i think the fa ct i disagree, personally. he is not an aristocrat in the same way that kate middleton is not an aristocrat is a huge step forward for the royal family. is not an aristocrat is a huge step forward for the royalfamily. plus, the impression we get so far, like harry, she is a great communicator, she can relate to real people on the streets. for many of us this is a big step forward. it will be interesting, she is a very forceful character. she has had to forge her own career, she has been outspoken once or twice before. there is a little bit of, you will have two button it. she will have to be diplomatic. you have to remember, harry is a brilliant communicator. he has grown up in the of modern media and has learned the lessons of what happened to his mother and he has learnt his own lesson subsequently and he will be able to help on this journey, as well as the army of people they have at clarence house protecting them. the story gets wider and wider. we will have a look at the south china morning post. i am going

i would respectfully disagree. i think the president has clearly shown his commitment to making a better place for all of our citizens. he ran on a promise of america first. i think he is delivering on it. piece by john dickerson of cbs, how the president became possible. -- the presidency became impossible. he made ispoints that george washington would not recognize the modern presidency. guest: i think that is true in the sense of how big our government has grown. that makes the case for why we need a smaller central government and get back to the roots of our country, which is pushing a lot more of these decisions on the states. government has grown too big and unwieldy and is not serving the best interests of the american people. host: john dickerson says the buck stops here is not meant to mean theresent -- president is responsible for everything that happens in the executive branch. guest: when you look at the size and scope of what this government is doing now, you literally cannot have one person by virtue o

i respectfully disagree. i hope things get belter and argue this country is a better place over the last year and a half. both economically and security-wise, and our safety and the relationships abroad. so i wish you the best and hope your life does get bet jeer from raleigh, north carolina, charles on the republican line. good morning. >> caller: good morning, steve. morning, sean. >> guest: morning. >> caller: i look back and how the media treated josh earnest and gibs and carney, almost with a reference -- reverence and i look bat at your experience and i see the hostility with very today and i feed like we talk but fake news, at the very, very least is a extremely slanted news. it comes from a viewpoint that seems to be in a herd, and the herd that the mainstream media from my standpoint, maybe hire the same people that went to the same schooled that have a limit viewpoint and an example, maybe nonpc but when you have major news anchors, like anderson cooper and rain rachel mad dao who live an alternative

i fundamentally disagree with that. i'm happy -- i brought a list of the actions this administration's taken to push back against russian aggression of all forms. their cyber efforts, their election meddling efforts, the chemical athack took place -- attack that took place. the list is long. i think the record ought to properly reflect that it is far more than took place under the previous administration. indeed, most of this meddling took place during the previous administration. and this administration is now working to deter that from ever happening again. and i think our administration ought to be very proud of the work we have taken, sanctions and otherwise, against russia. mr. johnson: thank you, mr. chairman. mr. secretary, thanks for your service. in your answers to secretary -- or to senator menendez's questions, you sure seem to make clear what your definition of dismantlement really means. you said you made it also clear to chairman kim jong un. did you? mr. pompeo: did i make it clear to him? mr. johnson: how

i disagree with some of the comments of judge napolitano earlier about the fact that mueller will win on the subpoena. ultimately, let me just say this, mueller will lose on the subpoena because it is unconstitutional. >> sean: if it was granted in the president fled the fifth, then they would offer him immunity and the perjury trap remains, correct or not? >> that is technically correct. but you cannot issue immunity to someone when you are doing it illegally under the statute because the only reason he would be giving him immunity would be to force testimony for an impeachment report. mueller does not have the t

i disagree. >> neil: who would be more? >> no, no. the reason i disagree is this. this road before. barak obama got beat by mitt romney by 30 points. and i won. and it is the bottom line they don't look at me as a democrat, but they look at me as a west virginia. >> when you voted no on the tax thing. >> well, no, we get along fine. health care, if i know you can fix it and repair it. i will not throw 200000 west virginiians off. i know we have a fix if we could get it voted on. and that's why i thought. >> neil: john mccain nixed the rework on that. and the president never got over. that and john mccain has pointed remarks and he doesn't want him to be at his funeral. >> i will not get into that. i will say this about the tax bill. the president knows i am for tax cut and relief. i did more than any governor. >> neil: why department you. >> 21 percent and 25 percent sufficient. and extra four in hundred p billion. and it should have been permanent on the people. >> neil: they have a second phase where they talked about making individual rates permanent. >> i will

