that's what the hypothesis should be for a special prosecutor, why is this happening. luckily, this guy is a bad liar. there have been better liars in the past who became successful december pots. >> there's been no credible connection between the trump campaign at this point. i know that -- what you said, but that's your belief. >> no, i think there are facts -- i'm sorry, don. the facts are, the meeting that we had for the attorney general at the republican convention, core respondeded in the platform for senator cruz, which was to enhance the sanctions. and the trump campaign. >> that was already in the works. >> well, why was the national security head of his campaign present at that meeting and talking to the ambassador, those are the hypothesis we should be testing. we're not doing it now. they have us talking about this nonsense. >> i agree with you, and we're going to stick to russia, and that is our mission here. robert, wherever the story leads us, by saying president obama ordered his phones tapped at trump tower illegally. isn't he insinuating the intellige

and that is that the trial has failed the hypothesis. >> reporter: trial failures that most recentlyncluded one from merck in february and eli lilly in november. litt lily spent more than $2 million in two decades, many believe those failures may have been due to timing. >> what we've realized in alzheimer's disease is that the disease process itself in the brain begins you know somewhere between ten and 20 years actually before. if you wait too late. if you are treating patients who are already severely impaired, cognitively, it's probably too late to be treating them with the kinds of treatments we are now using. >> reporter: ongoing work from biogen, merck and others is still targeting amyloid. earlier in the disease. they are investing $2 billion to question whether targeting amyloids in this time and way will work. it's a question society is waiting impatiently to have answers. for "nightly business report," i'm meg terrell. >> tomorrow the new approaches the medical community is taking to combat alzheimer's. >>> the food and drug administration says no to generic asth ma drug.

and when those processes are not repeatable, then you must change your idea about the hypothesis untile toward general theory. esp, psycho kinesis, these concepts have never been able to move out of the realm of hypothesis, never moved toward general theory because they're not repeatable. science is absolutely correct in pointing that out, but that doesn't mean that it should all be thrown out in my opinion. >> and yet you had no fear of us laughing at you by spending this much time to approach the subject matter. >> i mean i've written -- this is my fourth book. maybe i couldn't have written this book as book number two on the heels of "area 51," but i have been writing about hard science. when i wrote "the pentagon's brain" about darpa, about hard science in the military, it led me into this. i write about that in the book, about how the two subjects go like this, and that's what i find super interesting. again, reaches of knowledge. >> finally, on a going-forward basis, having nothing to do with what they have done heretofore, the millions of taxpayer dollars spent to find this phen

while gnosis and can be made infallible, the american people hypothesis we are identified ways to improve the vetting process and keep terrorists from entering our country. to our allies and partners around the world, please understand this order is part of our ongoing efforts to eliminate vulnerabilities that radical islamic terrorists will exploit. the state department will ordinate and implement these restrictions in an orderly manner. our embassies and consulates will play an important role in making sure our nation secure. and the state department will implement the provisions in this order that allow for the admissions of refugees when it is determined they do not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the united dates. upon the president's order issued on january 27, the state department's consular affairs and diplomatic offices undertook a review in coordination with department of homeland security to identify additional measures that would strengthen our vetting of those seeking entry into the country from 70 namedies. -- seven countries. iraq is an important ally in the fight

the problems you can have some basic knowledge and tested out and you can test your hypothesis whether it's right or wrong. can anyone tell me what time it is? i can't see it. i've not been on for too long. all of this stuff is about every day complexity. the first thing is understanding the basic rules of the world. the reason this picture is here is my grandfather, my mother's father is one who trained during the second world war and after the war he went to work at emi. .. >> there was loads of paper tape with code written on it. and then something like that, loads of laptops couldn't really tell you what they're up to. and the problem is that when you're dealing with this kind of thing, especially with things like touch screens, it's very easy to get taken away from the basics of the physical world. and yet we still live in it. we still have bodies that are the same size, chairs that are still about the same size, and this is about the right size for a piece of toast. but the problem is this is technology, it takes -- it lets you be a little bit lazy, for a start, because there are

