in fact, that was the hiroshima bomb. that was never tested. that bomb -- they had total confidence that it would work unless somebody forgot to put two particular wires together, or something like that, which could always happen, but the theory of it was quite clear. at lost of the work alamos and the next at los alamos isangst at los related to the other type of bomb, thep, -- plutonium bomb. and peierls said it might be possible to make a plutonium bomb, and plutonium, a man-made element, was easier to hurt his than the uranium -- uranium 235.the they decided to put some plutonium on the front of the bomb, on the back of the bomb, and they discover -- they calculated -- they figured out there was no way the plutonium bullet could be fired fast enough into the plutonium target to make it go up. active -- so so much more active than uranium 235 that no matter how fast you fired that bullet, by the time it got halfway, it would start to explode, but it would really sizzle because you wouldn't get le, because you would not get the full effect. s

we saw from that clip the cloud moving towards hiroshima.in moments in the movie she looks up and sees explosions in the sky as explosions of paint. there are moments when the narrative deals with very dark stuff you would get in a war movie, but it does so by the animation unravelling and becoming drawings and becoming fragments of animation, and by looking at global events and tragedies through the eyes of a particular character, it manages to watch as if from a distance or slightly sculptured, without ever looking away from harsh realities. this opens on wednesday, and if you would like a film like your name, which was a big hit, and returning to cinemas soon, this is well worth checking out. it has won numerous awards and it is easy to see why it has. a real integrity to it. the triumph is it approaches difficult subject matter in a way that, to me, seems universal. and it does that thing that animation can do that a live—action film can't do, to look at the world in a different way, to make us see events in a different and personal way.

the current paperback edition is subtitled "hiroshima and its legacy."

in fact, since hiroshima and nagasaki that a single person has died from nuclear weapons. but in fact, have been lots of casualties a as a result of smal arms and light weapons. so this is conventional weapons disarmament aspect is something that we would definitely like to highlight much more. it's also an area where we have been also making progress. and we need to actually advertise, if we put our heads together and work together, we are able to make progress and achieve wonderful things. and i think that sort of positive message in the disarmament will be very important. and i can be very much linked to the agenda 2020 and svgs. fact sdg is in my view are critical component of a concept also as human security. >> there are other questions here. yes. period i had a small arms saws would ask a question that a think jonathan and larry trained will be your extensive background in other areas actually think i think are beneficial. i want to ask the question of how you think you might bring the work done to push the disarmament agenda. i very much agree having worked at the

in fact, since hiroshima and nagasaki, not a single person has died from nuclear weapons but, in fact, there have been a lot of casualties as a result of more arms and weapons. this is conventional weapons disarmament aspect is something that we would definitely like to highlight much more. it's also an area we have been making progress and we need to actually emphasize if we put our heads together and work together we are able to make progress and achieve wonderful things. i think that sort of positive message also is very important and that can be very much linked to the agenda the 20 and it is in my view a critical component of the referred to as the human security. >> there are other questions here. yes, jeff. >> i'm also at the arms control. i was going to ask a question that jonathan is very trained well. your experience and background in other areas with great benefit and i wanted to ask the question of how you thank you might bring the working to push the army agenda. having worked at the un, the un has seen as a very. [inaudible] i would say you started reminding us that some

and last year in hiroshima president obama said those nations that hold nuclear stockpiles we must have the courage to as escape the logic f fear and pursue a world without them. and so for decades american presidents have with varying degrees of success, republicans and democrats, all pursued their commitment in the npt which we talked about this flick of the nonproliferation treaty to end the entrÉes, to pursue disarmament. we've negotiated agreements that limit and cut nuclear arsenals, work to curb the spread of nuclear weapons, and ended nuclear testing in atmosphere and underground, and sought to reduce the risk of miscalculation with a nuclear weapon. we have seen much progress in many areas as larry weiler, one of the participants year and one of the original negotiated of the npt reminded us this morning that there are many challenges ahead. and in some ways as we heard this morning, the risk of nuclear weapons use appears to be growing due to tensions between the current states. the situation on the korean peninsula, and at some key measure up at risk or even before president

weapons test in a decade and attend kiloton blast was almost as powerful as the bomb dropped on hiroshima jong unwarned of more nuclear weapons test. he stepped up ballistic missile tests and promised to test long-range missiles that could reach north america. in response, president trump said he would consider all options. say over here. if he gets the long-range missiles, we are not safe either. china's meeting with president xi jinping, trump agreed to work with beijing to find diplomatic solutions. he later warned of a major, major complex of diplomacy fail. in april, the u.s. installed at missile defense system in south korea, and the chinese are not having the system surveillance capabilities in their backyard. china, north korea's only significant trade partner, has been pressuring the company and suspended coal purchases, but the chinese are reluctant to push a artist a risk the collapse of the north korean government. meanwhile, south and north korea have hundreds of thousands of troops deployed on either side of the border. here is the argument. north korea has a long history of

