so there's no hypothetical in regard to that. you can't prove scientifically the age of the earth or the universe, bottomline. >> of course, this is where we disagree. you can prove the age of the earth with great robustness by observing the universe around us. and i get the feeling mr. ham that you want us to take your word for it. this is to say your interpretation of a book written thousands of years ago as translated into american english is more compelling for you than everything that i can observe in the world around me. this is where you and i, i think are not going to see eye to eye. you said, you asserted that life cannot come from something that is not alive, are you sure? are you sure enough to say that we should not continue to look for signs of water and life on mars, that that's a waste. you're sure enough to claim that. that is an extraordinary claim that we want to investigate. once again, what is it you can predict? what do you provide us that can tell us something about the future, not just about your vision of

i raise the hypothetical that technology has moved to the point where n.s.a. can do only one of it's core missions, protect american codes or exploit the codes and communications of other countries. i ask if tech noming did that and you could only do one what would you do. to no surprise they pick the second mission and i have to tell them that's wrong. it goes back to an incident i had several years ago. as a young historian i was having lunch with david and i said something today effect n.s.a. was misnamed. it was the national security agency and i and 90% of my colleagues did signet, we didn't do security. david looked at me and said if you could only do one, which would it be and i've always tcheapt either or thought in my mind and hope we never reach the point it becomes a reality. i think that same question about the role of counter intelligence versus what i refer to in my classes as positive intelligence only the make the distinction clear to people coming from the outside has that same sort of quality. what after all is the point of collecting all thi

they're all hypothetical am fluorests, all hypothetical wedding cake makers, because no one has an actual case. >> the case that caused the groups to propose this law in the first place was -- well, you know, what was also interesting, i think jan brewer is getting a lot of high fives and kudos for the veto, but let's face there was a lot of economic pressure, a lot of at stake. major companies coming down on her. this was really an economic decision. >> that was the new dimension, delta air lines, delta air lines could have stayed quiet. the marriott corporation, which is mormon owned and run, as dust unlents pointed out. he was stunned that the marriott corporation came out you know, on the side of the veto, as did mitt romney. this was a giant change in the reaction system that we have to this kind of situation. this was not just an okay, all the liberals went and marched and got some signs. this was a giant power play that i'm not sure we knew was there, that corporate america was going to rise up like this and say oh no, you can't do this. >> is that a good sign? >> i think it's a tr

it is a hypothetical circumstance. i would have to think that through and do research. >> do you think it is advisable that at this point given the footprint bse that at this point we are in a position where we can repeal the a you in half. >> well, again, i have to think that through. if, again, a hypothetical situation, just what would be done as a substitute, of the top of my head i just don't know. >> that's a pretty big question. here is another question. it is a question i have raised before. tomorrow we're able to capture the terrorists were would be with them? so if we capture the current head of al qaeda tonight where would he be detained? faugh would it not be important to interrogate him and could you identify a length on how long you would need to interrogate the head of al qaeda? >> a hypothetical question, -- >> at think it is a fair question to the american people. if you capture the head of al qaeda tomorrow where would we put in, what would we did to interrogate him, where would we interrogate him? do

i don't have any updates on that hypothetical. i can tell you that we strongly support action by the house in keeping with what the senate to to get the employment nondiscrimination act passed into law. if you look at the data on this issue and specifically on the employment nondiscrimination act, i think it is overwhelmingly demonstrated that this has the support of the american people. across the country. and as i said again and again, you know, this is -- history is moving on this issue in the right direction. and opposing these kinds of things means finding yourself on the wrong side of history, and i don't think ultimately that any member of congress wants to be on the wrong side of history. so hopefully we will see progress. nobody thought or at least a lot of people did not think we would see this move through the senate. did, and we remain hopeful that it will move through the house. >> strategy is for comprehensive legislation. why for the minimum wage? >> i take your point. what i can tell you is that our position on thi

i don't think there is a private that you have any reason to worry that your webcam is hypotheticallyd for access to intelligence. >> based on the report, there were plenty of innocent people who could have been dragged into this. withthey looking at people certain kinds of user names and randomly saving images inside their home? >> when you talk about intelligence collection, sometimes there can be a broad application of collection, as done with any type of intelligence from radio waves do anything. recently saidder that the nsa collects about 2 million intercepts of french communications every day. math onere to do the how many people it would take to translate that information, it would be about 100,000 people just to do french translations. the nsa or any other intelligence committee are not looking at content for the sake of looking at it here at there may -- it. targetingbe individuals associated with national security activities. >> do you see any problem with the practice as outlined in the "guardian" article? agencies wille look at the modern communication medium of the day,

