c, i c j the i c j. basically listening 6 measures the israel has to adopt, but also saying is, well, you've got 30 days to get this done and report back to the i c j. so perhaps a bit of pressure that from that have been put on television. let's, let's get back to my home. it's not jeep right now. mohammed doug, you can join us here on the live program here on knology international from the west. fine to the really describe exactly what's, what's going on with the people that mohammed, is there a sense of increased optimism? have you had a chance? i know it's just been a couple of minutes mohammed, but have you had a chance to speak with anyone since the i c. j made his final statement, the toner, the big one, the law, sit the whole where, how the club when they hear about the decision on the base. when from that decision and by the i c, j to access the lawsuit, that was public advice. i'll click on the 29th of last december and also when it's talked about those, what else would take care of manufacturin

because the final provisions handed down by the i c. j sir, said israel has 30 days to implement these measures and report back to the i c j. do you think israel will do what it's being told is they have to comply with the, with the image of the same as into he did by the ice of june. there is no exception that lives in they must comply and then uh they all miss just that we think that you and it starts us to deal with non compliance with this in the interest of the referral that they complied. so i do believe that there is no any, it's a non negotiable, the issue of fair compliance. and the issue of international law, we need to be in that whole space. so site. but as you well know, and the lady pandora, that's how that 1st foreign minister was saying the in, in, in, in just simply exercising the order. i had the down from the i, c j. they will have to be a ceasefire.

what people the, i'm making of, of what their country is doing at the i c j. okay, so i think on, on the hall this is actually having an impact on the domestic public opinion is really very interesting because you are seeing on social media. yes. is that those social media activist and commentators will try to discredit south africa to say then, oh, so that's because taking a this case to the i c j. but really, domestically they have failed this, the significant public in terms of the lack of providing a bit of a well, a bit of domestic environment. the politics have been caught up in its own challenges of social justice struggles, and you have to bring to the, to the international court of justice and demanding for this kind of accountability . and to stop what they say, what they see in terms of the application. so there's a bit of that kind of push, conduct left by those will build an especially within the broader social media space that they can, that, that they vent that and go that this is basically a application that's being done with. there's a level of

now from the i c j as well in the short term. so that's what does expect stations don't really look to what's the i c j. but they look more towards the international community and the report that paid annual and mention of these, they will be towards health at the un security council. and of course of africa is hoping that they will be action taken be. they're also hoping that other countries, now that the i, c j has made this ruling, will start to speak out and that there will be a change in is riled a. the behavior of these res need is, for example, one of the things mentioned in the decision it relates to, to, to the government stuff in any kind of incitement. and the, the decision also mentioned the language that was used by, of these reading the does. so the south african government is really expecting and hoping that there will be a change in that language and really a concerted effort to preserve lives. okay. have you correspondents, diane, hawkeye, and do hon is make. thank you sir. and when he is being held today, interna

c i. c. j has decided to go on to search and provisional mission as a soul to buy, so that we got the thing that is will, must also take all these steps to prevent, to be the side of violence against the dependency new people. but she is the so that we can just administer what he's reaction and to revise some of the issues that had come and see it is a victory for international law. it is also a message that they cannot be in the exception of these in the world. all countries must be took the same and is that i is not an exception. it cannot be an exception to the genocide convention. so i believe this is a victory for the people have caused them for the people of protest and particularly children and in and human. and for us here in south africa, we believe that the eh, eh, former president mandela would be smiling in his grave. the only practical outcome is that this would be a, is this for you, and they should be measures that are put in place to help you do monetary and ate with civilian in

and to present this complaint at the i, c, j is incredibly powerful. and in addition, in addition, the idea that the world court doesn't have the, you know, the enforcement mechanism or that it might be, it might be ignored. i mean, that's, you know, that's part of the parcel of this whole exercise. i mean, remember in 2004, the same body issued and overwhelming. overwhelmingly. so your decision on the fact that there is rarely the government built a wall in the west bank that was under a different procedure and a different you know, it wasn't under the genocide convention, it was an advisory opinion, but that opinion was largely ignored. even up to the point of the fact where the is rarely judge these rarely a point to judge. so this proceeding with that time was the presence of these rarely supreme court. our own box basically wrote an opinion saying, well, we interpret international law differently in response to the wall case and we find that the wall is legal. i don't think you're going to see that level of kind of a, you know, something is real. s