you put those together and you have hypothesis to test in real investigation by subpoenas by special prosecutor. if going to have invertebrate republican congress not doing its duty by the country and can't trust the justice department, we've got a constitutional crisis. >> are you saying perjury? >> yes. stronger today. other prosecutors seeing facts unfolding and i'm sure saying now that general statement he didn't talk to any russian representatives when you take into account what he said today on fox and at press conference as reported by "washington post." things he said that weren't in the transcript that "the washington post" reported. >> john is saying with his explanation and more he keeps talking, i think he's saying backing himself into a corner here and letting on more than he probably wants general public to know or anyone who might investigate it. >> should be debriefing his staffers immediately. >> stewart? >> you have to look at statute. that requires that not withstanding the statement is false. we know today based upon his admission, he made a false statement. but s

now again, that's just a hypothesis at this hour, and intelligence officials will run that to ground every way they can. >> and let's just also put in context the fact that there is this anti-isis summit right now at the state department, that in talking to diplomatic officials, including british officials, part of the predicate is that there is a lot of activity, that they have gained ground -- excuse me -- gained ground against isis in mosul, that they are beginning to organize the attack in raqqah, that isis is losing territory, and presumably, jeremy, they would be wanting to strike out and prove that they are still viable force, as they lose territory in iraq and presumably soon in syria. i wanted to also bring in by phone "daily express" report camella trmany currently locked inside parliament. can you talk to us what is going on and what you saw at the time and what is going on now? >> sure, andrea. it's a little bit of an update here journalist next to mes that learned there may well have been a package found in a car near the house of the parliament and that's why the lockdo

you have the hypothesis, russians meddled with the election. opposite hypothesis is no, this is baloney generated by sore loser democrats. the synthesis of the two is going to be correct which is that there was some meddling. i am protecting this, i am not saying i'm right, i'm just predicting. they are going to find some meddling but that's all they're going to find, i think. but you are going to hear about it for four years because whenever somebody is in power, the other side latches on to an issue and will run that issue. we did this. republicans did it with benghazi. but benghazi was real. it was. he >> juan: you should be embarrassed. >> dana: it was real. one thing i thought was surprising, to greg's point, senator warner was asked a question he said i do think we'll be able to get this done before the 2018 midterm elections. another year and a half from now. >> lisa: i think the difference between what we've seen in the senate and house is reflected of the various bodies of congress. senate is a more deliberative body. i think it's impo

based on a number of conversations with the president, his staff, i would not concur with that hypothesis. i know it is widely reported, but it is the way that the president it's the information. he is asking people from different points of view. guy," i asked a janitor about policies as much as ceos. that is what makes america great. to suggest that the opinion of a ceo is more important than another person with another job is not appropriate. he does that on the campaign trail and i am not concerned that i have to be the last person in the room. i made a compassionate argument with the president on a number of days and we are unified that we have to bring premiums down. this current plan does not seem to hit the mark. >> you talked about entitlement reform. on the campaign trail, said that he did not want to touch medicare and social security. you and mick mulvaney wants to. to.ant i know that the president wants to save medicare and social security. having seen the numbers and worked through it, i believe that the best way to do that is to work on reforms to save it. i was on the campa

of proving the diffusion process or my hypothesis that we can improve the pace if we move resources away from less to more productive businesses, we could get a big kick. if you look at the numbers, those are enormous rises in dispersion and productivity so there's large gains that are being unrealized and you could say that offers a more optimistic view, maybe even as john suggested in terms of the future. i will stop there. thank you. >> thank you very much, both johns. please pass on your questions so we can get them directly to our panelists. i will kick it off with you, john f. you said you are not as worried about the down turn. you don't think that's as big of a factor. i think a lot of businesses in particular are feeling that there's a lot of uncertainty in the environment, investments are low, we are waiting to see what's going to happen with some of the regulations, for example. i know you have looked at this. what do you think given that we are starting from even below your long-term trend, what do you see as the impact to the near term, the next five years productivity