>> i will avoid engaging in hypotheticals. >> why can't he answer that question?gaging in hypotheticals. that's not no. it's most definitively not a no. that's what is happening in your party. >> i think that's a shame, actually. i think that until we can stand up and have the courage to say, listen, just as i condemn what jer maya wright said with -- leaders are called to be statesmen. and as the governor of texas we make decisions about leadership and appointments and who we decide to represent us and campaign with us is a reflection of that leadership. and i have no brb coming out and saying i disavow those statements, i condemn those statements. they're wrong. you would never see me campaigning with someone like that. they could endorse me. but i do not endorse that. >> well -- >> this is not the republican party that we know. the republican party is lincoln. it's values. it's hope. charity. >> well, thank you very much, losa, for taking the time as we said. candidate for republican governor of texas in a tea party leader in texas. >>> ben ferguson cnn politic

>> i don't want to confuse the fact where nsa or in intelligence agency hypothetically has the capabilityre jumping to the conclusion that all of a sudden everybody is phone verbal. the intelligence agencies and committees look at valid targets to keep us stay for -- safe. i don't think there is a private citizen that you have any reason to worry that your webcam is hypothetically being used for access to intelligence. >> based on the report, there were plenty of innocent people who could have been dragged into this. were they looking at people with certain kinds of user names and randomly saving images inside their home? >> when you talk about intelligence collection, sometimes there can be a broad application of collection, as done with any type of intelligence from radio waves do anything. general alexander recently said that the nsa collects about 2 million intercepts of french communications every day. if you were to do the math on how many people it would take to translate that information, it would be about 100,000 people just to do french translations. the nsa or any other intelli

>> i don't know where you are getting your hypothetical from, sir. divorced women and what was the other one you cited? >> unwed mother. jesus spoke against that. >> who would be against an unwed mother? >> i wouldn't be. i wouldn't be against a divorced woman. i don't understand. >> as you know -- >> you take discrimination to the inth degree. >> jesus spoke against divorce. >> so i want your reaction on this. are you claiming that everybody that is against this law being passed is completely missing the point on this bill? >> fundamentally, yes. there has been so much lies. fundamentally, there have been so many lies and i'm sorry. what's that? >> go ahead, mr. bear. >> fundamentally, yes, there have been so many lies and misinformation spread out about the bill. i can understand if people are worried about it. some of the reporting on it has completely distorted what senate bill 1062 is all about. all of the hypotheticals that were thrown out that the people are going to be denied service, those types of things. those can't happen under the law. m

that is so hypothetical.what we need to talk about, how are we going to create jobs and growth is how america goes forward. we have to have growth to create the wealth so we have a military that can be ready to stand up to what is going on in the world. we need to be sending a message to our foreign partners who have historically been our partners. we are going to truly be there for them. >> should we raise the minimum wage? >> no. that's a job killer. at a time when jobs are the real issue, the idea that government should be forcing small business men and women -- because what's going to happen, we know. there are going to be jobs that are lost. >> but the cbo says 900,000 families would have -- >> that's not the issue. are you willing to tell people, listen, we're going to allow these folks to hoff up a little and you're going to lose your job? i'm not. >> what about extending unemployment benefits for long-term unemployed? do you support that? >> no, sir. you have to -- we have to get the spending under co

let's take the other hypothetical that it is not a successful mediation. each of you were in a position to intervene or to try and do something to prevent a humanitarian disaster from happening and what would you do at this point? >> danny. >> this is exactly the topic of the op-ed that we have in tomorrow morning's new york times. in my own view, just a press, desirable scenario vet my interlocutors have raised out, a transition into a post assad time, those aren't the hopes of the early days. beating from the rise in. it literally was not even discussed in geneva. precisely this is what my own focus shifted no to a more manageable piece of the nightmare. our own proposal that we lay out in this up that is that the u.n. security council has a resolution. france's already made suggestions that it is ready to take the lead on this end with this resolution forward. and the resolution to be latest that these besieged areas that are not starving, hundreds of thousands of syrians, this would be directed not only to the forces of assad but any armed actors to in

