the house intel committee as a lead on this issue. they will continue investigating but there's lot of other work house is doing. we've introduced a major deal to lower prescription drug prices. this will be something that we talked about in the next two weeks. we have introduce legislation on background checks for guns that we've already passed, bipartisan. bipartisan. it's before the u.s. senate. we will be putting pressure on the use senate to take that up for a vote, and we also have bills on election security and root out corruption. >> host: on the gun legislation, we've been waiting for a while from the promised legislation from the white house. i wonder what your thoughts are about cooperation on some sort of strengthening aor background checks in the wake of this story and that the president has responded to congressional inquiries about it? >> guest: so for a long time the nra would say, background checks would never have stopped any of these countries. it turns out the last yesterday, background checks would have stopped it.

the house intel committee will track down all of the different witnesses. the administration can provide information if they have nothing to hide or american people can figure they are hiding a lot. host: what is the judiciary committee's role? judiciary had taken the role -- the lead when it came to the robert mueller investigation and other aspects. what you do now? will lookuse intel into the investigation of ukrainian scandal. at some point they will conclude and send the information to judiciary and we will look at it. if necessary, we will hold a hearing for articles of impeachment. host: that is because articles of impeachment have to go through the judiciary committee? caller: if there were going to be articles of impeachment it would first come through the judiciary committee. host: do you think those articles will be narrowly focused on ukraine? caller: i don't know the answer to that. evidence andat the make a decision. liket to say impeachment, the power to declare war are two of the greatest powers. it has to be -- two of the gravest powers. it

have house intel chairman adam schiff questioned for treason. in a series of tweets he posted like every american, i deserve to meet my accuser, especially when this accuser, the so-called whistleblower represented a perfect conversation with a foreign leader in a total inaccurate and fraudulent way. then schiff made up what i actually said by lying to congress. his lies were made in perhaps the most blatant and sinister manner ever seen in the great chamber. he wrote down and read terrible things and said it was from the mouth of the president of the united states. i want schiff questioned at the highest level for fraud and treason. in addition i want to meet not only my accuser, but also the person who illegally gave this information, which was largely incorrect to the whistleblower. was this person spying on the

moments after the complaints went public, chief joseph maguire testified to the house intel committee. he defended the whistleblower and his own handling of the complaint. >> i am not familiar with any prior instances where a whistleblower complaint, touched on such complicated and executive issues. i believe this matter is unprecedented. >> all of this has come fast and fierce. jessica schneider with more from washington. washington. >> the details of the whistleblower's complaint are now fully revealed. and the stunning allegations are two-fold. first, that president trump sought out ukraine's interference for the benefit of his 2020 election campaign. and second, that the white house tried to cover it up. the whistleblower said that senior white house officials locked down all records of that phone call. and they said they were directed by white house lawyers to remove from electronic transcript from the computer system it would normally be on and transfer it to a second system only used for highly sensitive materials. all of this, in what some are saying amounts to a cover-up by t

congressman murphy, a member of the house intel and oversight committees joins us., i appreciate your time. i know it's been a very busy day for you, so we are very grateful that you're on. the reporting is that house speaker nancy pelosi is tasking your committee to take the lead on the impeachment inquiry. what's the plan? how quickly will this move? >> well, thanks, thanks for having me on. i don't know how long it's going to take, but it makes sense that we are conducting this part of the investigation because the whistle-blower's complaint went to the inspector general of the intelligence community. and so we have jurisdiction over the intelligence community, so i think this is the right place to start. >> the house intel chairman adam schiff told my colleague wolf blitzer earlier that he is hoping witnesses will cooperate voluntarily. but if it doesn't happen? could we see subpoenas? >> we could. i mean, you know that the acting d.n.i.maguire today technically appeared under a subpoena. he wasn't willing to necessarily comply immediately, so we may have to res