hiroshima and nagasaki, not a single person has died from nuclear weapons but there have been lots of casualties. they were conventional weapons disarmament, and we actually advertise if we put our heads together and work together, and make progress and achieve wonderful things. a positive message, it can be linked to the agenda 2020. referred to as human security. >> other questions here? >> the arms control association. i was going to ask the question that was framed well. and to ask a question of how you might push the disarmament i very much agree having worked at the un, it is a very sideload -- in some ways it is. can we think of it the other way around. the humanitarian consequences drove the nuclear ban treaty, very outside the box human side. if you have experience to bring to that, in the process of what you talked about. chemical weapons. i see that country is a sticking point for people who criticize the security council for not being able to undertake, people criticized the un and making it possible for russia to potentially cooperate. if you have been thinking on that, t

the 10 kiloton underground blast was almost as powerful as the bomb dropped on hiroshima.warned of more nuclear weapons tests. he stepped up ballistic missile testing with some lending in the sea of japan and promised to test long-range missiles that could reach north america. in response, president trump said he would consider all options. pres. trump: we are probably not safe over here. if he gets the long-range missiles, we are not safe either. >> after meeting with china's president xi jinping in april, trump agreed to work with beijing to find diplomatic solutions. he later warned of a major, major conflict if diplomacy fails. in april, the u.s. installed a missile defense system in south korea, and the chinese are not happy about having the system surveillance capabilities in their backyard. china, north korea's only significant trade partner, has been pressuring the country and has suspended its coal purchases from there. but the chinese are reluctant to push show hard as to risk the collapse of the north korean government. meanwhile, south and north korea have hund

defamation for what she said about there being death panels in the aca or for what she said about his hiroshimaed he had apologized for u.s. involvement in world war ii. none of which were true. i think we all need to take a step back and recognize that in the marketplace of ideas, they are going to be people who say dumb things, offensive things, overstatements, like the one in this "new york times" editorial. but that doesn't mean that we should engage in kind of snowflake lawsuits and say, you owe me hundreds of millions dollars because i was offended. >> you raise a number of interesting points. no surprise. one of them is, what is the responsibility of a newspaper? even though this is an editorial comments. they didn't really apologize to her. they were attracted and amended it but there was never an actual apology, which might have saved them some of this lawsuit and missed trouble perhaps. fun, there is the issue, charlie, you are a public figure, you go out there and say, i'll kinds of inflammatory things on both sides come i do have the ability to sue someone when they come back i do?

last year in hiroshima, president obama said those nations that hold nuclear stockpiles must have the courage to escape the logic of fear and pursue a world without them. for decades american presidents have with varying degrees of success, republicans and democrats all pursue their commitment in the npt to end the arms race. and pursue disarmament. a negotiated agreements that limit and cut nuclear arsenals or to curb the spread of nuclear weapons. they did nuclear weapons in the atmosphere and underground but for the rest of miscalculation with nuclear weapons so we seen much progress in many areas. as larry weiler, one of the original negotiators of the npt remind us this morning, there are many challenges ahead. and in some ways as we heard this morning, the risk of nuclear weapons use appears to be growing and the tensions between nuclear states situation and as some key nuclear arms restraint measures. so even before president trump took the oath of office and came into the white house , there were already tough challenges to make. in the area of nuclear weapons policy such as h

we saw from that clip the cloud that we know is moving towards hiroshima.ns in the sky as explosions of paint. there are moments when the narrative deals with very dark stuff that you would get in a war movie, but it does so by the animation unravelling and becoming drawings and becoming fragments of animation, and, by looking at global events and tragedies through the eyes of a particular character, it manages to watch as if from a distance or slightly sculptured, without ever looking away from harsh realities. this opens on wednesday, and if you like a film like your name, which was a big hit, and is returning to cinemas soon, i think this is well worth checking out. it has won numerous awards and it's easy to see why. a real integrity to it. the triumph is it approaches a difficult subject matter in a way that, to me, seems universal. and it does that thing that animation can do that a live—action film can't do, to look at the world in a different way, to make us see these events in a different and personal way. i liked it very much and i think you will

