that is, they believe that the world is inhabited by spirits and that humankind can make contact withse spirits, can make offerings to them by imitating the sounds of the places or the things in which those spirits live. hoo, hoo, hoo hoo, hoo, hoo tuvans love to imitate sounds. the reason they do this is because they believe that by imitating some sound, they can literally implace themselves-- put themselves in that being or thing. merroooo maew, meooowwww (levin) tuva sits on just the northwest border of mongolia. politically, it's part of russia. it's a small place and its people have always been herders. they herd sheep, yak, goats, and when you live all of the time with animals, you develop a very close relationship with the animals. and so there's actually many forms of music that are used to interact with animals. they're part of the environment. horses occupy a central place in the life of tuvans and there's a lot of music that's also related to horses in different ways. first of all, the instruments-- they're made of horses. the igil for instance, the two string fiddle, is ma

importantly it is claims to not see how local aslan's unique that no one has suffered in history of humankind and compared to what the jews endured to. and follows from that according to the israel he's because the sucker if you see me you can't you can't apply to israel and israel and you you can't comply with israel and use the same moral code neagle standards that you apply to any other people and so for example even though it's over he commits gross human rights violations commits gross. crimes under international law including the bill in some instances a work crime under the statutes of the international criminal court or i whenever you try to call israel to account for the human rights violations a war crimes crimes against humanity that it commits what immediately does it's an in both the nazi holocaust and says that. you can't apply to us the same standards the same moral standards and same legal standards because of what i was using doors were and were two which was allegedly unique and then the same thing comes up for example on kyra negotiations with iran when for example the new.

inclined to say that our concerns stop t -- stop at our borders, that we should all be concerned about humankindr where one lives, we are concerned about their lot, and we cultivate that concern when we know their stories. but we don't do that. >> host: back to our facebook page we don't do that. >> host: jack comments so happy to see and hear randall robinson on in depth. now if we could just delete all the heritage foundation programs. i read that because unwanted to ask you, we hear it is often on c-span, people only watching what they agree with. what is your viewing habits, what are you reading? >> let me say this about c-span first of all. i said to brian lamb many years ago, this story, this operation, c-span is one of the great contributions to democracy because you have with all -- without prejudice all voices expressing themselves. it is important that we all have an opportunity to hear all of those voices. i think the heritage foundation voice is a voice to be heard. i wouldn't even argue against a slice of life television offering that one sees as long as they are

times when there was interaction among them and by and large that interaction showed the milk of humankindnessh, optimism. so they coped. part of it was stockholm syndrome and part of it is the person analytical and character they had. >> doctor, what is their future? >> well, i've said very good things about them and as a doctor who treats i want to be on the side of optimism and encouragement and hope for them. but the damage that was done does not go away. they have life sentences. this was not trivial. i think they will, with the love and support of this whole community and what they bring to the table they have a good chance to have a good life. but that doesn't mean that they will ever be free of the damage that was done. >> and would you agree with me, doctor, that their injury is that of permanent injuries >> yes. >> thank you. >> no thank you, your honor. >> we'll be recess for ten minutes. we'll see you all at 11:50. >>> while we continue to watch what's taking place there you see a smiling ariel castro as we're just hearing from the doctor there, who testified about the trauma signs

the greatest civil action of the 20th century and one of the most significant in the history of humankind's struggle for its own identity took place. it was a day that hundreds of thousands of people of all persuasions gathered to hear the words of the old negro spiritual declairing the dream of the young martin luther king, jr. 50 years later, the son of that king has called us all together once again to gather at the feet of the great emancipator just wonder from the granite figure of his father and one of our founding fathers. he has called us together not just to celebrate nor merely to commemorate. he has called us to fortify and inknock late our human spirit to galvanize and energyize our collective consciences to take action to realize the dream. he has been an elected leader, the president of a southern christian leader conference, the head of the martin luther king jr. center for nonviolent social change, the founder of realizing the dream. he is a national civil rights champion, a global human rights crusader. he is the father of yo landa renee, the husband of andrew waters, the b

