director hinze? >> is staff considering your meeting with the primer, and if so, what is the [indiscernible] if you could give me a high level? >> i will try to answer -- i'm not sure if i fully heard the question, but i will try to answer. we were very fortunate to receive two presentations from staff so far. the february meeting was jonathan brewers, and the march meeting was -- last name von crow with passenger relations. >> we have no resolutions to pass onto the directors yet. what i heard from the last meeting was a deep interest in new sources and new ridership programs, similar to what existed for s.f. state and university of san francisco. i think there's more about rider fees will be heard, so i think commenting on that will be premature, and i think a lot of support for programs that have -- that create more efficiency and reliability with service. so with both increasing service hours and also the service hours that we have, delivering more service. >> okay. sorry if i put you on the spot

director hinze you are muted, director hinze. >> i did put my hand down. >> president: with that ... >> i'd love to move the item, chair boarded. >> is there asecond ? all in favor of secretary, call the role. >> on the motion to approve the consent calendar, director hinze. [roll call vote] >> the consent calendar is approved, thank you. >> president: next we are on our regular agenda. >> item 11, update on the building progress program authorizing the director of transportation to execute the agreement for the retail yard development project with a term not exceeding 568 days and potential termination payment will not exceed $9.99 million and approved by the board of supervisors a continuation payment of $4 million . >> president: you're taking us through? >> thank you chair borden, acting chief financial officer and progress program manager which is my normal job. today i know the board has been asking for several months on an update on our facilities program and kind of elements of development so i'm going to cover that todayand talk about one of the specific projects , the potre

i see director hinze has her hand unand so does eakin followed by director lai. >> director hinze: one 343 implementation, obviously it's great that we're moving forward so aggressively. we should continue to maximize the authority that we have under ab43. i'm curious if there's going to be any evaluation of performance and fee reduction. i know that the tenderloin report is 40 miles an hour is due out soon in the spring. i'm wondering there will be ab43 evaluation period. >> director tumlin: yes, evaluation is very much part of this pilot work. we will be collecting the information on a rolling basis and doing some summary reports part of our vision zero evaluation report. >> director hinze: thank you. that's it. >> vice chair eaken: related to director hinze's question. i have two questions, ab43, there's some transit. i know we didn't get everything we wanted out of that bill. there was some negotiations and compromises to get that across the finish line. i'm curious as we dive into the details of implement takes, what are we learning about the limitations of that authorization? are

director hinze? >> director hinze: first point, jonathon, -- last week, that's currently not in our sort of scope. am i understanding that correctly? >> at the prior hearing you will approve the term and you authorize director tumlin to execute the agreement with the selected lead developer. we're recommending today to bifurcate that. it becomes the second bite of the apple that today you approve the terms, meaning we are not going to renegotiate the terms of this agreement. which i think is very important to keep this process stable. we will come back to the m.t.a. board in april, at which point you will approve the agreement with that lead developer. in theory, in that meeting, we will add the name of the lead developer. it will be up and down vote, you can choose not to vote to select that lead developer. >> director hinze: okay. to the p.m.o., will that be something that's currently in our budget? do we have to budget to do that? >> throughout the process of this project, we have independently ve

director hinze? >> director hinze: first point, jonathon, -- last week, that's currently not in our sort of scope. am i understanding that correctly? >> at the prior hearing you will approve the term and you authorize director tumlin to execute the agreement with the selected lead developer. we're recommending today to bifurcate that. it becomes the second bite of the apple that today you approve the terms, meaning we are not going to renegotiate the terms of this agreement. which i think is very important to keep this process stable. we will come back to the m.t.a. board in april, at which point you will approve the agreement with that lead developer. in theory, in that meeting, we will add the name of the lead developer. it will be up and down vote, you can choose not to vote to select that lead developer. >> director hinze: okay. to the p.m.o., will that be something that's currently in our budget? do we have to budget to do that? >> throughout the process of this project, we have independently ve

hinze has a question but also areminder, these are clarifyingquestions . discussion will happen later in the agenda . director hinze, why don't you go ahead. >> would you like me to go ahead? >> go for it. >> thank you staff for your very comprehensive diligence working on this project. i had a quick question, one is that i see you've had a slight based on support based on recess, i just wondered if you had any data, similar to that on the disability. >> we do commissioner and we are calling it out.we have our parliament style binders again. >> i can ask another question. >> please. >> my next question is on characteristics. i know the lands can go which is great. as you know, it's also a function. [inaudible] i'm wondering if transit vehicles can have the same exemption permission if at all possible. >> thank you, and going to answer the second question first and i'm happy to return the question was we currently transit vehicles are allowed to access any of the closed streets because they're recognizable, they're marked as paratransit. anyone who's seenth

. >> director hinze: thank you for the presentation. ly try -- i will try to be brief and try to go in order. on the c.i.p. in general, i like the c.i.p. i hope that staff try to stretch every dollar. i would hope that after seeing c.i.p. funds, it's a signal of how much the importance is. on the fares, i'm curious if you knew offhand, some of the -- [ indiscernible ] >> we did calculate that how many would qualify for 125%. as soon as we get it, i will read it in the record. >> director hinze: that will be great. i will be supportive of looking at generating revenue specifically for expanding 145%. i had a few questions how the program was going. i forget the name offhand. i'm also in favor looking at the policy. i do recognize that while towing creating -- [ indiscernible ] towing is a tool that we have to use. i will be interested to know how those programs will be and that will be a follow-up action for me. >> chair borden: thank you. director heminger? >> director heminger: thank you. jonathan, i got one general question and then i