but did they make a convincing case on what a decision by the i c j make any difference? well, that's why i guessed in just a moment, but 1st a report from vincent on of israel stands accused of genocide before the world's highest court. south africa's legal team told the international court of justice about death displacement and deprivation in gaza. school and framed is a part of a larger campaign by israel against the palestinian people, dating back to 1948. this killing is nothing short of destruction of palestinian life. it is inflicted deliberately. no one is sped, not even newborn babies. the devastation resubmit is intended to and has laid waste 2 guys a beyond any acceptable legal, let alone humane justification. proving the case for genocide will require establishing intent. here south africa point to the statements from top. it's rarely officials on the what the living we are imposing a complete c, john gaza. they will be no electricity, no food, no water, no fuel, and every single be closed. so we are fighting against human animals and we are acting accordingly

i. c. j. yesterday in the cold hearing on 9 october 2023. mister, you'll have kalonde defense minister of israel, announced that he had ordered a complete siege of guys, a city in there, then that there would be no electricity, no food, no fuel. and that everything was closed. on 12 october 2023. mister isaac hurts, the president of israel stated, referring to gaza. i quote, we are working operating militarily according to rules of international law, unequivocally. it is an entire nation out there that is responsible. it is not true . this rhetoric about civilians not aware, not involved. this is absolutely not true. the court notes that the military operation being conducted by israel following the attack of 7 october 2023, has resulted in a large number of deaths and injuries, as well as the aforementioned facts and circumstances are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by south africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible. this is the case with res

i. c j's order? i think in israel there is definitely a sense of relief that a ceasefire has not been ordered by this court. you have to understand that here in israel there's still even more than 3 months into the war. and with the, you know, the, the, the civilian, adaptable in gaza, there's still a strong belief that this is a war of self defense. there are still over a 100 hostages that are believe, to be held at in gaza. so every day in this sense is one from one woman told me, i remember that every day is october 7th for people in israel. the collective trauma is very real. and so there was a, there was a lot of just confusion when this case started about why is it that people that are defending themselves are being sued for that self defense? that's the perspective here. so definitely there's a sense of relief that there is no cease fire that has been ordered vendor. the reactions of course, from the palestinian side which see this really a very differently. they look at the fact that the cour

here's a feeling really well, well, obviously with south africa, the pro, this case originally the i, c j as you well know, and the lady pendle the south african for an effect. spokes person was just speaking outside the i, c j. and one of the things she was aust was one of the press members off. so do you think that will be a cease fire in gaza? and the lady pendle said, you know, in exercising the order, they will have to be a ceasefire in gaza. i'm alone, i would just ask you, do you think israel will exercise the order or no, no, that's actually the is the would be. so that was very whatever problem the was a vague it says stopped today. so infrastructure dentistry is so this is something that these are under say we try to stop. i think the question he is now is easily we move on the i suggested to the security council to discuss the board because the instructions for the measures and as well as the best. but the question is, if the security in the, the us or during the causes can somebody is the, it seems for me sweat. and i don't know, i don't have an idea, it's moving out there to

is that disputes under the convention that can be referred to the i c j and the cash flow of the i, c j is quite particular about what the word dispute means. and in particular, it requires some form of engagement between the 2 parties. it does say that because to the i c gen. so the africa relied on this, that the dispute will result when one state says x and the other states as the opposite of the case. so the i, c, j has, we'll say, emphasized that there's going to be some interaction between the 2 states on that disagreement. and it's possible that south africa wasn't careful enough on this step. i simply con on so that on the fact, okay, how fun on the question of genocidal intent to these really said there is no genocide or intent. and that the statements made by is really political, military leaders simply rhetorical, and that we shouldn't ascribe them any important. that there is no evidence basically that there, there is genocidal intent from from israel. yeah. your thoughts about this argument and what do you think could undermine this claim? i am like it would be very happy

