but now we are going to open up questions to the audience. i am sure there are a lot of writers in the audience, let's go. >> thank you so much. my question is in terms of black activism. there is always concern about having in-house conversations and outhouse conversations was how can we as black people talk about our issues and highlight things without feeling we are dragging other black people, how do we handle both? >> that is a really great question. when you get in trouble as a kid and your mom would give you that look, she wasn't going to do it in the store. and had to spend the whole time in the store being of god. that is how it is when black people are like everybody dragging somebody but no one saying their names and i do think it is strategic and those conversations need to happen about a specific person. i say things like i have often seen people do this. and the fact that you can name multiple people it could be tells you i'm not talking a specific person but specific behavior and also, one of the things i talk about in a chapter

president trump: i think they are ok, and i think they are good. like the relationships we have it with a couple of other countries, probably not, right? but i think the relationship we have now with north korea is as good it has been in a long time. they had no relationship under the previous administration. it was nothing. nothing was done. hey, folks, this should not be up to me. this should have been handled a long time ago. not only by president obama, but other presidents that preceded me. this should not be done now. they should have been done years ago. >> do you plan to offer the north koreans economic aid? president trump: south korea will do that. i do not the united states will have to send -- to spend -- i think south korea will do it. i think china will help out. i think japan will help out. i do not see united they -- united states spending a lot of money. we had three hostages. how much money did we spend for the three hostages? we are very far away. we are very far away. those places are very close, in the neighborhood, within a --

i understand the comments you are making. i understand the concerns. i am certain that those concerns and comments will be discussed by that group. i would encourage you discussed the many most energetic and passed -- passionate way. thank you. moving on, the last time the sec update its rules was 1961. in 1961, roger and i were just kids. the internet and social media hadn't been invented yet. will you take a look and commit to taking another look at social media and the use of the internet when asset managers do what other companies do? when we rolled out 30 -- -- 30-e -- -- 30e-3, we are committed to making sure that rules reflect the technologies of today. my remaining time, last time you were here we discussed a rule. every shareholder has the opportunity to weigh in with management when it comes to how the company is being run, products offered, and so forth. it gives you an opportunity to express your views. i understand that. it also drives up the cost. i worry about every other small investor in america that wants the opportunity to own part o

are. hiring goals, what we set for managers. i sometimes people leave too quickly to what their checklist is of initiatives. if you are actually going to take this seriously and do it well, it has to be something that really deeply is suffused in the culture and everybody lives every day. again, you can have a good list of initiatives. but if it is not really in the culture, it is just going to work. emily: before we go, i understand there is a third brother who as i hear is even more tech savvy than you are? tell me about tommy. >> tommy is a four years my junior. tommy was very interested in this topic that we talk about, the implications of technology and the fact that more of our lives are moving online. he was really interested in that before it was the talk of the town and before it was the cool thing to be into. he worked at the electronic frontier foundation. a very storied nonprofit around digital rights and digital privacy and things like that. he now works for a nonprofit called tor who produces trace less or privacy pr

we are 6000 miles away. i have articled south korea, you know, you are going to have to get ready, and japan also. i think they really want to see something great happen, japan, south korea, and china. that is their neighborhood. where are you on that today? president trump: i did not like it. i did not like the russian meeting yesterday. i said, what is the purpose of that? it could be a positive meeting. if it is a positive meeting, i love it. if it is a negative meeting, i'm not happy. that could happen. we talked about it. we talked about ending the war. this war has been going on, it is got to be the longest war, almost 70 years. there is a possibility of something like that. that is more the signing of a document. it is very important in one way. historically, it is very important. we did discuss that. the ending of the korean war. can you believe we are talking about the ending of the korean war? you are talking about 70 years. we are going to discuss it prior to the meeting. that is something that coul

i hope you will deny the conditional use not because the people are bad, i am sure they are fine. 24th streets not thriving right now and we do have places leaving and you know, i know you have heard it that leases will change and this will be a watershed, but not just for noe valley we are changing in general and we have to try to preserve what we have always tried to preserve hear and so i just hope you will deny this conditional use for this large store that has a lot more money backing than our local businesses. thank you. >> any other public comment on this item? >> i came hear for another matter today. collin glass. grieve. i used to live in noe valley. i came hear from ireland, so i am an outsider and i lived hear for ten years before i moved to marin. i live in a town that is dying because people come into the spots and price them on amazon. >> okay. according to the institute for local communities and cities, chain stores have a weekend local economy is and eroded trust in the community. that is not the give-and-take in that family atmosphere. this also have limited local inve

