i c j. case we saw a try, we saw israel was defending itself. what happens with this? i c. c warrants. now, whether or not these really need is whether or not net, yahoo and kalonde do appear before the court. will they be a trial to? that's also for little correction the i c j has not yet said said what is happening is genocide. type c j has not st. that's fine. but to your point immediately, is that the, the, the, the nature of the, the process is that are the i c, c. we just have an arrest warrant. yeah. um, there is nothing yet uh, coming during the day that has to be what we call a confirmation of the charges. meaning the, the judges will do the prosecutor will the ones please the rest for an x x that good? then that would be the confirmation of charges because we have a file of charges and, and the judges would look at it and decide whether to confirm it or not. so that is a process that still, by the way, to the significance so that you're not going to have the trial any time soon. okay . um, but it will have, would be the states processed as a rooms thought you would now be comp

but the bottom line is that the united states doesn't recognize the jurisdiction of the i a, c i, c, c. and it has challenges jurisdiction to add rejection rejected rather as awards. but okay, but kimberly, i know that us has not signed onto the rome statute is not a member of the i c c. and i know it has rejected and pushed back very strongly and put pressure on the i c. c. but then if it were to impose sanctions on the i c c or it's prosecutor that really goes not just one step at several steps further, doesn't it? and if you west were to do that, it would become very hard then for the us to say, look, we defend a rules based order. we defend international law, we defend the rule of law, you can't both do that. and also sanction a court or prosecute to me the 1st time that the united states has spoken out of both sides of its mouth. and i'll give you an example as the united states is saying right now that it doesn't respect the jurisdiction of the i. c, c, when it comes to israel, it has no problem respecting the jurisdiction of the i, c. c, when it comes to rushes more on ukraine.

i c do. the international court of justice is looking into genocide. that's why the i c c are located to more uh for crimes against humanity and open ising a whole the hunger, not door open a bicycle of hunger is. i'm like what you have, what's called a couple of your fairly, i guess i state is. this is not like stuff either acquisitions or could have been that that guess is right. the organization organize nothing to do was self defense, right? that's why the choice or position of hunger by the prosecutor is so important. he's not saying you killed 40000 somebody is just like, i don't know the or the allies bomb threats that he's saying while you were fighting your war regardless whether it's justified or not. you deliberately, to stop this before because you deliberately start the people of guys out why you are protecting your why are you starting the people doesn't? well, you've got think aid would administer to the people to the people of guys while you are getting your so i think there's a very important distinction between us. it may mean that this very particular

the statements from the i c. c followed media reports last month about a document outlining, sexual misconduct allegations against korean con the i. c, c's, chief prosecutor. now the president of the governing body says that the inquiry would examine the allegations related to a woman that used to work in his team. this week. it's also been reported that internal document was sent to member states, essentially suggesting that conscious step down from his duties while the inquiry is ongoing. now, on the other hand, khan is denying these obligations, but he says that he would engage in the process of the investigation, but that he would not step down from his duties while the investigation is ongoing . one potentially troubling thing to note here is related to his brother in ron i, from a khan who is a former british politician and it convicted sex offender in 2021. he was charged and still denied the accusations, but he did serve 18 months in jail. in 2022 prim khan was one. and as the chief prosecutor of the i. c.

the i c. c accuses that he out and collaborative will crimes, including using starvation as a method of warfare and crimes against humanity such as murder, persecution, and inhumane cox. the court says that y'all and guidelines knowingly deprived because of civilian population of food, water medicine, and fuel. it also says that by preventing humanitarian assistance, israel failed to fulfill its obligations under international humanitarian law. while the top to provide joseph morales has been reacting to the i. c. c decision, he says the arrest warrants will be binding in o. e u member states. the decision to go to has to be respected and implemented. so i take note of the decision of the international criminal court to issue a rest squadrons from prime minister anything yahoo? the former, i mean you're still defending, restrict allen under how should either state this decision is a binding decision on all state all the states bodies of the court which include all members of the union on binding