so if indeed we could find ways to realize those opportunities, by that i mean it's the hypothesis of improving the diffusion process or it's my hypothesis that we can improve the pace -- [ indiscernible ] -- we could get a big kick. and again, if you look at the numbers i was talking about, those are enormous rises in dispersion and productivity. so there's large gains that are being unrealized. and you could say that offers a more optimistic view, maybe even than john suggested in terms of the future. i'll stop there, thank you. [ applause ] >> thank you very much, both johns. and please pass on your questions so we can get them directly to our panelists. but let me start and kick it off with you, john f. you said you are not as worried about the downturn, yet i think there's a lot of businesses in particular who are feeling that there is a lot of uncertainty in the environment, investments are low. we're all waiting to see what's going to happen with some of the regulations for example. i know you have looked at this, what do you think from even below your long-term trend, what do

let's take that as the working hypothesis. you have raised a difficult question.he sheer number, how do you make sure each is and remains, which may be a problem from time ortime, a loyal american member of british security forces and so on? dynamic atother work. in order to do this kind of stuff, we have to recruit from a certain demographic. i don't mean to judge them, this group of millennials and related groups, they have different understandings of the words , secrecy, and transparency" in my generation. we bring them into the agency, good americans all, but culturally they have different instincts than those that made the decision to hire them. we may be running into this different host role of approach that we saw with chelsea manning, edward snowden, and now perhaps with a third actor. , let'spesky millennials talk about something older than a millennial. president trump and his accusation that president obama tapped his phones. you suggested this is a presidency that is manufacturing crises. when there is a real crises, you know a crisis will hit the unit

perkins' hypothesis was simple.ng and singing would be the glue that would bind ranch kids and town kids, poor kids and kids with plenty. it still works. you think dancing helps you get along with people? >> yeah. because you dance with people that you may not like, and if you dance with them, you get along. >> reporter: you kind of have to get along. >> yeah. >> reporter: a curriculum of kindness. ♪ >> it builds a strong sense of being and helps build children who have a better sense of who they are when they go out into the bigger world. >> reporter: that friday night there was a community dance. the place was packed. generations joined hands. the past was present and all were thankful for it. harry smith, nbc news, bynum, montana. >> curriculum of kindness. >>> that's "nbc nightly news" this saturday. tomorrow on "nightly news" with kate snow, how a famous poem inspired one community to give new life to a fading tree. i'm jose diaz-balart reporting from new york. thank you for the privilege of your time. good nig

the working hypothesis has got to be this is an isis-inspired attack. i say that because isis has featured british citizens who have joined their ranks and cried out for, if you will, attacks inside the uk. in fact, isis's propaganda, the main magazine, online magazine, has said, don't come to syria, don't come to iraq. undertake attacks in your own home country. they put out, if you will, a terror tool kit that has talked about car rammings, that has talked about knifings, building on a november 2014 statement from their principal spokesperson in the syria/iraq area that id, you should strike the disbeliever wherever, whenever, however you can. they talked about using rocks to smash their heads and cars to run over them. that was the inspiration we now believe for last year's horrendous car ramming attack in nice, france, that took the lives of 73 individuals. i looked at the scene of westminster bridge today and i thought to myself, my god, this could have been so much worse. an individual even with low-tech capabilities, like a car, a knife, a person

that would support your hypothesis. in real time, i was working on the campaign, we actually put out a statement about it in august of 2008. i'm sure the mccain campaign did as well now that i think about it. i was just with senator mccain in munich sitting around with colleagues of mine who worked on that campaign. we were talking about this. there was a nervousness about that. it would not have happened, in president nothe taken the action that he did with the military. it was a trap set for him. it was a trap. i know the bush administration was trying to work with them to prevent that, but had that not happened, you would not have had what happened. i would just say they had not yet annexed that territory. maybe they will. i think more generally, to get no the bigger question, puti understands it is too costly to re-create the soviet union. i think he took the gamble with this project. he figured out it was too costly, mostly because the ukrainians fought. they do not get enough credit for that. they did. that proved