so, i mean, i think there are a bunch of -- that are sociopaths i think that are in it for power. but i do think that there are a number of politicians who are in it because they -- inspired to do good whether it's because -- you know they're active with their church group and they thought maybe they could bring values to washington or live those values through public service or they're veterans or -- community organizers or whatever. i mean i think most people go to do good -- a number of them go to do good thing i can't give you a number to break down terms in most. i don't know and i wonder these days. >> one back not for good mccarthy who was a -- you -- draw it so well in the book. you write of him in the book. he's impossible to ignore. he's become this planet blocking the sun. and whatever points he makes that have validity blotted out by indecency and to e smear and then you write -- of president eisenhower saying to charlie marteer -- of mccarthy -- he's incapable of stopping even when it is in his own interest. smearing and lying what he does one cannot appease the insati

i bet you are a very successful guy. i can see the eyes. big success. that doesn't work well, doesn't? and we have many cases like that. many cases. we are going to straighten it out and they all want to negotiate because they have to negotiate. they have to negotiate. it has to happen. that's not a threat. it is like the iran deal was so bad. we paid $150 billion to sign a horrible agreement. cash to$1.8 billion in pick up four hostages. [boos] they are the wealthiest hostages in the world. i the highest net worth of any hostage in history. , nothing toing north korea. and he did a very smart thing because it was good will. we did it before i even left. and a lot of good things are happening. it is all going to work out. it is going to work out because we have a big advantage. the bank andare they are taking money from us hand over fist and at some point that has got to stop. it has got to stop. we can lower your taxes which we did. we gave you the greatest tax cut in the history of our country. [applause] [cheering] right. we have some incredible thing

well yes not that i don't need not are more than what you are or i assume that they are all there is a world that doesn't that i thought the doing it out of. forces out of me to help. me. see it all there is unity does it all on yom tov or your gate or god i was all for you or your gaydar are for you all are well you could target going up to talk. to one or more you there. my concession they can hear if they want. to go out there do you know anything. about a woman that i don't think i'm glad i did talk or think of me can i tell you. there are some. didn't think i could stick with it at all no matter that. put you know learning on. those militants can understand citable and that kind and. do. take it stimulant acquitted and then taking. omar yes this. can all i see you are this you know look i really don't know how you do it or did i get out and i got to. summarize it it's going to go down there you are not you're going out on what the last. digits any of us you know what tony allen or it's an ink on your lot and it could well come out to know. there must be sorted out on the new wall

that does not mean i agree with what they are doing. and they know very well i don't. so, we are negotiating very hard tariffs and barriers. as an example, the european union is brutal to the united states. and they understand that. they know it. when i tell them that, they are smiling at me like the gig is up. the gig is up. there is nothing they can say. they can't believe they got away with it. canada cannot believe they got away with it. mexico. we have a $100 billion trade deficit with mexico, and that does not include all of the drugs pouring in because we have no wall, but we are. we have started building the wall, as you know. $1.6 billion, and we will keep that going. a lot of these countries smile at me when i am talking. the smile is we could not believe we got away with it. that's the smile. so it is going to change. they have no choice. if it is not going to change, we are not going to trade with them. how about a couple more? go ahead in the back. >> going into the talks with kim jong-un, do you have a clear objective of what you want to get out of them? >

but you can almost certainly do it wherever you are today. i take advantage of the community's tools and knowledge that is available and start where you are right now. emily: how do you see yourselves navigating your partnership, your relationship as brothers, as the company grows, and the stakes, if all goes well? only get higher. >> we have survived this long and i am not too worried on the go forward basis. in particular, it is -- after 20 years, we can extrapolate whether we will last a couple more years. emily: who gets the last word during an argument? >> i can't even remember. when you are so focused -- stripe just past thousand people. we are still hiring quickly. there is always the next problem and interaction to go with. one of the things i find enjoyable is when you have a high trust environment, which we do, and we have worked together for a long time, you're not focused on the meta-structure and how to be arranged. you are focused on the next problem. emily: where will stripe be in let's say five years? >> i hope that we substanti