so today there is no doubt that the i, c, c, i, c, j, and other such courts, but not to be the i c, c was it was, was conceived as a court that was formed to basically put on sort of, uh, so hold their toward leaders leaders from around the world and also to the truck. there isn't any news of the west. it was a piece overseas. definitely, even though it was an international criminal for advanced to be on the united nations court. but those in washington capitals understood that this was going to be a court. that's what put a role gastric on auto gage and the lesson american or even a bigger eastern leader or dental or what have you on file. that's what was easy for them to pursue, puts in but, but showing a name the major western allied like benjamin or couldn't, you know, i knew of color. that was an easy thing. so for the eyes you see it's, of course, there's so many words. and the fact that there were so many allegation and sound of the case was about to that is that it was, it's so cold. this tend to get to occupation. the fact that is that was making a vacation begin again, that

and he said that these arrest warrants were anti semitic, implying that the i c. c has a more compassionate ear for the palestinians than it does for the is really victims of the terror attacks. and i want your opinion, what have you experienced? they are the i c, c, in terms of the court. treating all people all parties equally. the us look what is in the hearts and minds of people is difficult to to know. also judges sitting in domestic chords. however, let us recognize that this is a, you know, a decision with gravity, a severe gravity to be named as a suspects interest warranty. you know, someone who has an arrest warrant against, for crimes against humanity, more crimes for someone with our history. and our identity, you know, is right is, is very grave and it's in his cannot be undermined. so it is very understandable that these arrest warrants are received even with shots and har, 5 is ready population. and this is true, despite the fact that n as rose society is not equal on it spends and on his positions on the ceasefire or the need of words and so forth. t

the when the i c. c was the prosecutor saying they lead us of kenya for the port selection filings in kenya. i cc was cold races to at to look in your colonialism and those that said until pep, pep is nothing new. the more intelligent thing for people to do is to respect to international more all these people know what international tiers, but sometimes they want to uh, have you know, a grave. it's thinking that they are powerful enough to comment and international doesn't was now we see that that's not quite the case v i c c. we know reliance on state cooperation and i want to ask you as journalist, we cannot travel to garza to independently verify information that is given to us by either the adf or the mos slid, health ministry. and gotcha, for example. how does the i c c, how does it have access to the evidence that it needs to justify arrest warrants as well? this is a matter of really to the intake is also have the copies of the project. you know, i used to be a prosecutor by so many years ago that

it is important that today the membership of the i c. c. the 123 states within the i, c, c, are not responsible to effectuate this decision to account when, when they deal with, without the patient. we know it's been a long delay to have been lots of threats and intimidation, also towards the eyes to see how worried are you that this whole trial that is now going to evolve health if that can happen impartially and safely? well, we believe in, in, in the courts done, this is why we brought our case before then we'd be lease in the system. it's an actual system that is based on, on, on, on low and based on the accountability and based on the problem itself. and that again, so this is why we resulted through this course on this is why that is also designed to jim. this is why we keep resorting the security council because we are to believe was yes, we paid the loss of, of, of, of blood and done that. he had a lot of suffering during the, the past, the 76 years of, of the history of this. i'm not sure the system, but we never lost hope and human

the when the i c. c was the prosecutor thing, the leaders of kenya for the port selection filings in kenya, i cc was cold races to him at to look in your colonialism, an old patch until pat. this is nothing new. the more intelligent thing for people to do is to respect to international more all these people know what international tiers, but sometimes they want to uh, have you know, a grievance thinking, but they're probably not still the comment and international doesn't was now we see that that's not quite the case, mr. ba, due to sorry. if i, if, if i can just ask you, i'd like to ask him as an inside or near someone who knows the, i see see very well considering the chords limitations. why are the arrest for the is really prime minister and the former defense minister as well as the homeless military cheap? why are they relevant today? so yeah, they relevant because it makes that point. oh is getting it said no one is above the international basis. again, this will just go to to raise them. they all