just as our opponents are raising tons of -- >> well, not a hypothetical. i'm talking about an actual case of discrimination. >> let me finish. an actual case could happen right now because people are getting -- are having same-sex ceremonies even without a same-sex marriage ordinance or constitutional right in arizona. they're getting married. they're having same-sex ceremonies in arizona, all over the state, in fact, all over the country. so are you telling me that if somebody wanted a photographer, let's say in arizona, to do their same-sex wedding photographically, that that person would have protection without this law? i say no. we need to learn from what happened in new mexico. >> one more chance, do you have any actual example where someone of faith has been discriminated against in arizona ever? >> you know, i haven't seen that raised in the newspapers here, but i know that things are happening. without this law they will be. >> kenji yoshino joins us again. you actually did the research on discrimination in arizona from the eeoc. and you found tho

it's a hypothetical circumstance. i would have have to think that through and do some research. >> do you think it's advisable -- given the footprint we have seen for al qaeda, that we are in a position where we can repeal the aumf? >> i'd have to think that .hrough just what repealed, would be done as a substitute or replacement for it. off the top of my head, i don't know. >> it's a pretty big question for us as a country. here's another question i would like an answer for both of you on. able torow we are him, where do we put him? if we capture the current head tonight, where does he get detained? would it not be important to interrogate him, and could you identify a length on how long you would need to interrogate the head of al qaeda? >> hypothetical question. >> it's a fair question for the american people. if we capture the head of al qaeda tomorrow, where would we put him? what will we do to interrogate him? do we have a place to interrogate him? do we have a plan? >> it would be situational dependent. put alu

joe now hypotheticals anyone else seminaries to inspire others.nors with the - to allow minors to talk about the impact of weapons. joe is ref support for individual how's he attends city college and working for the recycling center his positive number one violate change helped did young people while at the same time helped him to make progress. i'm honored to present this award to joe distracting (clapping.) good afternoon and greetings i embarked on this road shot 5 times and stabbed in the same day in a neighborhood that doesn't get much recognition for good. after being rehabbed by general it was great work and wrap around case manager and director - (clapping) - i was embraced by information and people that i did not know would be part of my life for a a long time. one of the people was dr. dick take care i had two tubes in my liver that i was shot ♪ the emergency and i had to come to the emergency the next day and i had a dead end look on life so much was taken from me and i looked at dr. dicker and she said what do you want to do now i said

so there's no hypothetical in regard to that. you can't prove scientifically the age of the earth or the universe, bottomline. >> of course, this is where we disagree. you can prove the age of the earth with great robustness by observing the universe around us. and i get the feeling mr. ham that you want us to take your word for it. this is to say, your interpretation of a book written thousands of years ago as translated into american english is more compelling for you than everything that i can observe in the world around me. this is where you and i, i think are not going to see eye to eye. you said, you asserted that life cannot come from something that is not alive, are you sure? are you sure enough to say that we should not continue to look for signs of water and life on mars, that that's a waste. you're sure enough to claim that? that is an extraordinary claim that we want to investigate. once again, what is it you can predict? what do you provide us that can tell us something about the future, not just about your vision of

i am not going to play the hypothetical game. >> that is not hypothetical.that actually did -- >> i realize that. and my answer is, i will answer for my own reporting and my own judgments, but i am not going to sit in judgment on others, especially in this case where my own newspaper was involved. >> ok. i want to take a minute now to identify ourselves for our radio and television audiences. this is "the kalb report." i am marvin kalb. and i'm here talking with "the new york times" columnist thomas friedman. >> very frustrating -- >> only on certain issues. >> you have been at this for a long time. 33 years with the times. upi before that. if you had it to do all over again, would you still do it as a journalist? >> oh, god, this is the most fun you can have legally that i know of. [laughter] growing up i only wanted to be gave it over stem, -- be david aversham, i got to meet him. i have had, this is been the most amazing run. i have never had a bad day, and i have never gotten up in the morning and said, you know, i just do not want to do this anymore. it

presidential candidates and led in a hypothetical matchup against hypothetical candidate hillary clintonthose days are long gone. eric shawn has been covering new york and new jersey politics. three players in this fiasco are refusing now to give documents to state investigators. >> and three are now refusing to testify completely. they're going to take the fifth amendment if they are called. they are three of the former top officials who have been subpoenaed by the state legislative committee investigating the bridge scandal. they include the former deputy chief of staff, bridget ann kelly. the lawyer says she will keep client. she ordered the close examination now she joins bell steppan in invoking their right against self-incrimination. a former top port authority official david wild stein clammed up. a lawyer, eddy hays, taking the fifth before a state legislative committee, is no guarantee against possible federal criminal charges. >> it doesn't affect the criminal investigation by the u.s. attorney. the other thing is the investigative body, that legislationure may call him in and

