howard baker. bob dole. we had ronald reagan. george bush. there was a lot of people were running.nd ronald reagan was not the favorite but he was the front runner. and so this process will probably churn for quite a while and a front-runner will emerge that will be the nominee and then it will be a bindery choice. on the democrat side, i remember being with leon in i think we were in tennessee some place and about this time in the calendar year -- >> that's about right. >> and the question came up, who do you think will be the next president of the united states? and leon proudly said, hillary clinton. >> eight years ago. >> that's right. and i said way too early to make that prediction. oh, no. it's going to happen. and i can remember howard dean was going to be president. as i gave speeches around. it's very early. we'll get there. jeb bush would be my choice and i hope he runs. >> we have a few minutes here. what do you think, erskine, quickly. >> just to comment on jeb bush. i've done several of these events on him particularly on education and he's a very impressive person an

the oldody on espn is howard baker term but watergate -- what did commissioner know and when did he know>> espn reported that ray rice reportedly told roger goodell that he did in fact hit his then-fiancÉ, now wife. if that is the case, why is it that roger goodell didn't actually try to seek a bigger punishment or make a bigger deal about this earlier on? the other thing, i got to say, mark, that is surprising to me is that a number of these companies, run by women, like soup,ary barra, campbell pepsi -- why aren't we seeing more of a proactive response from these sponsors? yesterday afternoon our sports reporter was reporting that pepsi has said no comment on this issue. one of the guests on the show said, look, there is no place for no comment right now. ,hey are a sponsor of the nfl an organization run by a woman at that, and then he really would think that pepsi would have more of a response. we have started to see just in the last 24 hours some sponsors come out and be a little more proactive. they have been saying, well, we do not condone domestic violence of any kind, but we are

howard baker. bob dole. we had ronald reagan. george bush. there was a lot of people were running.nd ronald reagan was not the favorite but he was the front runner. and so this process will probably churn for quite a while and a front-runner will emerge that will be the nominee and then it will be a bindery choice. on the democrat side, i remember being with leon in i think we were in tennessee some place and about this time in the calendar year -- >> that's about right. >> and the question came up, who do you think will be the next president of the united states? and leon proudly said, hillary clinton. >> eight years ago. >> that's right. and i said way too early to make that prediction. oh, no. it's going to happen. and i can remember howard dean was going to be president. as i gave speeches around. it's very early. we'll get there. jeb bush would be my choice and i hope he runs. >> we have a few minutes here. what do you think, erskine, quickly. >> just to comment on jeb bush. i've done several of these events on him particularly on education and he's a very impressive person an

senator howard baker was for it. general electric and westing house for for it.d it was quite an uphill fight. but in a stunning defeat of the clench river, we won in the senate 56 -40. that was in 1983. in 1986 against corporate lobbyists, there is a left right convergence between senator grassley, republican of ohio, and a democrat congressman from california to pass the cross claims act. that would give government officials an opportunity, if they blow the whistle, government employees, to share in the recovery that would be pursued by the justice department. that has saved tens of billions of dollars since then. and we see other examples. this is not pie in the sky. we're not sugar coating this convergence. we would have examples as of last year for example, there was a left/right uproar on e-mail et cetera to stop another war in syria, getting u.s. involved in syria. and the left/right in defiance of john boehner and nancy pelosi in the house, almost got a bill through blocking the nsa from drag net snooping. they lost by 12 votes on that. and at the state l

>> well, we think to what howard baker said at the senate commission back with watergate and said whatresident know and when did he know it? there are conflicting reports here. the nfl is standing behind the statement that they had not seen the tapes until yesterday. the ravens are standing by it saying this is the first time they saw it, and they are both saying in conjunction with each other, both the league and the team, that once we saw this videotape, there was no other action we could take. we had to release ray. he is suspended indefinitely from the nfling. >> let's say that that's is true, that they had not seen the tape. they had seen the other tape. >> that showed him pulling an unconscious fiance out of the elevator. could there be more backlash against the nfl? roger goodel and even the ravens. >> absolutely. i was talking to a lot of people in the league yesterday and today, and the question is did we really need the video to make this action? was the story we had already, the fact that he knocked his wife out, and she was unconscious, was that not enough for drastic actio

my understanding is granddad and howard baker, vice chairman, had an agreement they were not going to split on procedural issues, that they were going to work things out together. for example, the vote to send proof as to the white house for the subpoena -- with the subpoena was unanimous. senator baker did not act as a defender of nixon. certainly senator weichert did not. was not aor gurney nonstop partisan for the president. the impeachment hearings the next summer, there were a group of republicans who voted to impeach president nixon before the smoking gun tape came out. i am not sure you could have that kind of result now. we've gotten so politicized and partisan that people are almost afraid to exercise their own judgment in spite of the potential cost to themselves. there were members of the republican party willing to stand up and do what they thought was correct. i think that is one of the legacies of that hearing. quietus on the theory this was some kind of partisan witchhunt. butler decide did to vote for impeachment? why did other members of the house vote that way? why d

