in the same place, we are talking not only about hmm karabakh there, in general, a very serious tangleich is now in terms of cargo - this is north, south, went down through iran through azerbaijan there. even india took 400% plus for oil products for everything else , actually blocking europe, they sent everything down. it is important how it will be exported, by the way, the grain deal is the same in the very first question. how cheap to withdraw the whole thing and you understand that there is at least some, well, a consensus has formed. together with turkey, we have done with other countries. the so -called three by three platform, when six foreign ministers from all of this south caucasus should sit down. at least start talking. well, it is clear that georgia was blocked. there, the pro-american president with french citizenship stalled, that is history. but to her, by the way, now, perhaps they will announce impeachment and we hope that they, well, understand with whom they should live, but armenia, which is now starting to stop this in fact. they can now return to a new conflict.

will now repeat our position based on the fact that azerbaijan should be seven held uh hmm regions around nagorno-karabakhturned, uh, the very status of nagorno-karabakh should uh remain unchanged, that is, uh should be transferred to the future, helped economic culturally between russia and armenia, and in fact , we made very close friendly ties for armenia like nothing another country in the world a lot. we are simply good, but significant for this country , despite the lack of a common border and customs border. among other things, they admitted armenia to the eurasian economic union, and within the framework of this integration block they made extremely important for the rise of the national economy of this country. well, all the agreements collapsed when more than one pashinyan came to power in armenia as a result of street protests, who on the very first day of his premiership danced in nagorno-karabakh and provoked a new round of conflict to try on yerevan side by side, in which he again had to go to moscow in 2020. well, after this, pashinyan demonstratively refused to participate in csto military

in the same place , we are talking not only about hmm karabakh there, in general, deep.erbaijan there. the same, india took 400% plus for oil products for everything else. we actually blocked europe and sent everything down. it is important how it will be exported, by the way, the grain deal is the same thing in the first place. how to cheaply withdraw the whole thing and you understand that there is at least some, well a consensus was formed together with turkey and other countries. the so-called three by three platform, when six foreign ministers from all of this south caucasus should sit down. at least start talking. well, it is clear that georgia was blocked. there , the pro-american president with french citizenship has stalled, that is history. but , by the way, now, perhaps, she will be impeached and we hope that they, well, understand with whom they should live, but armenia, which is now starting to stop this in fact. they now they can return to a new conflict. the fact is that there, and there is an exchange of blockages , there is the nakhchivan enclave of azer

creation of a corridor that would connect karabakh and armenia in the zone, uh, lachin region of azerbaijan , so it was conditionally, uh, called lachin corridor hmmnd recognition of the status quo, yes, karabakh itself, not uh, consolidating its final status was not yet a mandatory condition. the return of refugees hmm , and from both sides, both azerbaijani refugees and armenian refugees, to their native hearth, and this is an unconditional requirement, but international humanitarian law, in my opinion. if we could do this, we would be able to reach an agreement on this base and there would be no war. this is true, in fact, in the nineties , the karabakh war began after regions were withdrawn. soviet peacekeepers, this role was played by the troops of the ministry of internal affairs, the ussr itself collapsed. and when in 2020 the long-standing conflict broke out with renewed vigor , it was the russian contingent that became the basis of stability and order in nagorno-karabakh; legal peacekeepers, they are not a party to the conflict russia throughout. eh, the entire period. uh, the conflict was the force that, uh, was able to lead the conflict

will repeat our position , we proceeded from the fact that the seven regions held by uh hmm around nagorno-karabakhturned to azerbaijan, the status of nagorno-karabakh itself should remain unchanged, that is, it should be transferred to the future was helped economically and culturally by russia and armenia and, in fact , we made very close friendly ties for armenia like no other country in the world. you are simply good, and we are significant for this country , despite the lack of a common border and customs border. among other things, they admitted armenia to the eurasian economic union, and within the framework of this integration bloc they did a lot to boost the national economy of this country. well, all the agreements collapsed when a number of people came to power in armenia as a result of street protests pashinyan, who on the very first day of his premiership danced in nagorno-karabakh and provoked a new round of conflict to try on yerevan baku, where we again had to be in moscow in 2020. well, after that, pashinyan pointedly refused to participate in the csto military exercises, in return