king's phrase of overriding loyalty to humankind also demands our attention.rom time to assess. we must ask if we want democracy here but only dependable friends elsewhere. >> ♪ >> our next speaker, a social activist, civil rights leader, chairman emeritus of the naacp. i thought he forgot to give him his name. i met this man when i was just a sophomore in college. ladies and gentlemen, long before there was a barack obama, there was a julian bond nominated for vice president of the united states. he was a citizen of the u.s.a. and a proud citizen of georgia. ladies and gentlemen, julian bond. [applause] >> thank you. i am delighted to be here just as i was delighted to be here 50 years ago. then we could not have imagined we would be here 50 years later with a black president and black attorney general. but that is a measure of how far we have come. still we march. we march because trayvon martin in the pantheon of young black murders. we march because the supreme court has eviscerated the voting rights act for which we fought and died. we march because every

the reason you do it is because these are the most awesome and terrible intentions of humankind. i am a physicist, as you mentioned. physicists always felt there was some responsibility that went with having created this technology. they are part of our arsenal that in -- that deserves our most careful treatment and responsibility, but they are not the answer to our budget problem. they are not that expensive. >> one more question and then we will go to the audience. at the beginning, we talked about afghanistan. he said you have to stay focused on it because we are still there. we know there is increasing debate in the administration about what some call the zero option. at the end of 2014, could you pull out everyone? there are down sides. one reason for keeping forces there is not only for afghanistan but to have forces in place in case pakistan went bad. tell us where this debate stands. is the zero option a real option in your mind? is it more of a negotiating position? we did it in iraq. could you a imagine a situation where we do it in afghanistan? >> let me answer your qu

barriers in the hearts of humankind that form a gulf between us. many of us still believe our differences define us instead of the divine spark that runs through all of human creation. >> reporter: another georgian-- former president jimmy carter-- warned of new barriers in the form of assaults on voting rights. >> i believe we all know how dr. king would have reacted to new the i.d. requirements to exclude certain voters, especially african americans. i think we all know how dr. king would have reacted to the supreme court striking a crucial down part of the voter rights act just recently passed overwhelmingly by congress. >> reporter: former president bill clinton urged americans to put aside political and racial divisions, as they look to the future. >> the choice remains as it was on that distant summer day 50 years ago. cooperate and thrive, or fight with each other and fall behind. we should all thank god for dr. king and john lewis and all those who gave us a dream to guide us. a dream they paid for like our founders with their lives, their

but they're still invisible signs, barriers in the hearts of humankind that form a gulf between us.oo many of us still believe our differences define us instead of the divine spark that runs through all of human creation. >> eugene, and it is so true today when you think about some of the headlines of the incendiary headlines that seem to want to tear us apart and you have congressman louis, i have on my phone, for example, a poll tax receipt from one of my relatives in texas who had to pay to vote. and the conversations that we get distracted with where folks are trying to quite divide, conquer and divide and not talk about the real issues that continue today. >> yeah, and that continues, tamron. i remember those days. i remember when gas stations would have three bathrooms and men, women and colored. and so it was very useful i think for congressman louis to remind us of that. to hear dr. king's whole speech again, you know, it's interesting that the point at which the speech takes off when he talks about i have a dream at the suggestion of mahalia jackson who says tell them about

envisioned of freedom, justice, and equality for all humankind. >> i heard your sister speak the otherhe things she talked about, while the loss of your father was a great personal loss, at the same time, she has took comfort in what has happened since that time, and what that spark in terms of activism, in terms of engaging people and bringing people to the fore. i want to get your thoughts on that. >> well, clearly, we lost our father, my siblings and i. my mom lost a -- lost her husband. but our nation gained an understanding of a movement and a message. and the unfortunate part is 50 years ago we had significant unemployment and we have even greater unemployment today, to some degree. but you know, what is amazing is, over the last two months, tragically, the supreme court gutted the voting rights act. and of course, two weeks later, we saw the verdict in the trayvon martin case. but i think it has aroused the consciousness of americans and people are coming together. it shows that activism is still important. marching is just one step. there's a public policy initiatives that must

there has never been anyone more on message, ever, in the history of messages, in the history of humankindn, everybody! to the extent that he is famous for anything, he is famous for that. now, also, though, i think he's trying to get famous for this. congressman peddles conspiracy theory on climate change. only radical environmentalists get government grants. mike coffman's voting record on oil and gas and on denying that there are human contributions to climate change, that's made him the target of a new ad campaign being run against climate change denialists in congress. congressman coffman is one of three house republicans that is now being targeted by the league of conservation voters in a $2 million ad campaign, that's aimed at making climate change denialism something you should be embarrassed about. something you have to pay a political price for. and the reason i think this is notable is, i think, a, because of the timing, but also, b, and i will speak frankly here, the ads do not suck. surprisingly, do not take this the wrong way, but for a vaguely left-leaning cause, this ad tha