we saw from that clip the cloud moving towards hiroshima.are moments when the narrative deals with very dark stuff you would get in a war movie, but it does so by the animation unravelling and becoming drawings and becoming fragments of animation, and by looking at global events and tragedies through the eyes of a particular character, it manages to watch as if from a distance or slightly sculptured, without ever looking away from harsh realities. this opens on wednesday, and if you would like a film like your name, which was a big hit, and returning to cinemas soon, this is well worth checking out. it has won numerous awards and it is easy to see why it has. a real integrity to it. the triumph is it approaches difficult subject matter in a way that, to me, seems universal. and it does that thing that animation can do that a live—action film can't do, to look at the world in a different way, to make us see events in a different and personal way. i liked it very much and you will too. thank you. and transformers: the last knight — i suspect y

in 1952 and the infamous bravo test in 1954, 15 mega tons, 1,000 times the size of the hiroshima and nagasaki bombs. up tony debroom was a young child fishing with his father when he witnessed the test. the sky bled red, he told in march 2016, the marshal islands cases before the international court of justice were not about compensation for the effects of testing. when the cases were filed in april 2014, tony said, our people have suffered the catastrophic and irreparable damage of these weapons and we vow to fight so that no one else on earth will ever again experience these atrocities. tony also said in accepting the 2015 right livelihood award, i have seen with my very own eyes nuclear devastation and know with conviction that nuclear weapons must never again be visited upon humanity. this is not just an issue of treaty commitments or international law, though it is that, and not just an issue of ethics or morality, though it is that too, but this is an issue of common sense. how could any one common person walking down the road, street, ever permit the possession or use of such

hiroshima was 15. they need a miss till to carry it.here is one that could reach new york. we doubt he has it weaponized small enough to be in a warhead. but the most important part will be the nose cone so it can go into the atmosphere and come back. whether he has the capability or not he is trying to. he will keep going until something stops him. neil: as you've been pointing out, you were way ahead of the curve, ben, he is rapidly moving in that direction. let me ask, all the stuff we have done including to arm the south koreans with adequate defense system. of course the south koreans pulled because they didn't want to do anything provocative. i think to myself, provocative is what the guy north of you is doing. having said that, what would be deemed a proper reaction for us right now because the chinese have warned about building up defenses in south korea? they have also warned about shooting down a north korea missile at least over land. i guess they would not act so despair ringingly if it was over the korean peninsula. what do

today, the mayor of hiroshima voiced hopes for a-bomb victims to see an end to these arms. >>> two escapedccused of killing two guards are now in court. they were both captured last night following a car chase with police just south of nashville >>> and mcdonalds and the international olympic committee ended the long running sponsorship deal three years early. they want to focus on different business opportunities and priorities the partnership began 41 years ago in 1976. next year's winter's olympics is the final set of games for mcdonalds. that is the news update this hour back downtown to you >> that was all the talk in london they had a huge mcdonalds -- >> yes >> i remember that >> massive never got in there, but the lines were crazy >> yeah, yeah, sure. >> exactly you wonder whether or not this is going to be a good move for them or not, but - >> i know. >> it is part of the entire repositioning of the brand, although, that's a huge platform, olympics, though, i don't know we'll see. >> the biggest all right, thank you, sue. >> you got it. >>> coming up, investing legend, bill miller

they included the first hydrogen bomb test and 15 mega tons, 1,000 times the size of the hiroshima and nagazaki bombs. the sky bled red, he told in march 2016, the marshal islands cases before the international court of justice were not about compensation for the effects of testing. when the cases were filed in april 2014, tony said, our people have suffered the catastrophic and irreparable damage of these weapons and we vow to fight so that no one else on earth will ever again experience these atrocities. tony also said in accepting the 2015 right livelihood award, i have seen with my very own eyes nuclear devastation and know with conviction that nuclear weapons must never again be visited upon humanity. this is not just an issue of treaty commitments or international law, though it is that, and not just an issue of ethics or morality, though it is that too, but this is an issue of common sense. how could anyone common person walking down the road, street, ever permit the possession or use of such weapons. so i think that the marshal islands and tony richly deserve this award and i t

four years later, the united states dropped atomic drops in hiroshima and nagasaki, to me it was nations fighting with each other. i felt deep shame to be a part of the human race. lord has brought an imaginable devastation and atrocities around the world. in my young heart i rose a question, how can we human beings be so violent toward each other and bring such horrific distraction upon ourselves. from now on, for the rest of my life, i must live and work for peace and at 22, she wanted to doctor a, but do to war she couldn't, she lived her life, she found beauty in life through painting and so she deviled into painting and worked with mentally challenged people in america, she married an american, by the way and came to america to live and so she has found her peace individually within and through that so many people come to her and enjoy the vibration of peace and get the encouragement and hope to move on. thank you so much. [applause] >> thank you. >> we have time for one more question. we have time for one more question. >> the gentleman here has been raising his hand. >> i have a q