expect hilton. >> harris: the house intel, adam schiff talking with reporters after talking with the dni chief. let's watch. >> it lays out a scheme to use the leverage of the president, to use the leverage of the vital military assistance to a foreign nation to provide or obtain dirt on at political opponent. it's hard to imagine a more serious set of allegations than those contained in the complaint. the complaint goes further, obviously, than the record of the call. in that it also alleges that there were efforts made to conceal this scheme, by moving communications onto servers that were designed for an entirely different purpose. there were designed, in fact, to contain communications of covert action and other highly- highly-sensitive department of intelligence information. it is a deep irony that the department of justice would say this is outside of the jurisdiction of the directional national intelligence, and yet someone felt that this should be put in the place that is used for the protection of the most sensitive of classified information. but what we do know at this poin

the white house and the justice department according to sources who spoke with our colleagues told odni they believe this complaint falls outside of the kind of intel activities that are protected by whistle-blower laws for the intelligence community. the white house counsel's office, the doj's office of legal counsel discussed this with odni and the top intel agency has said there could be an issue of privilege involved here. the intelligence community inspector general fotold lawmaks behind closed doors earlier today he was not authorized to discuss any details about the complaint. not the nature of what president trump may or may not have said not even whether president trump himself is involved as has been reported. as we just heard, house intel chairman adam schiff did not know whether the white house was involved or what pressure was put on acting intelligence director joseph maguire. we are hearing contradictions between the trump appointees. one hand, inspector general, a trump appointee saying it was a credible and urgent complaint from a whistle-blower. then the acting intelligence director joseph maguire saying in his eye it does not mee

maria: i'm back with house intel ranking member devin nunes and congressman, you moment ago discussedhave breaking news, what was that? >> well, few weeks ago general flynn's lawyer filed in court some very surprising claims, made surprising claims, some of which we didn't know, some which we were familiar with, remember we talked on the show about joseph, the professor, diplomat who is kind of like the forest gump figure, he shows up everywhere, he was was the one that originally talk today -- talked to papadopoulos. supposedly, this is what we have been told. general flynn's lawyer filed in court that when general flynn was at the -- the now infamous rt event where general flynn went to russia even though he told the u.s. government i'm going to russia, speak at this event, have a dinner, be with putin, well, guess who was at the dinner according to general flynn's lawyers, joseph. that's what i say, how does this guy show up in late 2015 and then just happens to talk to papadopoulos a few minutes later, happens to be close to british intelligence, happens to be close to christopher

he's briefing the house intel committee on the recent whistleblower complaint regarding the president's communications with a foreign leader. "the washington post" this morning reports the whistleblower's concerns involve a promise that the president allegedly made to that foreign leader. we don't know whom. that's a critical question. there are many outstanding questions on this front this morning. let's talk about this and a lot more with florida democratic congresswoman, a member of the house judiciary committee. thanks for being with me. >> good morning. >> what is your reaction to "the washington post" reporting that someone in the intel community heard the president make a, quote, promise, according to "the washington post," to a foreign leader that was so troubling they took it to the inspector general and now there's a fight over whether members of congress can actually see that even though it's the law that they see it within seven days? >> i am extremely concerned to wake up to the news. we need to understand exactly what promise he made and who he was exactly talking to. what

we learned of a whistleblower just this month, friday the 13th, when house intel chairman adam schiffued a subpoena to the acting director of national intelligence joseph maguire. this was more than a month after the complaint was originally filed. schiff wouldn't find out about the complaint until september 9. a day later, schiff demands maguire turnover the complaint. and september 17th, maguire refuses to testify. 24 hours later, he says that he will brief the house intel committee. and now we start to learn more about what the complaint was about. on september 19, the "washington post" and "new york times" report the whistleblower's concern because partly in regards to ukraine. 9 ne the next day reporting that president trump pressed ukranian government to investigate joe biden's son. now to tuesday of this week, trump announces the white house will release a transcript of his call with zelensky, the same day nancy pelosi announces a formal impeachment inquiry into the president. and before the day is over, schiff says the whistleblower is interested in testifying. to wednesday as

house intel chairman adam schiff says it's important that the whistleblower's identity also be protected in the course of acquiring this testimony. this as allies of president trump were out in full force today defending the president, attacking the whistleblower and questioning their motives. but the whistleblower's testimony is just one small part of a broad range of things related to the ukrainian controversy that house democrats are looking for. they want to see all kinds of documents related to president trump's now infamous call with ukrainian president zelensky and get testimony from a number of different witnesses. on friday we saw secretary of state mike pompeo subpoenaed by three different congressional committees. they are looking for documents from pomp greo and the state department by friday. they're also looking for depositions from top state department officials including curt volker. there's going to be a lot of pressure on the white house to hand over these documents and make these witnesses available particularly given the deadline placed on pompeo. house democrats have

