want to get your reaction to what control you think this rule gives chairman nadler in the house judiciary committeeu expect that on the committee chair. in 1998, we gave the -- the republicans gave the white house exactly the procedural guarantees that the democrats are now giving to the trump white house. it's almost word for word in terms of procedural guarantees. and after those were voted on, they were voted on by voice vote in the committee. here you actually have a house rule in place, which is much stronger than you had in 1998. after those rules were put in place, tom mooney and myself had to meet with the white house counsel to discuss the implementation of those rules. while there was intense disagreement during the 1998 impeachment, but during the meeting when we had to negotiate how the rules would be carried through, there was complete cooperation by the white house. the clinton white house cooperated every step along the way, even though there was intense disagreement on the overall impeachment, and that's totally contrary today. republicans have painted themselves in a corner by rely

i'll be getting reaction from a democrat on the house judiciary committee, congressman steve cohen and correspondents and analysts are also standing by. let's go to the white house for, and cnn white house correspondent kaitlyn collins.

this clip features several members of the house judiciary committee which eventually voted to submit e articles of impeachment to the full house. it begins with the venerable texas congresswoman barbara jordan. >> earlier today, we heard the beginning of the preamble to the coconstition of e ununit states. "we the people." it is very eloent getting. but when that document was completed on the 1h of september in 1787, i wanot includedn that " the people." i felt somehow for many arars at georg washington and exexande hamilton just left me out by mistake. but througththe process of endmento interprpration, a court decision, i h he finall beenncluded in "we, ee ople." inquisitor and hypeolole wouldot be fictional and uld d no overstate the psalm isis i fl ririgh now. my faithn the constitution is whol complet i it is total. and i'm not ining to sit here and ben n idol spectator to the demolition, theubversio the .eruction of eonstitutn >> it isn the e esidency that is in jeoeopay from us.s. we w wou strtrivto strtrgthen and ptect the psidency. t ifif tre be no acaccotabilityanotothe pres

during watergate and the impeachment of president clinton, the full house voted to direct the house judiciary committee to open impeachment proceedings. that -- but -- but during watergate, the full house didn't vote on the impeachment of richard nixon, is that correct? >> correct. the house voted to authorize the house judiciary committee to start an impeachment inquiry. but we had already started by the time they gave us that authorization. we had picked staff. we already been studying the high-crimes and misdemeanors, the constitutional standard for impeachment. so we'd done some work already well before the house voted authorization. and by the way, there's nothing in the constitution that requires it. it's just whether you follow precedent. but if the republicans are so concerned about precedent here, then why don't they keep their mouth shut about the hearings that are being held, the depositions that are being held behind closed door because the precedent is well established too. you can't have it one way and not the other way. >> in watergate, the pushback from, you know, people who do remember

and the evidence will be shared with the house judiciary committee. that is significant. the house judiciary committee is the panel that will first take a crack on voting of articles of impeachment against the president of the united states. that's expected to happen, potentially, in a matter of weeks, as the democrats press forward on this investigation. plan to move forward on public hearings. now, republicans have been demanding for some time a vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. they say this resolution falls short of what they are demanding. and the democrats say they're are notpeachment inquiry. they don't need to do that. in some ways they are calling the president's bluff and the white house's refusal to turnover documents and prevent witnesses from coming forward. adam schiff, the chairman of the house committee say they will have more depositions. some have been subpoenaed for next week. then, we'll see the public phase before democrats push to impeach this president, this fall or this winter. christine and dave? >> manu raju, thank you. >>> they are saying

the democratic chairman of the house judiciary committee on that decision says, quote, the grand jury information that the administration has tried to block the house from seeing will be critical to our work. meanwhile, the committee's top republican says of that decision, quote, this ruling is dangerous for every american. the grand jury secrecy rules exist to protect knifepoint inne from public disclosure and hearsay that could unfairly harm them. the administration is expected to appeal that decision. the judge found that the house has jurisdiction and can proceed with its impeachment inquiry. back to you guys. arthel: rich, thank you very much. eric: how will all these dynamics play out as the republicans call the meetings unfair, while the democrats push back, saying they're doing exactly what republicans did in the benghazi investigation. joining us now, dave brad, the dean of liberty university. congressman, i'll call you dean. >> thanks, eric. eric: you heard the democratic congressmen say at the deposition, they're not doing anything wrong. do you agree with that? >> i don't

