age as a --hsa they got a $20 substitute. the patient initiated and her health care was not compromised. a couple questions. i don't see much innovative beyond using monopoly power to drive down costs and presumably shifting whatever degree you shift. how do we effectively make the patient central as opposed to the payment mechanisms or government bureaucracy which must administer the program? >> thanks for the compliment, i think. i am not sure i want to be considered the author of this proposal. >> of what d there, but that is okay. >> i want to address each of your questions in turn. with regard to the question of whether or not this is an innovative approach, it is very important to emphasize, as i have, in the legislation, the idea would not be to replicate the medicare program but create a new program that had a broader set of benefits, different risk. >> you were explicit that you are using the same way to control costs as medicare which is through monopsony power and your bargaining power to lower rates. >> i said it