i'm talking of course about hrc's deeply concerning record on israel. no one in this room can deny that there is an unbalanced focus on one democratic country. no other nation has an entire agenda item set aside to deal with it. year after year there are five or six separate resolutions on israel, this year there was a resolution sponsored by president assad concerning the golan. how i ask is that a sensible priority at the very moment when refugees from syria are flooding in to the golan to escape assad's murder rule and receive treatment from israeli physicians in israeli hospitals. it must be said that the hrc's obsession with israel actually risks underminingly the credibility of the entire organization. it has the potential to limit the good that we have to do. no one should doubt for a second that the united states will measure these things i hope fairly and dispatchitely and a group in a u.n. system to ash arbitrarily isolate israel and not just hrc but where it occurs. when it comes to human rights no country on earth should be free from scrutin

they're called the hrc supervolunteers.hey told "the new york times" there were certain words that they could not use to describe their messianic presidential candidate. they cannot use the words polarize, overconfident, secretive, they cannot say she will do anything to winker they cannot say she is out of touch, and that's just to name a few of the 12 words you cannot say when you're describing hillary clinton. my god, we immediate to talk about this -- we need to talk about this, and look at our final panel. it's joanne nose chin sky, smiling vixen and another smiling vixen to her left is gavin mckin mis, bearded man. >> male model. also a male model. kennedy: are you a beard model? >> i do catalog and runway, but i want to get -- >> he's my favorite. >> i want to do commercials. kennedy: i remember when the jcpenney catalog calm out, and all the boys wanted to look at the bras. we will be watching, reading and protesting coded sexism, so be careful, america. now, gaifn -- gavin, you were probably my favorite sexist, so

speaking of, here's the maryland governor talking about the challenges of hrc. governor o'malley: that inevitable frontrunner is inevitable until he or she is no longer inevitable. i think we will see a conversation about how to restore middle-class opportunity. john: from hillary's point of view, how she looks at things, would it be better for her to have a credible challenger or challengers, or better off with none of that and going to go with the press? mark: she will get martin o'malley helping her out. to his base: governor, but behind his back i call him unemployed. he's close to his faith. i call him governor, but behind his back i call him unemployed. he's close friends with the clintons. the role he will serve will be in the debate and discussion not attacking her, but giving her a sparring partner. john: i was interviewing him this morning and i asked him what kind of campaign are you going to run if you run this campaign? will you run to win coming in the things that people do to run to win? will you attack her? and he said, i've never run a campaign

a group called hrc super volunteers to promising to track the media's use of words they believe are sixistculating. overconfident and secretive are all off the table. >>> from usa today, someone buy pelosi a pool table. she told reporters what she really wanted. >> you didn't request ask me whey wanted for my birthday. >> what did you get? >> i still want a pool table. >> this isn't the first time she has asked for a pool table. she said she wanted one five years ago as well. >>> during a twitter qa he was asked why he had not released a situation with zayn malik and without missing a beat, the mayor responded we are all devastating but he must soldier on. >>> the senate was busy all night. senators were allowed to bring up an unlimited number of amendments. harry reed was trying to hurry up the voting by making some big promises. >> i know that the republican leader bought dinner tonight and i appreciate that very much but if we can finish here by 11:30, i'll buy dinner when we get back. >> i can assure you that didn't happen but fortunately pepperoni rolls were brought in. he shared some

president obama and i support the hrc because we believe in the mission and its possibilities.best this council can be a valuable means for reminding every nation of its commitments and they are responsible when they fail to meet international standards and can respond successfully to domestic human rights challenges as we have seen firsthand advance global norms like lbgt rights and a means for self evaluation on the part of individual nations including through the universal periodic review process and we have seen this type of self examination, that engagement with the international community actually produce real

six years ago, we thought it would for sure be hrc, but that was before barack obama. i bet hardly anybody had money on john mccain. right now as we look at the list on the republican side will it really end up being who appears to be on the top right now? we have jeb bush, marco rubio, scott walker, chris christie, rick perry bobby jindal, carly fiorina, john kasich, mike huckabee, ted cruz rand paul, mike pence, rick santorum, ben carson. and probably a handful of others who may be watching right now saying, i'm thinking about doing that, too. it's what i love about the political process. we just don't know who it will be and why politics are so complicated but really so simple, too. about the only thing we can say for sure right now is we just don't know. and that's what keeps me so, so interested. you can find my take every day on my facebook page and at foxnews.com foxnews.com. >>> coming up on "the real story" today tragic, tragic news about that little boy, the death of that boy shot and killed by a cleveland police officer. but guess what? who the city says is

