i think there is a sense, desire _ get it so badly wrong? i think there is a sense, desire and _ get it so badly wrong? i think there l is a sense, desire and determination to make it work and make things better and t

i realize in hindsight it's absolutely perfect and no one would ever claim that they got anything rightbut as you go back on the last 20 years and you look at the world to date in the state of afghanistan and the state of the middle east and america's broader position in the world do you think basically we make the right decisions it did the right thing in particular those decisions in 2001, 2002, 2003 to not just topple the taliban but to try to stabilize those countries, do you think that was really the right decision? >> is a complicated question with a long answer but let me start by saying you don't land in airplane looking in the rearview mirror and you don't make policy by looking backwards. what people fail to understand how much is known when you're confronted especially with a massive surprise like pearl harbor and 9/11. much of what we ended up doing turned out much better than anyone could've expected no one had a plan for going 7000 miles around the world and toppling the taliban with six weeks, that was not conceived before 9/11 and when president bush made the decision to

the politician, we will all have phd '5 in hindsight. we will all he _ have phd '5 in hindsight.per picks this _ mentioned, and one only one paper picks this up, is that all the over 505 picks this up, is that all the over 50s will— picks this up, is that all the over 505 will have a pick5 this up, is that all the over 505 will have a booster pick5 this up, is that all the over 505 will have a boo5terjab by christmas. if that's the case, that chri5tma5. if that's the case, that has to— chri5tma5. if that's the case, that has to he — chri5tma5. if that's the case, that has to be not only a good thing, it will put _ has to be not only a good thing, it will put pressure on them. that has to be not only a good thing, it will put pressure on them.- will put pressure on them. that is what the government _ will put pressure on them. that is what the government is _ will put pressure on them. that is what the government is relying i will put pressure on them. that is. what the government is relying on, the efficacy of the vaccine and 12 to 15—year—olds getting it next week in order to cu

i'm hindsight, which is the luxury of... im not— hindsight, which is the luxury of... im not going —

what do you observe in hindsight, looking at this.er strong stand on the iraq war and how it positioned her as a leader? guest: this is a very interesting episode, because the safe position at the time was to support the war. there was public support for the war in iraq. the leader was supporting it. nancy pelosi was the highest ranking member of congress to oppose the iraq war from the start. she opposed it in part because she had been serving on the intelligence committee and she did not think the intelligence supported the case for war. she turned out to be right in that. i think it is a sign that she is willing to take what now looks, in retrospect, like the smart thing to do. but at the time, carried some real political risks. in one interview, she said her biggest disappointment when she first became leader was, at this point, when she became speaker -- leader and speaker the first time was her failure to convince george w. bush to withdraw u.s. troops from iraq. in one of the interviews i did with her, she said it was the bigge

that's from me, who was in hindsight, i was never in direct threat.sight, it's 20/20, but i could hear the ambient noise outside, i didn't know where the crowds were going to be. i was getting, had the sense of panic and powerlessness, interspersed by periods of huge boredom, trying to call and text people, what could i do and my experiences go double for people who were actually in the gallery that day. they go triple particularly for the female members of congress because it's a lot easier in the current world we live in for a white man to express anger in an acceptable way, and it goes quadruply for the staff, because when the capitol police came through to protect us, they got all the members of congress out first but the people who were barricaded behind those doors were staff and some cases nonpartisan staff. >> those staff members are definitely heroes and even though you say hindsight, that fear that you felt was real and congressman, we appreciate you coming on and being so forth right with what you and your colleagues were dealing with. >> t

well, you know, hindsight, you but a lot of supporting communities. i tried a couple well i'd, as it turned out, i guess it was inevitable because it's what happened. but whether anybody could have said 10 years ago that this was going to happen. i think that that would have been difficult to predict, but unfortunately that that is that is what has occurred. do you think that other administrations bear responsibility for the crisis that unfolded enough galveston? you're george w bush, beginning the whereas as you say the what were the war in terror? and then you had perhaps donald trump reaching withdrawal agreement with the taliban. the didn't very much for the well, i think the questions. yes and no, but obviously you have the george bush administration, in spite of ministration and trumped up maintain the american presence there. we just made a miscalculation at the beginning that we were going to be able to change and how i how afghan, a span operated. i think the president bush, when he went in there and we went after okay to after 911. i don't t

