hse understood that...at's _ this was commissioned, that the hse understood that... that's why - this was commissioned, that the hse understood that... that's why there i understood that... that's why there was a _ understood that... that's why there was a reference _ understood that... that's why there was a reference to _ understood that... that's why there was a reference to closing - understood that... that's why there was a reference to closing schools i was a reference to closing schools which _ was a reference to closing schools which was — was a reference to closing schools which was very— was a reference to closing schools which was very much _ was a reference to closing schools which was very much part - was a reference to closing schools which was very much part of - was a reference to closing schools which was very much part of a - was a reference to closing schools which was very much part of a flu i which was very much part of a flu plan _ which was very much part of a flu plan but — which was

you can see professor rubin saying that the hse will presumably want us _ saying that the hse will presumablyset of terms of reference. if we can look _ of terms of reference. if we can look at — of terms of reference. if we can look at a — of terms of reference. if we can look at a subsequent e—mail, this time _ look at a subsequent e—mail, this time it— look at a subsequent e—mail, this time it did — look at a subsequent e—mail, this time it did involve you. we see an email. _ time it did involve you. we see an email. two— time it did involve you. we see an e—mail, two thirds of the way down, from _ e—mail, two thirds of the way down, from you _ e—mail, two thirds of the way down, from you to — e—mail, two thirds of the way down, from you to professor you —— professor _ from you to professor you —— professor rubin. james, the effect is that— professor rubin. james, the effect is that government appointments are becoming _ is that government appointments are becoming very wary of putting things to spi-b _ becoming very wary of putting things to spi—b due to your risk of leaks or misuse — to

it is also responsible for sector orally, in the case of the hse, the nhs or the care sector.ional responsibility to try plans across the wider parts of government in those areas for which that department is responsible. correct. and i think your example of the social care sector is particularly personal because of the fragment to me of that sector, the hfc had oversight over it but no direct control. it's provided a mixture of public, private, national, local, third sector, etc. it's a complex sector and aches that we might come back to this point. the contingency planning should have covered that sector even though it wasn't directly within departments responsibility. department for work and pensions to take a different example, would have a plan for continuing to be to pay benefits. in terms of this civil contingency obligations upon that government. the complete absence of whole government plans dealing with the various parts of the country that would be impacted by this virus was a very serious flaw indeed, was it not? �* ., , not? indeed. and when we realised about a wee

th come into 2024 with the strong hse balance sheets which should sustain well in 2024. >> you say investors should be prepared for near-term picks. what is the move? >> in terms of the volatility, we have the market pricing in rate cuts in the first half as soon as in march which is early for us given the narrave you are getting from the inflation story well and from the economy at this poin i think there will be a pull back and that suggests volatility within the bond space. take a longer perspective. look at a x-to-nine-month period. you should be diversified. there will be gains for equities for 2024. it is forthworth getting expexp. we are expecting a slowdown, but you should focus on the higher qualitassets which can sustain through a downturn. >> seema, thank you. >>> turning now to the other top story this morning. elon musk is giving advertisers a message. go sell ads somewhere else. >> stop. don't advertise. >> you don't want them to advertise? >> no. >> what do you mean? >> if somebody is going to blackmail me with advertising -- blackmail me wh money? go [ bleep ] yourself. but g

got a i message back that the permanent secretary — message back that the permanent secretary at the hsebout the fact i've said this during the meeting on the sunday. i subsequently spoke to chris wormald and asked him why he thought— chris wormald and asked him why he thought that was something to be incandescent about and he said it was the _ incandescent about and he said it was the manner of raising it in the meeting _ was the manner of raising it in the meeting rather than the substance that he _ meeting rather than the substance that he was concerned about and i had thrown — that he was concerned about and i had thrown it into a ministerial meeting. — had thrown it into a ministerial meeting, whereas it should have gone through— meeting, whereas it should have gone through more due process, but i stand _ through more due process, but i stand by— through more due process, but i stand by the fact i think it was the i’ili'lt stand by the fact i think it was the right thing — stand by the fact i think it was the right thing to say at the time. and that was the _ right thing to say at t

diversity is now a fundamental american value, hse and buried in our multicultural amican community that only continues to grow. the pursuit of racial diversity will go on despite the cour although the court has stripped out almost all esf race in college admissions, universie can and should continue to use all available tools to meet society's needs for diversity and education. despite theourt's unjustified erse of power, the opinion today will serve only to highlight the court's own impotence in the face of an america whose cries for inequality res as has been the case before in the history of american democracy, the arc of the moral universe will bend towards racial justice, despite the court's effort today to impede its progress. we shall overcome. with profoundadness, justices kagan, jackson, and, dissent. justice jackson did not participate in the consideration of the case in 20199, and joins this >> washington journal, discussing politics and public policy from washington, d.c. c spans washington journal, jointly conversation live at 7:00 eastern tuesday morning on c-span, seized

