alexander hinton, andrey ontikov , and hugh williamson.ou can watch his program any time visiting our website. for further discussion go to our facebook page. you can also join the conversation on twitter. our handle is at ajinsidestory. goodbye for now. o7Ñ;Ñ;?k#ÑÑ3Ñ3ÑgÑÑgÑgÑgÑpipú yo, thisnnaturalhythm ♪ my art'si ♪ow, openy eyes d i see methindifferent ♪ when u're in your wst s, i can ta a pen a a paper and m. and toa school likthis d have tdeal th more ruggle >>on't noby want to see yr shin bubet, gonna sne. [ambient mus] - [announcer]: major funding for reel south was provided by: etv endowment, the national endowment for the arts, center for asian-american media,

ah, well let's now bring in our guests in berlin, hugh williamson, the director for europe and central asia division of human rights watch in moscow. andre, on to kava political analyst and in new york, new jersey. alexander hinton, director of the center for the study of genocide and human rights, and distinguished professor of anthropology at rutgers university, a warm welcome to you all. thank you very much for being on inside story. before we begin our discussion, let's take a look at what is considered a war crime. according to the un, it's a breach of international law committed against civilians or enemy combatants during an armed conflict. the geneva convention defines a war crime as they will for killing torture or inhumane treatment, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and in an unprovoked manner. and international criminal court has since expanded the list by including crimes such as for pregnancy, which is intended to affect the ethnic makeup of a population. let me start with you alex xander. hinton in new york, new jersey, do the images that we'

hugh williamson is europe and central asia director at human rights watch.ting atrocities involved in documenting atrocities in various conflicts around the world. just in the last few minutes we have seen that report, i have spoken to a woman who was then a convoy near kyiv on the 7th of march that was shot at by russian forces. there is plenty of evidence of what is going on which we have not always had and conflicts. we have evidence, don't we? . had and conflicts. we have evidence, don't we? , _, . , ., don't we? indeed. this conflict is a newer one. — don't we? indeed. this conflict is a newer one, because _ don't we? indeed. this conflict is a newer one, because of _ don't we? indeed. this conflict is a newer one, because of the - don't we? indeed. this conflict is a newer one, because of the volume j don't we? indeed. this conflict is a i newer one, because of the volume of open source material, photographs, videos instantaneously shared online. it is part of ourjob to verify those videos and make sure they were filmed where and when they appear to ha

lucy williamson, bbc news, paris. 0ver now to paris and our correspondent hugh schofield — so what'say the verdict is that macron came out ahead. but marine le pen advanced her own cause because she did not fail. if you remember, five years ago, she had this appalling experience in the equivalent debate where she just lost it and lost control of the subject matter in terms of laughing hysterically and it was really a terrible trauma for her and she has never once watched the tape, it was so traumatic for her. she got over that and she was a different kind of figure. you could see the preparation that she had done had made a lot of difference. but if you were looking into the kind of hard detail of the arguments, and that of course is what this should be all about, i think he came out on top. he had the strong arguments and was once again showing himself to be the master of detail, which we know him to be. but as a rider to that, not everybody watches these debates or is following exactly closely and meticulously who was right in which subject, it is about impressions and she made her