hmm, and the regions around nagorno -karabakh, the very status of nagorno-karabakh should remain unchangedould be transferred there for the future, helped economically culturally in russia and armenia and in fact we made very close friendly ties for armenia like no other country in the world a lot. you are simply good, and we are significant for this country, despite the lack of a common border and customs border. among other things, we accepted armenia into the eurasian economic union, and within the framework of this integration bloc we did a lot to boost the national economy of this country; all agreements collapsed when we came to power in armenia as a result of street violence. protests did not come from half of pashinyan, who on the very first day of his premiership danced in nagorno-karabakh and provoked a new round of conflicts to try on yerevan baku , in which he again had to go to moscow in 2020. well , after that pashinyan demonstratively refused to participate in csto military exercises in return for inviting him to armenia us armed forces for joint maneuvers. eagle partner par

occur there, you understand, if armenia recognized that nagorno-karabakh is everything to this part of azerbaijan. well, what do we need? hmmut? this is the key, the key component of the whole problem, the status of karabakh was determined by armenia itself, this is the whole problem, nevertheless, the russian military, from the first minutes of the resumption of hostilities , came to the aid of the residents of karabakh and began evacuating women and children from dangerous zones exclusively on their own. almost 2,000 people were stationed at the peacekeeping base. and this despite the fact that the armenian authorities and even the start of a humanitarian aid operation they never announced it to their fellow citizens , that is, they essentially washed their hands, if they recognize through this reserve of azerbaijan that it actually turns out to be an internal conflict within azerbaijan, of course, russia cannot do anything here. so in yerevan it seems they realized that they have nothing more to expect from their authorities in the morning. republic square in the capital the tents were finally empty. participants of the

and they are completely different than those, than russian than the same karabakh is so that all this will happen, but in short hmmhis, that the same mistakes were in ukraine and continue in central asia to this day, and so to speak, where are our ngos, where is our influence, where are we spending ours , today we are spending huge amounts of money on war on missiles for this everything is necessary. well, you can spend hundreds of times less money on bringing people to our these formations to educate the national elite, what did the soviet union . my father, after the front, was sent to graduate school to study in moscow, there was one caucasian intake. there were all armenians , azerbaijanis, azerbaijanis, georgians, everyone was friends, everything was purposeful. why was this done? ah, because it was necessary to educate. the national elite in general was in the soviet spirit and did not spare this remedy, so these questions are the last we have any chance of uh, getting out of this. well, there is still. it seems to me that it may be, the main guarantee here is that on my look, staging of the americans. e. in

nature of these hostilities azerbaijan and uh, armenia according to reports uh hmm ministry of health of nagorno-karabakhasizing this message from nagorno-karabakh other official data on the dead and injured i i don’t know yet, here we are we ended the previous block by saying that, of course , the context of what is happening now there in nagorno -karabakh is much broader than the events, and within the regional ones. it is much more geopolitical, and i don’t know if it’s a coincidence the fact that it also coincided with the general session of the assembly and so on, but in any case, it seems to me that this needs to be addressed now. uh, attention to this geopolitical context, in your opinion, which would be important to understand. in this regard, our viewers and the general assembly are unlikely to have any special coincidence here. yes , because it is not related to events without sources on the ground for a certain period. before they said that such a conflict is possible, and the conflict is socratic and connected. this first of all, with what i said. andrey , quite rightly, too many authors have

hmm, i rested on the laurels of victory in the first karabakh war, so for some reason i did not find these systems. and those that had systems and could transfer it’s like su-30 cm aircraft, it’s like systems. eh, such as iskander, they simply were not used. and if we talk about the possibilities of today ’s confrontation between azerbaijan and armenia , we can look at the gdp. well, the gdp of azerbaijan is striving for five percent and has not yet reached five percent of the military gdp of armenia . azerbaijan is a little more than 5%. well in absolute terms figures, if you look, azerbaijan invests approximately 2.5 times more in its armed forces and in addition , the military military reserve, that is , the mobilization reserve of azerbaijan significantly exceeds the mobilization reserve of armenia today, which path did you take , you see what nikol pashinyan said that there are allies who do not fulfill their obligations to supply weapons, and an agreement is being concluded in armenia. 400 million dollars for arms supplies from india, whatever goes there, goes there. uh, reacti

and recognition of the status of karabakh is not , consolidating its final status yet a mandatory condition was for the return of refugees hmmjani refugees and armenian refugees to their homes. and this is an unconditional requirement of international humanitarian law. uh, in my opinion. if we could do this, we would be able to reach an agreement on this basis. and there would be no war. this is true. i am now absolutely convinced of this; in fact, the karabakh war began in the nineties. after the soviet peacekeepers were withdrawn from the region, this role was performed by troops of the ministry of internal affairs and the collapse of the ussr. and when in 2020 the old conflict broke out with renewed vigor , it was the russian contingent that became the basis of stability and order in nagorno-karabakh, the peacekeepers are legally not a party to the conflict there, russia throughout. e. the entire period of the conflict was a force that e. i was able to lead the conflict in a normal direction. uh, uh , the negotiation process and uh, stopping the bloodshed, it was like that in the nineties, it was like that in 2020 in russ