it really doesn't actually answer to the i c, c. u doesn't take part in any enforcement with the i c, c. and this really is been the pattern since october 7th with us president joe biden. every step of the way when it is looked like, there will be a challenge to these really government. he has stepped in to use his, the military aid, his diplomatic cover at the united nations. so again, we've heard from all the departments here in washington today, and they're all really sending the same message that they don't think that the i c . c should be able to take up this case. we fundamentally reject the court's decision to issue a risk lawrence for senior israel officials. we remain deeply concerned by the prosecutors rush to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process errors that lead to this decision. the united states has been clear that the i c c does not have jurisdiction over this matter. so there are been missed calls from a lot of republican senators saying it's time to sanction the officials with in the icbc. now the, it's a bi

official who served as an advisor to the former president of the i. c. c. judge sign can song, he joins us from brussels. i was hoping you might be able to pull back the curtain little bit on, on the workings of the i, c. c. because you've heard the accusations coming from the us coming from israel some in the us. i should say that the court is biased and this is an anti israel move and decision. i want you to explain to our viewers how these decisions are made by the judges within the i see, see whether or not to issue interest weren't yes. um, the i suggest is come from a multitude of countries um as do as easy as the uh, and the people who are working on on these cases in all sections of the court prosecution defense registry. and the judges are highly professional and also mad esteem to careers in their national issue areas. and so the sense of the accusation of the court wouldn't be biased against any particular group of people is fairly ridiculous. but it's not a new for this court. when this court acted against the leadership of virginia several yea

he is also posted on ack saying, but the i c. c has no credibility at these allegations have been refuted by the us government. you can expect a strong response to the anti semitic bias of the i. c, c, come jr. in other words, the trumpet, ministration, feeling very much similar to that of the, by the administration in terms of how they feel about the rest for as being issued . i guess he's really foreign minister, add the defense minister. okay. thank you very much. for the updates uh company. so from the white house to the united nations, the heads of the u. n. has way daniel the i c c arrest warrant. so let's get more from kristen salumi. he's not the united nations headquarter in the us in new york . kristen, what is the one saying on this? well, united nations officials have expressed respect for the decision of the international criminal court and called on an international signatories to that treaty. to respect the decision of the i, c. c to a call, they called on member states to abide by their obligations under internation

v i c, c. we know reliance on state cooperation and i want to ask you as journalist, we cannot travel to garza to independently verify information that is given to us by either the adf or the hum oss lid health ministry and god. so for example, how does the i see, see, how does it have access to the evidence that it needs to justify arrest warrants a? well, this is a method really to do, you think is all said they can call to solve the project. you know, i used to be a problem to get them by so many years. i go out international criminal tribunal for the lender. and they do have the copies to solve the problem. because those of these mechanisms have the ways of obtaining evidence which is not always known to the public, but eventually they do gather information. so i can come from cooperation law states that can come from the what do you see yourself, which they have of the ways of verifying and confirming that very many ways of doing that. and then witnesses who will give evidence and witnesses

so, i spoke with the i c. c. 's former president chalet and by way of suji, i asked him for his response to claims that the i c. c's decision is anti semitic, is not going to submit. take a close. it is to the us back to the people who. ready they use these processes was deployed fact kind of from the political like and as a last resort the, when the i c. c was the prosecutor saying they don't need us of 10. yeah. for the port selection filings in kenya, i cc was cold races to like to look new, a colonialism, an old fashion. so pat, this is nothing new. the more intelligent thing for people to do is to respect to international more all these people know what i can to national tears, but sometimes they want to uh, have you know, a grave. it's thinking that they're probably not still the comment and international doesn't was now we see that that's not quite the case v i c c. we know reliance on state cooperation and i want to ask you as journalist, we cannot travel to garza to independently verify information that i

c at the time for making a u. turn on south africa's position on the i, c, c. and over the years we've seen officials in south africa, particularly from the african national congress, arguing that the i c, c. and the international community have come down quite harshly on some leaders and select countries and have given a pause to the nations. perhaps most notably is well for what they believe is unjust. vibe is the games for this game is ad you would remember in 2016 south africa was considering a withdrawal from the icbc went to b and c made it clear that it was committed to a new vote or that there was not dominated by what is perceived to be wasted interest and right now seems like so that's the cost is not to be fully the country to applaud ad welcome. this move reports to carmen to tell us that the nathan is also say that they will be the routing of the i. c, c, and a vist that to now, if he were to set foot on the dutch soil, the dots government will also no longer conduct. non essential contacts, wouldn't get any of his more on that. you've never taken t