conversations with the president, a number of conversations with his staff, i would not concur with that hypothesis. and yet, i know it is widely reported. but it is the way the president gets information. he is asking all different people from all different points of view so he can come to an informed decision. used to asks guy, i a janitor what they thought of policy things as much as i would ceos because that is what makes america great. we have people in different jobs all the way around. to suggest that one person's opinion because he is a ceo is the more important than someone with a different job is just not appropriate. i saws the same thing, him do that on the campaign trail. i am not concerned that i have to be the last one in their making that pitch. i made a very compassionate argument with the president the other day on a number of fronts. we are unified in this. we have got to bring premiums down. this current gop plan does not seem to hit the mark. >> you talked about entitlement reform, donald trump on the campaign trail said he did not want to touch medicare and social security. ob

little problems that you can use basic technology and tested out out and test your hypothesis whether it's right or wrong. i can't see the clock back there. can anyone tell me what time it is because i cannot see chris mark 810. >> awesome. the reason this is here the first thing is understanding the framework and the basic world the reason is picture is here is that my grandfather and early television trained during the second world war and went to eni dealing with early televisions. back when he started electricity was still really an immature science and immature technology and things went bang and pop and fizz and exploded and made smells and you knew there was something there. it was a very visceral connection. my mom before i was born was a computer programmer near manchester and when she started she was programming in zeros and ones. she hated telling me people that because she said it makes her son old but i said it makes her some cool. you can still see with the computer codes were doing they were loaded with paper tape with code written on it. my mom look something like that

for the last couple of decades, a key idea has been that the social brain hypothesis was the reason, the main thing that helped us grow such complex lead large brains. you and i conversing right here, we can do that because our brains have complex language abilities, and we are allowed to do this because in human evolution, there were large groups of us that supported each other and help each other find food. we need a complex communication, so do social abilities were the key binding factors of our group. the idea being that the group drove the developing brain. what about the new theory now? the study looked at 140 primate species, including monkeys, apes and asked, and advertised what they ate, social structures. they found that when they put these ideas together, the key driving factor was actually food. it wasn‘t just food, the fact that animals that eight calorie high food such as fruit, tended to have bigger brains. that came first, then social groups became important. and you had the outlier, the orangutan, who has a big brain, but not big families. they are solitary creature

it's a reasonable hypothesis that what is going on is a slower diffusion process. move resources away from the less productive to the more productive. there is enormous evidence that suggests that is important. there is aon goes up diffusion process and people catch up. those are different kind of mechanisms and i don't think we fully know which ones work. highhere is evidence that productivity businesses are not growing as fast anymore, and that almost cannot be a good thing. let me bring this to a close. i have not fully persuaded my esteemed colleague of this yet but i would say this is largely macrotent with the evidence. in the 1990's, we did actually see the surge in dynamism and innovation and productivity that was consistent with the temporary surge. ,ven when there was a decline it was important to sectors like retail trade. retail trade has continued to shift toward more essential change. what sector has had the biggest decline in entrepreneurship? i've shown you that in this time when there is a decline in entrepreneurship and dynamism in the high-tech s

>> it's certainly a hypothesis. >> reporter: holly and john have had to cobble this process together. for a marine animal welfare organization called sr3. he works for noaa fisheries department. they get transportation in antarctica the with lindblad national geographic expeditions. >> this is the seventh year in a row we've conducted research on board this ship. >> reporter: and it's the long term commitment that's important. >> we're studying animals that live as long as we do. to understand them and get enough opportunities with them, it takes multiple years. >> reporter: right now, though, even the short-term commitment is in doubt. mark phillips, cbs news, antarctica. >> and that's if "overnight news" for this tuesday. for some of you, the news continues. for others, check back with us a little bit later for the morning news and be sure not to miss "cbs this morning." from the broadcast center in new york city, i'm scott pelley. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com >>> this is the "cbs overnight news." >> welcome to the "overnight news." i'm don dahler. >>> the w h unveiled pres