as far as the i, c, j, the, the plaintiffs, the people prosecute who want to call a bite into account. in other words, are saying that the, the treaty and the i, c j is interpretation of the treaty. uh, disclose a positive obligation on us officials to enforce that treaty and to make sure that they are not a bedding, any genocidal acts. so now they're in a break. we're going to hear from a palestinians and residents of guys a later. so we'll see how the rest of this hearing this afternoon turns out and we'll be back to you when that wraps up. all right, thanks so much rob rentals. now, the european union has said it expects is right on how much to comply with the ruling. the commission released the statement saying, orders of the international court of justice are binding on the policies and they must comply with them. europe and union expect staff for immediate and effective implementation. harry fawcett joins us live from london so high, although they cooling full implementation of this routing one must remind one cell . so this was a case not ruled by any of the european union coun

i don't think the i c j a certainly for the united states, i can't speak for the brit for the british or the french. whether that will have any impact at all, it will, i suspect, added to the growing pressure on the is really government driven by high casualties by pressure is from the families of, of how those who remain hostage at the hands of a boss to bring them home um, i think it will have it will, it will add to what i think to where we're going, which i think is in fact is significant diminishment of israeli military activity. what follows whether or not gods or will be more stable, whether or not it be long suffering people guys will get the humanitarian and reconstruction systems that they deserve as another matter. but as i mentioned before, you have the real is really posted in conflict on the ground. and then you have the diplomatic political and it's taking place in capitals in new york and, and they sometimes they intersect. i'm not so sure that they are sect on this, on this occasion, but they may okay. are in depth and the thank you very much indeed for your insights

now the i c j hasn't just said that there's the posit, possibility of genocide taking place is also implemented these 6 emergency measures . and i know there's been plenty of concerns about the i c, j here not courting for a ceasefire, but by my understanding p i c, j only has jurisdiction, but of the states, right? so here it has jurisdiction, or the israel, it doesn't have jurisdiction or the mouse and will be faced by what actually takes 2 parties in order to comply. we've had the from the lady, bundle the south african foreign minister saying, but that these 6 measures effectively amount to the factors these 5 cause you worked on the ground that what do you make of that is this effectively is he's fine without necessarily cooling it one well, 1st of all, let me say that the i c j routing is really historic story milestone in the long run to the palestinians, towards dignity and justice and states who and yes, i agree. i hope that it's on the grounds and it is the is really all me does well, it's now legally binding. they've been told by legally binding adjustment by the school to, to stop k

they've announced that they would speak in israel's defense as a 3rd party, a d i. c j denying charges. that is where i was committing genocide in god, how much weight will this adds to his rose defense? all right, so any party to the genocide convention under a particular procedural mechanism can come into the case as a non party intervene or later terminated, said they're going to do that. and that they are going to offer their interpretation of the convention and support of israel's position that can sometimes add a legal value to the case depending on what the state comes in and says. but what's really interesting about germany's intervention here is that germany, along with a handful of other states, also recently interested me in a different genocide convention case in front of the court. that's the case that the gambia has brought against me, m r. mm hm. and that declaration is already in front of the court and sense for us . germany's position how various provisions of the genocide convention should be interpreted. and in particular, that is very important quest

and finally, israel must submit a report to the i c. j that outlines the measures being taken to address these provisional measures. this must be submitted within the span of one month from the voting provided as a j space has more now from the 17 judges of the international criminal court. the u. n's talk legal body took part in the deliberations on south africa's case against israel. rule terms of the genocide convention, is that ruling right out by the courts. president concluded that south africa's planes were plausible, but the situation and cause that was very grave and urgent. and the israel by the dehumanizing language of its leaders, had shown intent. so she directly quoted israel's president and its defense minister, minister, golan stated, speaking to his rarely troops on the guards and border. i quote, i have released all restraints. you saw what we are fighting against. we are fighting human animals. this is the isis of gaza. is the quotes president then read out because the judge's decision was israel most in accordance with

