hitler castro. "the new york times" is on the wrong side of all three. propping up or covering up the paper record that's fit to print this is important to understand because "the new york times" has not changed ownership it's the same family. is very incestuous handed down from one to the next in the ideology is very un-american as it has been in the past they don't embrace in our rights or the declaration of independence that this bond american marxist movement. every damn one of them. critical race theory. the trans- movement. open borders. the attack on capitalism and on and on. read "the new york times" and read what they spine have to say what demonstration is up to i point out "the new york times" how corrupt the media can be. did you know karl marx career was a journalist. you have this with the information a self-described socialist publication noting that marx was a journalist all of his adult life started to write in 1842 and founded his own paper 1848 his work for the new york tribune came about because he met an american and in 1848 a few ye

of his rebel force, and castro would later brag how he duped the "new york times," -- stalin, hitler, castroew york times" was on the wrong side of all 3, covering up the paper record, all news fit to front. "new york times." this is important to understand. because the "new york times" has not changed ownership, the same family, handed down from one to the next, their ideology is very un-american, as it has been in the past, they don't embrace republicanism, they don't embrace the constitution. they embrace the spawned american marxist movement. every damn one of them. critical race theory. the trans movement, open borders, the attack on capitalism, and on and on someo. you read "new york times" you read what the spawned american marx movements say in chapter 6 of "american marxism" i point out, how corrupt media can be, did you know karl marx, his career he was a journalist? a journalist. let me read this short bit of information to you, so you have it with the rest of the information. a. >> steven sherman notes marx was a journalist all of his adult life, started righting in 1942, and fou

stalin, hitler, castro. "new york times" was on the wrong side of all three.r covering up for all three the paper record, all of the news that is fit to print. "new york times." this iss important to understan. because the "new york times" has not changed ownership, it is the same family, handed down. their ideology is very un-american. it has been in the past. they don't embrace republican implement they don't embrace the constitution and the declaration of independence, they embrace the spawned american marxist movement, every damn one of them, critical race theory. >> and on on. you read "new york times," you read what the spawned american marx movements have to say, in chapter 6 of "american marxism," i point out that is the "new york times," how corrupt media can be. did you know karl marx in his career he was a journalist. a journalist, let he read this short bit of information to you to have it with the rest, as i write: >> his approach to journalism, as a write. is similar to modern journalists today, isn't it? >> >> i point out in short, in need to co