i'm not giving anything more to the house judiciary committee. no more tapes, nothing. he was held accountable in the sense that the house judiciary committee passed articles of impeachment and two members of the gop joined in on that. the problem right now, there is no basis in constitutional history for the argument that the white house lawyer made, lawyers made, regarding the unconstitutionality of speaker pelosis approach. nothing in the constitution that says how the house is supposed to impeach. it doesn't say whether one committee, six committees. also doesn't say how the subpoenas should fly, whether they should come from the chairs of committees or should come from the committee as a whole. in terms of constitutional history, the argument this is invalid is wrong and will be tossed out by some court at some point. i don't think that's what's going on right now. i don't think the white house believes this is true. what they want to do, slow the process, and basically allow the 2020 election to happen before this is adjudicated. >> what about -- you know, obviousl

gained through the house intelligence committee as part of the closed-door depositions, how that could be transferred over from the house intelligence committee over to the house judiciary committee. and why is that important? because the house judiciary committee will take the first step in determining whether or not president trump will be impeached. that committee is the one that will ultimately vote on the articles of impeachment. so this sets forth the procedures there. so now i'm told from democratic sources who were involved in this effort they believe this was necessary in order to step forward the procedures because right now there aren't any clear procedures about how exactly that would work, how exactly the intelligence committee leading this inquiry would give this information over to the house judiciary committee which is a big reason why. but, jake, a significant move because the white house has resisted at all costs turning over information and in part because they said this is not a formalized -- a formal vote to authorize this impeachment inquiry. democrats say they don't need a vote. they say this is not a vote to authorize inquiry but would have the s

then if there's -- once that process is finished, it will then go to the house judiciary committe committee for the committee then to determine whether these acts constitute an impeachable offense. >> then they draw up articles of impeachment. >> correct. >> then in theory the house votes on this. >> correct. but it depends what kind of evidence. well, the democrats and one independent have decided the process needs to start because of the evidence we have already. we don't know all the evidence that's going to be uncovered in this process. and so we don't know the outcome. but the point is the american people have to be able to see the witnesses, have to be able to test their sincerity, have to be able to measure the strength of the case and understand why he should be removed from office. >> pete, you are our resident expert on how this is all going to go down and i appreciate you never overstate your understanding of stuff and you said i don't actually know what happens here because we haven't tried it before. that said, do we have -- do you have some sense of timeline as to how this goe

this is a bit of a rocky start, one republican congressman who sits on the house judiciary committee appeared behind closed doors to ask questions. his committee is interviewing this witness. he objected to the democrat's efforts to kick him out and ultimately they did leave after the house told him to do so. when he left, i asked him why he didn't appear today knowing that he would not be allowed to attend. >> you know the rules of congress, why did you think you could participate? >> because there are no rules. one of the things that we've asked for as republicans is a resolution that would establish the rules of impeachment. so in the absence of any rules, i found it reasonable to look at prior precedent on impeachment, and in the impeachment matters that i've reviewed, there's a lot of involvement from the house judiciary committee. the house judiciary committee began the impeachment inquiry, and now his own members aren't allowed to participate. that came as a shock to me. >> we're going to come back to that in a second, first, let's listen in to the news conference on the death