we have hypothetical questions. according to a new poll paul ryan fairs best against hillary clinton. not bad for paul ryan there. from there it is all down hill for the republicans. clinton would beat mike huckabee. against ted cruz clinton leads by 17. she leads rand paul by 20, 58-38. she has the same 20-point lead on jeb bush. same as rand paul. she beats him 58-38. so much for bush coming in from the bench. marco rubio down 21. stay tuned for the christie numbers. we have those in just a minute and they are bad for the governor. cialis is also the only daily ed tablet approved to treat symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right

. >> but we just described that example -- first, it's a hypothetical example. >> it's your hypothetical. >> that is completely fair. again, it's a choice they're making. this doesn't -- they had something before, which was a 65-hour job, and maybe no health care and no great health care options. you now give them a new option they didn't have. a brand new thing. >> that brand new thing -- generous subsidies and enroll america is now employing two animals to get more humans to sign on. ♪ enroll today >> with an eye on the 2014 midterms, republicans had new ammunition for their long claim that the cost of the health benefits will hurt the economy in the long run. >> they can say anything they want, but this number is a lot worse than anybody thought. >> though the president insisted to fox new's bill o'reilly that government is not growing out of control. >> we have not massively expanded the welfare state. that's just not true. when you take a look at it, actually, the levers of support that we provide to folks who are willing to work hard, they're not that different than they were 30 ye

what i'm trying to point out, i think, through this question is, hypothetically, in a medical theation, it is the doctor, medical community that is making the decision. whether it is in the combat situation or somewhere else in the world. the doctors are making those decisions and i hope they would be the proper people to be making that decision. it does not mean they will be -- commanders will not be held responsible for ensuring the health and safety of their units. there will still be that impetus. you will not say i do not care how safe the motor pool is because doctors are ruling that and i'm trying to say that if we turn this over to someone else, some other entity hypothetically, military , lawyers, the commanders will not care about sexual assault anymore. i think you have pretty clearly said yes, you will. commanders will continue to emphasize and be responsible for sexual assault in the units just as, to repeat myself, they are responsible for safety, health, even though when things go wrong and a body gets assaulted by something that fell from the roof that should have been

a hypothetical for you. a gay couple walks into a business and the owner refuses to serve them. the couple sues and the owner loses, that is violates his religious beliefs. which party in this hypothetical was actually discriminated against? now, it may not be much of a quandary in arizona if jan brewer signs a bill passed by state lawmakers. it would allow individuals and businesses to cite their religious beliefs against lawsuits claiming discrimination. supporters of the bill, like the republicans who passed it in the state legislature, say that their beliefs are being substantially burdened. a photographer was sued for refusing to i can wedding pictu a same-sex college. opponents say it's discrimination. gays and lesbians could be denied, say, medical treatment as a result of the law. let's bring in one of the republicans who voted in favor of the bill arizona state representative john cavanaugh. there's a lot of discussion about what this bill would allow and not allow. there's obviously some tension in

she couldn't come up with one other than hypotheticals that maybe might happen. but she had no actual example of it actually having occurred. that's interesting because governor brewer specifically pointed that out. i want to play some of that exchange we had with nancy barta, one of the authors of sb 1062. let's listen. >> senator, do you have any actual example of someone in arizona being forced to do something against their religious beliefs? >> well, in arizona it could be happening all the time, yes. >> do you have an actual example? >> well, surely. people may be being asked to -- >> i mean where it's actually happened. >> well, obviously if people aren't bringing it to court we don't know about it at this point. but we do know that without this law, people would not be able to defend themselves in court. >> but again, you can't name actually one example where this has happened. because people opposed to this say look, this is a problem -- this is a solution in search of a problem. you actually have not had this problem. >> it absolutely is not. >> you can'