once the hearings, wrapped up, armed with the evidence sofa, africa had just dropped on the i. c. j. the appeared to turn the screws even tighter on his really officials. i think of this tragic and the folding of south africa has decided to play, advocates for the dental and serve as the legal home. if i don't get a policy, the name is to lady because almost every point i put to every question i ask you, you respond with a non so that is not relevant to the question on a custom to, to tough questions from western news outlets. some of the exchange is left. this is really spin, doctor squirming. biopharma 6 is my dep tow fairly. this is one person i wish we questionable. it's difficult for me to comment on you know exactly what kind of make of it spend less so often the questions that they are fox, i think i think is providing a foundation for some less to consider that the allegations that as well as can seem pretty serious violations of intestinal, i have no credibility. now that us aside state south africa, has decided to bring this case is the chase. the judges are expected to is

adjudicating international disputes for 78 years and expand, takes a closer look at the role of the i c j. i think the international court of justice, or i c j as being the united nations main judicial body since 1946. its main role is handling disputes between countries, most individuals and its decisions a legally binding. but it's also office legal advice to the united nations despite being dumped the wills. quote, the i c j's role is more limited than the name suggests. it can only resolve disputes of the countries involved have recognized its jurisdiction. the court has 15 judges elected by the un general assembly and the security council. it's laid by us judge join don't i. q a former state department official, entered the peachy is russian judge could either give odeon former ambassadors of an invalid. they all represent the different regions and legal systems, and it looks like this. 3 seats occupied by african judges. judges from messing america and the caribbean holds another 23 occupied by asian judges, 5 held by judges from western europe and other western countries into by ju

the i. c. j. 's ruling is binding and without appeal about these ran, the government believes the i c, j will reject the case. the head of the ruling has what israel under mass had to say. we have expected, of course, to throw out the completely upside and ridiculous charges pressed, by se if the court in the hague she was enrolled into a c spy. how must move in with a bind by the c flat as long as the enemy bonds by it. second from us will release his honest prisoners detained bias if the occupying state really is all the palestinian prisoners detained by as we have. of course that seems covering every side of this developing story goes, how do you i've moved and southern gaza, stephanie deck or isn't occupied east jerusalem, indiana is back for me. the miller is dining 5, but 1st let's go to james bass. his life for us in the hague. it's like, jane's 1st stop is we've got a couple of hours or so to go, this will be a statement i guess from the i to jail. what will the process be and what are the

we expect the i c j to throw out these spurious suspicious judges. while i had a foot in canada and america, i'm at the field a high 1st. if the court in the hague is use of route into a c spy, i'm us move, it will abide by the c flat as long as the enemy bonds by it. second, some us will release his honest prisoners detained bias. if the occupying state routes is all the palestinian christmas detained by it as well, we have out teams covering every side of the story from gallons it to the occupied territories. israel, south africa, and the international court of justice and the height. we start without diplomatic . it is a james base who is asked the course and james less than an hour to go. now, can you explain how this is actually going to work? would it be a statement from the i c j, and can you just to cut through the varying potential outcomes that we could hear? what we think is going to happen is that the judges will come into the cold and the presiding judge will that and read out the statement of what they have decided. now let's just be cle

ross, you know, when the i c. j. again, when the icj i ruled in favor of provision or protection for bosnia and herzegovina, and 1993 the us and they so imposed a no slides aren't soon after that. but we know that the, even if the i c j was in favor of south africa, it may not be enough to stop the world because of the rulings from the court haven't always had an impact. i want to look at one significant case that was between nicaragua and the united states in 1986, the icy j will, will that the us had violated international by supporting rebels in nicaragua. the washington ignore the ruling unblocked it's enforcements. and mr. ross, are you hopeful that any ruling at the i c j, even if it's not respected by israel said it will be enforced by the other members who are policy to the convention on the prevention of genocide? i mean, as you know, the court is the court. you know, it doesn't have an army attempt and forces judgments on its own. it needs the un security council to enforce his judgments, and they are the us