you've been writing about hrc for the whole week. it's a big story.his tell you about our government that we have to really watch out for? >> transparency is the key to our government. knowing what fish officials are doing. having the opportunity to look over their shoulder. having media examine what they're up to. and, the clintons complete opposite of all of that. they're nixonian. next son didn't destroy the tapes. hillary clinton destroyed emails. >> she destroyed emails. she had her own email system. essentially running a department within a department it seemed. why aren't democrats really rallying behind her here? >> they should be careful. remember, there is enough evidence to, before us, that a hillary clinton administration would get into some major scandals that could be politically troublesome for democrats. first eight years of the clinton administration was great for the clintonss but messed up the democratic party disasterously behind republicans. they lost both houses of congress. lost a whole bunch of governorships. do democrats reall

a supporter at group, hrc have volunteer sent a scolding letter to the "new york times" and 120 journalistsme coverage." you are unnoticed we will be watching reading, listening and protesting, sexism in words like insincere and ambitious, we will do everything to win, represents the past, inevitable, overconfident, defiant, and inside kepts like tired, warn out and haggard. polarizing? calculating? ambitious? we say that stuff about male politicians all the time. the group's founder told me she takes the criticism of hillary clinton personally. >> the way i feel when i see that language that is...thin livid or -- thinly veiled or overt sexism i feel defeated. >> we will hear and talk about this debate for a long-term. still to come your top tweets, nfl inching into the digital age and jon stewart was fox -- right about ferguson but he is still teed off at fox. before i had the shooting, burning, pins-and-needles of diabetic nerve pain, these feet grew up in a family of boys... married my high school sweetheart... and pursued a degree in education. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain

system to arbitrarily and regularly isolate israel >> not just in the hrc, but wherever it occurred.> reporter: samantha power said america would continue to defend israel in the diplomatic arena. the netenyahu speech to congress, she says injects politics into a place where it shouldn't be. >> debating the most effective policy both within our respective democraciesyies is more than useful it is a necessary part of arriving at informed decisions. politicizing that process is not. the stakes are too high for that. >> reporter: tony has this been painful for many on capitol hill. right now the count is 53 all expected to be democrats who will not be at tending the prime minister's speech. >> 53. okay. mike, thank you. coming up at the half hour we will talk more about the complicated relationship between the united states and israel. a large-scale offensive is underway in iraq. shia fighters are trying to take back tikrit. jamie, the u.s.-lead coalition is not part of this operation. tell us why. >> reporter: well, you know, tony, the told expreks is the enemy of my enemy is my friend

a group of hillary clinton supporters not associated with her calling itself the hrc super-volunteers is out with a list of 13 years. reminds me of george carlin. and phrases they say are sexist if anyone uses them to discuss hillary clinton. these are the list. i want you to jump on these. i want to take each one at a time. is the word "polarizing" sexist? >> no. >> okay. by the way, jump -- >> i like being the ruler here. >> i only have one woman here. "calculating"? >> no. >> "disingenuous"? >> no. >> "insincere"? >> no. >> ready for this one? "ambitious"? >> ha, ha, ha. ted cruz is ambitious. every -- >> you don't think that term was just reserved often for -- never said a politician is ambitious, but just saying hillary is ambitious is negative? >> no. >> tonal thing. okay. "inevitable"? >> no. inevitable is positive. >> okay. "entitled"? >> true. >> "overconfident"? >> possibly. >> possibly what? >> possibly she is overconfident. >> but is it sexist? >> it has nothing to do with gender. >> not sexist so far. "secretive"? >> true, and not gender related. >> okay. "will do anythin