so this is not a hypothetical. it's a will of us actually integrating a platform that gives you actionable knowledge in real-time, anywhere, anytime, and is evidence-based. that encentavoses the provider to give the best care, and the marketplace will do that if you actually -- you hear accountable care organizations and i will challenge anybody, how can you have an accountable care organization when in no real-time can you tell who is accountable for that patient? if you have surgery and you're elderly, you see just as one person 27 healthcare providers, and an elderly person has 19 medications. who is accountable? so, you can't have a accountable organization when you cannot measure who is accountable, and then you want to give value-based care. it's outcome divided by cost. if you can't measure outcomes and pathways in real-time, how can you know when you're giving value-based care and you have no idea about the cost of real-time. so we can measure outcomes in real-time and costs in real-time in st. john's hospi

let's say hypothetically that you are acting in self-defense against somebody who is.ing a gun at you and you, in response, to protect yourself, fire at that person but you hit other people who are close to that person. well, you were acting in self-defense with respect to the guy who was shooting at you but what about the other people that you hit? the way they charge this case was they charged attempted murder on the other three individuals in the car. so they're struggling with, well, the self-defense that he claims against mr. dunn, does that apply to the other kids in the car? so i think that's what they're struggling about. and what's making these tea leaves very difficult to read is, the fact that they've gotten on to those counts and the fact that they said yesterday they had convicted or they were only deadlocked on one count certainly suggests dunn has been convicted of one of the more serious counts. so most people might think, well, if that's the case then, they've already discounted and said there is no self-defense claim. so tough questions. tough things the jury is stru

if we acted upon hypothetically, if we acted upon reversing that disapproval, then in essence that's an approval of that permit. >> correct. >> he would still have to complete the final. >> not necessarily. this is what i'm saying. >> i think the challenge that the board doesn't have before it in the record, the information required of a complete permit application for a mobile food facility. >> you would have the permitee submit that information to you and you would receive it >> i understand that, counselor, but let me go to another instance then. there have been a number of cases in this board where an applicant submitted for a permit, they were not going to approve it because of lack of something and usually it's a lack of a change whether it's by planning for that permit. that permit applicant can then request the department to disapprove it so theca appeal it here. what's the difference? >> i think the challenge of evaluating whether the permit is co-compliant. in the building context you would be able to do that maybe mow readily when in this context the permit application is

so engaging hypotheticals about actions they could've taken by saying all of the things being equal and of course they weren't and aren't doesn't really get you very far. >> thanks jay. on minimum wage cbo has been looking at the effects of raising the minimum wage on credit. what do you say it raising the minimum job -- wage will cost jobs and cut hours? >> i would point them to the ample documentation from respected economists who say the opposite that there is not evidence it has significant impact on jobs and to the contrary it's beneficial to the economy and efficiency and productivity. the theory behind the opposition to raising the minimum wage that cost jobs if you tease it out all the way that it shouldn't be minimum wage at all. and there are probably fewer than 5% of the american pete of the believe that. let's just pay people a dollar an hour and nobody believes that is the right thing to do anymore than paying the full-time wages that keeps them below poverty is the right thing to do which the situation we have right now and there are far greater economic minds than this on

sometimes to engage my students i n we're discussing ns a raise the hypothetical technology has moved to the n.s. a. can do only protectts core missions ciphers of other countries. technology could do that which one would you do? they pickedsurprise the second mission and i have to tell them that's wrong t goes an incident i had. as a young historian i was day and i said something to the effect that nsa was his named. it was the national security my and my colleagues didn't do security. david looked at me and said, the if you could only do one which would it be? nd i've always kept that either/or thought in my mind and hope we never reach the point becomes a reality. and i think that same question of counter le intelligence versus what i sometimes refer to in my classes as positive intelligence only to make the distinction clear from has that m outside same sort of quality. hat after all is the point of collecting all this information if we can't protect the sources that thods and processes allow us to bring it to decision makerers. point of a world class intelligence structure if cou

position where any further employment, we are not recommending it, but, just, talk and just speaking hypothetically and for anything to continue employing something like this i think would be very strange if nothing else and so here, i'm not troubled by the penalty, as is my colleague commissioner hur, i mean, the fine, and the 5,000, and to me that is, negligible compared with the findings of guilt official misconduct and disgrace, we are saying that you did a lot of bad things here, ma'am. and i don't know how you, and we had members of the public saying that she is just going to tap dance away from this, and nothing is going to come as a result of it. there is no way, after we make findings like this in conjunction with the fppc, that, a governmental agency, is just going to say, well, we could get a problem, but it is over. >> we will go back to work and by the way you are due for a raise. that not going to happen and if that does happen, i would be the first one to complaint about it. and so in that regard, here, i see we as an agency, our staff has done a good job and in terms of it, i would

