that is the loophole that hra would close. everybody has to go through this screening process. what we saw in odessa a few weeks ago was a suspect who had failed a federally licensed background check in 2014 in texas, but for this particular shooting was able to buy one from a private seller and of course he killed seven people. the democrats will highlight that tragedy. you mentioned walmart, a story last week you had on the hill, walmart's decision on guns and ammo in certain places. does that have a nice way and how legislators might make their decisions? guest: certainly, or at least that is the hope of gun reform supporters. they believe corporate america getting behind these things will change the dialogue. even if it does not mean immediate passage of these bills, it is changing the culture and the conversation. things have shifted over this month. it is not just walmart. it was a long list of corporations turning to take internal steps. at the same time, pushing congress to do something. the victims and advocates have not had a lot of sway on capitol hill. nothing has b

more than 8,000 americans have lost their lives as a result of gun violence since we passed hra in februaryt is going to fall on moskow mitch mitch in the senate and president trump. >> while president trump usually enjoys being in the spotlight he's been making the case if democrats continue to investigate his business dealings, they should also look into the deals his predecessor has made since leaving office. the reporters asked trump what he thinks the congressional investigate of president obama's deals with netflix and his book publishing would find, and the president said, well, it was a very substantial deal. plus the book was the highest book ever sold, the highest book ever said, whatever english that is, and there were other thing he did. so i think somebody should if they're going to be looking at me over nonsense, they should be looking at. michelle obama, the former first lady has had the most successful book in nonfiction history. she sold 10 million copies that people wanted to read and paid for. the company made a rough estimate almost $200 million off her book. the deal wi

they called for a vote on hra. >> this is a situation where there will be another shooting. the pressure to act ? bay area supervisors trying to help teachers feeling the effects of the housing crunch. his wife and two young kids and come with him because they could not find an apartment that he could afford. he moved into an rv and jumps from county park to county park. his family lives with relatives several hours away. other teachers have similar stories. >> we don't go into this for the money, we going to because we love kids and we love the fact that we get to change every generation. >> we need to find the properties, need to find investors and projects. my hope is that when people listen to the individual stories of individual teachers, they will understand this is real. >>> this is a story of mass displacement, calling into question what is affordable in the bay area. the tickets for the warriors game go on sale a few hours. we will show you the uniforms they will sport as they make the move across the bay. >> the market opened up 10 minutes ago. the dow is down abou

again, this is the hra statement here and has been unaltered since it's construction in 1926. with the sole exception of the sunroom added in 1933. even the staff agrees with the hre in a sense that the subject property is a contributor to the marina corporation residential historic district as mr. winslow previously attested. so i suppose my question is, why is it that the project sponsor could not have added the vert cavertical addition by retaining the facade. we see this day and day out. many, many projects that, you know, do vertical additions and maintain the facade or even if they do make vertical additions with a new structure and new facade, they have a front setback. so that is quite unusual for us to see that this beauty, this is a contributor to the historic resource and does have its twin next door being defaced and not existing with vertical conditions that start with the front setback. and also, as mr. frankle pointed out, it is the prevailing pattern in the marina, where you would have taller buildings and corner streets and then shorter buildings in between. s

is engaged, is to examine the impactand hra is engaged, is to examine the impact and what is relevant so when you are assessing proportionality for example, is the thing that the government wants to do, the policy thatis government wants to do, the policy that is being pursued, proportionate to the nature of impact on individual rights that it creates, thatis individual rights that it creates, that is the fundamental question, but you have legal standards at all parts of that analysis and the same is true back to the centre and sandyford, where you have a statute stating the relevant purposes and objectives and legislation that you can interpret. so not merely here are there none, but we submit that the tools for their invention are lacking. what about political advantage or political issues and how all of that phase? again, in common with lord hodge, we understand it was common ground that at least some types of political advantage were common ground accepted, as permissible. and even lord pannick seemed in the course of his submissions to accept that some might be, but how is this c