i want to move you on the hillary clinton, hrc, they can't let it go.f the things that really caught my attention and that i keep thinking about is she kept talking about how she's met all the requirements of the law. in revealing these emails. has she? >> no, she hasn't. first of all, you know i said this once before on your show, she has a history, you know, that is very unfortunate. you go back to white whitewater. file gait. she's been duplicitous. and handled herself around. then trumped these committees by saying i'm turning all these material over. she's obfuscating the fact. (?) the fundamental here is about honesty and about -- it's not about trying to trick your way into the -- the election. you know, she says, don't you want a woman to be president? she defends herself by being a woman. she takes everything out of context. this is just terrible, i think. it's all political. she has a history of this. you know she's not telling the truth. she's going to obfuscate the truth. i hope congress gets at it. >> does she have a point about not putting

the president of the hrc will be my guest and new details on the mental health of the co-pilot whosealps. that and much more coming up next. stick around. i'm not having a heart attack, it's my back. i mean bayer back & body. it works great for pain. bayer back & body provides effective relief for your tough pain. better? yeah...thanks for the tip! ♪ at mfs, we believe in the power of active management. every day, our teams collaborate around the world to actively uncover, discuss and debate investment opportunities. which leads to better decisions for our clients. it's a uniquely collaborative approach you won't find anywhere else. put our global active management expertise to work for you. mfs. there is no expertise without collaboration. there's nothing more romantic than a spontaneous moment. so why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? with cialis for daily use, you don't have to plan around either. it's the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrati

and it's up to the hrc to shed light on it.hose who violate those human rights. >> well, in kiev the very shaky state of the ukraine economy is under the spotlight today, with parliament discussing financial reforms that could cut benefits and push up energy prices. david stern is in kiev for us. >> reporter: outside ukraine's national bank a small but desperate group gathers. because of the collapse of the local currency they say they cannot pay their mortgages. they're demanding the government do something, anything to stabilize the economy. otherwise, they fear they could be forced from their homes. >> in 2008 it goes from $1 to $8. and from that time it is very difficult to pay. and now when the dollar costs, for us 30 it is almost impossible. >> reporter: lunchtime in central kiev is usually the busiest time. but this sushi restaurant off the main square part of a nationwide chain, is half empty. people's salaries are in grevna but the prices here are tied to the dollar. because of this, the restaurant's owner says every d

>>-of- question rereading parts of the book hrc about her time as secretary of state. wondered did all of us in the press miss this giant story about her e-mails? it was hidden in plain sight. she was e-mailing people from a private account. did all of us miss it. >> it's hidden in plain sight if you have access to her server. not many reporters would be e-mailing her directly or them directly. sid blumenthal former reporter e-mailing her about what was going on in libya. maybe he counts. this is a situation where you couldn't possibly know without being on the inside that she had set up this system. look there are a lot of stories missed at the state department. the way in which we missed this one most a lot of us got foia requests denied from the state department that really should have been available to us. >> you're saying that was a sign. that was a sign of something going on. >> right. if you get back to something that says no existing document and you're pretty sure that document exists how the foia letters are often written, perhaps time for other questions, wh

. >> joining me now, the author of the book "hrc" jonathan allen. also professor at fordham university christine greer and david axelrod. david, what is your reaction to secretary clinton's formulation there that this letter was either designed to help the iranians or to harm the president? >> well, i mean, i think you can make that argument either way. obviously, it was -- whatever it was, it was designed to scuttle these negotiations. there's a long way before you get to the logan act and treason to describe it. i think outrageous is a good word for it. this was a blatant attempt by the republicans in the senate to try and undermine these negotiations at a very sensitive stage. none of them can offer a really credible alternative in terms of what happens next, which is always my objection to some of these foreign policy escapades on the part of members of congress. they they have ask what do we do if the talks do fail? and what is a credible response to this. they never really offer one. >> christina greer, david axelrod tweeted when the letter ca

and it's up to the hrc to shed light on it.help to hold accountable those who violate those human rights. >> well john kerry there, highlighting what he sees as the very dreadful situation in eastern ukraine. and no doubt that washington does hold russia partially, at least, responsible for the conditions there. and we do have the united nations report saying there is credible evidence that heavy weaponry and foreign fighters have been crossing the border from russia into eastern ukraine. but, in fact just before i came on air to talk to you, i talked to the head of the u.n. human rights monitoring team for ukraine. and the thing that is concerning him most he says is that now, this shaky cease-fire should hold, give the hundreds of thousands of civilians some space to breathe and go back to their normal life and in the long-term, perhaps, heal very bitter divisions. >> imogen thanks for that. let's look now at what life is like for people in eastern ukraine. the u.n. saying as imogen just said, hundreds of thousands of people