i think you are more than able to handle it. i wanted to ask you what you are going to do about all of the whites? when i mean is you are talking about major reallocation of wealth and power. when you talk about reparations, we're not talking about five dollars. we're talking about trillions. when you talk about wanting to change admission so class becomes more important, and so on. everything you said implies a major take from the whites. they have not been terribly accommodating. we have seen backlash. when trump voters were asked, is your life like you are climbing up the hill and people keep getting ahead of you, is that what you feel? that is the way the majority of the white people felt. whites like to talk about equal opportunity. everybody should participate in the race. but if you discuss about the starting points, those who are disadvantaged are always going to lose the race. you need meaningful quality of opportunities. so, how are we going to get there? >> a lot of people think about reparations as a kind of impossibl

record numbers of women that are democrats running. i think the number right now is 247 democratic women have filed to 83 republican women who have filed. there are fewer republican women. democratic women make up about 40% of the caucus. women, 14%, something like that, of republicans, a little lower. so what is going on with republican women? ms. ayotte: yes, interestingly, my numbers are a little bit different, because i am involved with a organization that is newly formed that is focused on helping republican women get elected. and so they kind of draft this stuff, and they are looking at candidates around the country. yes, there are fewer republican women running for office, but our numbers are that there are actually an increase of women republicans, and it is not as great as democratic women running for office, but there are republican women running, and it is actually from the 2016 election, we have seen -- we think it is a 20% increase, and there is a gap. if you look at the senate right now, where i served, there is 23 women th

think we are. ink we are almost becoming more interested in winning than we are being right and the notion that the ends justifies the means by any means necessary can bring us to the atrocities that we have seen in the past. as an african-american when i listen to people say that we have never done this before in this country, that is really not true. we have done this before. we have done this in slavery. we ripped children out of the arms of their mothers leaving families traumatized for financial gain or some economic excuse. we have done it before and sthat wsthat -- that is why we have no excuse than to do it again. we cannot afford to go back down this road again and create generations of people who were already traumatized before they got here and further abused by a system that we failed to correct. >> we have seen criticism of immigration policies of the past, some of them as recent as surrounding the second world war. when we look at all of that, there is the question, too, for many people

bottom line here, airlines are not purchased at whim. i don't think china is in a position also the deal they have means a lot of the small body airplanes are being made in china. >> that is what insulating for boeing here the bottom line is boeing had a miraculous run on the way up a lot of this is air out of the sales. >> eastern the market is beating this down, the poster child of the trade war. it's a fundamental am. it will not be hit >> i don't know. was i not clear? i knows way nervous about this game i want to get you on record >> the calendar of like if you did the calendar of trade war stocks, boeing would be like mr. january. caterpillar right behind >> i think you are wrong what is the choice are they going to an airbus plane correctly. >> you don't have any china-related stocks at all? >> of course, i do we'll wade for that. >> this did, boeing. >> apple, trade war stocks or not a trade war stock? guy adami, are you up. >> one would think the logical answer it is a trade war stock. a significant percentage of the revenues, mos

i think the koch brothers are often misunderstood. t is interesting that they favored gay marriage for long time and a liberal circle started attacking the koch brothers and i said you know for gay marriage they were -- they had shot looks on the faces they did not believe me. go to google and look it up. anyway. >> host: mike is calling in for north arlington, new jersey. good afternoon, mike. >> caller: my question has to do with political correctness. what is roger's opinion about political correctness and its opinion affect on our culture ad universities and how it affects our dialogue? how do you feel about political correctness? >> caller: well, okay, i will answer that. it's ang big topic in "i know best"" what you bring up the university and i'm not going to get into it heavily now because it is premature but my wife and i are starting a company that in part deals with clinical correctness. in the university it's anti- thought. the university is a place where chairman mao should rule. i know i am being sarcastic here because he