maria: i'm back with house intel ranking member devin nunes and congressman, you moment ago discussedhave breaking news, what was that? >> well, few weeks ago general flynn's lawyer filed in court some very surprising claims, made surprising claims, some of which we didn't know, some which we were familiar with, remember we talked on the show about joseph, the professor, diplomat who is kind of like the forest gump figure, he shows up everywhere, he was was the one that originally talk today -- talked to papadopoulos. supposedly, this is what we have been told. general flynn's lawyer filed in court that when general flynn was at the -- the now infamous rt event where general flynn went to russia even though he told the u.s. government i'm going to russia, speak at this event, have a dinner, be with putin, well, guess who was at the dinner according to general flynn's lawyers, joseph. that's what i say, how does this guy show up in late 2015 and then just happens to talk to papadopoulos a few minutes later, happens to be close to british intelligence, happens to be close to christopher

in my hand, new information about that whistleblower claim that the dni has not sent to the house intel committee. this is their explanation for why it's not going to happen. where it stands, what is likely to follow, we'll take you through it on our watch. today of the first impeachment hearing did hauling in the president's ex-campaign manager help or harm the democrats' potential be obstruction case? cuomo's court is about to convene. it's the perfect night for it. and if the president really loves hispanics, more than the country as he said last night, he sure has a warped way of showing it. we have a trump loyalist caught in the middle of the latest mega rally madness. and sean spicer drawing you a deep stage conspiracy after his "dancing with the stars" debut. we have some hard truths for our lime lad. what do you say? let's gets after it. all right. so look, on the impeachment front, democrats had to know what they were going to get from corey lewandowski at this first official impeachment hearing -- nothing but a fight. >> how many times did he direct you to deliver a message to

another important development this morning, house intel chairman, adam schiff, says the whistle-blower wants to speak to his committee. that could come as early as this week. clearly there's a lot going on. we're covering this story from every angle this morning. let's begin with manu raj u on the hill. it has not even been 24 hours, and wow, how things have changed. >> reporter: yeah, no question about it. even though subtan tifly the investigations will essentially continue as they have been doing, the six different committees on capitol hill and the house have already been investigating automatll aspectse presidency, his business, and that will continue, the fact that the speaker put her blessing on moving forward with impeachment proceedings essentially is a green light for this house to potentially move forward to make president trump just the third president in u.s. history to be impeached. now that this investigation is formally under way, we expect a decision about whether or not to actually recommend articles of impeachment to be made before the end of the year. that's the goa

department officials. >> while the acting director of national intelligence testified before the house intelommittee yesterday, speaker nancy pelosi lambasted his handling of the whistleblower complaint by consulting the white house before lawmakers. >> i think what the dni did was broke the law. the law is very clear. the dni shall convey the complaint to the intention committee. the very idea that the subject of the complaint is who he went to, to find out it was okay, to go forward, i think is wrong. >> pelosi also accused the white house of a quote coverup based on allegations laid out in the report. >> the complaint reports a quote repeated abuse of an electronic records system designed to store classified sensitive national security information. which the white house used to hide information of a political nature. this is a coverup. this is a coverup. >> meanwhile, minority leader chuck schumer took to the senate floor to furth he question the trump administration's purported actions. >> if this was all so innocent, why did so many officials in the white house, in the justice departmen

also the video he can pleasing house intel chairman adam schiff's mendacity. corrupt intent.e'll take that up with congressman matt gaetz after these quick messages. please stay with us. that liberty mutual customizes home insurance, so they'll only pay for what they need. your turn to keep watch, limu. wake me up if you see anything. [ snoring ] [ loud squawking and siren blaring ] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ no, just a sec. what would it look like if we listened more? could the right voice, the right set of words, bring us all just a little closer? get us to open up? even push us further? it could, if we took the time to listen. the most inspiring minds, the most compelling stories. download audible and listen for a change. to the wait did frowe just win-ners. prouders everyone uses their phone differently. that's why xfinity mobile let's you design your own data. now you can share it between lines. mix with unlimited, and switch it up at anytime so you only pay for what you need. it's a different kind of wireless network designed to

