all right, lets go to the senses and find colonel hollingsworth. there he is in exactly the right county with this 50 slaves. so you begin to find that the stories are quite reliable when you can check them against other kinds of sources from the time. also you can then with steals information and information in gay you can go back to the "baltimore sun" and find fugitive slave as where the owner will put in an ad in the newspaper, sort of escaped, reward them ran away from reward $100 for a person who gave him. that's a funny phrase. if anyone can get him and bring him back, $100. that's a pretty good illustration of where they came from who owns them and often of physical descriptions. so you put all this evidence to get educated pretty comprehensive picture post back to give any sense of how successful these people were who did escape to the north? other than someone like frederick douglass of course. >> guest: you know the problem is most of them just disappear from the historical record. some of them pop up in the canadian census but in 1861 t

here's a guy who says i escape from colonel hollingsworth's plantation and owned 50 slaves. let's go to the census and find colonel hollingsworth and various at exactly the right counting with his 50 slaves. you begin to find the stories are quite reliable when you can check them against other sources sources. also with still's information in the information going back to the "baltimore sun" to find fugitive slave as where the owner will put an ad in the newspaper. so-and-so has escaped. reward comer ran away report $100 for the person who will get him. it's a funny phrase. if anyone can get him and bring him back they will get $100. that's a good illustration of where they came from and who owned them and they often a physical descriptions. you put these up in cystic and you get a conference of picture. >> host: you get a sense of how successful these people were when they did escape to the north. other than frederick douglass of course. just go the problem is most of them disappear from the historical record. some of them pop up in the canadian census. there was a census i

one lane is shut down between lancaster avenue and hollingsworth. also told the driver in this accident was hurt. we don't know any more on the driver's condition. but we're working to get more information. again, one lane shut down one southbound lane shut down on city avenue. we'll keep an eye on this for you. >>> i'm john clark. coming up what are the chances tim tebow actually makes the eagles team? and what kind of role would he have? we'll hear from former birds on the newest bird next. >>> hey, i'm john clark, tim tebow is officially an eagle. never thought i'd actually say that. he signs a one-year deal. he's joining the team for the workouts this week. there's no guarantees for him to make the team. he's going to try to resurrect his nfl career. and we were there when he came in for his workout last month. >> it's a good thing, it's a good quality for you. >> did the workout go well? >> it was fun. >> determination has paid off for tim tebow after two seasons out of the nfl, chip kelly is giving him a chance. after working him out last mont

tuesday i escaped from colonel hollingsworth per croquet. let's go to the census. so we begin to find that they are reliable. with the information to go back to "the baltimore sun" to see the ads were the order puts the name in the newspaper. a reward for the person who will get them. so that is the good illustration from where they came from. >> for zero successful these people were. >> the problem is most of them just disappear to pop up with the canadian census. how there were plaques elements with fugitives may know for some of them they we're doing their job but most of them some of the most famous but have them shipped in a crate. winner of frederick douglass , harry jacobs coming harriet tubman but we know very little after they manage to get to freedom. >> host: that those who go to great lengths. >> if i have to walk more than a few blocks. [laughter] but they were walking sometimes 200 miles. this is extraordinary. what would you like "the reader" to take from this? >> guest: this book is a little different because the wanted to humanize it. these individ

pretty strange for windsor to say anything about baker given that the companion case to windsor is hollingsworthhey decided there was a jurisdictional impediment for getting to the issue presented in today's case. ms. stanyar: i understand. i understand what the court is saying. i think in this case, this court can reach it because, you know there has been doctrinal development. we are not asking to redefine the marital relationship. we are only asking for an end that prevents same-sex couples from the right to marry. due process focuses on the attributes of the right itself person -- judge cook: when you're talking about getting that right, it requires statewide, that's what your clients want. ms. stanyar: they want state license. judge cook: license, fair relationship. ms. stanyar: that's correct and the right to marry, yes. judge cook: well, the import there is something different than i thought you were talking about. you want them to recognize it and to license it by the -- the state to license it. ms. stanyar: we do. the central attribute of the marriage is the freedom to marry the person

hollingsworth -- but what is a lower court to do about that? eric murphy: i think with windsor, it is a garden-variety application of the animus case. judge holmes's concurrence in the bishop case was a pretty good analysis, this doctrine can apply. in windsor, it was an unusual federal intrusion into what had always been a state matter. and in romer, it was an unusual experience of illumination of one class of people's rights. that just cannot explain the traditional definition of marriage, which has existed since the founding of the states , and you cannot really explain either, i don't think, the two thousand four amendments. i do not think the 2004 amendments were explained primarily by democracy. the citizens or the general assembly worrying that this fundamental question of public policy would be taken from them, either by a massachusetts court or by the ohio supreme court. it is a rational response to that concern to pass a constitutional amendment retaining the traditional definition of marriage. i think judge holmes had it exactly righ

derek hollingsworth, andy drumheller and billy belk were ana's attorneys.l. "fatal attraction." do you think that that started to stick with the jury. >> well, i mean, that was clearly what their goal was. i thought that the prosecutors' theory of the case, this diabolical killer, was a bit of an overreach. >> reporter: certainly, the defense told the jury, ana cared for george, but not in the outrageous, homicidal way the prosecution claimed. >> this case is about a consenting consensual relationship between two peers. it's not a case of fatal attraction. >> reporter: the defense argued ana wasn't obsessed. she bought george gifts because she was generous. all those alleged plots were just sheer speculation. and under cross-examination, george had positive things to say about ana. >> she was a dear friend and somebody i cared about. >> reporter: as for ana becoming increasingly unhinged? george told the jury how in the days leading up to his poisoning, their casual relationship showed no signs of trouble. >> this wasn't a relationship that was in any kind

pretty strange for windsor to say anything about baker given that the companion case to windsor was hollingsworth. they decided that there was a jurisdictional impediment. carol stanyar: i understand what the court is saying. in this case, this court can reach it because there has been doctrinal development. i guess i don't have anything to add to that. we are not asking to redefine the marital relationship. we are asking to an end of same-sex couples having the right to marry. not on the fact -- judge cook: when you are talking about getting that right. it is that it requires state licensing. that is what your talking about. a state license. to license their relationship. carol stanyar: that is correct. judge cook: the import there is something different than what i thought you were talking about. you want them to recognize it and to license it -- for the state to license it. carol stanyar: we do. the central attribute to marriage is to marry the person of your own choice. the court must make a careful description of the fundamental right. there is a long history of decisions defining that right