it is not hypothetical. it is the will of us integrating the platform that gives you actionable knowledge in real-time, anywhere anytime. it is evidenced-based. they need to incentivize the providers big is the best care. .he marketplace will do that and you will sift out. you hear accountable care organization, who will challenge anybody, how can you have an accountable care organization when in no real-time can you tell who is accountable for the patient. it has shown that if you have surgery and your elderly, you see, just as one person, 27 health care providers. an elderly person will have 19 medications. who is accountable? have an accountable care organization when you cannot measure who is accountable. and then you once a value-based care. that is outcomes divided by cost . it you can't measure outcomes of pathways in real-time, how can you know when you're giving value-based care. and you have no idea about the cost in real-time. system that can measure outcomes in real-time and costs in real-time. i

was your hypothetical. > that is completely fair. again, it's a choice they're making. this doesn't -- they had something before which was a 65-hour job. and maybe no health care and no great health care options. you now give them a new option they didn't have. a brand new thing, option to buy in the marketplace, it is subsidies through that, maybe it's medicaid if their income is low enough. they still have everything they had before, labor demand hasn't changed, they still have that job, they can still go to that job, they can still do that, but you give them this extra new thing, you can't have made that person worse off. if they make a new choice, it's optimizing re subject to a new constraint. >> but work hours-wise, it might be better for the family to have health insurance but a lot less take-home pay. >> in my example -- >> are you making more money when you go from 60 to 30? >> some people may choose to -- i'm not going to sit here and go -- give a list of 140 million americans and tell you how many hours each of them should

>> i don't know where you are getting your hypotheticals from, sir. >> now, here is the deal. you ask us about -- >> one of my comments goes to this. >> i think an easier way for people to think about a distinction that is appropriate is in public accommodations which was your example. i walk into a restaurant, shouldn't matter whether i am red, white, black, brown, purpleal. public accommodation serve everybody that walks in. with the baker and photographer those are private engagements. >> this law is much broader than that. are you concerned about this law? >> let's just see if we can reach an area of agreement. can we at least agree that those two are different? i would agree that if you open your doors to do business that is a perfectly legitimate requirement that you have to serve whoever comes in versus if you have a private engagement, one-on-one, for instance to be a photographer at a wedding. >> we are going to be back. this administration's attacks on religious freedom are part of a larger pattern. when we come back i'll show you something unbelievable that happened

come on and on but found that the hypothetical settlement of them have them up on a song with a kick at the heineken cup tonight looking to hijack the crime scene. i must touch on that money on closings on the curb my best work. i can push off the shelf at my official chef hat they set them up and ethan has a new high the monumental and she has an assumption that time the company assets. in that race in the afghan ministry of education is equally measures. well that's my next long run. at the top has left the guests such as ash a decade and a mazda two game lead on a single mum i said and friday with aching and that i should stress on the side of town so that they eat the stuff they can be in the next my phone. by that i didn't have a dish to share too much. one senses that the boldness of the stitching the fifteen year old young women comes from feeling real responsibility for the future of the country. and they say it's much more. i'm nice that she's making a mess and put them on the back of the clothes and tonight i couldn't lie that support the continent and his sake and not moun

republicans are in tears to your of lowering of the tree he h which sped right guy was would during hypothetically if you have the daughter of getty bready to go to college what is. >> host: to id or even if act of''. >> here is but if you saved based on the expectation that is a projection is a if you are wrong what happens because they have cheaper or better alternatives it is still good to have money in the bank if your kids decide they want to start a business it is nice to give them the money to start instead of paying to go binge drink. [laughter] but there are a lot of people in the audience that says they are in capital management but they could probably tell you better. bayou portfolio shows why shouldn't not give the best -- investment advice. [laughter] dublin peace is on the outside of the 529 dekalb because that you have a vintage is up front on taxes but it has to be spent on college with the road to change that might tie you up too much it is possible of what the people end up something in the law would be changed but that means you take a chance that congress would act rationally t

