the requirements of the da are not requested -- affected pai- hua parkmerced. this is because it iwe disagree. we do not believe the da did not resume demolition is necessary. it simply proposes a scope of development on the project site that allows the increment of replacement and demolition of up to1580 apartments. we also disagree in part with finding five. we believe this is a real question and that the city attorney gave extensive testimony on the enforceability of provisions and and by the supervisors of all of the reasons why the d.a.'s brent provision control should be enforceable. the city also went through the details and remedies that are included to bolster its enforceability and provide tenant protections, even in the unlikely event that tenet provision were deemed unenforceable by these protections. [no audio] deputy city attorney charles sullivan to add anything. supervisor campos: we have the deputy attorney. did you want to add anything? >> good afternoon. charles sullivan. i thing the department pretty much summarized it correctly. i have noth