but the fact of the matter is that house judiciary committee conducted almost all of its proceedings d doors. but this is going to be different in the sense that the house intelligence committee and the other two committees working for it are holding these depositions in secret. but anything that's going to become public will be made public and anything that's going to go to the house judiciary committee will be public. so the public's going to have a chance to examine it. republicans are going to be there to cross-examine the witnesses. the american people will get to see a very fair process. this is the preliminary part of the process. and what's happening, sadly, is that republicans are trying to distract from the damning facts, from the very grave facts that have come out about donald trump by this red herring about process. >> nancy, the president's been remarkably dismissive of the whole process so far actually. they're attacking process but he's been dismissive of it. do you have some sense that the white house is rethinking the strategy on this? i think we've lost nancy's audi

any articles of impeachment would come from the judiciary committee, then sent to the full house. the resolution also lays out due process rights for mr. trump and his lawyers once proceedings move to the judiciary committee. today trump's republican allies in the house argued the resolution and a subsequent vote still do not address their concerns about the process. >> you can't put the genie back in the bottle. a due process starts at the beginning. it doesn't affirm a sham investigation all the way through. >> it's clear pelosi needs to declare a mistrial. this has been a tainted process from the start. >> this process has been illegitimate. it's been without credibility. >> tomorrow afternoon the house rules committee will begin reviewing the draft impeachment resolution. as it moves forward, the top democrat in the senate says he's concerned about the impeachment time line and the president's tendency to try to distract. >> i'm increasingly worried that president trump may want to shut down the government again because of impeachment, an impeachment inquiry. he always likes to

in the house judiciary committee, six of the republican members of voted for articles of impeachment against richard nixon and once the so-called smoking gun tape came out, all of them said afterwards if we had known about that, we would have voted to impeach. moreover, nixon left without a full vote of impeachment in the house because the delegation of republican legislators went to the white house and said mr. president, the case against you is irrefutable, you don't have the votes, it is time for you to go. famously, barry goldwater is asked by president nixon whether or not there were the votes on a potential article and he said yes, mr. president, there are and frankly i would probably vote for it myself. i do want to suggest the republicans and the nixon period were eager to impeach nixon are they were always rigorously neutral, they were not. but they behaved as we would expect american-statesman to behave. they were interested in facts, they were prepared to make hard judgments even when against their own political party. one would at least hope that congress in present day m

get to that point and this is why republicans would love to have open hearings with the house judiciary committee they think they might be able to turn fire on adam schiff. >> dana: all right chad pergram we appreciate all you do press. thank you. the freshman house democrat who is resigning after admitting to an affair with a campaign staffer gave her farewell speech just a short time ago. california congresswoman katie hill says she will step down tomorrow on the way out she blamed what she called a double standard. >> i am leaving now because of a double standard. i am leaving because of a misogynistic culture that gleefully consumed my naked pictures, capitalized on my sexuality and enabled my abusive acts to continue that abuse. it's been hill also apologized to her constituents and ask for forgiveness. she's in the middle of a note divorce with an abusive husband and denies an affair with a male aide. pressure mounted on hell to resign after private photos of her with the campaign staffer rose on the internet. one of the biggest debates in this election season, showed social media companies

house judiciary committee jerry nadler in new york's 10th congressional district former under young stuff a jonathan hertzog joins me now via skype from manhattan and jonathan thanks so much for coming on the show how can you possibly beat the chair of the house judiciary committee jerry nadler he's the man who's going to be part of all the impeachment proceedings maybe. well baykeeper outing me. and the reason i'm running is the fact that in new york's 10th district which is the west side of manhattan and south brooklyn one in 6 folks can't meet their basic needs and one in 5 of our store fronts are closing because of the commerce so it's just an emblem of the fact that we're going through this fundamental economic and technological shift and i'm running on a set of policies that will help move in new york and help move the country forward so that's the main focus and the way will bring campaign across the finish line you have you know on the doorstep if joe biden or i don't know maybe kemal heiresses your presidential candidate how you get here on how you going to run against don't trum