. >> as for the next steps, speaker pelosi has assigned the house intel committee to take the lead on the impeachment inquiry. the probe will focus on allegations related to the ukraine call. >> the complaint reports a, quote, repeated abuse of an electronics record system designed to store classified, sensitive national security information, which the white house used to hide information of a political nature. this is a cover-up. >> democrats are hoping to vote on formal articles of impeachment before the holidays. they don't plan to make robert mueller's report central to their investigation. >>> mueller's report's misconduct were widely panned for turning into a circus. impeachment requires a majority of the white house. removal from office requires two-thirds of the senate, which is controlled by the gop. >>> and president trump responded angrily about the whistleblower complaint. he said whoever spoke to the whistleblower is a traitor and alluded to execution as a punishment. >> who is the person who gave the whistleblower the information? that's close to a spy. you know what we

good luck to adam schiff and others to go hold the white house to account. not for the inteleport on the white house. >> but if they don't give read outs of the calls, how else would anyone know what's being said? >> why would they give read outs on the calls? the president has a right to talk to foreign leaders without the congress knowing everything he says. that's different than saying did he do something that broke the law. that's different. did he do something that violated regulations on how you conduct intelligence activities? if the president wants to tell kim jong-un or president putin here i promise you this and it's not illegal, i don't know why the intel guys -- >> i hear you and i appreciate the analysis. i'm saying i guess the open question for both of us is what did he say? why did it concern this person enough to lodge the complain, and does it go to what your threshold is it a violation of the law? >> the question is did the individual heard something he was so offended by he felt he needed to report or did he hear something he thought reached the threshold o

the other thing that i am actually encouraged by is the speaker of the house wanting the house intel committee to take a lead role in all of this. i am encouraged by all that because evidence is out there. what do i mean by that? i mean even humans resist subpoenas and lewandowski did not answer questions within the intelligence committee, there is electronic intercepts, there is other ultra sensitive evidence that'll tell us how the russians or how the saudis reacted to the conversations they had with trump and that of the end of the conversation is likely captured and the house intel committee needs access to that because that evidence will not lie. >> frank, thank you for your analysis tonight. frank figliuzzi and barbara mcquade and jonathan allen. we appreciate you guys. there are 29 more minutes and we can call it quit for the weekend. >> coming up, we got more on the impeachment. the secretary of state was subpoenaed for documents pertaining to ukraine. "the 11th hour" is back after this. ter this >>> we expect the administration to do everything they can to shut us down. when

rudy giuliani is calling for an impartial, independent chair of the house intel committee. enough to remember when devin nunes chaired that committee. there's that. let's talk about where this goes. schiff made it clear last night on "60 minutes" they are going to subpoena documents from rudy giuliani within a few weeks. where does this go? >> look, it's a congressional subpoena like any other. it's a committee in the house of representatives have the same sort of powers to subpoena, so there's really nothing for rudy giuliani to stand on when he says or suggests he's not going to comply. he doesn't actually end up saying when pressed, and this is reflected in conversations i've had with him as well, when pressed he doesn't actually say he's not going to comply. but he is taking those opportunities when asked to trash adam schiff, to call the committee illegitimate. i think that's really part of his effort to sort of push not any sort of legal case, but really sort of a public affairs case, which is really what giuliani's role is in trump's orbit. >> you call this in your p

house intel chair adam schiff looking more like he was auditioning for a part in a movie than tryingo do his job. watch. >> i want you to make up dirt on my political opponent, understand? lots of it. you know what i'm asking, so i will only say this a few more times in a few more ways. by the way, don't call me again, i will call you when you have done what i asked. lou: there is only one problem with this. the president never said those words. congressman schiff just made it up. we'll be exposing some of the other lies we heard today. maybe the democrats should be careful what they wished for. most of americans say they don't want to see the president impeached and they are using their wallets to back that up. rnc chair ronna mcdaniel is here with that. what if i told you, proof that the left's assault on capitalism has it exactly backwards and is dangerous for our country and middle class. "trish regan primetime" begins right now. good evening, i'm david asman in for trish. our top story tonight, major theatrics on capitol hill. house intel chairman adam schiff amping up the drama