the united states has been clear that the i c. c does not have jurisdiction over this matter. now there has been a bill to section officials within the i, c. c. it did not make it through the full congress. it's unclear if the democrats are going to pursue that. in the few months they have left in control, the set it, it does seem very likely that the republicans will take that up once they are in office, at least that's what they're saying is the question is, how broad would the sanctions be if they are just targeting the people within the i c c. basically they wouldn't be able to access any property they have in the united states. it would tell us citizens and businesses not to do business with these people or their families. will that have a major impact remains to be seen, but it does seem clear that this is something washington is going to be talking about in the weeks and months ahead. patty claim elda 0, washington on the ground, and gone. so it's really a tax continue at least 5 people have been killed in this way. the strike in the central area. they attacked latham 1s

it is important that today the membership of the i, c, c, the 123 states within the i, c. c, are now responsible to effectuate this recent decision. so the main question now will be, if these people and these are you, all the alons will ever arrive here at the courts. will the be arrested because it's very important for the i to see a to start the actual trial with the suspects present. there are some exceptions for starting a free trial and the charges are late. but when the actual file starts, you saw specs should be here. and we know that the icpc is still looking for at least 15 people full of they issued a rest for once again, which is 0. the hey, how does on photons the latest on israel's reaction to the arrest warrants from my mom? and that's because he's ready to government his bond officer from the forcing in his role and the occupied territories. this is really politicians across the political aisle rejecting the decision by the international criminal court to issue arrest warrants for prime minister benjamin netanyahu and former defense minister. you'll have to l

the us does not recognize the i c. c, but have nonetheless, in tuesday i simply supported cases against dispos, including rushes. president lucky be a person. in this case, the ability of the court to dispense even have justice is also on trial. laura come to inside story out to 0. the. okay, let's bring it in. i guess in june is francesca albanese, the un special rapid tool, only occupied palestinian tire trees and tel aviv. our goal book is a political commentary to unfold academic, specializing in middle east studies. and in san francisco, we have professor steven soonest. he's a professor of politics at the university of san francisco, a warm welcome table. i want to start with talking about the situation in gaza. and i'll ask you 1st francesca, because of the palestinians, what time to the policy engine goes to is the most important thing and all of this . will this change how israel prosecute it's war and gaza at the moment? the rest of these warrants? i wish to see twill and in fact, looking at what has happened i

and this decision by the i c. c. while you can understand why they should feel skeptical about this, but in fact it's, i think it's a starting moment. i think it's a very important turning point in favor of justice inside the international order in favor of, of humanity. really. this is the, the effective is going to be quite a huge not only on israel and nothing. yeah. whose ability to communicate and present himself as a prime minister. this is a sitting prime minister of a so called democracy being called to say, in the hague as a criminal, uh, wall criminal. so it's, it's in on this and that. so do you think gave a man whatever be brought to the hague to face trying to be honest, it wasn't the bro to not that this at this stage. it is an important part of the pressure against as i and its allied and i states every war criminal who has been accused throughout the history of i. c. c, has had an ally who rejected the decision. and i think this time this is no different. the us is almost ridiculous of the south 2 days

welcome christine to walk us through what v i. c c has said, and the implications of these warrants, i guess also the statement from the i c. c reads that in the case of benjamin nation, y'all and israel's home. a defense minister you'll have kalonde. they have found both individuals who have intentionally and knowingly deprived the civilian population in guys, off objects indispensable to their survival of a side food watts at mid send and medical supplies, as well as fuel and electricity were told that the 3 judges who were on this panel made the unanimous decision to issue these warrants at full destination. yahoo and mister galani. now, as it pertains to the implications of this, you will know that israel, i feel, is not a member of the international criminal court. and the issue of jurisdiction, whether the court has the ability to be able to look into this was even possible has been going back and forth between israel and the i. c. c. the warrants have been issued. now the court all do use that. it does have the jurisdiction ove