on the house judiciary committee and the u.s. in west has been granted unrestricted access to robert well as reported to russian interference in the 26 day an election democrats demanded it as part of efforts to build an impeachment case against donald trump. indonesian investigators have found boeing a lioness and pilots are all to blame for last year's plane crash which killed everyone on board the boeing 737 max plunged into the sea one of 2 accidents that led to the aircraft being grounded worldwide. reports. it's taken these investigators a year to determine exactly what happened in the final moments of lion air flight $610.00 the final crash report blames a combination of factors including design flaws in boeing 737 max jet as well as maintenance problems and in adequate pilot training. line a plane crashed into the java sea 12 minutes after takeoff from indonesia is capital jakarta all $189.00 people on board died including anton so hardy's cozzens he says he's disappointed with the report's conclusions. we actually had bi

but only if the house judiciary committee feels like holding hearings and calling its own witnesses. in other words, no due process now, maybe some later, but only if we feel like it. no due process now, maybe some later, but only if we feel like it. well, that's not even close to fair. no due process now, maybe some later, but only if we feel like it is not a standard that should ever be applied to any american and it should not be applied here to the president of the united states. now i understand that many house democrats made up that you -- ur minds on impeachment years ago but justice does not evaporate just because washington democrats already made up their minds. now on one final matter, our democratic colleagues do apparently have time to push show votes on messaging resolutions with no chance of becoming law. this week's installment is a democratic effort to limit the flexibility that governors of both parties have utilized to lighten the burdens of obamacare. states have jumped at the opportunity to use waivers to reduce the costs associated with obamacare's mandates, and

house members are going to desert the president. 1974, six out of 17 republicans on the house judiciary committee voted for the first article. seven of the 17 voted for the second. those were tough votes, but they took them. that was an indicator of rising bipartisan support for impeaching and removing the president. i think it is important to look carefully -- if it comes to a house vote on articles of impeachment, will any republicans of the house break ranks? if so, how many? susan collins, ben sasse met mitt romney expressing concerns. is that a sign? many republicans in the senate, but what about that? collinsf i were susan running for reelection in a hotly contested race, i would certainly be expressing concern. there are a few republicans voting -- running for reelection in tough states. colorado is at the top of the list. i would expect them to try to steer a middle course as long as they can. express concern, give the impression, i hope it is a valid impression of being fair-minded. and then hold their fire as long as they can. fromld expect republicans bright red states, republican sena

committee or house democrats? >> we wanted bill barr to come from judiciary committee and he refused to do it when he was going to be questioned by barry burke and or norm eisen. and as we all know, chicken barr didn't show up. >> i vividly remember your kfc appearance. >> and we pointed out the fact that the attorney general was afraid to be questioned by the attorneys who tore lewandowski apart. and barr did chicken out. >> i'm almost out of time. the president's attacks on these whistle-blowers saying that he's searching to try to find out about this whistle-blower, for example. what remedies does congress have, the whistle-blower's attorneys have raised a concern that that person is protected under the law here. so what can congress do? >> i'm not sure exactly what congress's role will be, but there are whistle-blower laws that exist that protect the whistle-blower and he might have to resort to court. i'm not sure what congress can do. i'm sure it's being looked into. what the president is doing to try to ex pose this man in saying that in the old days he would have been shot or hung for treason, is despicab

republicans had claimed that the house judiciary committee cannot begin impeachment proceedings without a formal vote of the house and that even if it could, speaker nancy pelosi is not empowered to simply grant that authority to the judiciary committee. but judge howell rejected those arguments saying these are at worst red herrings and at best incorrect. leading off our discussion tonight are natasha bertrand, lisa graves, former staff member of the senate judiciary committee, and former deputy assistant attorney general under president clinton, and evan mcmullin, former cia operative and independent presidential candidate. he is the cofounder of stand up republican. lisa, this is a ruling that is not going to be, i guess, taken well by house republicans in the white house. they wanted to say over and over again that this impeachment inquiry was illegal, it was unconstitutional because they never held a vote. >> those arguments are simply misplaced and judge howell, the chief judge in the district of columbia, was very clear in her analysis showing why that argument is deeply flawed.