i don't like that because people disagree. i think a robust exchange of ideas is great in our country and we should encourage it. i do believe especially on, what a 79 year-old great grandmother, i mean i'll read some of the things written about her. it is, i mean it's the lowest of the low. i think we all agree on that. you were shaking your head. >> i agree 100% that you know the first amendment is important and free speech is important especially political speech which we have learned is the highest form of protected speech in this country. where i disagree with the fellow panelist is when he says it's the left doing this. people who make these kind of threats are crazy whether they're on the right wing crazy or left wing. they're not part of any mainstream movement. they're not part of any political party or any real ideology. they're mentally disturbed and of course many are keyboard cowards. look, i get horrible things said to me all the time. we talked about this last week, but that doesn't stop me from talking and shoul

i absolutely disagree with josh on the interest rate side of it, though if the velocity of that movement rates, if it jumps -- if rates go up and the velocity of that move is extremely -- >> i don't think he necessarily believes that it's going to go up >> well -- >> i believe -- i believe that 3% ten-year brings out buying power like you've never seen in your life, young man that is not something that's going to change anytime soon you have oceans of cash that are thrilled with a risk-free 3% rate >> what if it jumps from 3, suddenly you're at 3.2.3.3 >> that's godzilla -- >> we already know what happens -- >> we already know how goodzi a ski godzilla gets smashed. >> and around july, based on the fact they're going to pull higher, probably closer to the mid-2s i don't think that's a level that people should get concern will you see stock volatility on the back of that probably but as we said reinjected into the fed statement does respond to the fact that the fed is not likely to react to variations in underliking cpi. i also agree with josh there's a very strong contingent, particularl

well, yeah, i would disagree. there isa well, yeah, i would disagree. h, i would disagree. there is a reason numerous presidents in the past have not fulfilled campaign promises to move the embassy. israel have —— has every right to view jerusalem as its capital but there are real dangers to making this move without at the same time recognising palestinian rights tojerusalem and u nfortu nately, palestinian rights tojerusalem and unfortunately, it is fitting a pattern of this administration which is making moves that don‘t seem to have this —— clear strategic purpose but further isolate the united states globally. the point is i guess opening an embassy in west jerusalem recognises implicitly israeli control over the whole city. there is a case for having the embassy in west jerusalem there is a case for having the embassy in westjerusalem but only as part of a negotiated share —— settle m e nt as part of a negotiated share —— settlement surely or support for a palestinian capital in east jerusalem? absolutely, a strong case for it, it is that a factor r

with us. >> i disagree. [laughter] >> bruce, has the conservative movement has been disagreeable family movement? >> not in a serious way. certainly in earlier days, those things that you may disagree on but they are petty, they are not worth talking about. by in large, there were certain -- it was the buckleyism, bill buckley. it would be pretty difficult to find a conservative who would disagree with him and certainly as time went on, president reagan and -- but that was like a little bit more like it used to be than it is right now. it's just different. it's very different. and, you know, in a sense i wish that we did this a couple of weeks ago prior to the time of what i heard conservatives saying regarding the decision, the moralless decision of what president trump has done in syria and i would hope it would be encouraged as much as necessary and recognize that bashar al-assad, if not a prime target today in all days that he's going to be a terrible, continue to be a terrible enemy of everything the u.s

have not done it in a way that is supportive of equal rights and civil rights. >> tucker: i respectfully disagree -- it's spending its time defenning illegal aliens and everybody in the world -- >> tucker: i'm so sorry. let me tell you that some of us can defend all fundamental freedoms for all people. >> tucker: but the emphasis on speech is absent to the aclu. >> tell that to the people who are criticizing the aclu and lobbying us to change our position which we have not because we defended the free speech rights of the alt-right demonstrators in charlottesville. that is a decision i stand by and my aclu colleagues stand by. in part -- >> tucker: that is not true! your colleagues do not stand by that. look, i'm here to tell you how much i respect your views. but you are not being honest there. >> there is debate and discussion within the aclu, tucker. but you know what we have not seen, what we saw in the case in the 1970s that raised the same issue when the aclu came to the defense of the neo nazi to demonstrate of holocaust survivors and jews. >> tucker: i remember. >> we lost 15% of the memb