another hypothesis is based on "reversed targeting, an illegal practice where a government targets citizens. after criticism he briefed president trump before the committee, the congressman stood by his decision. >> it was a judgment call. at the end of the day, sometimes you make the right decision. sometimes you make the wrong one but you've got to stick by the decisions you make. >> ranking democrats have the probe is tarnished. >> we can't have our chair acting as a surrogate for the administration. he has to have the surrogate role or the chairman role but not both. >> democrats said the timing is suspicious. presidents fox interview about the wiretapping allegation. >> i am of the opinion this is orchestrated either from the white house or possibly someone associated with the white house. if you look at the statement made by the president. >> we will be submitting things before the committee. hasn't been submitted as of yet but it's potentially very serious. >> spokesman said the reports were new and reporters should focus on content. >> whether he briefed us first or the democratic m

i mean, it's the andrews hypothes hypothesis. we could get a big kick. those are enormous. raises in productivity. there's large gains being realized. >> thank you very much. and please pass on your questions so we can get them directly to our panelists. let me start and kick it off with you, you said you are not as worried about the downturn, you don't think that's as big of a factor. there are a lot of businesses that are feeling there's a lot of uncertainty in the environment, investments are low, we're all waiting to see what's going to happen with some of the regulations for example. i know you have looked at this. what do you see as their impact to the near term, let's say the next five years. we should expect. we had the past five years, we saw capital shallowing. we came out of the recession, businesses have lots of capital. they didn't have demand. and they didn't have the workers, they could -- at this point the capital output ratio is back on trend. and i think those dynamics take a while to play out that makes me more optimistic about the future. even apart from

we are a very interesting investment hypothesis. we are a technology company.will take a lot of money to develop this mode of transportation. we have already raised $160 million. not only will we develop the technology, we will create partnerships with a funds and other pension funds to finance those projects. we are particularly happy we recently were joined by the cfo at uber, at a similar phase of their development. join the company with 300 employees, raised that to 3000. and he was the treasurer at google where he invested in green energy. we are a interesting, unique investment opportunity. yousef: clearly on the line of expansion. but to pick up on what you are doing in this part of the world. you are looking to set up a subsidiary, a local presence. how big is that going to be, who are you talking to? >> we do see the region is one of the areas where hyperloop could happen first. our business plan is to find an environment in which we can select a route. we have been worked -- working with the land and transport authority in dubai, the emirates, and acr

what would be the kind of hypothesis of what might have gone on between the russians and the trump campaign to see? well, i think that russia did try to collect some kompromat on trump, it was good to have him as a source of kompromat on other politicians. you think they got something on trump because. . ? because he was owner of chain of hotels and they're the perfect place to carry out intelligence situations. but you need the security of hotel to have blind eye. well you have no evidence of this? no it isjust logic. this is your speculation? yes. it is interesting you say they probably didn't mean to get trump, because it doesn't seem to be working for them. if you look at what trump is doing, everyone is saying aren't they being nice to the russians, the only thing they have done is say we are going to spend another $60 million on defence, which leaves the russians standing. the remilitarisation of the us and the remilitarisation of nato. that is not great for the russians. it is not great, but that is not the worst thing that trump already done to russia. the problem is that trump dest

in an're very interested investment hypothesis. toake a lot of develop this new mode of transportation. we have raised $160 million. not only are we going to develop the technology, but we will create partnerships with sovereign funds and other pension funds to finance those projects. so we are particularly happy that we were recently joined by at a very uber, similar phase of their development. joined the company with 300 employees, raised it to 3000. raised $4 billion during that two-year period. at google he invested in green energy. we are an interesting, unique investment opportunity. yousef: clearly on the line of expansion. but to pick up on what you are doing in this part of the world. you are looking to set up a subsidiary, a local presence. how big is that presents going to be, give us a little meat to the story. >> we do see the region is one of the areas where hyperloop could happen first. our business plan is to find an environment in which we can route we have-- been.working with the transport authority in dubai. and