and all of them are talking about 30%. i had to address a little public comment to let them know even at the 25%, we don't have the money yet. so if they can help usthey y reinterested in what we are doing, maybe for broader discussions as to where we are. and i'm going to segue at the end of the day where we are right now. how is the funding? m.o.h.c.d., what are the conversations? what are they saying as of today? what are the next steps? are we going to bring them here so they can be telling us ere we are and what we should be doing, us, in order to further why we are doing all this planning, the funding and the time line, is also on a trajectory and where are we. for people who are listening, people who are not privilege to all the technical information we have here, and you have been doing a great job on that. just one bottom line, simple answers that we can -- you know, transparent. so help me answer those questions. >> sure. >> i think, mr. beck, you are coming back to both the infrastructure committee with some housi

i worry about every other small investor in maine that want the opportunity. are you going to be looking at this also ? >> i want to look at the whole proxy including that. >> thank you. i appreciate. -- i appreciate it. >> take you. the last time you were here you and i had a good discussion. think creatively about ways we can structure our behavior. but it was more important and difficult to commit fraud, it becomes harder. you turned your attention to ministry to businesses that have played a local role in our committee. if so, how can you provide any updates on retail fraud. >> we did a retail fraud task force, i appreciate they've done that, and focused on this, that group of people dedicated to rooting out retail fraud, more importantly, there are a number of ponzi schemes, where we have identified them, brought asset freezes, brought them to a halt. i like to think, as quickly as we could, because the longer they go on the more money goes away. the less money we can get back for investors. that has been a focus of ours. the ico space process this by saying

i will call the names of these folks, and if any of you are on this list that i will rattle off and you are for the charger, would you please raise your hand and tell me who you are so i can put you on the appropriate category. i will call them up separately. allison collins, leah fisher, susan solomon, dianne great. are any of those in the wrong category? >> is there anyone on that list who was not in the right category? >> this was speaking against the charter for the resolution that was put in front of us to deny the charter. very good. i am going to start with the, for those who are in favor, i'm sorry, those who are opposed to the petition you will have 30 minutes and there are, i gave extra time because there are a couple of spanish speakers that we will use a translation for. sherry taylor, veronica martinez, and if i call your name in this category and you are in the wrong category, would you please let me know? veronica martinez, amalia mend mendez, erica choy, and you can start coming up and getting behind the podium. [please standby for captioner switch] >> and michelle isnog

which is what we are here for. first, i would like to thank prime minister trudeau for hosting this summit. it has worked out to be so wonderful. the people of canada are wonderful. it is a great country and a very beautiful country, i might add. we tackled a variety of issues facing our nations. at the top of the list was the issue of trade. a very important subject because the united states has been taken advantage of for decades and we cannot do that anymore. we had extremely productive discussions on the need to have fair and reciprocal -- meaning the same -- people cannot charge us 270% and we charge them nothing. that does not work anymore. i made a lot of statements having to do with clarity. we want and expect other nations to provide fair market access to american exports, and we will take whatever steps are necessary to protect american industry and workers from unfair foreign trading practices, of which really there are many. but we are getting them straightened out slowly but surely. we also discussed the issue

i thought that is incredible. have you rich guys that areorth billions, they want to spend money to rocketry that great. i told my people, let them do it. if they reach the moon with their money, we'll take all of the credit. nobody will remember name, let it do it. keep this momentum going, we need more republicans in washington. we need governor henry mcmaster as a continuation in south carolina. very important. come here, henry. because with your help we're going to continue to win. do you remember in the campaign? henry do you remember? i came to south carolina. i said we'll win so much, you people are going to get tired of winning, you are going to say governor mcmaster please, we can't stand winning and more, go to washington, talk to the president, we can't win any more, we're going to win, remember, i said we're going to win in trade, we're going to win in space. by the way, henry, army, navy, air force, marines, coast guard, airs force, right? air force? and what are we doing to do, space force. people love that. you know it will be

