great are trying to maximize one type of intelligence and we can't know for people people like howard gardner and others that there's multiple types of intelligence that we bring multiple types of intelligence together that we actually get it or problem-solving, more exciting environment and quirkiness in the system. if we get only the kinds of intelligence that lead to the best law firms in new york robust financial institutions in the country, these quick problem-solving types of intelligence, which are real, then we have dollar crosses at the best schools are the worst schools. doesn't matter. we really have to rethink what we do, how we define success in an admissions process. so what i'm saying is that there is a paradox and irony were at the top of the mountain with the best universities in the world and yet if things are so good, why do we feel so that? why do we feel we're in a state of crisis or near crisis? i think that calls for rethinking, but not disbanding of the great universities, for rethinking the way they are organized their values, structures and the way we actually built