uh, karabakh is not uh, consolidating its final status was still a mandatory condition for the return of refugees hmmom both sides, both azerbaijani refugees and armenian refugees, to their homes, and this is an unconditional requirement of international humanitarian law. uh, in my opinion. if we could do this, we would be able to reach an agreement on this basis. and there would be no war. this is true, actually in the nineties years the karabakh war began. after the soviet peacekeepers were withdrawn from the region, this role was played by the troops of the ministry of internal affairs and the ussr itself collapsed. and when in 2020 the long-standing conflict emerged with renewed vigor, the basis of stability and order in nagorno-karabakh became the russian contingent ; legal, it is not a party to the conflict, russia is there throughout. e of the entire period. e conflict force that was able to introduce. the conflict in may is the direction of the negotiation process and stopping the bloodshed, it was so in the nineties and so it was in 2020 russia has always played a role. peacemaker unfortunat

uh, karabakh not uh, securing its final status is still mandatory the condition was for the return of refugees hmmides, both azerbaijani refugees and armenian refugees, to their homes, and this is an unconditional requirement of international humanitarian law, in my opinion. if we could do this, we would be able to reach an agreement on this basis. and there would be no war. this is true; in fact, the karabakh war began in the nineties. after the soviet peacekeepers were withdrawn from the region, this role was played by the troops of the ministry of internal affairs and the ussr collapsed. and when in 2020 it became obsolete conflict with a new force, the basis of stability and order in nagorno-karabakh was precisely the russian incident of the peacekeepers, legally it is not a party to the conflict there. according to russia , throughout the entire period of the conflict, it was the force that was able to lead the conflict in may, the channel of the negotiation process and the cessation of bloodshed , it was so in the nineties, it was so in 2020 in russia it has always played a role. peacemaker

authorities implemented the military part of karabakh, the unrecognized republics promised to take measures to protect the civilian population, and in yerevan the whole hmmt night, the protest reaction detained 16 people in the russian foreign ministry, and called on the side to stop the bloodshed and start negotiations. and all the information hmm that is available by this time is boris ivanin. yerevan i did not sleep almost all night, the protest on republic square escalated into clashes with the police, people tried to break through to the building of the armenian government , the crowd demanded specific measures to protect nagorno-karabakh, but only the actions of the security forces were decisive. the most violent activists were detained so harshly that someone even required the help of doctors. however, local residents still did not disperse right on the square, they set up tents for the night and called for the dismissal of armenian prime minister nikolo pashinyan, the demonstrators are sure that it was he who surrendered nagorno-karabakh . when back in may he announced that yerevan was ready to recognize the territorial integrity of azerbaijan, h

hmm certain disputed territories. uh, there must be a way out through iran. isn’t this an attempt in nagorno -karabakh?he exit? belarusian russian? goods, including through this transport to the logistics route. i think that this is not the main reason , this is the outbreak of a conflict, but this is also taken into account, because, uh, the united states is also interested in weakening iran and they are actively opposing them, and there iranian interests come first. and as soon as, uh, some opportunities emerged for resolving this conflict. it was when there were latin agreements that this corridor appeared, then uh, they took note and began to be developed. these are the actions that are now being implemented in the form of open conflict, but there is always a backup path. we see that georgia now takes a relatively healthy position, so there is a way, azerbaijan, georgia, uh, further. uh, russian federation so uh always uh, there are other possibilities. yes, water will find a way out, because it determines politics, so there are possible options. and i think that this is not the main reason for wha

azerbaijani military operations, yevlakh began there negotiations between the karabakh armenians and the authorities of baku hmmin the twentieth year, for which so much blood was shed that the entire armenian historical history has always been for thousands of years. armenians lived there. this is him a symbol greater than, say, the eiffel tower for the french, it has been handed over to the enemy. people have the feeling that every armenian’s loved one has died, grief-stricken, despair, anger, powerless, rage, i don’t know the words , the prime minister of armenia speaks. uh , on the occasion, and independence day , independence day and he doesn’t say a word , he doesn’t say a word, but he’s heartbroken. but the prime minister says nothing, the minister of armenia nikol pashinyan. this is completely different. if i call him a bastard on air, that's probably putting this person mildly were not chosen by chance. you remember you made a film about march 1st. let's quickly show some fragments there. these are the ones that were in my film, this is the year 19, or 18, 19, in my opinion, let's show. nothing good awa

