that was approved by the zoning administrator and includes a horizontal expansion at the rear but doesn't extend to the property line and maintain a three-foot side setback. the subject building application that was submitted in october of 2008. the required neighborhood notification was completed in august and september of 2009. there were no discretionary review requests filed. the building permit was reviewed and issued and we have the appeal. the proposed application is very reasonable and complies with the guidelines and no way does it maximize the development potential or adverse impact on the neighbor's property and believe that the permit holder's offer of further restricting the hours of construction is a really good neighbor gesture. they could operate seven days a week, 12 hours or so a day, so any effort they would have to reduce that would have to address the neighbor's concerns adequately. thank you. >> good evening. tom, d.b.i. we have a site permit and we are approved on the concept. and obvious they need to -- the project sponsor needs to submit a further review. i do see

the expansion is horizontal, and it works on a network basis. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: not leaders of this movement, but they walked along with the movement. the presence has strengthened the movement. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: within this movement people with different ideologies exist, different groups, some of them believe that we have to throw the constitution out. [speaking in native tongue]

expansion? a wax there is a horizontal and addition. >> -- >> there is horizontal i edition. -- addition. >> thank you. anything further? no? nine commissioners, the matter is submitted. >> it seems as though we have not have one of these in a while. it is always done if there is mutual consent, so we had and a legal unit, and to accommodate the individual living there -- and we had an illegal unit, and in order to accommodate, if the individual allowed to of -- agreed to allow them to stay there, we would go through the process of legalizing it, rather than the process of some apartment, probably planning, to have the individual move out. it is unfortunate someone was there, but the reasons are pretty compelling to grant the individual who bought this house to go ahead with his plans and do what he would like to with that building. >> i would follow on a slightly different cas path. the variants is null and void. a permit is null and void, and this indicates the current status of the structure is a single-family home, and if there is no further comments, i am going tuo move to overrule this. >> i

the expansion is horizontal, and it works on a network basis. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: not leaders of this movement, but they walked along with the movement. the presence has strengthened the movement. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: within this movement people with different ideologies exist, different groups, some of them believe that we have to throw the constitution out. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: something that this will not be possible without bloodshed in. the best thing to do is to use the present constitution. there are articles in the constitution that guarantee people's rights but have never been implemented. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: for example the rights of associations, political parties, and the group's teaching bears sox to children. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: i can't tell which group is going to win. let's wait and see. [speaking in native tongue] >> translator: up to this moment the government does not show any flexibility or listen to the people. [s