unanimous, senator lee has a bill pending in the senate with bipartisan cosponsorship, i know this committee cares deeply and look forward to working with you. >> thank you. >> senator holly. >> mr. horowitz, i see that the fbi continues to persist in characterizing the problem in related to the surveillance issues here as limited. i see the fbi's director statement makes it sound as if there was a limited problem. let's talk a little bit if we could about the scope of this problem at the fbi and how it is that the fbi came to be interveening in a presidential election while the election was ongoing in the fall of 2016. when it comes to fisa warrants, surveillance warrants, are the targets given an opportunity to defend themselves in court? >> no. >> so the court relies on who to establish the facts? >> the fbi and the justice department. >> there's nobody there to contest the facts? the court only hears from one side, is that correct? is it normal in your experience, your knowledge, for the fbi to use as the principal basis for a surveillance warrant political opposition research paid for by a major political party? >> i can't say that wie've lookd at any. >> have you he