tim: i can't speak for the fed, but there are lots of things i wish we had done differently over the but over the last couple years, the changes we are making in the company to make sure that customers are taken care of, that we are fixing anything broken and that we are building a better company by making these good long-term decisions, we are absolutely going in the right direction. erik: you have taken pains to explain to your investors and others how this asset cap is going to function and the impact on your business. one thing that does not seem as clear is the degree to which it has forced you to change any of your plans or any of your strategic initiatives. tim: the impact in terms of the asset cap affects ace will number of customers in our financial institutions group. eons that, there is not an how we are serving customers. erik: creating room for the rest of the business to grow, there is no impact on anything that wells fargo is trying to do? tim: not in terms of customer activity. in terms of making sure that we are making the right investments, hiring the right people, a

are shrinking? yes, it troubles me. i do believe the qualities of opportunities that you see in the public capital market space is not as good as the quality opportunities that are available the people with a great meal -- deal of capital in a private space. >> in your opening statement you mentioned you notice an open meeting for thursday, june 28 to include a number of items on smaller company reporting. will there be any discussion at that time? >> yes there will be. i expect there will be. the smaller reporting company thresholds are something that we will be examining, providing more public companies with the opportunities to use scale disclosures. there are thresholds when 41 when 41b is applicable. i believe those thresholds should be examined and i expect a discussion of that at our meeting. >> i must admit when i meet with a lot of entrepreneurs, venture capital, startups, i asked the question, i just recently came back from a trip to silicon valley. one of the things i heard when i asked do you consider going pu

what are the things i can bill for myself that are now about me maintaining a nuclear structure that one of us can maintain i think it's about how the entire structure is becoming unlivable, it's not serving us particularly well. and what i care about black folks need to think about whether they should be gentrifying. it is the marker of the system that is designed to eat us a live. that is a conversation we should be having. that's what i'm thinking about. [applause] >> i'm ruth and i have a vocal disability. there with me. i've been aware of most of these issues most of my life. starting at about eight years old. there are many white women and men who would like to do something but are not involved [inaudible question] [inaudible question] [inaudible question] i love to see some change. [inaudible question] [inaudible question] [inaudible question] [applause] >> i agree with you. i think the hard part, this is what i've been saying to white people, for unity at some level we have to build some trust in bonds of trust. part of the challenge they think white people have is you grow up

some choices are daunting, do i do my job or risk everything and when the tasks i have been given aremmoral. in february, i faced that choice. it was my job at the montana department of labor to pass information that would be used to deport people. i could not do it and live with myself. i had seen the video of the border patrol dumping lifesaving water in the desert, with knowledge they were condemning people to death. arrest people who had been reporting for years, throw them in detention centers where they were reviewed. i had seen loving families torn apart for no good reason. [indiscernible] i could not sit by and let it happen. i could not be part of that machine, even if i would only be one small year. -- gear. i could not just follow orders. [applause] >> it was my choice. right,o choose what was even though it meant placing my family at risk. i was no longer comfortable with the demands of my job i would quit if a few more people would have joined me. i later asked my governor face to face to change the way the departments don't with change request. so people would be more pr

we are not there yet. ion't know that we will ever get there. >> here's what holder said about where we are going in terms of the justice department. take a listen to that. >> i suspect that we are on a path where there is going to be an inevitable clash. we are going to get to a point where the justice department simply will not go any further. rod will not go any further and something is going to happen. i don't know who gets fired or what happens, but we are going to be -- buckle up your seat belt. >> david? >> you know, that's all certainly possible. but we can't forget that the united states has seen worse than what we are experiencing right now, by several orders of magnitude during the nixon administration. and the system held. thist system worked. i want to be really, really careful about using words like constitutional crisis. i do think that the president could act impulsively and create a political crisis. but a constitutional crisis is an order of magnitude greater than that. we need to be carefu

i think we are having a reboot right now. ink we are going back to the day that our forefathers set up. this great country with this great living document, our constitution, and we will be living by the constitution again by rebooting our supreme court. i am thrilled. have before you go, you any -- do you have any particular pick you want the president to choose? caller: i really do not. as much of a conservative i am, i really believe in our constitution. i am a little concerned about roe v. wade. i do not know that it will be revisited, but i think i would like a woman, because i think she would be a little more sensitive to that. having said that, we need to be guided by the constitution and not by a personal feeling. that is what i want. i want a constitutionalist. host: thank you. next, we continue our spotlight on magazine series with a look at the construction industry with an article by andrew soergel of u.s. news & world report. we will be right back. ♪ >> watch american history tv this weekend on c-span3. include tod