the last 40 years. madam president, is the by defies that as a new shoes on the concert defies the i. c j the i see. see if there's an, an open war against the u. n. there is no single country on s that has come pained so openly and brazen lea a gaze that you and the way is that i looked at the they was we won the because the u. n. is the source of the evidence of is that i look crimes and is the ones to discredit the what is to destroy the evidence. because the u. n helps the palestinian people said live remain in the land and is the ones to approve them. because the u. n is the forum where palestinian rights for the most to settle, determination and 3, then have been recognized. and is the ones to deny and dissolve these rights? because they, you'll, and has identified that requirements for just and lasting peace. and is it i, it has chosen f, the cleansing, and genocide instead is the, has sold the, the funding of you and the agencies from eunice go to another or it has at that all the mean. the main body's of that you, when the security council, the general assembly daniel motorized c

you actually have to take all of the rulings of the i, c, j and the i. c, j has made it clear that it feels this time off of the complaints made by south africa. those complaints that that could be actions that could lead to genocide taking place in y'all's that they all plausible. so it'll be interesting to see what some of the country is not natively the united states, say in that security council meeting about the i c j ruling and how they going to interpret that i c j. really what i think you're going to hear. of course is the many of them to hear about the allegations against unrestored stuff, those 12 under stock numbers which came out all exactly the same day as the ice each, a ruling diplomats privately telling me they're still somewhat typed. i really say it is a coincidence. so those things came out on the same day that as well, all of us suddenly decided to raise that on the day that it felt it was on under most of the threats, politically, because of the ice each. i really and james, given the question mark, particularly when it comes to the u

we're not going to see i c. j. investigate doesn't gauze at all, we, i know that the courts actually does not investigate itself. the cold base, the key rates for the policies to present evidence. so the burden of proof is on south africa. so as africa has to provide the quote was evidence that there is genocidal intent. now if we zoom out of bed, well this morning, only effect the wall between is right and how mos, or could it also have repercussions on other was i think it will be see that there is already a series of cases before the cold. there is the case brought by ukraine against russia. there's a case brought by the gambia against me on mom and the case by south africa against israel is now the 3rd so called the genocide case within a spell of 2 years. so i assume that there will be more cases in the offing in the next couple of years. stuff on top of that, a professor of intel international law at the university of bonds. thank you very much. you're welcome. do you an agency for palestinian refugees? says

v i c. j also ruled that israel must take steps to ensure its military does not commit acts of genocide . measures must also be taken to prevent and punish incitement of genocide. israel has been ordered to take immediate measures to allow basic services and humanitarian assistance into gaza. at least $1700000.00 palestinians have been displaced by is really a tax. and the un says around half the population is that risk of salvation. the hotels the rules varies, route must prevent the destruction of any evidence of genocide being committed in gaza. and finally, israel must submit a report to the i. c. j that outlined submission is being taken to address these provisional measures. this must be submitted within the span of one month from the will need to provide the guys are james based as more from the hague? 17 judges of the us talk. legal body took part in the deliberations on south africa's case against israel. brought under the genocide convention, is that ruling without by the quotes pres

i notice these references to the i c j. but back to, to your question, i think today in the world we live in south africa. that's the champion of international human rights and who might appear in law, not the source of declared western powers that are uh, the, the champions of, of the humanitarian in our work. but, but, you know, back then we laughed and i'm still laughing now. i mean, you can't make this stuff up, you cannot make this stuff up. the hypocrisy, the hypocrisy, advi bucher, see of what's to need, especially to bundle. and i mean, i'm the by the name assertion. there's 2 things here and we need to differentiate between the there's the hypocrisy and there's a double standard. the hypocrisy is because the europeans and especially the you in general and the u. s. has been saying that they and their values are universal values. and we think about that position on the question of gaza for us to be actively hit with the pep of critical. and the 2nd is a double stand that they say something about the queen because it

now i c. j also ordered israel to prevent and punishes direct insight into commit. genocide is really all me is killed, at least a $193.00 palestinians across the gaza strip in the past to aid that takes the death toll to more than $26000.00 since and will began in october. the south 0 understand zip codes as prime minister will meet the heads of the us is really an egyptian intelligence agencies in europe this weekend to try and secure a deal between a mass and israel tulsa, already taking place. how does that mean? i understand is the south african president, so a renaissance is reacting to the i, c, j really and causes and is the address of the nation is wanted in the depths of many is riley's undertaking of hostages. the courts in this judgment are firm installed. africa's right to take is arrive to quote, even though it is not a party to the conflict in gaza. the icy day is the principal traditional organ of the united nation has headed down their ruling that the state of visitors should im