i can tell you why the i c c didn't do. so i think that it's a good start to go after the, the main responsible thing that the higher the highest session and the chain of command. but let me tell you something, not only there is universal jurisdiction for the crime of genocide, i often say that there is a rules the domestic course a can and must play that is still very overlooked. because a number of tools, including the highest level of the media, treat those who i have been finding in gaza, have double nationalities from australia, from canada, from the u. k. from france there are many nationalities including throughout our country. so i, i recently scored the tough being, finding a new so, so these countries need to talk to me to their, to do show, make on the justice system. and i hope that civil society would keep an eye on this because starting to condition can, can contribute. and my school to get to the work of the i t. c. i to see the universe of body cannot deal with the entirety of the countless crimes that that'd

the i, c. c has polarized the world this being a predictably furious response from israel and its greatest ally the us. it is falsely accusing me the democratically elected prime minister of the state of israel, and israel's former defense minister, your color of deliberately targeting civilians. this when we do everything in our power to avoid civilian casualties for us president's job item quoted, outrageous, and some sense of said they would look into sanctioning the quote. the u. s. has committed a record amounts of military a to israel since october, the 7th 2023. we remain deeply concerned by the prosecutors rush to seek arrest warrants and the troubling process errors that lead to this decision. however, most of your and the rest of the world, say zale, uphold the court decision, and a rest, nothing yahoo or kalonde, if they travel to that territory done. this decision is a binding decision on all state which includes on members of the union. on binding. this lemon discard this is some of

so you off come on the i c. c also issued one. so from us colanda from the site is what i was again talking to the tomatoes wines, hospitalization, bags out here in northern garza, the drive the tax has to be much as the entrance of the facility squatters and electricity generates. 6 medical personnel have been injured us president elect donald trump is dominated former florida, the attorney general time from day to had the justice default. she'll replace month gates who withdrew his name full consideration due to a legit sexual misconduct. gates has denied any wrong doing in the occupied, westbank is riley allen. ground rates of killed at least 9 people in jeanine and not less than 48 hours. many residents and jeanine returned to the homes to find the bone town so destroyed. roads have been dug off and infrastructure torn down laurel, han reports, child rules and twisted metal. it's all that remains of a room to once provided comfort and safety. as many of the residents and jeanine left the homes on tuesday night, as is ready, for

has proved once again, can't be trust a v i c. c never established a secured the ability with us in the global style, especially in africa. around 53, i speak on countries, have joined the icbc and rectify the role dispatch short that establishes the whole thing. and yet we in africa, i'm the global solid. we feel that most of the cases are for crime are brought against us against our government and leaders. with complete ignorance of the war situations in the continental, usually the visa or for us the cutest. i was not favored by the west and do a support tech because when favor by the west we. so what's happened in libya, 2011, eros before that and i've, i've gotten this time many for patient. so i don't think that's what is happening now. in the past and i have a situation of got in touch as well as any substance to the lack of it. but if you see, i see, see i do believe that this relates more or less to because there are you the case and bmw. yes. or now's a being or the to come forward to the icpc the quarter past the out here

the ruling comes after the i c. c had been for decides for delaying is decision and residing judge southerly with who from the case us senate us have threatened to sanctioned the court and it's employees speaking earlier this you can head back over to threats all attempts to in the, to intimidate or to improperly influence the officials of his cold cease immediately. my office will not hesitate to act pursuant to the provisions of optical 70 of the rum statute. if such, conduct continues and possessed, benevolence has responded to the world and saying it's will arrest those now one to the you fall in a 5th chief has called on other nations to follow suit the decision see the binding decisions on all state which include on members of the union on binding this lemon discard this is the palestinian ambassador through the netherlands, also calls on all states to pull their commitment to the i c. c. today. accountability and justice have stopped it and we hope that this world will continue until we reach our independence a

neither of those countries to us the read through our state parties to the i c. c. but 124 countries around the world are, and all of them legally are obliged to arrest anyone who's on the i. c. c. internationally wanted list enters their territory. and that's why this is taking up a whole load of different logic dilemmas like hed, especially for european union countries. since the u, as in the past held itself as one of the top supporters of the i, c. c. you've talked to people not use that brill has been reminding member states that this is an independent court with legally binding decisions fall. on the other hand, we seen officer, you're saying that they move to an issue, arrest warrants against these really prime minister damages the court's credibility and hungry is gotten so far as to say, it would defy the arrest board and invites the it's really probably minister to visit hungry. now, important to note that the internationally wanted labeled hasn't always in the past turned people into global pariahs. russian president vladimir putin, for example, is also of