text i what simon case saying in that text that that is the case and he is clearly concerned that the hsehe leicester question and that was probably the first time that element had been drawn to my attention. by then we had the covid task force and what this exchange is revealing is how challenging it was for them as well in dealing with a situation where the secretary of state is essentially in a high—profile political row with the local mayor. another topic, you proposed in late may the establishment of covid s because helen mcnamara produced advice on the 22nd of may which recommended the establishment of those committees, and evidence has been received by the inquiry in relation to their operation, so why did you propose that there be a division of between covid s and o? division of between covid s and 0? and was that not duplicative of the covid task force? titer;r and was that not duplicative of the covid task force?— and was that not duplicative of the covid task force? they were cabinet committees — covid task force? they were cabinet committees so _ covid task force? they were ca

like tolstoy, the forming former publishing director of two leading publishing hses, he has edited books that have won the pulitzer the booker and many other prizes 21ooks under his watchful. i have been numbeone bestsellers. richard's writt works have appeared in the new york times book review and in the wall street journal he is also a fellow of royal society of literature. richard will join us for the second half of our program. but to start us off, peter. welcome to you. peter moore. it is such a delight to have you here and all of us in the audience, of course, know that we set this 3 p.m. eastern time to suit your uk time zone and i think it'll be worth it to get your transit atlantic perspective. thank you so much for taking us back to the mi18th century and sharing information about the onyx expected influencers behind america's independence. as the washington post called it, i think i'm sure you member that review well, they also called this group caste beyond the founding fathers. and i love that word beyond. so we really you for your research and over to you to introduce us to

so by mid-july they ctinued, they finished the mess hall, the latrines, the pump hse in the sanitary areas. i's difficult from where you're probl but if cloly the nail the men are wearing say cor and. lumb company loonville, ohio so if you're familiar with history and swank larg hardware retailer in town and a lumber mill. so more than likely, most of the lumber and tools also came from there. so by the keep coming into town, not only did it help the forest, but benefited local businesses as well. they also hired local men to drive trucks and do other things that maybe the enrollees were not qualified to. and e army officers usually moved their families into town so that they could be nearby. so once all of those were built in mid-july, they moved the camps into, the what would become the permanent camp. so this is sitting on that ridge top shortly after they moved into the tents, scarlet broke out and the entire camp was quarantined. fortunately, no one passed away. but just like we're all used to quarantining, they had to get used to it as well, which is probably difficult when you

. >> please finish projects he has nouthority end and of hse to take any action likeha >> so justiceas askgnd the last argument about the sixth circuit test and whether it relied fully on a written law and excluded customs given talking bac a forth with justice cap and about custom customary duties. so do you agree custom can be part of the source or duty? x not exactly but i do think the sixth circuit use the phrase apparent duties. i guess what i wouldit the say e cityouil directed mr. freed to discuss city business on a social media account. >> 1983 clearly customs should be enough. do you really want toig it that hard? >> i do not disagree 1983 statute dince regulation on customer usage. we do not have to look just to state law but the oy it's addressed i'd had to be something so forceful it essentll was the law. so when we look at that case they weot letting any blacks at theounter to eat. there i a police officer in foe t custom we don't have anything like that in this case when it's so defined i becomes essentially a duty. once understand your argument with respect for the nee

that he would never subpoena another would not subpoena another document from nixon from the white hseas a condition of ming forward. and at the end of the day, tt was totally in order. but but he cox did struggle with and i intervwed senator dr. who told me that he was had been shot in this burglary attempt was on heavy doses of codeine at the time did not want to do this but he felt he couldn't say no but cox really agonizover this and as of this is coming to bear and going to shoa little video from john, just as all of this is a crescendo. john dean agrees to cut a plea with cox's team. he wasn't john wasn't able to join us from the west coast tonight, but we have a little video of from a previous event we didogether. so here is john dean explaining why he and his lawyer, charles shaffer, decided to cut a deal with cox's and why he feared this was a dangerous move for him. ken, the reason thought it was really to be challenge to testify against nixon is because the president, united states not only has a lot of pporters, he has lots ways to get the truth out. so when i did break rk,