the i c. j handed down 6 provisional measures. they call on as well to take immediate and effective measures to stop killing palestinians. and the show it's minute treat prevents acts of genocide from being committed. as the court considers that with regard to the present situation is real most in accordance with its obligations under the genocide convention in relation to palestinians in gaza takes all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of article 2 of the convention, in particular, a killing groups of members of the group be causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group. see deliberately inflicted under group conditions of vice calculated to bring about its physical destruction in holland, in part. and the imposing measures intend to prevent 1st within the group. now find the routing and whether its route is committing genocide and golf at well, that's expected to take use of the integration of the court. south africa's following this, this is a sci fi, is the only wa

do you still think it will adhere to at least some of these preliminary measures demanded by the i c j? i think it will because if you look at the measures for that, you will see that the 1st 3 hours of the 6 messages actually just repeat the obligations under the genocide convention is wrong. it has argued all alone. that is complying with the genocide convention. so there is only left the order that it is to enable the provision of humanitarian assistance and to get his role probably could. all you gotta do is already in a building a, the provision of humanitarian assistance. i think the policies will crawl about this because this will say it, he's already providing humanitarian assistance on south africa. hold. say it is not enough, but this will basically say they are complying with the old. so all that there is left is that this row has to prove the evidence. and again, these roll my roller say that it is preserving any evidence that is not destroying any evidence. and so the only thing left is that israel has to report in the months time that it is actually doing what it is doing

since the beginning of a when it was announced that this case would be, would be entertained at the i. c, j is really the politicians have rejecting, rejecting it. and so the prime minister they calling at outrages is by no means surprising at the same a time here in israel, i would say people are still a very much, you know, concerned with the big question of returning the hostages in the conduct of, of the warranties there's a sort of sense of disbelief that this would even be happening at a the, the i c j. we've also seen interviews with is really government spokes. people trying to frame this as a some sort of wind for israel because the core did a stop short of ordering a complete ceasefire. on the other hand, we've seen a palestinian politicians posted in people and their allies certainly celebrate this. and there are analysts to say, indeed the court may have stopped short of ordering a ceasefire, but did. but it did order these provisional, a measures that is real. a should allow in more aid that it should be, protect civilian life more. and what some analysts say is that for these

and secretary general. antonio gutierrez, issued a statement through spokesperson acknowledging the i c j ruling, but offering few insights on how he views the judgement is the secretary general disappointed that the i c. j did not call for a cease fire. there's the secretary, john was not here to do color commentating on, on decisions of the independent court of the way his position has been. what it is, it's been very clear. it's what the secretary general thinks that what he would like to see is an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. all eyes now turn to the security council. it seems likely that by the middle of next week, the counselor will call for an open meeting to discuss the rulings by the i c j. then the question becomes, will algeria, the error of the member of the council begin to circulate a draft resolution calling for an immediate cease fire. diplomatic sources are telling us all indications are pointing to exactly that. gabriel is on to l, just needed at united nations in new york. so the reaction to the i c. j ruling in the occupied westbank was muted. charles strong that

i. c j's ruling. he was in pretoria with his supporters when the decision was announced, the south african government said because provisional measures are decisive, victory for the international rule of law. we expect israel as a self proclaimed democracy and the state that respects the floor to abide by that mesh just handed down by the international court of justice. after more than half a century of occupation, this possession oppression and a party as the palestinian p postcards for justice had been heated by an eminent organ of the united nations. israel's prime minister benjamin netanyahu has reacted angrily to the colts decision. he called the rolling a disgrace is ro, we'll have to report now to the i c j within a month regarding its compliance with the measures hold of domains reports now from tel aviv damage to the court did not cool and these are up to stop is military campaign in gaza, but it also did not throw out the case submitted by south africa on genocide the limited as israel reque