hmm well, now you're right. necessary. now this should be called mountainous karabakh.st karabakh, there are our peacekeepers who are now performing the function that i should remind you in the peacekeepers' mandate; never in any part of the world has there been the functionality to stand between, uh, the warring parties during a battle. yes, peacekeepers don’t fight. and not after the parties have agreed, they ensure separation. this is the truce and that's why now especially after 13:00. today our peacekeepers are doing what they must do, and our country russia could turn to the tank with an official proposal to organize a humanitarian mission on the territory of nagorno-karabakh. yes, simply on the basis of our large agreement to assist baku in the reintegration of people into e. the legal framework of azerbaijan, the reaction to this mission proposal will indicate to what extent the azerbaijani authorities are absolutely ready. there, a third party would appear, relatively speaking, now inside an absolutely humanitarian non-state. ahh status. moreover , he turned th

news agency hmm of the ministry of defense reports that since the conclusion of an agreement on the cessation of hostilities. five violations of ceasefire regimes were recorded in karabakh karabakh are being investigated by the russian peacekeeping contingent in cooperation with the azerbaijani side. this was information from the ministry of defense. sweden transferred 10 of its main battle tanks to ukraine. they have already been delivered to their destination about this the ministry of defense of the kingdom reported that the department added that the ukrainian crews were trained in sweden for this model of tank, in fact. this is a modification of the german leopard 2, however, as experts note, the supply of western equipment and the situation will not change american journalists. seymour hirsch, in turn, claims that the ukrainian armed forces actually canceled the counteroffensive due to heavy losses. and if they continue, then a rebellion will begin in ukraine, all the details from artyom zelensky is trying to please the west, but irritation among allies is growing in the us media pay attention to the real state of affairs in ukraine, and we are not only talking abo

hmm, it’s trying to restore the picture. first we heard the ministry of defense of azerbaijan stated at the beginning anti-parental measures. in karabakhn brought forward the accusation that azerbaijan is trying to drag armenia into full-scale hostilities, so we saw that negotiations with macron. his pashinyans were blinking, france demanded an emergency security meeting. he the kremlin calls on yerevan. baku yesterday we heard about this following the previously signed trilateral document, and then we saw what was happening on the streets of armenia: protesters came out. eh, pushinyan himself said attempts. coup d'etat people are demanding pashinyan’s resignation, but we have been watching all day today how, in general, the tension does not subside alexey viktorovich , how do you look at all this? well, uh, here we need to understand, firstly, that this conflict is definitely inciting. this is one of the chains of confrontation between the west and russia, that is, the task is to escalate all possible conflicts along the russian border. it stood for a long time and the karabakh conflict. it's very convenient here. uh, and we see that

karabakh or our fathers? and this is not the first and this is not the last. this directly concerns our real understanding of politics, and not this ideal uh, or hmm from textbookse practically as lomonosov, maybe even better. uh, he said, here the image of the union as a model of the euro was implanted - this is multiculturalism. the terrorists are finished. fine. this, too, was not only planted there in moscow and enjoyed, as was the establishment in the studios there. yes, this experience was implanted here. well, it didn’t work out, and russian diplomacy, among other things, propagated it. yes, textbooks were written in the book. i think that in many textbooks it remains. they haven’t been rewritten there yet . the republic of artsakh's problems have disappeared, but their problem has not disappeared. sorry, there is such a territory included in the de-jord facts of the composition of moldova, we recognize all this, but the problem did not disappear from the fact that , uh, i hope that it’s much more serious. uh, our foreign policy will now be much more open about all these problems, but analyze and not say everything, pursue appropriate policies, because a

hmm make such conclusions? well, look, firstly, the lost war in 1920. yes, of course, azerbaijan is well prepared. aliyev, it must be said, created a strong armed forces. the turks helped. well, as you understand, karabakhl profukan and this, of course, is certainly not only the responsibility of pashinyan, putushi and the previous leadership , so to speak, unfortunately, everything we know about what happened in armenia was corruption, theft, and so to speak, while azerbaijan was building an army, the armed forces were purchasing weapons , training armenia, all this, as they say, i was studying. it is not known what. well, okay , let's say that not all responsibility lies with the current prime minister. well, already in 1920, russia managed to stop this conflict, and stopped it. she him, of course, with a show of force. this is known . this is known because azerbaijanis, in principle, have practically no problems. they could have occupied, then the entire territory of karabakh. in general, russia gave armenia a chance in order to find some compromises on the fate of the people of karabakh. in the future , it is already clear that karabakh was lost. it was it's clear. it's obvious, but it wasn't lost.