the army intervening in the political affairs and let me ask you a hypothetical question what if the next elections bring to power you know some political force that the army doesn't like will they have to intervene again isn't a question that is it will be controversial that is either too would be clear you were left to mr x. or mr y. and there it is on its have to be respected this is democracy and the people who would respect to the result of democracy whoever is elected we will accept that as of the elections both elections will be organized within the framework of transparency and the observers from abroad and from the population and from that egypt but will the winner of those elections allowed to serve full term of about the army delivering any of judgment on whether he or she has been efficient enough to serve the country which it is the case that you've been making against president morsi that his later she wasn't efficient enough even though he was never allowed to fly to serve until the end of his term i'm sorry to tell you that you are assuming things. perhaps quoting cer

afghan people down the continent in the state of oneness of prominent on the bus and that the hypothetical settlement of them have them up on some of the kick at the heineken cup tonight. looking to hijack the crime scene. i must determine our money on things on the curb. my best work. i am not a clash of the shots and one fish at the chef's hat i then set them up. i mean isn. and she hn assumption that time the company assets. in that race is the afghan ministry of education is equally measures. well that's my next long run. at the top has left the guest services as the decade and a mazda two game lead on a single mum i said and friday with a key and that i should stress on the side of town so that they eat the stuff they give you the men that time my child that i didn't have any chance to share. so much. one senses tha the boldness of the stitching the fifteen year old young women comes from feeling real responsibility for the future of the country. and they say it's much more. i'm in the second wicket in the mess and put them on the back this up with and tonight i couldn't lie that supp

point in this program is that expansion creates more risks but you know having ukraine for example hypothetical in the alliance is that really create more safety for the alliance as a whole i don't see it. no absolutely quite the country quite the contrary and that's why i think ukraine will be a nato member not as least in the foreseeable future i mean there are east said nato is a fake i mean you brought up the amount of the fig leaf nato as a fig leaf for u.s. foreign policy to a certain extent definitely because of the u.s. much greater sway than any other allah on the ally and nato a's an instrument in the us for all of us foreign policy but nato is also now alliance which has in which. is have their own rights and duties and i can make sure you thought. offering again ukraine a concrete prospect of membership is pretty much not an issue which is well come in many european countries particularly western europe and night i don't see them giving their consent to moving them forward in nader's agenda would actually. i would also contest the interpretation of ukraine being a thirty two car set

post office is central to economic and social fabric of the area it's not just the painting on a hypothetical signs a place as its faults in a series it's the busiest thing i signed on to the studio since his close up the savings account it is viewed her as a young price many self help save this as an on site seeing this close up in my bag. the services on offer here under the microscope following the death of the local postmaster in january. of course routinely examines the viability of offices with hundreds of great stories or retires. the sort of business undertaken demographics and the distance from other offices are all considered views of locals are also sold by the company in taverns to think this would have to watch all seven of my outing to chew to collect our attention to post our pictures and let him live in spirits when everytime you come to the post op she meets some of you have a test you hear this news about the non independent embarrassed to say goodbye to speak for almost eleven and it also uses the phrase our contract bases around the country many of them in small rural area

clinton is clearly the number one choice, there is support for michelle obama as it leads to a hypotheticalpresident of the united states in some future time. so michelle obama enters at a very high rate. hillary clinton, though, when in 1993 when we took the same survey during the early years of the clinton administration, actually entered the survey at that point at number two. it's not unprecedented but it is impressive. >> now, don levy, two things i want to ask about on the top 10 list. number one, only one republican, betty ford, is on that list. why is that? >> well, there's two ways to understand that. number one, many of the first ladies on that list, they stand out as having accomplished a great deal, as being first ladies that all first ladies clearly aspire to. but frankly what we find, this is a survey of practicing historians, political scientists, many of whom are nested within the academy, authors who publish books on the presidency and the institution of first lady and frankly as a group that group tends to be a little bit more biased towards the democrats than towards the

sorry for interrupting you but just hypothetical yesterday you know if exaggeration gets out of control what steps are you ready what steps are you ready to take to protect the jews in the country very briefly if you could. well during the last seventy years one being one big thing was done by jews to give them security is the creation of the state of israel which today is the only thing that can really provide security for jews any jew in any planes can feel not secure you can come to the state of israel there is no visa between ukraine and israel so definitely we call upon jews if there is a danger to come to our mr house gave the c.e.o. of the world form of russian speaking jury thinks so much for sharing your views with us here on our international. i don't example of how split the feelings of ukrainians are is the way police officers returning from kiev were received in the south of the country while the opposition in the capital or proclaiming the ryerson as heroes other parts of ukraine are firmly on the side of the law enforcers. now in the crimean city of sebastopol returning o