unless we deal with the reality of private sale and background checks, which is what hra does, we havem on our hands. it is not just the guns. once you get that gun, then you can walk into any store and buy the ammunition because there is no requirement for a background check on ammunition. that's why i am fight fog or jame fighting for jamie's law. >>> walmart, the nra, as you might have seen, is pushing back saying it is shameful to see walmart succumb to the pressure of the anti-gun elites. >> yeah. >> do you consider an anti-gun elitist? >> i consider myself the father of a dead child because of gun violence. now, the nra, which made that statement, they have spent their dues that they have collected on things like hair cuts, hair dye, vacations, suits, and the attempt to buy a house in texas. that to me sounds elitist. what i am trying to do is save lives. no other parent should feel what i feel every second of every day when i wake up >> what is your message to specifically senator mitch mcconnell, who is facing increasing pressure on this, and to president trump, today, right no

this is legislation hra that we have already passed through congress, it passed with bipartisan support now several months ago, earlier this year. and it is sitting on mitch mcconnell's desk in the senate and so far he has refused to bring it forward for a vote. there is a glimmer of hope when trump and the wake of one of these shootings set of course we should have background checks. and mitch mcconnell said maybe we will bring this forward. and unfortunately now that this, the spotlight has moved on, they are not feeling the pressure to carry through on that commitment. so that is really where we come in and where we have the opportunity to come in and continue to keep the heat on. to me there is no excuse, why background checks are not mandatory. whether you are purchasing from a gun shop or a gun show, or from you know a private person. the vast majority of people support this. the other sensible gun safety laws can and should be put in place, it requires the leadership of and the courage of members of congress to do it and it should not require that much courage but in this day and

is what we need to do, this is not controversial, it is well past time that leader mcconnell brings hrathe house inel background checks for the senate floor for a vote. l i hope leader mcconnell will allow president to keep the americans safe act the disarm hate act, and domestic terrorism prevent act, it will keep her children and her neighbor safer. i hope my republican colleagues will join in the bipartisan efforts. thank you and i yield back. >> senator duckworth, let's do this. so we can have a complete record, if you would reduce those three posters to a size that we can copy and bill lee omitted in the record at this point in the hearing without objection. >> thank you very much sir. >> senator young. >> thank you, mr. chairman. i want to thank all of our panelists for being here today, i appreciate your testimony in your answering ours. questions. if we all need to collaborate in curbing online extremism which i understand to be one of multiple causes that we can cite as we all think about the issue of mass casualty events in extremist events more generally. the nation's wrestli

host: hra has passed the house.onnell says he will bring up any votes on gun measures that president trump won't sign. is this one of those measures? once -- one that the president wouldn't sign? why hen't imagine wouldn't sign it. it has a companion measure, the bill sitting on mitch mcconnell's desk. 97% of americans in the last poll support this bill. let me explain for a minute by. the brady law, when enacted a quarter century ago said that federally licensed firearms dealers have to conduct background checks before a gun is sold. what they didn't require is private sellers to make sure that there are background checks. now the sales through gun shows and through the internet mean that about one in five guns sold today are sold with no background check at all. these bills fix that and protect lives on the process. -- in the process. mitch mcconnell said "we are in a discussion on what to do in the wake of the surrender shootings. i have said for several weeks that if the resident took a position on a bill so tha

that is the loophole that hra would close. everybody has to go through this screening process.t we saw in odessa a few weeks ago was a suspect who had failed a federally licensed background check in 2014 in texas, but for this particular shooting was able to buy one from a private seller and of course he killed seven people. the democrats will highlight that tragedy. you mentioned walmart, a story last week you had on the hill, walmart's decision on guns and ammo in certain places. does that have a nice way and how legislators might make their decisions? guest: certainly, or at least that is the hope of gun reform supporters. they believe corporate america getting behind these things will change the dialogue. even if it does not mean immediate passage of these bills, it is changing the culture and the conversation. things have shifted over this month. it is not just walmart. it was a long list of corporations turning to take internal steps. at the same time, pushing congress to do something. the victims and advocates have not had a lot of sway on capitol hill. nothing has been