i will be brief. we are going to expand our options of recourse to misconduct for employees and provide a one stop shop for information. this is the office of integrity and i think it will be a hotline for employees for guidance and this intervention and it will be a source outside of their own court. in addition to the national hotline we will provide similar outlets to the circuit level. the ninth circuit recently announced an office of director and workplace relations. outside of the local workplace -- as he mentioned we have extended the filing deadline for employee complaints for 180 days. we have a long list of training for employees and judges much of which has been implemented and on its way. we are educating our workforce aggressively about the options that they have available to address their concerns. many of the recommendations were made. enclosing -- in closing, i recognize that the judicial branch is not immune from workplace was conduct desk a misconduct. we made -- we remain committed to havi

i made. right? human becomes are human beings. ultimately, i think the idea of belittling people for who they vote for, particularly when you tell them you had their back. it's shameful. >> what these political leaders are doing, they are helping president trump with the gop in november. they are pissing off the electorate. while they may not understand we are approaching 5% growth, and possibly averaging 3%. what they do understand, their pay is increasing, they are able to find jobs. they have mobility. charles: that is a great tie. don't put it down. retail sales soaring. consumers not just sitting at home. they are pumped up out on the streets spending that money. i'll tell you all about it when we come back. luckily for him, he uses super poligrip. it helps give him 65% more chewing power. leaving brad to dig in and enjoy. super poligrip. and i recently had hi, ia heart attack. it changed my life. but i'm a survivor. after my heart attack, my doctor prescribed brilinta. it's for people who have been hospitalized for a heart at

i pursue all of our rulemaking. we are all human beings my hope i rip -- pursue all of our withaking and pursue cases the idea of what is in the long-term interest of the people who came and put money in our money market and left it there. >> social policy would not influence you. thank you. i would like clarification on your proposed best interest role for broker-dealers. the sec proposed rule that said a broker cannot put his own financial interests ahead of the interests of a retail customer. the proposed rule then goes on to imply that a broker will satisfy this obligation as long as the broker's interests are not "the predominate motivating factor behind the recommendations." is this your intent, do you mean to equate these two big things? under the proposed rule, as long as the broker's own interest was the predominant motivating factor behind a recommendation, does that mean the broker automatically did not put his own interests ahead of his customers? >> you are taking that language -- let me be clear. the broker c

so director wray and i are not trying to conceal any wrongdoing from you or the american people ar. congresswoman: let me thank you for your service to this country. we often have a phrase in congress, that we associate ourselves with the comments and questions of collie, but i would like to disassociate myself with the manner in which i believe you two have been treated. and i believe that your service has not been respected. i've talked tot, both of you before about a subject matter that i'm critical of, of the department. but i'm critical in the context of respecting your service and the service of your officers. we've hadremember me, a couple of conversations about andk identity extremists about that report. i have asked both of you at different times if you would look into the matter further, and i didn't actually hear back. so i want to ask you questions i have asked before. and we also had a classified departments,your and i'm still in search of answers, and the answers i'm in search of our if you have identified who drafted the report and, when more important than the individ

great we're not but i think you are much more complicated and i think that we need to understand also saw where women are placed on should really and all the kinds of beliefs and things which become sedimented over time and which become ways of imposing certain expected behaviors on women and bollywood fed into this right up to the gills until recently when with the entry of new young women directors it began to change and now you're getting these amazing films which are made by women directors produced by women which started with ellen female story so there you have you know there is a recent film really the wedding which is about really women's sexual lives and it's amazing that which brings me to the question of how artistic creation can actually help to break down stereotypes we'll talk about that in just one second but first we're going to look at an exhibition of indian women artists and it's currently happening involves spotlights of all. bracelets fired into bricks but not just ordinary bracelets they all come from violated women deaf room is an