i disagree with it, i don't think that it's proper. but i come from a christian viewpoint everybody's a human being. we're human beings first. and so i'm called to love. and after that i can disagree. >> bruce herschensohn, do you use social media? >> not one second of my life has been given to social media. >> congratulations. >> i wouldn't know how, and i don't want to learn, and if anyone wants to educate me, stay away. [laughter] >> why? >> because i'm very happy with the mediums -- meld -- media that exists. in fact, i'm not very happy with them, i guess. not as much as i used to be, that's for sure. i don't see movies anymore, and i used to love movies. >> i'll send you a copy of mine. >> okay, that's a deal. but, no, i wouldn't know how to use social media, and i don't want to know. >> is it just because it's a time suck? >> sure. i mean, that's certainly one of the reasons. the major -- >> you, though, will spend a lot of time communicating and learning from social media. >> i learn from books, i learn from things that i live t

[laughter] i disagree with the estimate. he's an agitator, outside agitator bent on destroying people up and making everyone dissatisfied. minutes after hearing of his death he denounced him. he was no outlier and he spoke for the millions of white americans who thought he had received his just. the shots ring out and rippled across the nation and the world. news of the murder stopped people in their tracks and rendered him speechless and others were led to celebration and drove some to violence and still others to political activism. african-americans were overcome with grief and were gripped by rage. there was an 18-year-old who attended hammill to high school in memphis. i wanted the world to end completely, she wrote. i felt there was no reason to continue living in the bubble, i wanted to kill myself. such a foul she wanted to opt out of it. her classmate, 17-year-old frankie gros gros broke down ins and new people over the world mourned his death and i felt better knowing that, quote on quote. at the same time he reali

. >> let's not forget -- >> i disagree. >> go ahead. >> i disagree.hink the media keeps a good watchdog eye on a lot of lobbying. >> there is an exception. people think all of these lay firms do when they hire former white house officials. it's all about access and influence. >> it it's riglated. people outside the swamp thy arthritickenned president for draining the swamp. someone so close to him taking this money. >> i wanted to say saul of the millions of dollars of consulting and lobbying firms combined have had less coverage than cohen head. this is a daily industry. i did see one company make a point that this is what the town is about. >> i agree. at&t said it was a big mistake. they said he was hired to help with the merger with time warner which the trump justice department opposed. this happens all of the thyme and doesn't make it right. some people are so shocked over it. let's come back to michael. lit's hear from him first and ask a question on the other side. >> there has been criticism about how often i'm on cnn and your show and other

i can disagree with you and have my perspective, but committed to engaging with you first as a childin this letter about the things you are worried about. you don't mention donald trump has issued -- as the issue, but people could argue that the divisiveness and discord and the tenor that has been part of the dialogue has come from the white house or is certainly part of the conversation. why not mention the president of the united states? bishop curry: what we are talking about are the values. what are the concerns, and what are the values? to some extent, it is probably too easy to point at donald trump. the election, regardless of where you stand, the election opened up and exposed deep divisions that have been there a -- there is a difference between differences and divisions. those divisions are getting deeper and deeper and deeper in our culture. a democracy requires relationships between people so we can engage in a public debate . we really see a danger to our very democracy in the divisions that are dividing us profoundly. a house to fight itself cannot stand. i didn't say t

i disagree with that. ve done a lot of depositions that were more complicated than this and i think you could prepare this president for this. >> trump has done a lot of depositions himself buried >> he has an experience on side. >> tucker: very precise people have gone to jail having fallen into perjury traps by experts. >> that's true. there's no question about it. there is no know-risk option. >> tucker: thank you both very much. great to see you. joel joins us tonight. overly simple question. impeachment is a constitutional mechanism, there's nothing to be embarrassed about here as a factual matter if you think the president has committed crimes, he's demonstrably unfit to preside over the country and you just heard byron say 71% of democrats believe that, then why lie about it and say we are never going to impeach him when that's what you do to a president? >> after listening to that open, you almost convinced me that that was going on. that's not what's going on. democrats are not lying to cover up th

the nuclear posture she should do that in a greeted nuclear weapons are crucial deterrent however i disagree with this nuclear posture. i agree with about 80% of it that a good chunk of that puts us in a more dangerous position and the line we can afford survival sort of implied whatever we spend on defense is necessary for survival. we can afford survival. we don't have to necessarily spend money in order to help the survival to the nuclear posture sets the course of nuclear policy that is going to spend more money than we can afford in a situation where we place ourselves at greater risk. a nuclear arms race is not good for anyone and i will quote a republican george shultz former secretary that he said one of the alarming things to me is this notion that we can have something called a small nuclear weapon which i understand the russians are doing and that somehow that's usable. your mind goes to the idea that yes nuclear weapons become usable and then we are really in trouble because a nuclear exchange can wipe out the world. the question is how do we respond to what russia is doing with