in which the massive humankind had been born with saddles on their back to be ridden by a booted and spurred air stockily si. collective bargaining made obsolete the iron law of wages which stated that labor could command no more than a subsis tense living from capital. it made obsolete bidding at the factory gate in which workers offered their services for ten cents an hour only to lose a job to a more desperate pan who would take nine. -- man who would take nine. perhaps we have to ask when the golden age of the american worker was a historical aberration made possible by the fact that we were the only country to emerge from world war ii with any industrial capacity. was that golden age destined to end as soon as the rest of the world rebuilt itself making blue collar workers an obsolete class? in this global century, will laborers have to reconcile themselves to the roles of an international peasantry? was the american middle class just a moment in -- just that moment? america's never again going to be as wealthy as it was in the '50s and '60s because we had no economic tet to hav

the genius of the arab people and infused it with something worldwide to make it something that humankind could understand. rageh omaar: muhammad received revelations throughout his life, but between mecca and medina their content changed significantly. whereas in mecca the revelations dealt with inward principles of spirituality and faith - here in medina the revelations would be far more practical. they provided a blueprint for how one should live life on a day to day basis as a muslim - from the social to the political. a blueprint that many muslims try to follow today. dr. amira bennison: whilst in mecca he is very much a religious preacher he talks much more about issues such as the end of time, you know about morality, about of justice and these kinds of things, but once he moves to medina he is the functioning leader of a community, he therefore has to get much more involved in the day to day running of a community. how people interact with each other; how people manage inheritance; how people greet each other even. rageh omaar: the revelations could be quite explicit - all muslims

king's phrase of overriding loyalty to humankind also demands our attention.ght stops us from time to assess. we must ask if we want democracy dependable friends elsewhere. >> ♪ , a socialt speaker activist, civil rights leader, .hairman emeritus of the naacp i thought he forgot to give him his name. i met this man when i was just a sophomore in college. longs and gentlemen, before there was a barack obama, there was a julian bond nominated for vice president of the united states. he was a citizen of the u.s.a. and a proud citizen of georgia. ladies and gentlemen, julian bond. [applause] >> thank you. i am delighted to be here just as i was delighted to be here 50 years ago. then we could not have imagined we would be here 50 years later with a black president and black attorney general. but that is a measure of how far we have come. still we march. we marched because trayvon in the pantheon of young black murders. we march because the supreme court has a eviscerated the voting rights act for which we fought and died. we march because every economic indicator

king's phrase overriding loyalty to humankind also demands our attention. yet, conformists talk stops us from trying to persist. we must ask, do we want democracy here but only dependable elsewhere? our next speaker social activist, civil rights leader, hairman emeritus of the naacp, -- oh. i thought he forgot to give him his name. i met this man when i was just a sophomore in college. ladies and gentlemen, was it vice president of the united states? ladies and gentlemen, long before there was a barack bama, there was a julian bond. that was nominated for vice president of the united states. and he was a citizen of the u.s.a. and a proud citizen of georgia. ladies and gentlemen, julian bond. >> thank you. i hope that didn't come out of my two minutes. i'm delighted to be here just as i was delighted to be here 50 years ago. then, we could not have mangnd we would be here 50 years later with a black president and a black attorney general. but that is the measure of how far we have come. but still we march. we march because trayvon martin has joined emity hil

king's phrase of overriding loyalty to humankind also demands our attention.ght stops us from time to assess. we must ask if we want democracy here but only dependable friends elsewhere. >> ♪ ♪ >> our next speaker, a social activist, civil rights leader, chairman emeritus of the naacp. i thought he forgot to give him is name. i met this man when i was just a sophomore in college. ladies and gentlemen, long before there was a barack obama, there was a julian bond nominated for vice president of the united states. he was a citizen of the u.s.a. and a proud citizen of georgia. ladies and gentlemen, julian bond. [applause] >> thank you. i am delighted to be here just as i was delighted to be here 50 years ago. then we could not have imagined we would be here 50 years later with a black president and black attorney general. but that is a measure of how far we have come. still we march. we march because trayvon martin in the pantheon of young black murders. we march because the supreme court has eviscerated the voting rights act for which we fought and died. we marc

