out of the comfort zone, because that's why i think i would still be with my family in kyiv in the holosiivtrict and before that, there were fears, fears, how to move on, how will i work, i have no work, my family and the like, and here another question, uh, about the question of existence in general. i raised the issue in the family meeting. we gathered uh, at four in the 30s in the morning, i was shaking i said, "well, i'm ready to take you out . we have to think about where we're going. i'll return. i'll volunteer." everyone refused, although there were moments when kyiv was surrounded by 3/4 and it was really very dangerous. but, well, i couldn't do my i don't know how to tear my family away from my native land, and they're just in kyiv, my wife, children, mother, and kitty, that's the kind of team we are, we all stayed, well , very quickly. he is a roadblock for steam concerts i played with them and supported them. there's some food there. i pulled them up secretly. i'll tell them. i had such a serious bottle of wine. they were there. we don't drink. well , come on, maybe there will be

well, journalists differently evaluated a similar decision of the holosiiv court, if i am not mistakenwhich was limited to only a fine in this case for obstruction. let me remind you. the film crew of the e-e radio svoboda program was attacked by yevhen menzerer himself, and his guards were taken from them, and the filming equipment, including cassettes and diskettes , were all then destroyed. well, then they gave it back and the journalists managed to restore the recorded video material, your word please look, based on legal logic , he does not have an unexpired criminal record, that is, in principle, he can if he still threw it out there and paid a fine. and they will demand from the law enforcement agencies to initiate a criminal case under more serious articles, eh, if you look at it from a legal standpoint , eh, of course he is clean. to be such a person cannot be the head of a state body, especially in leadership positions, well, i hope that journalists will press because in this case there are specific facts of obstructing journalistic activity and putting pressure on the author

this is the video for which on september 14 of this year yevhen merzgar was convicted by the holosiivistrict by the court of kyiv under part one and part three of article 171 of the criminal code of ukraine, illegal seizure of materials collected by a journalist, technical means of obstructing the journalist's work committed by an official using his official position and fined as much as uah 3,400 , and finally, on the 11th, the day before yesterday, yevhen mezger was convicted under article 171 of the criminal code , he received a new public position, obviously, for which he will be able to quickly recoup not only uah 3,400 in court fines, but and earn a good life for himself in the future, congratulations to yevhen medgar, now he is being appointed to a new public position, a public figure, and i will also say that when yevhen medgar was asked after the journalist's trial if he would go to the state office again he said the following if there is such an opportunity , already having a sentence. yes, if such an opportunity arises, i will have such a desire. the state finally needed so