i disagree with the judge. if it were up to me, i went have -- >> neil: shot him? >> no. know that. >> what would you do? >> i would have sentenced the two parents with his son, i would put them in prison for life. parenting failure 101. >> neil: oh, stop. he's 30 years old. you can't possibly -- >> i'm impressed how the parents are handling. they offered to get him out -- >> they wouldn't believe. >> because of the amount of money -- >> they gave him $1,100 to move out. >> they tried to -- >> and one thing if he was helping out and pitching in. he wasn't. that's a big difference. >> they enabled him. >> for younger people, they don't care about shame or how they're perceived or looked at. >> neil: in italy, my paternal country, generations lived with each other. i have no progress with that. but this guy -- >> he wasn't contributing. >> no. >> he needs a job. >> the holidays will be awkward. >> he's getting his 15 seconds of fame. >> this is the fame he wanted? >> neil: it's well crafted. the parents say if they do it just right, they'll talk about us on cavuto. and star

i disagree with it and i don't think that it's proper.but i come from a christian viewpoint that everyone is a human being and so i can call to love and after that i can disagree. if anyone wants to educate me, stay away. i'm very happy with the media that exists. but not as much as i used to be that's for sure. >> i will send you a copy. >> okay. that's a deal. i wouldn't know how to use social media, and i don't want to know how. >> is it just because of tim? it's for things i've lived through d. think people can be successful with social media today? >> they tend to be people others will follow anyway they can do most things without social media but it's how most people especially get their news nowadays, so it's very important i get a lot of stories from social media there are a lot of things people following on twitter might pick up that i haven't seen so i use it as a resource as well. i think you can be successful and i think there's great wisdom in books. there are things you can read about today's politics reading intthe things t

i would respectfully disagree. i think the president has clearly shown his commitment to making a better place for all of our citizens. he ran on a promise of america first. i think he is delivering on it. piece by john dickerson of cbs, how the president became possible. -- the presidency became impossible. he made ispoints that george washington would not recognize the modern presidency. guest: i think that is true in the sense of how big our government has grown. that makes the case for why we need a smaller central government and get back to the roots of our country, which is pushing a lot more of these decisions on the states. government has grown too big and unwieldy and is not serving the best interests of the american people. host: john dickerson says the buck stops here is not meant to mean theresent -- president is responsible for everything that happens in the executive branch. guest: when you look at the size and scope of what this government is doing now, you literally cannot have one person by virtue o

naive that she was a pawn in a much larger plan which she didn't clearly understand at the time i disagree with that she knows the banking system history of all the policies of the bank she knew about the cards she set it up she was obviously waiting for the funds to be credit and when it was credit that she acted with like. getting this accounts out of the beneficiary of the other accounts. the senate report documented the timing of the payments many were made within minutes of each other. lawyers say that when funds were received on february the fifth she confirmed the legitimacy of the remittances with our c.b.c. head office and received e-mails confirming they were from valid sources a legal team say she didn't have all thirty to unilaterally prevent transfers and their client was told there was no reason to hold the phones following an investigation by anti money laundering or forest the a m l c the philippine department of justice has recommended that my be charged with eight counts of money laundering legal team is trying to quash the charges against her but if the case goes ahead s

i disagree. particularly when you're reaching out to north korea and saying to north korea, abandon your nuclear program and we'll make friends. to have this mixed message with iran and its nuclear program -- kennedy: the success that the president is seeing with north korea started with mixed messages. so i think he's doing essentially the same thing. it's interesting. the president is an interesting person. you document a lot of his personality and the transformation he's made over the years as your good friend in your book "the geraldo show." you also talk about roger ailes. and you yourself have had an interesting and polarizing career. what do the three of you have in common. >> you know, we come from the mad men era, the kind of 1950s when it was different, where locker room banter was a real thing and obnoxious thing were said, there was no such thing as jend equality, political correctness had no place. it was the sharp elbows in the ribs. i should be a lot madder at president trump becau

