we're working with hudson pacific on the commercial work. we have no control, no responsibility toward the -- legal responsibility. >> so you have no agency relationship whatsoever with the residential tenant. >> i don't believe so, there is no privity. >> obviously they're going to be upset, the ones making the noise, especially if you go outside the bounds of the rules. but the advocate for the tenants should be car mel and gray star? >> they're mad at gray star. they're very mad at gray star and gray star is not here, they're not the holder of the permit, it's us. if they have an issue with gray star, i get it. but we're being penalized. >> is gray star and car -- should gray star, car mel, they in fact should be leading the charge here versus hudson pacific and google? >> that's my opinion. >> did you not reach out as the tenant and say, hey, we're taking a lot of flack from your people here, we're going in front of the board of appeals, you should have representation here to answer these questions. >> ask gray star? >> to be here in att

bcci has been participating in weekly meetings with the commercial property manager, hudson pacific properties. and google every week since prior to this work starting to discuss any issues that come up. hudson properties specifically requested that all communication between the commercial and residential prosecution portions of the building should be to the management and not reach out to the tenants. that was the direction we were given, there are two property managers, the residential and the commercial space. we completed over 160,000 square feet of interior demo in two months. we started in early october through early december of 2017. the work that was discussed earlier, that was work that was not associated with the google project. there is roof work that the building was doing and other work in the building that was unrelated to any google construction. we did receive two noise complaints through hudson for after hours work in mid october. when we were doing demo. and we addressed it, our protocol to shut down demo and begin clean up at 7:30 p.m. to ensure no noise after 8 p.m. we had

and then hudson pacific has agreements with commercial tenants who have other priorities that they probably don't want a lot of noise happening when they are trying to do their commercial businesses. so we have a car crash. >> also, i think, rick, this requires a supermajority of four. and there is only four of us here. so i mean, i think this panel is going to really have to agree on what goes forward and otherwise, the permit wills go forth as they go. i am very interested in hearing president fong's idea regarding retaining two and letting two go. >> me, too. >> i just as soon not get involved in that kind of -- the analysis and determination to what hours and what work and whatnot. i prefer a slightly more global approach to this. i would be prepared to deny the the appeal on two permits that relate to the lower floors and continue the other two to a short time fuse of two weeks, at which point either this board -- i will commit to make a final decision, period. >> so i have actually not -- the only problem i have with that is that the tenant -- and i do comment the fact that google and

i ask, what is your social pacific responsibility -- what is your social or civic responsibility in the digital age? cleaning up the hudson river, most people were probably done by the time they did, but that was there responsibility. they harm to the environment and took the responsibility of cleaning it up. and is there harm of your data being mishandled or used in actions and are far away from the initial agreement? analogy -- i cannot remember who made it, but somebody said that we do not ask americans to understand all the internal workings of the combustion engine in order to drive a car. should we force them to understand every data transfer that their name or address goes through once they sign up for an online that form in order to engage in the digital world? it seems a little unreasonable. >> so you heard senator kennedy say i don't want to regulate you, but i will. what was he referring to? ms. o'connor: a call for federal privacy legislation, there has been that as long as there has been an internet. all not saying i agree with the choices europe has done to regulate, but they do data as a comprehensive issue

hudson bay says it's taking steps to contain the breach online criminal group has been threatening to sell the information. and abandons chinese space laboratory has reentered the earth's atmosphere up over the south pacific china's space agency lost control of the chiang one in twenty sixteen ounces here as well as on the reports now from arlington virginia. in the two thousand and eight fictional thriller gravity sandra bullock plays an american astronaut stranded in space in one of the final scenes she's seen catching a ride back to earth in the chinese space station gong one that then breaks up in a fiery pieces as it hurtles towards planet earth. gone one space station is real and it really did crash into earth. it was launched in two thousand and eleven and it was china's first space station it served as a laboratory base until controllers lost contact with it two years ago ever since it's been a giant piece of space debris about the size of a school bus and as this animation shows it's been slowly pulled into earth by gravitational force before a final uncontrolled reentry while dramatic it's not the first such manmade space object to crash back to earth unplanned the largest was a one hundred thir