are representing, at this point. >> you know, michael, as you put on your counsel to the house judiciary committee, a former hat you had during the nixon impeachment process and inquiry, what is it that is happening right now with the judiciary committee? they are the committee, they are going to put together the articles of impeachment. have they already warmed up the engine here as they watched the other committees led by adam schiff right now gather all of their data? what are they doing right now? >> well, i think adam schiff is taking the lead. you know, there's nothing in the constitution that requires the house judiciariment to write the articles of impeachment. that's been the case, it was the case in nixon's impeachment resolutions, but here's what could happen. the intelligence committee is having these closed door hearings. they have access to information, confidential information, classified information, that the rest of congress doesn't have access to. the judiciary committee members don't have access to. so i think it is going to fall on adam schiff and his committee to marshal that

district court issued an opinion and order releasing the house -- to the house judiciary committee allortions of the mueller report that were redacted pursuant to 6 e. also states the department of justice has to send this to the house judiciary committee by october 30th. next wednesday. judge how wil noted it needs th grand jury material referenced and cited until the mueller report to avoid possible injustice in the impeachment inquiry that this need for disclosure is greater than the need for continued secrecy and the request is structured to cover only material so needed. jonathan. >> the democratic sources i talked to on capitol hill said in the tea leaves in some of these proceedings, they are expecting this. in addition, they were expecting to get favorable rulings with regard to documents and testimony with don mcgahn, basically the white house's assertion of executive privilege in some of these cases. so this is going to be something received extremely well by them and a signal they're going to start getting some of this information the president's been trying to withhold. >>

you know, there's nothing in the constitution that requires the house judiciary committee to write the articles of impeachment. that's been the case. it was the case in nixon's impeachment resolutions. but here's what could happen. the intelligence committee is having these closed-door hearings. they have access to information, confidential information, classified information, that the rest of congress doesn't have access to. the judiciary committee members don't have access to. so i think it's going to fall on adam schiff and his committee to marshal that evidence, to collect it, and to present an article of impeachment based upon ukraine. but as glen said, i think there are other articles of impeachment. the emoluments is a gross example of that. and the connection between the two is important. the frameworks were very concerned about foreign governments having influence in our affairs. the common denominator between ukraine and emoluments is the foreign governments involvement. getting dirt on a political rival and then padding the bankroll of president trump. both those things are

but even in the house judiciary committee, the republicans who ended up voting for one or two articles of impeachment, a month earlier, they weren't going for it. so there is time for some of these republicans to change. it depends on what they're hearing from home. and that, in turn, depends on the public testimony that's to come starting in about a week or two. you're going to see some of these just big witnesses. like -- like ambassador taylor -- full of credibility. impeccable career. you're going to see them testifying in public. and then when that happens, some of the constituencies might change their minds. >> and the challenge for democrats. can they keep the narrative simple if you're a supporter of impeaching this president? natalie andrews, congressional reporter for the wall street journal. thanks for being here. glenn and jonathan, don't go anywhere. >>> okay. right now, joe biden laying out his policies on criminal justice reform at a forum in south carolina. but another democratic candidate was in the president's crosshairs for threatening to skip that event. and specula

house judiciary committee has been granted unrestricted access to robert miller's reporting to russian interference in the 2016 election democrats demanded it as part of the efforts to build an impeachment case against donald trump. to give the protesters in the levels capitol of clashed with supporters of hezbollah riot police were brought in to try and defuse the situation has blood is a political armed movement and is part of prime minister saad hariri is coalition government its leader hassan nasrallah was that if the government falls there could be a civil war 70 deca has more from beirut. it's the 9th day of these protests and we've seen some trouble already at the protest areas we had a group of men who supported hezbollah enter the square in front of me government not as we're just a couple 100 meters away from here they started throwing stones and sticks the word injuries among the protesters it was very tense people were very scared the police on the ground riot police trying to separate the 2 sides with this is one of the fears number doesn't really matter the political part