committee and now of course you're the ranking member of the house intel committee.nd it voches the fusion gps related company called a campaign for accounting. would you believe not only tried to harass and intimidate you, but your wife who is a schoolteacher, publishing her e-mails and doing everything they could the closer you got to information to show the corruption at the department of justice and the fbi. how -- you filed a rico statute and of course that has to do with the corruption, organized criminal enterprise. but you filed it civilly. you expect to get a trial date soon. what do you expect to get out of this and what is the essence of your complaint? >> well, what people have to understand out there is that, you know, we're not going to be able to fight these fights just on the legislative battlefield. the left for decades have been using the courts. they've corrupted the courts. we need the third branch of government to step up and start to do their job. one of the ways we can do this is by bringing case to the courts. and so i'm filing against fusion

house intel chairman adam schiff says this -- >> what this whistle-blower said about the nature of that call has been borne out in great detail by the call record that has now been released. so in a very substantial part, this whistle-blower has already been found to be credible. >> so let's go through this. in the very first paragraph of the complaint, the whistle-blower lays out the main allegations and they are shocking, saying the president used the power of his office -- used the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 election, including, quote, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the president's main domestic political rivals. in the rough transcript of the president's call with the president of ukraine, remember that transcript was released by the white house itself, there is this, and i quote, "there's a lot of talk about biden's son, that biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. so whatever you can do with the attorney general would be great. biden went around bragging that he stopped t

again, notably former chief counsel to the house intel committee. susan page, washington bureau chief for usa today. matt zapotosky, national security reporter for "the washington post," and peter baker, chief white house correspondent for "the new york times" who also happens to be co-author of the book "impeachment: an american history." good evening and welcome to you all. jeremy, given your background in this line of work, i'd like to begin with you for our viewers who couldn't see today's live coverage, who have only seen snippets of it, sum up what we witnessed today and sum up for us, if you can, the gravity of what we learned today on live television. >> well, the significance of today really was the putting forth of the whistle-blower complaint. the acting director of national intelligence admiral maguire appeared before the house permanent select committee on intelligence. and his testimony really centered around the process by which that complaint was shared with the white house, the justice department, and then ultimately after some machi

tonight house intel chairman adam schiff gave this explanation about why the white house may be shifting strategy. >> the hearing with the director is having the effect that i had hoped that it would, and that is forcing the administration's hand. i told the director that i'm going to call on him not in closed session but to all the american people to explain why he's the first director to withhold a complaint in violation of the statute. >> earlier today, the senate unanimously, passed a resoluti calling for the whistle-blower complaint to be provided to congress. as all of this unfolds, "the washington post" reports tonight onsh divisions within the white house over ukraine. quote, trump's attempt to pressure the leader of ukraine followed l a months-long fight inside the administration thati sidelined national security officials andd empowered political loyalists including the president's personal lawyer, rudolph giuliani to explain the u.s. relationship with kiev. several officials described tense meetings on ukraine among national security officials at the white house leading up to

they didn't launch investigations went they had house intel and they had a majority in the house.p the right to say anything now? >> i think perhaps not. if you look at what happened with firing the prosecutor after the pressure placed on by biden, but hey, maybe republicans were concerned that if they did press that investigation, they too would have a finger pointed at them that they were working with a foreign government to the detriment of the bidens. how is it okay in one scenario and not another? leland: all right. well, rudy giuliani was on" sunday morning futures" talking about going over to ukraine, among other places. stephen miller was on "fox news sunday," that's coming up after our show. gents, thank you very much. interesting points. >> thanks, leland. leland: all right. sure. molly: a police officer makes a heroic rescue. it was all caught on camera, and that is coming up next. ♪ ♪ ♪ the amount of student loan debt i have i'm embarrassed to even say i felt like i was going to spend my whole adult life paying this off thanks to sofi, i can see the light at the end of