when you look at hindsight and what you learned about the approach, was he wrong? lawrence: i agree with the cdc feeling that we should not stigmatize countries for the origin of the virus. there was this pandemic of the flu called the spanish flu and spain had nothing to do with the origin of that influenza outbreak. it became the spanish flu because of 1918, the first world war, there was censorship in spain with nonsense and the newspapers so we got tagged with the blame. the delta variant -- i think it is -- in this case, the stigma is in many cases warranted by the chinese behaviors. it is hard to reconcile these two things. there is no reason to try to steer up the -- stir up the joe political pot but china really needs to be responsible to the international community. host: do you think the world will ever know the origin of cover 19? -- covid-19? lawrence: if there is a whistleblower in china that is willing to risk so much and expand what happened with a possible lab leak from the wuhan institute of her allergy or -- urology -- virology or this was found i

easy to flash back and maybe get into the moment and it could have turned badly so easily so in hindsightare talking about one of wonderful event it was. in light of what happened in chicago for example this happened because so many people were behind the veterans and the veterans were so on top of it and there was a script from the beginning in a scripted and. started off when they left and said you can't come. now they changed and when i committed to civil disobedience disobedience -- they they are taking on the role of the british. they are shape-shifting and mobilizing them as they make these changes so lulac really surfaces which is why i think it's a very creative protest. >> i would add there is also a parade and a parade is where you get feedback back and forth. those who are watching get something back and there was clearly that kind of an exchange taking place. >> this is why the most successful protests are parade protests. because you have a chance to get feedback and interaction with so many different committees. >> were going to switch to a little bit of humor in the script

what was it like to add with hindsight? >> i'll defer to you. this book is is complete to me as it could possibly be. >> i think the book works really well as a snapshot of that time and i don't even need a lot of hindsight. as it is, i think it works to evoke emotions in the reader. if it works so i don't think it requires any reframing or re-bracketing. not right now. but yeah, that's what i'd say. >> as someone who read it and loved it i agree. i was just curious if you felt now there was something missing but i certainly didn't think about. >> i would rewrite every single sentence because i see all the flaws in it. but no, we were new we were happy with the book. >> these last 48 hours are any indication of success of this book, at least in my world, in my healthcare world, two things came about. first thing that dan and i said was he got closer as cousins so once we share that prosciutto mozzarella roasted pepper oil vinegar, from players, that was a sandwich and i was the happiest guy in the world. that was great and in today's my colleagu

then in hindsight, we see that s g s people wanted to see prosecuted, those organizations -- none ofhat was happening. none of that was happening. romaine: another successful show here on "what'd you miss?" talking about insider trading. the great cover story on bloomberg businessweek about the idea of whether this is insider trading and some people are insiders and getting wonky with their trade. it brings up the broader issue that we talked about about the idea that it's really just hard to even determine what it is and once you find out what it is, can you prosecuted? taylor: do you go after the big ponzi schemes, and is that where you get the most bang for your buck, people stealing from grandma versus the ceo making a couple of trades? >> what do you actually look out for, do you look at the bank analyst working at a firm and passing tips? >> it does get to the heart of these prosecutors, when it hits home to where real people can understand it and feel it. that's maybe where you go after it. that is the end of our show. we've got about 15 seconds left. that does it for "what'd

