with interest and even hope, there are some grounds, the wing that is conventionally represented by hyaki call it the right, right-wing conservative wing of the party, it is more eurocentric in such a political, i don't want to use it in a geopolitical sense, well, in the foreign policy aspect. here hyaki is in in general, he speaks out there, and this is a common agenda for this wing, for some kind of continental integration, this is a franco-german axis in europe first of all, on the model of the first two decades of the fargashen history, and of course these are some more or less good relations with russia, starting from purely such economic pragmatism, ending with he was asked a question there from the category of either or. you can’t choose him, and the problem was posed there, moscow or washington, so he obviously didn’t want to answer, but he answered moscow, that is, at least at the level of rhetoric, this is a moderately anti-atlantic agenda, an anti-american agenda, nevertheless, i think that, in general, everyone understands perfectly well that nato structures, in general , the