>> there is still the hsa collaboration, collaboration is hsa, dph and public health foundation enterprises. the majority of the team with the contractor is with public health foundation enterprises as with cats before. >> that's why there is a different contractor and why the names and the face changed. you mentioned that you lost a backup of hotels, lost stabilization rooms many can you speak to that. why that is and was there a financial we should -- issue with that? >> there was a lawsuit. there was like ten hotels that were identified that were substandard. so we lost because of them. we still have clients that are in some of those hotels by attrition. as they get permanently housed we are not renewing. >> by saying you lost those hotels you are not able to use them anymore for stabilization? >> right. >> and the baldwin just turned to master lease. >> the baldwin and the civic center. >> right. okay. that is a lot of challenging work, isn't it? thank you. >> i'm going to open up for public comment at this time. thank you. >> we have jackie bryson. >> good afternoon, i'm still jackie b

money given the way the budget works but again the majority of spending is occurring in health and hsa and they're general fund funded departments most of the spending occurs out of the general fund itself at about 50% of the total or out of the hospital fund so we have two hospital funds for laguna honda and san francisco general hospital. the largest contract is with ucsf to provide services at the general hospital so that is a fund subsidized by the general fund so between the general fund and the hospital really about 80% of the spending on non-profit services comes from the general fund or its related funds. of course we have about 25% of spending here comes out of other special revenue funds and i think the best example here is the childrens fund which supports a vast array of services, a are provided by non-profit organizations and sits outside the general fund. i thought this would be helpful because of course one of the things we're talking about here is things that prevent funding at levels that folks may deem ideal and of course the general fund itself is usually financially

recently as our families moved into an apartment, that is a concerted effort -- of hsa, housing developers and also the mayor's office of housing. we think things can happen. and make such a difference for families that can move into decent housing. it's really a big deal. however, those opportunities are very few. i hope that there is a way for us to do it and san francisco does know how to make that happen. right before us the five-year plan is things that are possible they are things that the city all of us can work on to make it happen. so thank you for the hearing, thank you for making this topic for us to look at discuss, make real thank you. >> thank you mrs. chu, i know you have been in this position for 24 years now at ccdc, and great to hear you say that we can end this issue, there is hope. call the number of speaker cards, please feel free to come up. if not, i will call other speaker calls i haven't called yet. i have elizabeth arker, and jenny frigenbot. >> a couple from the previous batch. >> i did and no one came up. if you stand, so i have a sense. [speaking spanish] trans

and catholic charities and raphael house and providence and along with trent and cindy and joyce from hsa and leadership from supervisor kim and supervisor farrell and mayor lee and president breed all came together and decided it was time to scale up some of the interventions that we know work. that meant there was increased investment in rapid re-housing and increased investment in housing for homeless families and increase investment in eviction prevention strategies. we also reached out to some of the corporate community and folks like sales force and especially our friends google that stepped up with large donations in the millions of dollars to help this effort to end family homelessness and today i get to stand before you that the waiting list is down to 137 families, a drop of 150 families. the numbers that kevin truit showed that the numbers at the end of the school year last year have actually gone down. we are being successful folks and this just isn't about the school district. this is about the whole city coming together to work on this program. we are making progress. howeve

the library 313,000 and hsa is 175. moscone 85. ti96. and dpw for graffiti abatement about 60,000. >> in terms of the airport academy they're coming through our academy and -- >> right. >> and straight to the airport. >> director martin in an effort they got up to full staffing more quickly they offered to pay for the positions and we believe they're at or near that point so subsequent recruits will be all in san francisco. >> got it. >> i need to make a point and there were more comments about more police and increasing staffing. i think that's a misnomer. the charter mandate is listed and we have been 300 officers or 15% behind the charter, so the officers that we're talking about adding are not in addition to or increasing the department. it's trying to get to the voter mandated minimum of 1971 which we haven't been at since 2009. as far as positions go again the charter mandate is full duty officers so we have about 2262. some of those officers are officers in the academy, aren't counted against the 1971 because they're not outside.

often have higher cost sharing than people with higher incomes except by choice if they go in to an hsa plan or such. so we have some serious issues with people who have insurance being able to really effectively use it. we did a paper which you can find on our website which shows that a substantial share of people don't have savings or liquid assets to actually pay the deductibles, much let the out of pocket maxes in their policies. and including families where everyone had private health insurance -- or private coverage, yes, private health insurance. so this is an issue we have to keep paying attention to over time. and one of the ways that the aca addressed it but to a minor extent is that people who are lower income also can get subsidies but that's certainly not everybody, and that's certainly not people who are lower income in employer plans who may be facing high cost sharing. >> great. so before we take our last question or two i want to remind you that you have a blue evaluation sheet in your packet. if you would kindly fill that out, and those of you who are congressional sta

often have higher cost shareing than people with higher incomes except by choice if they go into an hsan or such. we have some serious issues with people who have insurance being able to really effectively use it. we did a paper you can find on our website shows substantial shares of people don't have save savings or liquid assets to actually pay the deductibles much less the out-of-pocket maxs in their policies. includeing familyies where everyone had private health insurance or private coverage yeah private health insurance. this is an issue we have to keep paying attention to over time. one of the ways the aca addressed it but to a minor extent people lower income can get subsidyies. that's not everybody and not people on lower income employer plans who may be faceing higher cost shareing. >> before we take our last question or two, i want to remind you you have a blue evaluation sheet in your pact if you would kinely fill that out. congressional staffers you were handed a yellow survey we'd be happy to have back from you at the end of the briefing. we have a question about how effec