when it was the ruling, the i c j ruling was for russia to say, so i'll still a tease in ukraine. now, that ruling and the fact that ross are ignored, it showed some of the weaknesses of the i c, j. and it's for that reason. but some experts are saying that the i c j may this time, not take it to that length, it may not go all the way cooling for full cessation of hostilities that it may give them on. you wants to pry it to ramon, you want the ruling cooling, full more i to be led into gallons of israel to hold up it's obligations and that kind of thing. now if that's the ruling, we may well see israel comply by it, but it is the ruling is that the israel has just completely saved hostilities. it is very likely the israel could ignore that, but it's just too soon to say rebecca, thank you so much for that update. that's rebecca renters for us in jerusalem turning to some other news now and pop when you get a has declared a state of emergency looting and arson in the capital port moresby have killed at least 16 people. the violence triggered by police protesting against cots to thei

so here is among the nations which has praised b i. c, j. verdict, the pa, the city. and i'm boss of the to the countries spoke to auntie, exclusively also, but hate positive judgment. if i didn't list of the international communities, we worked together to stop the war in garza and implement a 2 state solution in the israel is now in a corner. is the whole world listen to what the court said and presented in terms of reasons and facts which largely confirmed with south africa went to and its lawsuit against the occupying state. and much of the evidence presented by south africa in its case, and is called to support the palestinian people was adopted. therefore, we as palestinians, welcome what was issued by the international court of justice. i left the indicator suggest that israel will continue this aggression by you. this requires the international community to take responsibility and exert maximum pressure on israel to stop this aggressive war. this crazy war wages against trees, stones, and people in the gaza strip, where the main target and the 1st to suffer are

since october 7th has been based in its new student. journalists in those studios then covered the i. c. j. hearing's law. in this case, alongside the deputy speaker of the connect whose name came up at the hearings as evidence of these really officials speaking with jenna seidel intent during the i c j hearing one ton of 131 of the guests that was the parliament's member. missing the 2 weeks who said that all you guys us would be burned down. and this statement was quoted in the i c j and the whole asked him about the damage it call. normally we flip the little stomach and he started to talk about what happened on october 7th, kind of preaching to them about so re 6, the attack against is a call you based on the notes on the line. so we have a deemed and the whole told him that we already reported that we are asking you something to add as and when he continued, they asked him to leave for the job and that kind of pushed back is highly unusually. is riley's, haven't seen much of it on their news channels. in fact, some of the genocide statements raised at the i c. j were originally delive

gathering at a local government building in the west banks able to a mile or on friday to watch the i. c j is decision being delivered. a community activist, i'm the last started out i said, so i thought everything going the way the palestinians had wanted. the ruling still carries a lot of weight, or of course, as well as emailed to you and hopefully you more, you know, our hope. so it much better, especially about a serious event of up to cease via media to is by our addictive this again against the read. the other thing gives us to, but in as a whole, the statement was a very good for the senior goes and it took into consideration or the gomez that were presented by itself african team. you get a team. and of course uh it's a states, it also is the ones that i really need those sit insinuating the genocide for that gives us through. i hope there will be fair to that issue about the union side. that's happened you guys us today. and i think that asking is a 3 course, and that is very important. and then uh and uh, the top, the top that things will go on. we'll have a look at these crowds

south africa is that top different about to attend to the i, c, j. u hearing of the hague and speaking of the press conference afterwards. now lady pend or expressed hope that israel will implement all of the quotes to my my husband's back to we will begin to move toward a process where substantively a 2 state solution is being discussed. the people of palestine of stuff at home for many, many decades. i don't, but i do believe it to in today or tomorrow. but what we've done is a very key, a signal has been sent by the court. and it's now a test for the government and people of israel as to whether they will act in a manner that says all of us must respect international, real issue. that's of all your questions are about israel. but the real issue is the people of palestine who are being killed every baby and all the people of palestine was sleeping in the quote. the people of palestine were denied food all to an energy. that is the critical issue that all of us should focus upon in the early days off the how must as well, who in particular so the op