but we are a very interesting investment hypothesis. we are a technology company.will take a lot of money to develop this new mode of transportation. we have already raised $160 million. we are in the process of raising more now. not only are we going to develop technology, but we are going to create partnerships with sovereign funds and pension funds to finance those projects. we were recently joined by the c.f.o. at uber and in a very similar phase of their development. joined the company with 300 employees, grew it to 3,000, raised over $4 million in that period. before that he was the treasurer at google, where he invested in green energy. we are kind of an interesting unique investment done. >> clearly in line of the expansion. but just to pick up on what you are doing in this part of the world. again you are looking to set up a subsidiary, a local presence, a bigger one. how big is that presence going to be? give us some meat to the story? >> we do see the region as one of the areas where highway loop could happen first. our business plan is to find an enviro

i think we have a hypothesis, which is that when users are looking at organic content. our organic content is from businesses. so, when you are browsing your home feed, assuming there is no advertising, you are looking at photos or pins that are ideas that reflect products and services. so, when we put ads into that feed, they don't stand up here they are not interrupted. no one gets mad. cory: no one gets mad at the ads in "vogue." tim: precisely. and what we see -- that's good. what we see is the hide rates. you can hide ads on pinterest. the hide rates are 1/10 of the hide rates we see across the industry because they fit. cory: when is the right time for pinterest to do an ipo? tim: we don't talk about some of the prospect of an ipo. cory: just between us,,. -- come on. tim: very focused on building a business. ben has said we want to build an independent company. so, the focus is let's build an enduring, independent company and continue to grow it. know,at is about, you building a great advertising business that the announcement today is pinterst propel, which is o

every hypothesis you can say about it's a difficult question. >> guest: the genetics have been brought into this also. it's almost like what we do is in our dna for example the study i saw where people exercise with one leg and they didn't exercise with the other end when they comparand when theycompare the s actually different. it's different depending on what you do. one thought is they are inheriting these patterns one generation to another. >> host: it could be viruses and bacteria as we get from it could be genetics or more fast food and hidden sugars, but the thing is what do you do now. and i think are there me interesting things on the horizon. if you had this therapy you would trick your brain into thinking you are fat when you're not so therefore your brain wouldn't tell you to keep eating. they would say we are losing more, come help me. >> guest: that is a good idea. it's still in the experimental stages, but we don't have it yet. other things like individualized diets is another thing to understand peoples genetics and can we individualized a diet that works for you so you

there are other possibilities but let's take that as a working hypothesis and you've raised an incrediblycult question. just the sheer number, how do you make sure everyone of them remainsa do you make sure everyone of them remains a loyal american citizen, the british security services and so on. beyond that, katty, there is another dynamic at work here. in order to do this kind of stuff we have to recruit from a certain demographic and i don't mean to judge them at all. a group of millennials, and related groups, who simply have different understandings of the words loyalty, secrecy and transparency than certainly my generation did and so we bring these folks into the agency, good americans, i can assume, but again, culturally, they have different instincts than the people who made the decision to hire them and we may be running into this different cultural approach that we saw with jason manning, edward snowden and now with a third actor. 0k, pesky millennials for sublets talk about someone older than that, president tom. and his accusation that president 0bama tapped as phone —— presi

think we should have an energy policy like he's proposing, all of the above and keep testing the hypothesis. it's not proven to me yet. >> neil: that's typical. >> yeah. >> neil: jack welch. thanks very much. president trump, i don't know if you listen, but great words of wisdom there. your call. more after this. >> neil: all right. forget her clothing line. ivanka trump with a controversy because of an unpaid position in the white house? i don't remember democrats complaining about that. >> is this a negotiating tactic? a constructive way of doing it? >> it's constructive in fifth grade. >> neil: all right. not all caucus members are happy with the way the president has ranted them and fingered them for not going along and supporting the latest healthcare measure. they're trying to rework that now. the strongest words come from the president on this. the freedom caucus is going to hurt the entire republican agenda if they don't get on the team and fast. virginia republican congressman, tom garrett. good to have you, congressman. what do you think of the president singling out the caucus bu