are. that was a purpose of the working group. i would add to my earlier answer to the question that all the claims and settlements that we are aware of in the branch reported nationally to our office and so we would know of any sort of settlement. it is more than a guess that i am unaware of any settlements, monetary settlements. >> thank you. >> senator feinstein? feinstein: i have been listening to you, mr. duff, and it seems your reasonable, smart and you have experience. i really believe it is important that the federal court system lead the way. we've got a state court system and what i want to say to you is i hope you are going to be very aggressive. i believe the women of the senate, the men of the senate would support that. that we want a federal court system that is free from this kind of sexual harassment. this, itf you look at is a bit of a fight, because our culture is so liberal. there are so many influences that come from so many different directions. i hope you will see from what is here today that we really do care

only assume that i don't like are more than what you are or i assume that they are told there is a world there doesn't that i thought the that he thought of. was inside of me to help. me. see it all there is unity does it all on yom tov or your gate or god i was all for you or your gaydar are for you call our local target going up to talk. to one or more you did. wrong. we did. life you can face in they can hear if they want. to go out there do you know anything. about a woman that i don't think i'm glad i did talk or. can i tell you. there are some. didn't think i could stick with it at all no matter the. chilling moment. it is. citizen and that kind and not that do you. think it's. taking. oh yeah it's just. got to know all i see you are this you know you know i really don't know are you doing or did i get out now i gotta go to the sunrise and it's going to go down there you are not your cup going out or what the last. digit in any of us you know what tony allen oh it's an ink on the out and it could work i'm out there no kacang me there must be sorted out on the new wall norco no. mon

i think they are worth, actually, then cnn. i m.hink nbc -- and they wantd to renew w my contract. they wanted to renew my contract, and they were doing everything. they had the top man at comcast came up to see me in my office with a whole group of people. "please, please renew your contract for "the apprentice." that is when i knew it was going to run. i turned it on, a primetime show doing well, 14 seasons, did, arnold schwarzenegger, big movie star took my place, it bombed and if you shows. it actually bombed in wenzhou. s it was so bad they didn't believe it so they let it go a little bit longer. and the one who knew was my wif wife. said, you know -- [cheers and applause] she's very smart. she said, you know there is nobody that can take your place, don't you? i said, thank you, darling. how smart is not? i don't know if she believes that but she said, there is nobody that can take your place. he will not be successful. i said, it's arnold schwarzenegger. he will not be successful. there is nobody, darling, that can take your

i think that there are many things on this issue. when you talked about political realignment, supporting it or not supporting it, i think there was so much of a scramble as a bruce mentioned, about what failure is or success is. who supports whom, who supports what. it is less clear than it probably was two or five years ago. ms. demick: i think we have time for these two questions and that will be it. >> thank you. i'm with the german embassy. thank you very much for your great presentations and answers to our questions. i'm curious about your take, whether it is u.s. withdrawal, oa, whether it is actually strengthened or weakened the u.s. position in this whole scramble. because it has not gone unnoticed that there is another and there was another agreement. there was no summit in ingeborg, but there was an agreement that the u.s. was somehow a part of. i am curious about your opinion. klingner: i think the initial narrative would need, especially before the u.s. pulled out, it would be well -- it would collapse any sort of north k

to provide story to be heard tamara i totally agree with your busy are i think the positive impact on the younger people of you being are out if. the mafia reward the whole. thing that you are doing because you're creating hope for goals who have been excluded and do not foresee for any puter and but when they see oh you as an example you give hope and you give a warm those to these very difficult. yes i'm waiting for it and check at skype i'm going to show you a headline from the daily mail this is from a year ago they mailed the first gentleman husband of luxembourg's gay prime minister joins the nato weiss and girlfriends let me show you that picture. lessing we discuss is justice gus. well you know i think we've come a long way in this country in the u.s. when it comes to you it's not going to be african-american. people in elected office and well obviously or and. also in ireland and discrimination and personally we now have a white house and like we have the green court and less and less tolerant of where we are today and where americans are today and so i get very concerned whe

well yes not that i don't like are more than what you are or i assume that they are told there is a world there yes and that i thought the heat it up. was inside of me to help. me. see it all there is unity does it all on yom tov or your gate or god i was offered your way or gave up. for you while you could target going up to the car. to walk or even what you did. wrong. life you can face in they can hear if they want. to you don't out there do you know anything. about a woman that i don't think i'm glad i did talk or think of me can i tell you. in their midst if i saw one. evil nothing i could stick with it at all no matter. chillen want. it in an i.c.u. citable and that kind and. do. take it stimulant to quit taking. them off their list this i know she got going all i see you are this you know you know i really don't know what you do or don't or did i got out of. the know i said it's going to go down there you are not your cup going out or what the last. digits any of us you know what tony allen or it's an ink on the out and it could work i'm out there no kacang me there must be slid do

