proceeding but fairness applies in all proceedings, like what hisis children think of hi, are you comfortable with the standard that once accusedf something, that you should be the one who disproves the accusation, that is up to you to prove where they are saying about you isn't true? are you okay with that? >> i think what we have to have is a hearing both sides. we will have that at least from dr. ford. we need to hear from all of the accusers. most importantly, we need to hear under oath from the actual suppose that witnesses to the events that occurred. this is not, by the way, i think it's really important, though, to go back back to something yu pointed out. it is not a criminal trial. due process does not apply the same way. this is like a job application. >> tucker: no. hold on. you are arguing something parallel to what i ask you. i am in favor of hearing all the evidence we had -- have access to it, including when and where the suppose of crime took place, which is a very basic questions still unanswered. the question is what you make of your party leaders, members of the judiciary committee, saying that the onus is o