. >> reporter: that's right, that's matt gates, a member of the house judiciary committee. the house judiciary committee is not one of the three that is witnessing this person behind closed doors, so when he arrived, they told him he had to leave, that he could not participate in today's proceeding. government brought in the house parliamentarian for a ruling, and the ruling was that he had to leave and he ultimately did and he came out to the cameras and objected to the progress. it just showed the rocky start to this that got off to a slow start as this witness has now been behind closed doors for about three hours. we ever yet to see members emerge, so we're waiting for details to see exactly what she testified to. but we do know there were a lot of questions going in about what she knew about that july phone call between president zelensky and president trump, what she knew about giuliani as well, what she knew about digging into the bidens, what she knew about this. she did leave her post over the summer, so in some ways she is free to testify. the democrats did issue a

then, florida republican matt gaetz, member of the house judiciary committee showed up and was probably told to leave by adam schiff, causing something of a kerfuffle. today's deposition is limited to members of the house oversight, intelligence, and foreign affairs committees only. no matt, something that is ruffling feathers among a few key republicans. >> 423 murmurs of congress who represent three quarters of a million people who don't know what frankly is going on and at some point they're going to be -- it looks like they're going to be asked to vote on this and after seems to me exactly the wrong way to do this. >> so fiona hill left her white house position this past july. before president trump's now-infamous call with ukraine's president. we know she wasn't ready to that call, though cheated work with two other top diplomats at the very center of the impeachment bro. that's marie yovanovitch and gordon sondland. he is slated to appear here on capitol hill on thursday. looking ahead, there are four more officials slated to testify this week and also four documents that have bee

he is the ranking member of the house oversight committee, the member of the house judiciary committeeto say, it was a strong statement and i was very skeptical about it. but it was a strong statement today and you guys ought to be proud of it. >> every republican voted the right way. because they understand what is going on in the unfair and partisan process the speaker pelosi and adam schiff to running. i've been saying this for how long, the trying to impeach the president of the united states 13 months before an election based on an ominous whistleblower with no first-hand knowledge to his bicycle the president, who worked with joe biden and that is the basis, and when the call happened in the whistleblower gets information from somebody who leaked it to him, he writes a memo that says it was a terrible, frightening call. then he waits 18 days until he files a complaint. and just as the president was saying, guess who he goes and sees first, adam schiff staff and nobody tells us that he talks to his staff and adam schiff does not reported. in the form used posta fill out when you f

the chairman of the house judiciary committee plotted among the most brazen example yet of the presence corruption.>>> the apple ceo is calling on the senate to pass immigration reform. immigrants make this country stronger and our economy more dynamic. i urge the senate to move quickly to pass the act. that led to them phasing of the limits on green cards instead of replacing it with the first come first serve system. the house passed a bill last month but the senate has not scheduled a bow. >>> some people say squatters have turned have been e thhomeowners out in test. july. right after that the city squatters moved in it were leaving trash and doing drugs so that home.>> there is always something crazy going on over there. we do not let the kids walk that way. you do not want to see that here.>> they say they got more than 10 calls for service about activity at the home. >>> recently released police type of video gives us a new angle on a dramatic police chase. the hijacking involved a quick > th ing driver. in the back is susanna ma up. >>> the quick thinking driver noticed spike st

congressional democrats, the federal judge has determined the justice department must share with the house judiciary committee jury evidence from the mueller investigation. democrat chairman of the house judiciary committee jerry nadler writes the court's thoughtful ruling recognizes our impeachment inquiry comports with the constitution and rejects the spurious white house claims to the contrary. this grand jury information the administration tried to block is critical to our work. his republican counterpart rights, quote, when we consider removing a democratically listed president our yardstick is historical experience and the decision ignores that. while failing to answer the crucial question of when the suppose it impeachment inquiry actually began. the white house has no comment on the judge's decision. collins is looking forward for the white house to move forward and appeal that decision. leland: we will check back with you later. jillian: defense secretary mark esper says the us will send reinforcements to a syrian oilfield after troops began applying from other parts of the country. benjamin hall got

