SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
105
105
Nov 17, 2015
11/15
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 105
favorite 0
quote 0
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose that. it has been 15 years since the charter has opened so i agree since it will be in effect for a minimum of 10 years we should do the best in the worder to get the strongest laj nguage we need. we have 3 areas, accountability exwuty and extend the open space fund. keep the charter laj wchblg in there. it will support the later audits and annual reviews. equity is addressed. you may look at prop j and the language in the open space funds. it speaks well to that. protect and extend the open space fund because it is due to expire in 17 years. if we extend it to 30 years we can create revenue bonds in
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
115
115
Nov 13, 2015
11/15
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 115
favorite 0
quote 0
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose that. it has been 15 years since the charter has opened so i agree since it will be in effect for a minimum of 10 years we should do the best in the worder to get the strongest laj nguage we need. we have 3 areas, accountability exwuty and extend the open space fund. keep the charter laj wchblg in there. it will support the later audits and annual reviews. equity is addressed. you may look at prop j and the language in the open space funds. it speaks well to that. protect and extend the open space fund because it is due to expire in 17 years. if we extend it to 30 years we can create revenue bonds in
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
67
67
Nov 30, 2015
11/15
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 67
favorite 0
quote 0
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose that. it has been 15 years since the charter has opened so i agree since it will be in effect for a minimum of 10 years we should do the best in the worder to get the strongest laj nguage we need. we have 3 areas, accountability exwuty and extend the open space fund. keep the charter laj wchblg in there. it will support the later audits and annual reviews. equity is addressed. you may look at prop j and the language in the open space funds. it speaks well to that. protect and extend the open space fund because it is due to expire in 17 years. if we extend it to 30 years we can create revenue bonds in
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
61
61
Nov 13, 2015
11/15
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 61
favorite 0
quote 0
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose that. it has been 15 years since the charter has opened so i agree since it will be in effect for a minimum of 10 years we should do the best in the worder to get the strongest laj nguage we need. we have 3 areas, accountability exwuty and extend the open space fund. keep the charter laj wchblg in there. it will support the later audits and annual reviews. equity is addressed. you may look at prop j and the language in the open space funds. it speaks well to that. protect and extend the open space fund because it is due to expire in 17 years. if we extend it to 30 years we can create revenue bonds in
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose...
SFGTV: San Francisco Government Television
38
38
Nov 12, 2015
11/15
by
SFGTV
tv
eye 38
favorite 0
quote 0
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose that. it has been 15 years since the charter has opened so i agree since it will be in effect for a minimum of 10 years we should do the best in the worder to get the strongest laj nguage we need. we have 3 areas, accountability exwuty and extend the open space fund. keep the charter laj wchblg in there. it will support the later audits and annual reviews. equity is addressed. you may look at prop j and the language in the open space funds. it speaks well to that. protect and extend the open space fund because it is due to expire in 17 years. if we extend it to 30 years we can create revenue bonds in
as members hof prosc 22, appointed by you the supervisors we hear from the community and work with reck and park department and they are true professionals who work with very very little and need that funding to do a better job in maintenance. so, i do appreciate the fact that this has come before you for amendments. unfortunately it doesn't go far enough and do think more funding is need ed to address the overall problem and i understand that may not be possible, but we are here to propose...