would be if there had been a concerted andrt to set things right asserted truly the equality of humankind. we will submit to you that the work of the 21st century is that work. that we didtools not happen the 20th century -- did not have in the 20th century. we understand how the brain works now, how and by the -- how as get embedded in the human conscious. it is time to my wise -- mob ilize those technologies, to change the fundamental construct on on which our nation was built. we asserted a quality -- equality, but we built this on inequality. as we go forward into the 21st century, we ask, as the w.k. kellogg foundation, to move beyond rhetoric and beyond denial. publication last week that suggested that we are contrary to a post-racial less than half of whites actually believe we have made a lot of ryegrass toward -- toward dr. king's dream. that means that some of us are moving past denial of the work that remains to be done. and a lot of us are moving past denial. once we passed the dial of fact fact, we must move past the denial of fact, of the consequences, of the feelings. i wan

the reason you do it is because these are the most awesome and terrible intentions of humankind. i am a physicist, as you mentioned. physicists always felt there was some responsibility that went with having created this technology. they are part of our arsenal that deserves our most careful thought and treatment and responsibility, but they are not the answer to our budget problem. they are not that expensive. >> one more question and then we will go to the audience. at the beginning, we talked about afghanistan. you said you have to stay focused on it because we are still there. we know there is increasing debate in the administration about what some call the zero option. at the end of 2014, could you pull out everyone? there are down sides. one reason for keeping forces there is not only to be a tripwire in afghanistan but to have forces in place in case pakistan went bad. tell us where this debate stands. is the zero option a real option in your mind? is it more of a negotiating position? we did it in iraq. could you imagine a situation where we do it in afghanistan? >> let m

would be if there had been a concerted effort to set things right and assert truly the equality of humankind. so we would submit to you that the work of the 21st century is that work. and we have new tools that we didn't have in the 20th century. we understand how the brain works now. we understand how ideas get embedded into the unconscious. we can also understand how to up root those ideas. we have technologies at our disposal that weren't even dreamt of 50 years ago. it is time to mobilize those very technologies to change the fundamental construct upon which our nation was built. we asserted equality but we built a nation on the fallacy of inequality. and so as we go forward into the 21st century, we ask, at the kellogg foundation, that we take this moment to move beyond rhetoric and indeed beyond denial. there was a poll released by the pew center last week that would suggest that we are, contrary to a very few years ago when people were touting us as a post-racial america, that less than one in three and less than half, less than one in three african-americans and less than half of whi

would be if there had been a concerted effort to set things right and assert truly the equality of humankindwe will submit to you that the work of the 21st century is that work. we have new tools that we did not happen the 20th century -- did not have in the 20th century. we understand how the brain works now, how and by the -- how the ideas get embedded in the human conscious. it is time to my wise -- mobilize those technologies, to change the fundamental construct on which our nation was built. we asserted a quality -- equality, but we built this on inequality. as we go forward into the 21st century, we ask, as the w.k. kellogg foundation, to move beyond rhetoric and beyond denial. there was a publication last week that suggested that we are contrary to a post-racial america, that less than half of whites actually believe we have made a lot of ryegrass toward -- progress toward dr. king's dream. that means that some of us are moving past denial of the work that remains to be done. a lot of us are moving past denial. once we pass the denial of fact, we must move past the denial of the conse

it is because they don't cost that much and they are the most awesome and terrible inventions of humankind to a high in a physicist as you mentioned, and we always felt there was some responsibility that went with having created this technology. so they are things always to remember part of our arsenal that deserves our most careful thought and treatment and response devotee. but they are not the answer to the budget problem. they are not that expensive to disconnect at the beginning we talked about afghanistan. and you said you have to stay focused on that because we are still there. we know that there is an increasing debate within the administration about what some call the zero option, the reflection that the end of 2014. could you pull out every one? there are down sides to this. one keeping forces there is not only the trip wire for afghanistan, but to have forces in place in pakistan. tell us where this debate stands. is the zero option in your mind a real option? is it more of a negotiating position which some have argued? can you imagine the situation that we did in iraq and the s