the next steps, including how hearings will be conducted and transferring evidence to the house judiciary committee. follow the impeachment inquiry, watch life on c-span and c-span3, online at c-span.org or listen live from wherever you are on the free c-span radio app. >> defense secretary mark esper and joint chiefs of staff chair gave more details on the raid in syria this past weekend that led to the death of al baghdadi. from the pentagon, this is 15 minutes. >> good afternoon, everyone. as president trump announced yesterday, united states joint special operations forces conducted a successful raid on saturday night results in the death of abu bakr al baghdadi. baghdadi and the thugs who follow him were responsible for some of the most brutal atrocities of our time. it marks a devastating blow to the remnants of isis following the detrustruction of their caliphate earlier this year. there is no guarantee of success in an operation with this level of difficulty and president trump new this when he made the bold decision to order the raid confident in the expertise of our forces. our service me

>> the house lawyers representing the house judiciary committee make that bombshell accusation and thist filing is part of the house judiciary committee to attempt to obtain the under lying evidence in the mueller probe. so the lawyer writes in this filing, he says not only could those materials demonstrate that, it could also show the campaign's contacts. and to back up there lawyer, he siting a passage in the mueller report where paul manafort says that president trump says they want to be kept up on the efforts. that is the assertion made in this court filing and we should say it was first reported by them from oh lpolitico. >> that means three important things, if the president lied in his written responses, it would be a five year offense. a violation of 5001. two, it now gives the house a heightened legal reason to have a judge order the release of all of the transcripts that the department of justices that been opposing for no real good reason. it seems, other than than to protect the president, and three, sworn grand jury transcript is really strong. they say that transcript can

efforts to enforce congressional subpoenas against executive branch and help and represent house judiciary committee, last and not least led me to write a book that jeff mentioned to end presidency, power of impeachment, the question that we fundamentally sought to answer how impeachment can work and should work in a society as polarized as ours and in a period of democratic decline. in many callings of lawyer, uphold litigant in front of them, advocate for rights, the institution and that was one of guiding principles of justice kennedy's career and i hope one of the guiding principles of my own. we will talk to julius, many others. [laughter] >> we need a list. he will cover it. [laughter] >> so justice broken phone, clerk for justice sutter. it was always at the tail-end his career. i think it was the 100th clerk and there were, i don't know it was annual, but i remember one union of many and i remember sending, former clerks are so old. [laughter] although they've had really breasting careers and i haven't done a math but it's been 20 years since i clerked and i think i'm now in the category. it

first democrats on the house judiciary committee say the decision to hold the next g7 at a trump resort is an example of corruption. ard debt into one monthly payment. and get your interest rate right. so you can save big. get a no-fee personal loan up to $100k. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done. and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ ) doprevagen is the number oneild mempharmacist-recommendeding? the day we'll finally get something done. memory support brand. you can find it in the vitamin aisle in stores everywhere. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. it's an honor to tell you that [ applause ] thank you. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. i love you! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ that's why xfinity mobile lets you design your own data. you can share 1, 3, or 10 gigs of data between lines, mix in lines o

. >> dana: joined me now as a ranking member on the house judiciary committee, georgia republican congressmanoug collins. as these things go, donald trump right there tweeting, "so pathetic to see sleepy joe biden who with his son hunter and to the detriment of the american taxpayer has ripped off at least two countries for millions of dollars coming from a impeachment and i did nothing wrong. joe's failing campaign give him no other choice. you sir are focused on the process and the law. where do you think and things stand now? >> is good to be with you. she said the white house is continuing to hide his actions, and that's not true. the speaker needs to be more careful with what she says because there has not been an impeachment inquiry in any historical fashion. the clinton investigation in the late 90s, the nixon impeachment series, there was always a fairness issue and the american people are beginning to see that nancy pelosi and adam schiff like going behind closed doors where no one can examine what they are doing what they can only leak out information that they want to have and nobo