, which is the luxury— the benefit of hindsight, which is the luxury of... the benefit of hindsight,eril of their lives, and there was still not a proper crisis centre up in place. do you not see that it is important for british people to understand why you thought it was right to go on holiday? tia. it was right to go on holiday? no, sor , it was right to go on holiday? no, sorry. i'm — it was right to go on holiday? no, sorry, i'm afraid _ it was right to go on holiday? no, sorry, i'm afraid i— it was right to go on holiday? no, sorry, i'm afraid i don't agree with that analysis. of course i've been clear— that analysis. of course i've been clear with — that analysis. of course i've been clear with the benefit of hindsight i wouldn't have gone away at all. the charge — i wouldn't have gone away at all. the charge in relation to officials ithink— the charge in relation to officials i think it's — the charge in relation to officials i think it's particularly unwarranted, because we always make sure that _ unwarranted, because we always make sure that we _ unwarranted, because we alwa

government's response now, 20 years of hindsight and clarity, it is clear we mis-underestimated, in presidents was an organization of about 100 people and to go after that attack, to sort of all encompassing 20-year war in multiple countries around the world and here we are 20 years later and more adherence to al qaeda and the franchises, in more places, in more adversaries around the world than we had on 9/11. >> and i think, i don't think that there is anything more we can do as a nation that will honor the memories of those who died on 9/11, and since, because we've now lost more people to 9/11-related illnesses, than having these discussions and these debates in a thoughtful and respectful way, with people whom we disagree and sussing out all sorts of what happens after that, and what happens after that, and what's the best way to do this, instead of this is the only response. >> right. >> and if you don't believe in this response, you know, you don't support america and you're unpatriotic. it's very important, wolf, that we honor their memories, by behaving the way that i think a lot wou

that hindsight that comes with the 20th anniversary.ubject of a new feature documentary airing tonight an msnbc. the film tells the story of survivors, who recorded their personal experiences in a video booth in the wake of the attacks, and return this year, to reflect on those they. lost in their lives over the past two decades. >> my name is lisa, it's tuesday april 27th. 2021. >> it's very surreal to be back here, and to be talking about everything that is happened and change since, then and also specifically the experience of recording that video. in this booth. >> hi my name is lisa, it's september 10th 2000 into. >> it was 364 days after september 11th that i went in recorded that video. and i, i know that in those 364 days. i did not deal with my feelings about lindsey. or even a day of september 11th itself. i've avoided talking to my, friends talking to my family, talking to coworkers. about everything that happened. just because i'm not ready. i mean it's the worst thing i've ever seen. and it's the worst thing i hope to see.

so this was in hindsight me trying to be as eloquent as he is describing seeing some whales. >> hereke a look. >> it's a whale. and a tail. another one! oh [ bleep ] [ bleep ]! it's coming for the boat. [ bleep ]! >> jimmy: very eloquent. >> that's my best david at atleboro. we don't get much practice in the uk. we get like a gray squirrel. >> jimmy: with a whale close to you, it's hard not to use profanity. >> and not to give any other information other than it's a whale and repeat it again and again. as if that's insightful for viewers watching my show. >> jimmy: i'm looking at your wedding ring right now that. is a wedding ring? >> it is a wedding ring. [ applause ] yes, i got married. it's funny, ever since i've been wearing this ring, people have been asking me if i'm married. >> jimmy: that's what happens, yeah. >> so i figured i should clarify it. i'm not going to jump up and down on the couch and express my excitement in that way. i know you do that in america? >> jimmy: when you're so happy, that's what you do. >> i'm as happy as a brit can be. i'm married to a very wonderfu

in hindsight, it is always easy. i on the day of the strike or the day after the strike, i received from a trustworthy source that like i ask you members themselves were talking about that one of them was hit, so, yes, there were reports about civilian casualties. but it was a tragic stake an shows the difficulties with these signature strikes, striking a target which they don't really exactly know who it is just because of some patterns and movements that the military deems suspicious. this is an extremely difficult fine line to walk, and that is what the pentagon tried to explain today. phil: thank you. we will stay in afghanistan with our next story because the taliban have already stripped women and girls in the country of their human rights. big question marks remain over their futurist militants have failed to elaborate on what they have in store for women. >> the taliban tried to brutally crush dissent in afghanistan. women pushed to go back into burqas, beaten forward -- beaten for daring to demand their righ

