on disability the e hrc is was their decision to abolish disability commissioner and the question is the question is what is being done to help disabled people and how can we ensure for helping disabled people. that is why we are committed to tackling the injustices of this they will be face with sending over 50 billion-a-year of benefits with health conditions at record type of course we do want to ensure and i urge the hrc to in their work they are paying proper attention to the needs and rights of disabled people because that is an important part of their [inaudible] >> mr. speaker, my constituents was killed by a driver taking a lesson with one in four young drivers been involved in an accident within the first few years there starting to drive and 400 deaths or serious injuries involving young drivers each year will the prime minister meet in my constituents to meet and hear their story and consider the graduated lightingg system. >> i will certainly look at the request that she has made and i will also ask the department of transport to look at this as an issue. she said that t

on disability the e hrc is was their decision to abolish disability commissioner and the question is the question is what is being done to help disabled people and how can we ensure for helping disabled people. that is why we are committed to tackling the injustices of this they will be face with sending over 50 billion-a-year of benefits with health conditions at record type of course we do want to ensure and i urge the hrc to in their work they are paying proper attention to the needs and rights of disabled people because that is an important part of their [inaudible] >> mr. speaker, my constituents was killed by a driver taking a lesson with one in four young drivers been involved in an accident within the first few years there starting to drive and 400 deaths or serious injuries involving young drivers each year will the prime minister meet in my constituents to meet and hear their story and consider the graduated lightingg system. >> i will certainly look at the request that she has made and i will also ask the department of transport to look at this as an issue. she said that t

but of course we do want to ensure and i would urge the hrc to ensure and i would urge the hrc to ensureesson. with one infour learner driver taking a lesson. with one in four young drivers being involved in an accident within the first two years of starting to drive, and 400 deaths or serious injuries on our roads involving young drivers each year, will the prime minister meet with me and my constituents to hear their story and consider the introduction of a graduated licensing system for the uk as they have another countries? the honourable lady has obviously raised an important issue and i will certainly look at the request that she has made. and i will also ask the department for transport to look at this as an issue. as she says there are too many people who suffer a loss and tragedy at the hands of learner drivers in these circumstances and we will certainly look at that. the royal marines are the most adaptable of our elite infantry, central to our amphibious capability and they provide much of our special forces. does the prime minister agree with me that producing them further a

much of the media and republicans focusing on the fisa warrant, you're saying that the real story is hrc. i will say this. i live with someone who has seen the democrat memo. i look at all the reports. the reports are saying that the memo from the democrats is not necessarily discounting or undermining any of the things that were in the republican memo. in my opinion, it's just about -- like you say, you put one out, we'll put one out. we'll start to muddy the waters, we'll start to confuse people. we will put purposely, as trey gowdy said, will put classified information and methods and sources so that the president has to redact it. >> catherinen said, the democratic memo has a deep dive into sources and methods. so the democrats howl because the republican memo was going to reveal all the sources. it never did in four pages. they intentionally put sources and methods in, which we know are the most vulnerable and dangerous part of anything that's classified because it undermines our ability to get that intelligence, then trump has to redact to actually be responsible, all the while whi

showing americans just how the agency was weaponized by the obama officials, dnc, hrc. hillary clinton to target political adversaries #release the memo. when it's released, what's in it? >> republicans for a couple of weeks now have hyped up this memo as something that will cause people at the f.b.i. to lose their jobs, that will expose corruption. there is a reason why the f.b.i. is pushing back on this. of course this week we saw director christopher wray ask in a final plea the names of f.b.i. agents in this memo be redacted but the problem for republicans is living up to the hype first of all from a political perspective and second the issue is going to be if it really is as bad and the abuses are as bad as republicans have alleged what will they do about it moving forward? will they take on fisa reform? going to hold f.b.i. agents who allegedly took part in this corruption and misbehavior and abuse of the process accountable? will people lose their jobs? as we've seen before with the federal government in terms of abusing power, it is very difficult to hold these