intervened and congress may work best when we are on a deadline. i am not suggesting that is the way we should work but that is the way we do work. signed the discharge petition were responsible for the fact we are not discussing this on the floor of the house. host: what is the discharge petition? for those not aware of parliamentary means. where does that stand? could that still be a play that moderate republicans make? isst: on the definition, it a suggestion that a bill come to the floor that has not gone through the committee process. it requires a majority of the .ouse to get that to the floor it is extremely rare it actually happens. usually when you are in the majority you do not sign a discharge petition. you sign it when you are in a minority. 23 republicans to have signed a discharge petition to get the ball rolling on the immigration issue. because we voted yesterday on the more conservative till we would have to start again in the discharge petition process. certainly that is in our back pocket. host: when or why would you bring it up? g

there are some people in the low 4s. as i said uncertainty bands are not quite a full percentage point on either side but three quarters of a%, that ki percent very possible. we can't be too attached to these unobservable variables. i think we have to be practical about the way we think about these things. and we do that by being grounded in the data and what we see happening in the real economy. >> i have a coue of regulatory questions. first of all, on the countercyclical buffer, i was wondering what are the chances ed wil need to use that in the next year or two? hand my second question is there has been a lot of talk in congress bts ability for banks to serve marijna businesses. and i was wondering if you think that banks should be able to serve those businesses in states where marijuana is legal? >> so the countercyclical capital buffer gives us the ability to raise capital rirmtds on the large-- requirements whes meaningful above normal. that's the language we've used. and that's certainly a possibility. i wouldn't say

now i know you are secretary of bosnia. i want you to know she got a shot out from bono with u2 last night. she had on a rock 'n roll pin. >> before we began you are the most incredible leader. you have built it, and are the most dedicated human being in a really good friend. i think everyone understands the huge role that you play. >> thank you. we have a lot of fun doing different things together and this is a treat for me. there are so many things i have to ask you, i am going to jump into one, you just finished your six book. it hit the new york times best- selling live, but it is a little scary. it is not by your pin book. it is a really insightful history looking back and telling us a warning of the trend of rising authoritarianism around the world. it is a history lesson, but you bring it into today's world. madam secretary, dear we ask what is the warning that we all need to be afraid of? i read it and i know how scared i am. >> it has a scary title, and it is meant to be. i think that we do need to watch what is goi

think they are ok. i mean i think they are good. is it like the relationships we have with a couple of other countries? probably not. but i think the relationship we are now with north korea is as good as it has been in a long time. they had no relationship, under the previous administration, there was nothing, it was nothing. it was a nothing, nothing was done, hey, folks, this should not be up to me, this should have been handled a long time ago. this got to a critical point. this should have been handled many years ago. not only by president obama but by other president, this should have been done years ago. what is going to happen south korea will do that. i don't think the us you is going to have to spend, i think south korea will do it, think china, i think frankly china will help out, i think thatjapan will help out, i think thatjapan will help out. no, i don't see the united states spending a lot of money. you know, we have three hostage, how much money do they spend for the hostages? we are very far away. we are very far awa

what are we dealing with here? >>speaker: i think it's been stated already today there is no city the size of san francisco in the u.s. at least that has constructed anything like this. there are other public/private networks around the country like north kansas city, missouri has but a much smaller city. chattanooga also but their population is about 177,000. >> is there any chan of awst? >>speaker: i am sure there is many in a project like this, it's a big expensive capital project so those kinds of projects are fraught with risk. i think the most important thing if the public/private partnership is pursued the protections that are built into the project to ensure that the city doesn't end up with some unforeseen cost. there could be delay. the private partners could go bankrupt and not be able to complete the project and unforeseen expenses can pop up in any capital project. i am sure the attorneys working on the project swel as well as e project team would work through those issues. >>speaker: in your opinion, what other qu