kma complaint that the nation's top national security official is refusing to turn over to the house intelmittee. that's despite a government watchdog calling it a credible and an urgent concern. today the director of national intelligence is refusing to turn over the complaint to the congress and refusing to testify as the house intel chairman schiff has demanded. we're looking at still more erosion at checks on executive branch power and possibly more lawlessness as well. this is weird story. we don't know what the what is, we don't know what the secret is, but it is another example of the stone walling of congress being applied even the most sensitive national security agencies. >> yes. i think, though, it's part of a larger story which doesn't necessarily reflect very well on the democrats in congress. especially after things like the lewandowski hearing yesterday. i mean, there is a sense if not a disarray among the democratic caucus, a sense of toothlessness because it does look like the president and the administration has -- i mean every time they do this it makes it easier to do i

acting dni joseph maguire set to testify before the house intel committee in open session tomorrow. so we may get some answers then. so stand by. we might get some more answers when he testifies. that as sources tell cnn that nancy pelosi wants to keep the impeachment inquiry tightly focused on the president's conversation with the leader of ukraine, a conversation that he asti is still trying to defend today. he did it in a rambling conference at the u.n. after the white house released a rough transcript of that call, and that's important. it's not a verbatim. this is a rough transcript, not verbatim. >> lindsey graham said to me when he read it -- it was very interesting. he's a good man. he's a smart man. he said, i can't believe it. i never you could be this really nice to a person. he said, i cannot believe it. you were so nice. i didn't think you had that in you to be so nice. i was nice. i'm nice to a lot of people. >> nice has nothing to do with it. the president withheld $391 million in aid to ukraine just days before that phone call. $390 million in aid to ukraine just day

in calling the transcript troubling, and gop congressman mike turner said yesterday during the house intelg with the acting dni the following. >> i want to say to the president, this is not okay. that conversation is not okay. and i think it's disappointing to the american public when they read the transcript. >> joining me now is republican congressman james comber of kentucky, a member of the house oversight and government reform committee, congressman we appreciate you taking the time this morning. >> thank you for having me. >> you saw your colleague, mike turner's comments there. do you believe that this call was okay? >> i don't see anything wrong with the call. i've read the transcript. several times. it appears to me that president trump simply asked his counterpart in ukraine to possibly look into potential corruption from the biden family, and i don't think that's anything irregular, and my question would be, if president trump is not the appropriate person to ask that question, then who is? >> let me ask you a question though, let's read directly from the transcript. here is how

this is just coming in to cnn from the head of the house intel committee. that is congressman adam schiff of california. he issued a subpoena to the president's acting director of national intelligence. here is the accusation. joseph mcguire is the acting. he says, schiff, that mcguire is illegally with holding a whistleblower complaint, possibly to protect president trump and taking extraordinary steps, says the congressman, to withhold the complaint from congress, which he says is where it is supposed to go. schiff says, quote, the inspector general of the intelligence committee found that complaint not only credible, but urgent. more than ten days since the director was obligated to transmit the complaint to the intel committees, the committee has still not received the disclosure from the director in violation of the law. the committee can only conclude that the serious misconduct at issue involves the president of the united states and/or other senior white house or administration officials. now, we just happen to have the chair of the house judiciary

>> the house intel committee is the lead on this issue, they'll continue investigating but there is other work the house is doing. we have introduced a major bill to lower prescription drug prices this is something we'll talk about in the next two weeks. we also have introduced legislation on background checks for guns that we've already passed, bipartisan, it's before the u.s. senate. we're going to be putting pressure on the u.s. senate to take that up for a vote. and we also have laws -- i'm sorry bills that i hope become laws on election security and to root out corruption we'll talk about those issues as well. >> on the gun legislation weave been waiting for a while from the promised legislation from the white house. i wonder what your thoughts are about cooperation on some sort of strengthening of background checks in the wake of this story and how the president has responded to congressional inquiries about it. >> so for a long time, the nra would say, you know, background checks would never have stopped any of these gun crimes and it turns out the last mass shooting, background ch