does anyone wish to comment on the draft meeting minutes, cha, december 20, hpc, december 20, 2017, or hrcnuary 18, 2017. seeing none, we'll close public comment. do i have a motion to adopt minutes. >> motion. >> second. >> clerk: thank you, to adopt the minutes as have been amended, on that motion. [ roll call. ] >> clerk: so moved, commissioners. that motion passes unanimously 6-0 and places us on item 5, commission comments and questions. >> there appear to be no comments or questions. >> clerk: very good. item six, election of officers. in accordance with the rules and regulations of the historic preservation commission, the president and vice president shall be elected at the first meeting of the historic commission held after the first day of january each year or at a subsequent meeting which was established for today. >> thank you. commissioner johnck? >> commissioner johnck: yes, i think we should recognition of the very fine work that they have done, i move that we elect commissioner wolfram as our president and commissioner hyland as vice president for another year, should they

before -- already knew who was paying christopher steele, who was paying fusion gps, they knew about the hrcampaign, they understood that the dnc was paying for this, ass well, and o they were feeding him these falsee allegations, which he wasn't even corroborating, which he was puttingng into this dossier. then two fold, to be taking information, it appears, from close friends of the clintons, and i have been told, i know other members of congress have spoken this already, from sidney blumenthal and others, code each year, and then using that information in the dossier -- >> sean: what about comey's flimsy excuse? he had given us good information in the past? before the fbi, sebastien, goes before a fisa court, applying to spy on an opposition candidate, they downplay who paid for it? they purposely hide that from a court but don't they have some obligation to see if it's true at all, beyond, we like this guy, we worked with him in the past? >> they have an obligation to verify that the information in the application for the warrant is legal. mark lavergne said at right. with this document,

they knew about the hrc campaign. they understood that the dnc was paying for this as well. and so they were feeding him these false allegations, which he wasn't even corroborating, which he was putting into this dossier. and then two fold, to be taking information, it appears, from close friends of the clintons and evan told and i know other members of congress have spoken this already, from sidney blumenthal and others, cody shearer and using that information in the dossier to corroborate. >> sean: what about comey's flimsy excuse well he had given us good information in the past. before the fbi, dr. gorka, goes before a fisa court applying to spy on opposition candidate. they down played who paid for it they purposely hide that from the court. don't they have some obligation to see if it's true at all? beyond we like this guy and we worked with him in the past. >> they have an obligation to verify the application for the warrant is legal. mark levin said it write, with this document it's proven that hillary clinton bought a warrant to spy on an american. >> sean: stay on

down to its cores showing americans how the agency was weaponized by the obama officials slash dnc/hrc, meaning hillary clinton, to target political adversaries. what do you think? >> well, i mean, the narrative -- there's 18 different narratives from the republicans right now. all of this concerns me. the dualing memos between the democrats and republicans concern me. here's the piece on the memo. if the speaker comes out saying it's not about the fbi and mueller investigation, that comment does not say that at all. it says the whole organization is corrupt. that's why you see something unprecedented. the fbi -- the director says something director, that's unusual. >> unprecedented. >> and the fbi agents, working men and women of the fbi, making cases, cuffing people, hauling them to jail, they said, hey, we appreciate the fbi director standing up for us. again, and i just -- i plead with my republican colleagues, if you believe that they were conspireing to purr jury in an affidavit before the court, that's a serious case to go to the ig or full investigation of the committee. this p

. >> i believe it is fairly -- i will rely on the fact they did not say dnc/hrc, they said political.> political opponent. >> they said political opponent. if i'm reviewing that and tell the attorney general, by the way, this came from the dnc and the hillary clinton campaign and that's not in the memo, we go back to the fbi, there was no division of national security at that time, and we send it back and put it in. if you were a corporate executive in america and you did a quarterly earnings report that showed income from a source and you did not describe that source as sketchy, shady or suddenly compromised, you would go to jail. people ought to think about a fisa warrant as a quarterly report and hold it to the same standard. all that said, you and i talked on the radio. they oversold it. they should have put it out there without saying anything about it and they have hurt themselves as a result. rod rosenstein is not going to get fired. the special counsel is not going to get fired but this memo does hurt the fbi with the fisa courts. >> i think it's fascinating that the co-author