justhose for photos i showed you, it confirmed putin's hypothesis about us.ecause we were behind all of that in his view. we were supporting the revolutionaries in all these places. and so, what he -- earlier maybe he had an open mind about obama being different. but 2011 convinced him we were not different at all, particularly libya was an important juncture. we got medvedev to support us on that. i was in the meeting when he said, you are right about libya and we are going to abstain. that was a meeting with just one other -- that was a small meeting because he did not want other people in the government to hear it. two days later he was criticized by putin on the record for the first time. and so this stuff confirmed his old theory about the united states. especially this event. let me just explain a little bit about this for people who do not know. so he announced he was going to run for president. there was a parliamentary election in 2011. kind of falsified by the normal rates. 5, 7. i remember us meeting and thinking that was normal for russia, no big

it is translated into research hypothesis, often through models that begin 10 to 15 year -- the begins at 10 to 15 year journey to get medicines to patients. we create a monocle -- a molecule that we believe will interact in the right way. we run studies to ensure the molecule have what we believe is a desire -- the desired biological effect. we run multiple doxology studies prior to trial to humans. at that point, we conduct early studies referred to as phase one and phase two and assess the safety of the compound and identify the right patient population. once phase two has been passed, for safety and advocacy, we can chip -- we conduct large phase three trials. to prove the risk-benefit of the drug, and then we submit this data to a registry body like the fda for approval. this process has many interactions and. -- and full stops. you remove the toxicity and you find -- there's multiple attempts to get the right medicine with the right distribution. that risk-benefit profile is favorable. i will share with you our first in class drug cash it started -- it started in 1990 with a resu

. >> do you have a thought, a hypothesis about how this happened? do you think investigators are going to be going and the sorts of questions they will be asking here? >> it seems they will honed in on someone being on the inside that has access to this information and these documents. whether or not that was self-motivated, somebody trying to assist wikileaks or with the involvement of foreign intelligence offers, that remains to be seen. we know wikileaks had ties to the russians in the past. it doesn't have to be with help from a foreign country. it could be somebody disgruntled within the intelligence community itself. >> and, brian, this has been now, at least the last couple of months, the age of leaks. and this as we were talking about what was leaked in this particular situation. is this tactic allegedly by the cia that we are hearing. you are out with a new article today that says the easiest way to protect your devices from hacks, keep up updated. you say this isn't a hard or complicated process. what are some of the steps that one can tak

we can now make more hypothesis sees of why patients get these cancers and identify targets to develop drugs against. dr. beckerle: all of us in the cancer research community are desperately working to improve outcomes for cancer patients. we know that none of us as individuals or even within the institutions hold all of the knowledge that's necessary. so we are naturally inclined to collaborate and to share information. and the national cancer institute is really helping to support us in that effort. an example that i would give that's related to our new knowledge and the precision medicine era is that we now are trying to test really exciting new therapies that are only relevant for a small subset of patients that have a particular genomic signature. particular d.n.a. signature. and so what that means is that even for a disease like lung cancer that is a relatively common disease, the patients with a particular type of lung cancer that might be eligible to contribute and to participate on a particular clinical trial might represent less than 10%, even 1% sometimes of the total patien

the thought occurred to me, but i would not suggest it is anything more than perhaps a potential hypothesis want to look into as you go forward. i don't know that the russians actually committed the theft. this may be what wikileaks said it was, an insider. but with regard to the timing, i mean, look, i'm now pretty close to the position that wikileaks is acting as an arm, as an agent of the russian federation. >> you have proof of that or you just mean -- >> no, this is my making assumptions based upon what's happened over the past year and what wikileaks has been doing. look, jake, they claim to be a transparency organization. i wish they would emphasize transparency in some of the world's autocratic nations rather than one of the world's great democracies. >> you talk about the culture at the cia but i have to -- and the intelligence service in general. this leak, this hack, whatever it was, follows documents revealed by edward snowden, chelsea manning and nsa contractor harold martin who stole documents revealing some of the most sensitive offensive cyber weapons. what's the problem her