the i. c. c is also issued an arrest warrant for a hum us commander, known as mohammed de from israel says it killed in an air striking gaza back in july. but that has not been confirmed. it's not going to be up to the courts, $124.00 member states to enforce the arrest warrants. all of this comes off to $412.00 days of israel's genocide in the gaza strip. it's military has no killed, more than 44000 palestinians, and wounded more than a 104200 people since the war began. more than a year ago, most of the victims had been women and children. and us out who the standing by in amman with reaction from israel 1st. so let's go to step boss and step. you'll live from the hague in the netherlands near the seats of the court international criminal court. so most countries in the world now have the obligation to arrest the is really prime minister if he steps foot on there. so that's absolutely correct the if for any prime minister and the orders are now one to man and we're talking about the 124 countri

what does this decision by the i c c, which comes more than a year after the start of this war? what does this mean for palestinians? certainly it's a positive step but, but also the i c. c has so far been effective in coming to resolving the palestinian conflict. and that is a very good question. let me 1st say that the palestinians believe that this decision, by the uh i see is, is a, has been delayed for many months. we all remember that it was in may of this year's 2024. when the prosecute done on the ice, easy came all going up this account for us on august the free trial child or do i show other slides? again, it's not that y'all, and i got that so it's been more than 6 months since that discount as well, by the high season it has been delayed because of the politics. i think within, within the i see that's one thing. the other thing is that the protestant is, uh, know that uh, a such a decision isn't going to bring their loved ones. but as i just mentioned, more than 440001000 is, had been killed. most of them more than 70 percent of them are civilian women and children. o

if you try to help the i c. c, we're going to sanction you the decision by the i c. c to issue and arrest horn for vladimir putin is a giant step in the right direction for the international community. it is more than justified by the evidence. and while the us was put to slam the i c. c decision that failed to provide legal grounds for its criticism, saying they weren't necessary to reject the warrant. and how can you reject the, what's been presented by a legal body one of the highest, you know, it's an international law court. how can you reject this if you don't have the counter legal assessment, what is your? is it a political rejection? and if you don't have a legal assessment, we're jack the court's decision. but that doesn't necessarily mean that, that has to go through a legal process. we can reject decisions from the court that come down in various forms and we're in discussion with our partners, including israel and next steps. but i'm just not gonna have more for you. we spoke with a former palestinian ambassador to the u. k. who says this warrant is the 1

car issue is that is that i didn't get all the time, you know, and rejecting the decision by the i c. c. i did, especially the rejection. what they see is a clear, yes between from us and, and, and there's a, this is the thing that helps them and most, i think and below to it, it's to the, to the code for the young police politics. yes, it isn't easy. getting back to the c e facing it's hard for us. yes. no. and beautiful collections of both of us evidence in the side in the, in the metal was 2 weeks now is supposedly comes from the field as long as 5 minutes. so it comes up and it comes off of the globe with the exception of the united states and some other drug please. so i think because replacing, not only because a little dicey se says whether it is due to a low, but how it affects is ability to function as apartment as well how much as welcome the i c c, 's move coding is right, the prime minister and the form of defense minister you have go on terrorists. in a statement, the group says the arrest warrant is unimportant historical precedent and a correction to a long path of histor

are they willing to sanction allies to contribute to the i c. c. there are a lot of different levers of power that the us presidents have. how far either of them are willing to take it remains to be seen. all right, so i plan to go home life as the in washington dc fox. you thank if as well jeffrey nice is a human rights lawyer. he says they honestly see once again smitten yahoo and guidelines may put enough political pressure on israel's allies to end the support . always remember the october of 2023. an attack was part of fine on, justified, grotesquely gross, the criminal. but that doesn't validate in any sense. what may have been down since it may have been country to international law, which is what the judges have found. what will happen to the palestinians is they will suffer more the same until and unless the international community puts it, showed up to the will, will of stopping this war. and ensuring indeed that it's subject to an accountability process. preferably, preferably the international criminal court, possibly. ready the internat

