. >> my name is hiroshi. i am here to support the continued and since the -- the continuance since the dr requestor is unable to represent themselves. it would be unfair for the process to continue without his presence. vice president olague: thank you. is there any additional public comment on the continuance? >> -mark myers. i come from san francisco, it is unprofessional -- a design professional. i think he should let the process goes through. as a property owner in the city, it seems that when things fit within the guidelines to set up it is ideal that you let the planners do their job. i think when anyone can just drag out the process for property owners here in the city, that is a strain on the property owner as well. vice president olague: thank you. is there any additional public comment on the continuance? seeing none, public comment is closed. commissioner moore: i am looking for the city attorney's guidance on this particular discussion and how we go about it. there are two concerns. the human side

. >> my name is hiroshi sakuda. i am here again to state our concerns from csfn. we are a neighborhood organization of over 40 neighborhood groups. this is the third time that this has been tried to be amended -- ceqa amendments. twice before, it was rejected. this is the third time. we have concerns about these things. first of all, the neighborhood organizations, environmentalists, and the public, has not been involved in the process from the very beginning. this has been essentially a developer-proven process. the public was left out in the cold. we think for good government that everyone should be included. here we are at this meeting and there are more amendments at the very last moment. no one seemed to quite understand what it is. obviously, we cannot proceed. why the rush? this is introduced in 2004 and 2006. here we are again. planning director ram -- i'm want to thank you for the meeting you had last week, the conversation with director moran about the health element. that was very useful. if we could have something like this on the ceqa amendments, that