here's what trump said today while arguing house intel chair adam schiff is ignoring biden's actions.oesn't talk about joe biden firing a prosecutor, and if that prosecutor's not fired he's not going to give him money from the united states of america. >> and trump has said again and again that biden, you know, did this for a specific reason. he wanted this prosecutor fired and held up the money for specific reason which was to protect his son from a corruption investigation. >> he wouldn't give, i think it was billions of dollars to ukraine, unless they fired the prosecutor who was looking at his son and his son's company. >> now, let's just be very clear, there's been absolutely no evidence that the former vice president did this, did anything wrong. out front now, democratic governor who sits on the house foreign affairs committee. i appreciate your time. not only are you a sitting member of congress, you were under the obama administration. when president trump said he got him fired to protection his son as a motive you were there. tell us what really happened. >> so here's what h

acting dni joseph maguire set to testify before the house intel committee in open session tomorrow. so we may get some answers then. so stand by. we might get some more answers when he testifies. that as sources tell cnn that nancy pelosi wants to keep the impeachment inquiry tightly focused on the president's conversation with the leader of ukraine, a conversation that he is still trying to defend today. he did it in a rambling conference at the u.n. after the white house released a rough transcript of that call, and that's important. it's not a verbatim. this is a rough transcript, not verbatim. >> lindsey graham said to me when he read it -- it was very interesting. he's a good man. he's a smart man. he said, i can't believe it. i never you could be this really nice to a person. he said, i cannot believe it. you were so nice. i didn't think you had that in you to be so nice. i was nice. i'm nice to a lot of people. >> nice has nothing to do with it. the president withheld $391 million in aid to ukraine just days before that phone call. $390 million in aid to ukraine just days bef

the house intel committee will track down all of the different witnesses.dministration can provide information if they have nothing to hide or american people can figure they are hiding a lot. host: what is the judiciary committee's role? judiciary had taken the role -- the lead when it came to the robert mueller investigation and other aspects. what you do now? will lookuse intel into the investigation of ukrainian scandal. at some point they will conclude and send the information to judiciary and we will look at it. if necessary, we will hold a hearing for articles of impeachment. host: that is because articles of impeachment have to go through the judiciary committee? caller: if there were going to be articles of impeachment it would first come through the judiciary committee. host: do you think those articles will be narrowly focused on ukraine? caller: i don't know the answer to that. evidence andat the make a decision. liket to say impeachment, the power to declare war are two of the greatest powers. it has to be -- two of the gravest powers. it has t

an exclusive interview with republican doug collins along with congressman john ratcliffe on the house intelcial guests at 10 a.m. live over on fox news. right here on fox business, start smart weekdays, 6-9 a.m. eastern for "mornings with maria" right here on fox business. hope you'll join us as we set the tone for the day and kick off the day every weekday. that'll do it for this weekend. thanks so much for joining me. i'll see you again nexthave a ge weekend, everybody. ♪ ♪ gerry: hello and welcome to "wall street journal at large." well, the national football league kicked off its 100th season last night. the sport takes in billions of dollars in ticket sales and tv revenue including from our parent company, fox. adding to the excitement for fans this year is the anticipation surrounding a new crop of young quarterbacks including the number one draft pick, murray of the cardinals, as well as baker mayfield in

and later, pelosi's strategy as the house intel chief says that donald trump has betrayed america. and of course, later in the hour, a little bit of rudy letting loose. >> insiders are saying you mucked this up. your response? >> man, i really did? and you know who i did it at the request of? the state department. >> rudy gonna rudy, but the beat gonna beat, so stay tuned. we'll be back in a moment. , so d we'll be back in a moment. hout) hout) i have moderate to severe pnow, there's skyrizi. ♪ things are getting clearer, yeah i feel free ♪ ♪ to bare my skin ♪ yeah that's all me. ♪ nothing and me go hand in hand ♪ ♪ nothing on my skin ♪ that's my new plan. ♪ nothing is everything. keep your skin clearer with skyrizi. 3 out of 4 people achieved 90% clearer skin at 4 months. of those, nearly 9 out of 10 sustained it through 1 year. and skyrizi is 4 doses a year, after 2 starter doses. ♪ i see nothing in a different way ♪ ♪ and it's my moment so i just gotta say ♪ ♪ nothing is everything skyrizi may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. before treatmen