we had some formidable foes, ronald reagan was for it, senator howard baker was for it, the general electric and westinghouse were for it, and it was quite an uphill fight. but in a stunning defeat of the clinch river, we won in the senate 56-40. i was in 1983. in 1986, against lobbyists, there was a convergence between senator grassley, republican of iowa, and another senator to pass the false claims act which would give the government officials and opportunity if they blow the whistle, government employees, to share in the recovery that would be pursued by the justice department. and that has saved tens of billions of dollars. and we see other examples. this is not pie in the sky. we are not sugarcoating this convergence. we have examples. as of last year, for example, there was a left-right up for on e-mail to stop another war in syria. the left-right in defiance of john boehner and nancy pelosi and house almost got a bill through blocking the nsa from dragnet snooping. they lost by 12 votes on that. and at the state level, a lot of interesting things are going on. 15 legislatures have pa

and i asked a howard baker question, what did they know of the tape and when did they know it? that's not been answered to my satisfaction. i'm told and i have studied the issue, that it was handled in a typical fashion of similar domestic cases and therefore it really seems to be an indictment of the whole process, at least the way in which it's handled in atlantic county, new jersey. >> jean, if i could go to you. we've seen sponsor after sponsor come forward, speaking out against the nfl, mcdonald's, verizon, pepsico, anheuser-busch. millions of dollars from them go to the league. procter & gamble said, quote, domestic violence is completely unacceptable and we have strongly urged the nfl to address this issue. we'll determine future actions as needed. goodell says he has no plans to resign. but if the sponsors do more than what they've done so far, do you think there will be pressure on team owners and ultimately on goodell to leave? >> i do believe that the pressure will be mounting. it's all key to the sponsors, as you point out. right now, the sponsors and advertisers ar

we had some formidable foes, ronald reagan was for it, senator howard baker was for it, the general electric and westinghouse were for it, and it was quite an uphill fight. but in a stunning defeat of the clinch river, we won in the senate 56-40. i was in 1983. in 1986 come against lobbyists, there was a convergence between senator grassley, republican of bergin, tohoward pass the false claims act which would give the government officials and opportunity if they blow the whistle, government employees, to share in the recovery that would be pursued by the justice department. and that has saved tens of billions of dollars. and we see other examples. this is not pie in the sky. we are not sugarcoating this convergence. we have examples. as of last year, for example, there was a left-right up for on to stop another war in syria. the left-right in defiance of john boehner and nancy pelosi and house almost got a bill through blocking the nsa from dragnet snooping. they lost by 12 votes on that. and at the state level, a lot of interesting things are going on. 15 legislatures have passed juvenile j

and the credibility of frank and colin powell and howard baker and myself, not just as managers, butebody who could figure out a strategy to make those last two years important. when i came back to the white house, who people were writing about was that ronald regan wasn't a lame duck, he was a dead duck. why? because he just lost the united states senate to the democrats for the last two years of his term. regan went out of his way to rebuild a presidency so that we did the canada/u.s. free trade agreement. in hindsight it looks easy. except jim baker, my wonderful predecessor and secretary of the treasure couldn't push it over the line. it took the president to do it. the president had built up a trusting relationship with the congress on both sides of the aisle. he did the strategic arms. we got a supreme court nominee, anthony kennedy from here and california and northern california approved overwhelmingly by a democratic senate. and i know this is going to sound weird, but we had all 13 appropriation bills passed on time. not bad for a b-movie actor in the last two years of his

howard. people had a problem with you again this week. in particular your coverage of the chris baker twitter you said this week can the nfl figure anything out in new york, to not fine or suspend chris baker for his cheap shot on nick foles is a joke. let's see what they said. big dawn one said it was not a cheap shot, it was old fashioned football. i like this one. steven said the play was still live. in any other position, it wouldn't have been a flag. people like you are turning football into a joke. >> well let me just break this down for you. number one the nfl has made many mistakes over the last few months. problem with me, boy, that's a shock, you got a problem with me. it's no longer good old fashioned football. the nfl has taken that away and with that they changed the rules. and with that the official threw a flag and threw chris baker out of the game. genius, get it right. know the rules. the football is different than the way it used to be, okay? >> all right, genius, how about this one. on facebook this week ron house said you probably never played a day of organized sp

howard. >> nfl has made a decision on what the penalty will be on the hit by chris baker on nick foles on sundayi can't believe what the nfl has ♪ >> a teenager caught on camera holding up a deli at gun point in the elmwood section of philadelphia. it happened last friday around 5:00 o'clock in the evening inside the j and a deli on the 6100 block of elmwood avenue. cops say the young robber is no older than 17. police say this surveillance video shows the boy holding a gun and demanding cash. other customers and a small child ran from the store. nobody was hurt during the robbery but the teen escape. >> it has happened again. another pregnant woman shot and killed. the gunfire rang out this time in the ogontz section of philadelphia. >> the woman who was struck was 25 years old and her baby did not survive. >> 25 year old man is in critical condition. fox 29's dave schratwieser is live at police headquarters. day, the second time this month gunfire struck down a pregnant woman. >> reporter: lucy, that's right. another pregnant mother and her unborn child died from gunfire early this morning aro