and he wrote about her e-mail use in hrc out in paper back. and we have kasie hunt here with us at the table. and washington post columnist dana mill bank in d.c. welcome to all of you. jonathan she said she opted for convenience that was her explanation for why she used the private e-mail address exclusively and so that was the reasoning, the rational. but she is not planning to turn over her personal server which means that she gets to be the ultimate arbiter of what is and isn't work-related. >> and i think that is the real reason she has a personal server. it took eight days to come to the word convenience. that seems kind of convenient. that could have been tweeted out in one tweet. the other thing she said was that she's taken unprecedented steps, and the reason is because she's taken unprecedented steps to hide her e-mail. i don't think this press conference will do a whole lot to quell the questions about what exactly she was thinking and why she did it. and the one thing we don't have, i imagine she's smart enough not to have e-mailed

where were the people, top diplomats in other countries receiving these e-mails from hrc @yahoo.com ore this. there are so many unanswered questions about this. she a very secretive person. and yet she understands rules and protocol. and for her to just willingly violate it just to preserve some semblance of privacy just really makes no sense. she's got a big speech tomorrow night at the emily's list dinner. she's going to have to address this. >> i suspect she will not have any real addressing of it in that location. jeremy, the cia director in bill clinton's administration got into very serious trouble by having some of his cia information at a computer at home. but nothing like this where in effect all of the electronic communication that she was issuing on e-mail was sent out into a, to a, basically through a private company, to distribute. this is a stunning breach of security. >> right. and that's one of the things that my colleague michael schmitt raises in the story, that we don't know if the e-mail she was using, even though it was personal, was somehow encrypted. there are so

also sexist, according to hrc super volunteers secretive.ng to win, represents the past, and out of touch. wow. and hillary isn't even officially running yet. joining us with reaction, kerry sheffield, senior writer at opportunity lives, along with jessica carlisle. jessica overconfident is sexist? >> i don't know. >> and ambitious? >> new definition of sexist that i wasn't aware of and i'm a woman. i think this was a mistake and now they've done an interview -- the daily mail did an interview with the person behind. this i think what the problem here is it detracts from discussing sexism, which is a huge and real issue in america today. and i think it was a big mistake to do this. this has nothing to do with the hillary clinton campaign. >> i don't know about that. he was a volunteer in 2008. >> a lot of people volunteer. a lot of enthusiastic people out there. >> this is par for the course for the democrats. war on women, war on women. this is more of the same. so this is like the faux war. it's like creating words that somehow, to be hone

hrc and our coalition partners support the introduction of comprehensive nondiscrimination legislation that will protect lgbt americans from discrimination not just in employment but also in housing education, public accommodations, jury service and credit. thank you so much for the opportunity to testify today. >> thank you. miss simmons? >> good morning, mr. chairman, members of the commission. i would like to thank you for inviting the national lgbt task force to participate in this briefing to examine workplace discrimination that is faced by lesbian, gay bisexual and transgender americans. i'm the director of public policy in government affairs for the national lgbt task force the nation's oldest lgbt advocacy organization. today's testimony will examining the scope of federal regulations against lgbt employees. lgbt americans face high levels of employment discrimination. there's an estimated 5.4 million lgbt workers in the united states. discrimination against lgbt people in the workplace persist despite the increasing visibility of these communities, improved local and statewid

hrc supports the introduction of non-discrimination legislation that would protect lgbt americans from discrimination not just in employment, but also in housing, education, accommodation, jury service, and credit. thank you for the opportunity to testify today. >> i am the director of public policy for the national lgb t to task force. the testimony will examine the protections to eliminate workplace discrimination against lgbt employees. lgbt americans face high level of discrimination. 5.4 million workers in the united states. discrimination in the workplace persists despite the increasing visibility of these communities and local protections against anti-lgbt prejudice and violence. the data indicates that employment discrimination can lead to a significant impact on the well-being of lgbt people. over 50 studies of discrimination against lgbt people have been conducted. lgb people have significant barriers to equality for studies of been conducted about transgender people. in a joint effort with the national center for transgender equality, a report was published. this document at