frank wisner, with the benefit of hindsight, what does it look like to you, whether there was wisdomat the united states was doing at the time? >> i think that as we look, in hindsight-- you're quite right to put it in that perspective in the two previous remarks-- underscore the fear that we entertained as a nation. but i think i'd add one other point. it's worth refcting on. and that is a sense of arrogance, aense that the united states could do what we ended up doing in afghanistan, a sense of hegemony on the world stage coming out of the cold war. and that lack of restraint, lack of sense of having to work in an international system, meant that we were unleashed to act on our own. and that led to many of the mistakes that followed. >> woodruff: robert grenier, from your perspective, was there a sense, at the time, that the united that there was almost a hubris, an overconfidence on the part of the united states? >> i think if we look this over the span of 20 years, i very much agree with ambassador wisner that we, as a reaction, ultimately was disproportionate, that rather than a

but i would like to know now in hindsight, is there one thing that you wish that you or the pentagon had done, could have done differently? >> thanks, helene. i would just tell you that there hasn't been a single operation that i've ever been involved in where we didn't discover that there's something that we could have done better or more efficiently or more effectively. and i would also say that no operation is ever perfect. i will tell you that we will do what we always do and that is to look at ourselves and do after-action reviews and we want to make sure that we learn every lesson that can be learned from this experience. but i want to take the time to do it the right way. and, so, we'll do that in the days ahead. >> do you think that -- oh, sorry. >> i was just going to say, i will just say again, helene, i'm enormously proud of our men and women who worked hard to accomplish what they just accomplished which i think, as i said earlier, is historic and heroic. go ahead. >> do you wish maybe you would have thrown out the book, i mean, the previous administration did leave, i un

i would like to know how, in hindsight, is there one thing that you wish that you wish you would've done distally. -- differently? sec. austin: there has not been a single operation that i have not been involved in that we discover there was something we could have done more efficiently or more effectively, and i would also say that no operation is ever perfect. i will tell you that we will do what we always do, and that is to look at ourselves, do reviews, and we want to make sure that we learn every lesson that we can be learned from six race best from this experience -- from this experience. we will do that in the days. i was just going to say, and i will say again, i am a normally proud -- i am enormously proud of our men and women. as i said early, this was historic. >> the previous administration gave a lot of comments on the sib program. this admits rage had to deal with that upon arrival. -- this administration had to deal with that upon arrival. sec. austin: i would say that the sib program is not designed to accommodate what we just did in evacuating over 100,000 people. perhap

in hindsight, would you say the package worked as well as you thought, not as well or better than you thought? >> when we put it together, we were hopeful that would work. the truth of the pudding is in the eating. it was a matter of days before we really appreciated the message was received. fiscal authorities began to act in tandem and good coordination. i think the impact of next-generation eu when all the europeans decided to go on board together jointly, this entire package actually responded well and fast and big to the unbelievable crisis situation we face. all in all, i think it works well and we responded faster and better than we had in 2008 and 2011 and the european sovereign debt crisis. david: in the united states, we've had challenges during covid that people who are minorities, often women, people of lower income strata, they could not get access to broadband and they had childcare problems and so forth. it is thought that they felt further and further behind. it did you find the same phenomenon in europe? >> this is been the case in europe as well where inequalities in

and iraq and iraq decision as we all recall was fraught with also some uncertainty and as we -- hindsights always 20/20, probably not the evidence to go there to divert resources from afghanistan to iraq. again, we'll learn from all of these things. and a it's amazing. republican president was the one that put this in motion in trump and a democrat president, president biden is the one who acted it out. now, we can have a debate about the 2500, 3500 troops. i differ slightly from my friend and mentor, dr. bennett on that at the same time, i do think hindsight gives us an opportunity to learn from these decisions that were made and to ensure a that as we go forward, we don't make the same kinds of mistakes that we may have made over the last 20 years. howie: when it comes to press freedom -- let me ask my question, then you can circle back. when it comes to press freedom which we take for granted in this country, one of the horrible aftereffects of our withdrawal which everybody i think would agree was not well-handled, botched really. are two afghan journalist, and we've seen the pictures

it says something about perspective and hindsight that we're now getting. that comes with the 20th anniversary, it's the subject of a documentary airing tonight. the film tells the story of survivors who recorded their personal experiences in a video booth in the wake of the attacks and returned this year to reflect on their loss and their lives over the past two decades. >> my name is lisa ridd. it's tuesday, april 27th, 2021. it's very surreal to be back here and to be talking about everything that's happened and changed since then and then also specifically the experience of recording that video in this booth. >> hi. my name is lisa knapp and today is september 10th, 2002. >> it was 364 days after september 11th that i went in and recorded that video. and i -- i know that in those 364 days i didn't like deal with my feelings about lindsay or even the day of september 11th itself. i have avoided talking to my friends, talking to my family, talking to co-workers about everything that happened just because i'm not ready. i mean it's the worst thing i've eve