another hypothesis under consideration, according to city congressional staffer is based on "reverse" an illegal practice where a government targets a citizen under the guise of targeting a person overseas. the california congressmen stood by his decision but offered some regret. >> a judgment call on my part, and that, at the end of the day, sometimes you make the right decision, sometimes you make the wrong one, but you've got to stick by the decisions you make. >> the committee's ranking democrats at the bipartisan probe is tarnished. >> we can't have our chair acting as a surrogate for the administration. he has to either have the surrogate role or the chairman role, but he can't do both. >> the democrats that the timing is suspicious, pointing to the president's box interview about his wiretapping allegations. another lawmaker leveled a serious allegation paid >> i'm of the opinion that this was orchestrated, either from the white house or by possibly someone associated with the white house. if you look at the statement made by the president -- coat >> we will be submitting thin

the way that they explained what happened with these dns look-ups a they say that their hypothesis isbelieve possibly some of their executives, possibly some other employees may have stayed at some trump hotels in the past. may have given their email addresses there while they may be were checking in and then what happened is that trump servers made have sent emails, advertising emails back to servers of the alpha bank and therefore, that triggered some of the cyberprotection that they have and that that in turn triggered that dns look-up. they said they also launched an investigation, it's never clear what happened to that investigation or whether they came to any sort of final conclusion. so there are a lot of questions out there. a little bit about alpha bank, the bank is actually very independent. it's not in any way, shape or form owned by the russian government. in fact it really is a bank that prides itself at keeping an arm's length towards the russian government. that's only possible to a certain extent in a widely regulated and restricted environment like the business enviro

are trying to wrap their arms around this information, put it together into some kind of working hypothesis and make sure that that area, that area that is filled with people at this time is safe and secure so they can gradually begin to get things back to normal again. >> we know one individual got inside with a knife, stabbed a police officer and then that individual was shot by other police officers. we don't know that person's condition but presumably they have an i.d. already, they know who this person is? >> normally they would. the key thing is that the scott land ya scotland yard is good at identifying suspects. they are among the best in the world. some would say the best in the world. they will check with the databases and go through and when they can do this, they can not only figure out who it was but a potential motive and figure out who was connected to whom and are they have pressure that is being caused by isis right now. or is it something else. and as the investigation moves forward we should know fairly something soon. scotland yard is about to have another statement, at

to take this understanding and translated into a research hypothesis, often through animal models that began 10 - 15 year journey to get medicine to patients. we discover a molecule, create a molecule, synthesize a molecule that we believe will interact in the right way with the target pathway. we run studies to ensure the molecules have what we believe is the desired biological effects. we verify the compounds follow kinetics and dynamics profile and how it affects the body, and we run multiple tax holiday tecy studies prior to beginning testing with humans. at that point we begin early studies referred to as phase i and phase ii to understand the right dosing and assess the safety of sec and compound and determine the right patient population. once phase ii has been passed for safety and efficacy, we create large phase three trials with thousands of patients to prove the risk benefit of the drug. then we submit the data to a regulatory body like the fda for approval. this process has many interactions and false starts. very often you start with the basic drug substance and it is toxi

fb hypothesis -- every hythesis y could think. genetics has been brought into is, the way that r genes are. it is in our dna. for example people exercise with one leg and not the other end when they compared the pattern and imprinting on dna it is different where people are expressing and the one thought is our people inherit a that. it's all an area of wonder. there could be more fast food and hitting sugar. there are interesting things on the horizon. this hormone replacement thera therapy. >> so if you had a disrupt in therapy you would train your brain into thinking you are fat when you're not so therefore it wouldn't kill you to keep eating it. >> guest: that is actually a really good idea. it's still in the experimental phases. we don't have it yet. things like individualizing diets, that's to understand peoples biography is and how can we individualize the diet that works. can't you just keep trying one after another and try to find one that works for you? >> that's what i did a. >> tell us about how you did this. you come