hrc supports the introduction of non-discrimination legislation that would protect lgbt americans from discrimination not just in employment, but also in housing education accommodation, jury service, and credit. thank you for the opportunity to testify today. >> i am the director of public policy for the national lgb t to task force. the testimony will examine the protections to eliminate workplace discrimination against lgbt employees. lgbt americans face high level of discrimination. 5.4 million workers in the united states. discrimination in the workplace persists despite the increasing visibility of these communities and local protections against anti-lgbt prejudice and violence. the data indicates that employment discrimination can lead to a significant impact on the well-being of lgbt people. over 50 studies of discrimination against lgbt people have been conducted. lg be people have significant barriers to equality for studies of been conducted about transgender people. in a joint effort with the national center for transgender equality, a report was published. this document at

hrc and our coalition partners support the introduction of comprehensive nondiscrimination legislation that will protect lgbt americans from discrimination not just in employment but also in housing, education, public accommodations, jury service and credit. thank you so much for the opportunity to testify today. >> thank you. miss simmons? >> good morning, mr. chairman, members of the commission. i would like to thank you for inviting the national lgbt task force to participate in this briefing to examine workplace discrimination that is faced by lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender americans. i'm the director of public policy in government affairs for the national lgbt task force, the nation's oldest lgbt advocacy organization. today's testimony will examine the scope of federal regulations against lgbt employees. lgbt americans face high levels of employment discrimination. there's an estimated 5.4 million lgbt workers in the united states. discrimination against lgbt people in the workplace persist, despite the increasing visibility of these communities, improved local and statew

hrc is like hrh, isn't it? but this is hilary clinton, right? but interesting piece in the post.hington post and in the new york times saying that democratic party and the majority says we're sticking with her and as a result they didn't even look that closely at whether that was a great performance or he has tanlt performance or whatever. they don't care. this is going to be who they're with anyway. >> i think that's right, joe. i think it's basically a judgment of that's good enough for us. >> i saw it a couple of times. >> there's a lot of criticism including from former colleagues in the administration, the choice she made to co-mingle the private and official e-mails but people are not taking that extra step and saying huge problem, you know think twice about running running. 86% of democrats say they're open to embracing hilary clinton. they believe she is on track to win the presidency. that's why people aren't taking seriously the idea of elizabeth warren or whatever. >> the one other point to make was that some are saying that not only -- it may be that she's not campaig

. >> i think the e-mail is hrc 22@clintoncoverup.com. >> first we'll start with a fox news alert forbing the deadly one at the boston marathon justice may finally be served. opening arguments will be heard later today as tsarnaev faces the delth penalty if convicted good morning. >> good morning. after being delayed because of this historically bad weather as well as a jury selection process that turned out to be much tougher than anyone expected the opening arguments expected to get underway at 9:00 this morning. tsarnaev is accused of placing two bombs at the finish line of the 2013 boston marathon. later it's alleged they murdered a mit police officers. his wife remains under suspicion. her attorney said she had no knowledge of her husband's plans. her lawyers saying she had been cooperative and there is no word she'll be testifying. ads the trial gets underway, people all over boston and massachusetts have pretty strong feelings. >> i'm not sure you're going to find anybody anywhere who hasn't heard about it. but will people try to listen to the evidence and base on the evidence?

hrc@hot mail.com. >>. then they decide what they are going to release.ring. this is what happens every time she starts to run. it brings up memories of eight years that people look back and have glossed over a lot of things. but every day in washington, d.c. there was another example of how they just didn't play by the same rules as everybody else in washington, d.c. and then they lawyered themselves up. >> i don't think we're overstating it. >> it's taking money from foreign country its, they know no boundaries. this is shocking. >> i think it is. i think it's going one step beyond biting the hand that feeds you. giving it the you know what. it's ridiculous. >> richard you live in this world. how stunning is it that a secretary of state ignores federal guidelines and has her own private e-mail conducting business as secretary of state and then says i'll release these e-mails. >> when you work for the government, you give up the luxury of private e-mail. >> i thought you did. >> unless you're a clinton. >> the question is who it belongs to. there's the c