. >> what do you think the lesson is with the benefit of hindsight now looking back when america is hitof 9/11, and then the question of, okay, well what do you do in response? what do you do? who is it going to hurt? who is it going to help? we now have 20 years of war behind us to look at that question. we also have, like you said, unity except if you were say a muslim american you say i sure didn't feel safer or more unified. what's the lesson? >> you know, i think what countries and particularly governments do when they're scared is often not very pretty with the benefit of hindsight, you know, during the civil war, suspending habeas corpus. these are ugly episodes in our history. and i think whether it was abu grave or torture which in many cases did not work, still debated by some of those suspected terrorists. i think those things have a real impact. and we have to weigh -- look, we have not been hit again. that was something that the president said, president bush at the time would be very important. he also said if we take the fight to them, we won't have to fight here. that ha

>> hindsight is 20/20, and when you see posts of students bragging about taking part in the tiktok challenge, it's clear the problem is nationwide. the challenge is to vandalize school bathrooms and then post the results online. sinks, even toilets, ripped from the wall. >> in p.e. i went to the bathroom and i see stuff on the floor, wet and everything, so the schools started closing the bathrooms. >> it's critical that you not close a school during a pandemic. how do we wash our hand? >> districts have been asked to shut down bathrooms because of damages done. now other schools are seeing the same issue. >> it's not fair to them, it's not fair to the teachers, it's not fair to the students who aren't involved, so that's not okay. >> reporter: now richard blumenthal says tiktok needs to be held accountable along with the students responsible for the vandalism. >> i'm calling on tiktok to ban these videos, to protect them, and to ban as well the users, those kids who make use of its platform to encourage, and, indeed, incite others. tiktok is complicit in these types of actions. >> reporter:

i know in hindsight you have the clarity. i know this is difficult.hat is why i want to explore it with you. how do you know when to make that entry point? when they had problems in 2015, it took a long time to work things out, they threw a lot at it. krishna: you will not be able to call the bottom precisely. but given what is going on with probably one of the largest entities with lots of pain points across the financial system, across the general populace, i think it is a fair assessment to make that it may not be the bottom but we are probably getting closer to the bottom with respect to the pain point of the policymakers. jonathan: interesting conversation. still ahead, the week ahead featuring chairman powell and a federate decision. i believe we hear from the chairman twice next week. from new york, this is bloomberg. ♪ jonathan: i'm jonathan ferro. this is bloomberg real yield. time for the week ahead. central bankers returning to force. right decisions from the boj, boe, and federal reserve. a host of global pmi's on thursday. rounding out th

. >> in hindsight i probably would have been better off taking off. >> reporter: while many who stayed struggle to find gas and other supplies. about half of louisiana is without power. some may have to wait weeks until it's restored. >> every area is not going to come back at the same time. >> reporter: meanwhile, ida's death toll continues to rise after part of the highway washed away in mississippi. the deadly storm leaving behind a path of destruction. parts of louisiana could be uninhabitable for months. >> this is going to be a marathon and not a sprint. >> reporter: and recovery could take years. >> my heart sinks, because i know what we went through to rebuild after katrina. >> reporter: neighbors are answering the call to help. support pouring in to rescue and rebuild once again. fema officials are now on the ground in louisiana. as of last count, 113,000 households have applied for disaster assistance. >> liz mclaughlin, nbc news. >>> up next, concerns over a covid outbreak on board. an update on the cargo ship that's now docked in san francisco. >>> an at-home workout gives