now the i c. c. pre trial chamber rejected israel's challenges to the jew restriction, that is what is like fee is, is rel raw the likely to supply the challenge of these arrest warrants. i dare say it may seem to do so. i think it doesn't allow me to have success. this course has finally charlotte. it yet, which is to act in accordance with is jurisdiction. so sometimes people thought it was rather slow to act and sometimes so that it felt very responded to political pressure. while the quote showed, it's not going to do that. this time is taking a very long time, both to no effect on common or long time to consider the jurisdictional issues as well as whether the evidence was sufficient to justify the issue of search for arms . i think it's highly on march 8th, but any available change to position and do you think that the member states will act upon this some or saying that they will consider it? there will be other countries, the ones um, suddenly when it came to the uh on the um, search arrest fo

it's extremely short and it says, quote, the i c c, issuance of arrest warrants against is really, leaders is dangerous. is i beg, your pardon is outrages. let me be clear, once again, whatever the i c c might imply, there is no equivalence, none between israel and hum us and quote, and the statement. i wanted your reaction to this yes, most americans officials have talked about how trade just, uh, the ruling is. and i would suggest that the more the americans pink over the link as outrages, the more the rest of the world is going to think how important, how many mental and how historic is the decision in as far as model equipment. and so of course, there's a long history of american judgment, about equivalency model and equivalency. in this case, of course, they think is there is a democracy defending itself and it has, it has the moral high ground when it comes to have mice. but dick will say that i to interest organization for the palestinian and for much of the world, this is an occupation, is there a is defending us occupation? have mass isn't defending its feet, but it's trying to fr

i c j. i paused for a minute this yeah. now the i c, j made it very clear and this is a different set of judges. it's not the same as the, the ones in the course of the i. c. c protein very, very clear terms of the occupation for 75 years has been low, which means anyone in the world you collaborate with an unlawful regime is risking to missing a crime. that's what it's really about is trying to deflect responsibility. and no one says and i'll stop one second, but no one said that they're not entitled to self defense. what the rule of law say is your there are limits on that and it's called proportionality yukon, destroy a whole nation in the set. then of course, what the that's, that's the objective is the destruction of a nation. i'm making garza uninhabited books. he will not end until that's happened, because if he ends the war, he is in trouble. he's in trouble if he leaves the country. mesa is a $125.00 would probably have him arrested. and if he goes to, if he stays in israel, which is what a more likely to do, of course, is the

but who ends international called the i. c. c has confirmed that seeking an external probe into allegations of sexual misconduct, vice chief prosecutor, carry him con. i am seeking on behalf of the assembly of states, policies, presidency and external investigation into the masses related to alleged misconduct by the i. c. c. prosecute to an external investigation has been pursued in order to ensure a fully independent, impartial, and fat process in conformity with the legal framework of the i. c c. and the independent oversight mechanism. i'm following a victim send to the price. the statement from the icbc followed media reports last month about a document outlining, sexual misconduct allegations against korean con the i. c, c's, chief prosecutor. now the president of the governing body says that the inquiry would examine the allegations related to a woman that used to work in his team this week. it's also been reported that internal documents was sent to member state. so essentially suggesting that conscious step down from his

and also your opinions when it comes to implementing the the i c. c, a bus one, and i asked him about whether it is going to be an it consensus. why do we know, for example, that's one of the key players of the juice of in the united states of america has dismissed the order of all trades. and the united states of america is not signature read to the rome statute that they have the way for the establishing all the i c, c. and this gives you a sense of the device that we see along many keep a us as part of the a for example is concerned hungry says that it is going to end by 5 minutes. so that's any i hope to travel to hungary and that there's absolutely no way that would implement that decision under what rebukes by the commission, which said that every country should not choose and take whatever a profess, we have to respect regulations laws, andrew things, and in particular to the decision by the i c c, but even though it was said they wouldn't implemented, does not necessarily mean that they would arrest that. and yeah, so i, i off the, tell you in

the use talk different might also say they would uphold the i c, c 's decision. israel was closest ally, however, a washington taking a very different approach is the i c, c. and it's prosecutor do not reverse their outrages and unlawful actions to pursue arrest warrants against israeli officials. the senate should immediately pass sanctions legislation, as the house has already done on a bipartisan basis. as majority leader schumer does not act, the senate republican majority will stand with our t l i is real and make this and other supportive legislation a top priority in the next congress. the i c. c has no credibility. and these allegations have been refuted by the us government. israel has lawfully defended its people and borders from genocidal terrorist. you can expect a strong response to the anti semitic bias of the i, c. c, and un come january. the court is a dangerous joke. it is now time for the us senate to act and sanction this irresponsible body. the court defied every concept of fundamental fairness and legitimize the corrupt prosecutors actions a hi, that's just about it

tell me that kane has this report from belen, for almost 24 hours off to the ruling from the i. c. c. the german government issued a statement in which it recognized the ruling and refer to its recognition of the i c, c. and it's important but also its recognition of its you unique relationship in history . these of the, the state of israel saying that it would have to examine domestic measures if prime minister netanyahu was to visit germany. the other thing to say is what has been happening since that ruling? we know several european countries expressing the opinion about the ruling. what they would do, one particular country hungry, the head of government, them to oregon, saying pretty clearly he invited prime minister netanyahu to visit his country. even though hungry is a signatory to the i. c c, the of a points to make here. while it's the reference to the amount of age military age given by this government, the german government to the surface ro, we know more than a $100000000.00 of a pledge to israel by germany. off to it had filed its objections to the icy suitcase in augus

but that's again when it comes to the i c. c. when it comes to international christmas or to criminal court. there is a consensus here about the institution itself. it's biased and that's also why this ruling is widely rejected. security w's. emily coordinated with the latest from jerusalem. emily, thank you. know to another conflict to russian president vladimir putin says that his country attacked ukraine with a new mid range ballistic missile and a national address boot, instead of russia deployed and experimental weapon and retaliation for ukraine's recent strikes on russian territory with us. and british missiles just a day earlier in the rush, the accused ukraine of launching new case applied storm shadow and missiles into rushes. course border region where this media reported that one didn't have given the green light for the weapons use. united states also recently gave the go ahead for keep to use it's longer range. attack them's missiles for strikes inside russian territory, boots and also warned the west that most scal

so the i c. c 's decision, $124.00 countries, a signature is to the court within the head, including most in europe and nations, but not the us. russia hungry as a member, but its prime minister, victim old man. well, listen for yourself. so that's the thing. china, there is no other choice button to defy this decision. so today i will invite israel for 5 minutes to mister netanyahu, for a visit to hungry, and in that scene. but i will guarantee him that if he comes to the ice succeeds rolling will have no effect in hungry, and we will not fall on it if it comes to you on one side. and i'm just gonna go to a cycle and issuing them from you correctly because that we comply with national european, an international laws. so now we're examining exactly what this means for us in terms of national implementation. we fundamentally reject the court's decision to issue a risk lawrence for senior israel officials. we remain deeply concerned by the prosecutors rushed to seek arrest warrants and the troubling

with money and providing isn't and also with the aid and has seen and have the right to go to the i c, g h. i c, c and oscar 2 or so to go to the, the americans and to go, you know, the american leaders at to be also try and, and in the same way because they were complicit in this war and they weren't pop nice and this was so because of that, the americans are great if that happened to raise the way it might also be a bad for them later on. if someone tried to go to the a i, c, c and a fine, a quarter, a fired case against the united states as a company said in this war. and in this genocide i'm water crimes. most of the day i'll be marked by a series of protests across the globe. here's a recap of the highlights. is well, one was gathered outside government buildings in several times to tel aviv chosing slogans that are carrying for traits of hostages, as well as cause the gains to benjamin netanyahu. mazda and his immediate resignation, assess, worked valley with similar kohls, was held in jerusalem, is where the crying the and baffled problem. and this is failure to end the will, and bring a