ana: i mean, i'm going to disagree. ner, i'm a furniture designer, but, i mean, i think it should be a team effort, definitely. i mean, i would like to run things by you. steve: well, it -- it -- okay. lemonis: are you pissed off right now? you look a little fired up right now. steve: i am. i am fired up. i do think it's fresh and it's clean. sam: it's a nice look. i don't want to say it's not. but it's not, i think, what we're looking for. it's just there. lemonis: okay. this is a story about mail and packages. and it's also a story about people. people who rely on us every day to deliver their dreams they're handing us more than mail they're handing us their business and while we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country, we never forget... that your business is our business the united states postal service. priority: you ♪ somebody burned down my she shed.. nobody burned down your she shed, cheryl. well my she shed's on fire. your she shed was struck by lightning. zachary, is my she shed

putin will say different things i disagree with and may not be factually accurate. he's been known to do that. i think sanctions have an impact center countries that won't do business because of the sanctions. it is having an effect on their economy. we've impose sanctions because we want them not to interfere with ukraine or not to interfere with the united states sovereign countries. if you change course and do not interfere with the sovereignty of other countries, we don't talk about sanctions. >> one more question, guys. >> you sat on the stage that you, the congress, is ready to increase on russia. what did you mean? >> the congress sincerity pass pretty strong distinction regime. i think you will find we will continue to use her oversight questioning as he did with the pompeo hearing-impaired statement was made by mr. pompeo and we'll continue to to look for every avenue of appropriations bills. a lot of things we can do in regards to carry not sanctions against russia. [inaudible] [inaudible conversations] >> thank you. good to see you. [inaudible conversation

i simply disagree with that. i'm happy to consider whether there is an appropriate mechanism to engage with cuba on civil aviation. i don't know the answer to the question. senator: the point of the question is, when there is cooperation on all fronts in cuba, i think americans do better and cubans do better. and that is what the policy of the last administration was, to uplift everyone. and when i had a discussion with you in my office, you talked about, we are going to try to have an engaged policy with cuba. we are not going backwards. my time is up, mr. chairman. i would wait for the second round. thank you. chair: thank you. on the zte issue, there were a few of us that were part of a briefing last night. i do think that, having nothing to do with other countries' interests, i do think the administration is using trade policy and some of these other sanctions issues, maybe too transactionally. i know that doesn't happen to the state department. and sometimes, just based on feelings with an individual they are

but i tell you what, he did -- i was afraid in that speech he was going to start saying stuff i disagreeally everything he said about compassion for prisoners, i think the most liberal democrat would have agreed with. >> good luck on booking him for the van jones show. we'll be watching for that. thanks so much. >> thank you. >>> happening this week, nancy pelosi answers your questions in a live cnn town hall. chris cuomo will host this wednesday night at a time that will become very familiar to him, 9:00 p.m. eastern only on cnn. >>> this morning, new and deadly danger in hawaii. look at this. the lava flow reaching the pacific ocean. ♪ heartburn and gas? ♪ now fight both fast new tums chewy bites with gas relief all in one relief of heartburn and gas ♪ ♪ tum tum tum tums new tums chewy bites with gas relief every day we hear from families who partnered with a senior living advisor from a place for mom to help find the perfect place for their mom or dad thank you so much for your assistance in helping us find a place. mom feels safe and comfortable and has met many wonderful residence a

i suspect you disagree. >> i disagree just a little bit. but i think the bigger flag for me in this particular piece is the ways in which they were attempting to close out hillary clinton investigation, but james comey stepped forward saying there were damaging e-mails and they ended up being anthony wiener's and they are ramping up the investigation and before the election and there was no mention of it. and so we heard this term kompromat and there was somebody in the campaign who would have known that it could have involved the fbi, or it could have involved the department of justice. so when we talk about compromising democracy, some of our key institutions were part of that and withheld critical information to the american people even if the investigation wasn't solved and it still isn't, there is key facts that should have been presented. they were afraid of donald trump bullying them. that is essentially what this piece says. so we allowed someone who bullied before and before the campaign to bully the department of justice an the fb

and i disagree with that. because i think the mentality that prevailed then could easily take hold now if god forbid we were in another situation like that. what do you say to people who have an issue with your personal iet ideology thaideology that wu for voting for someone like gina haspel. >> i don't get to vote but my senator does and he's opposing her. to your point, is a little bit of torture okay? no, i don't think a little bit of torture is okay. what i would say to those people who support her saying we shouldn't relitigate this, we should always relitigate this. kennedy: i agree. >> this makes our soldiers less safe overseas when they get caught. the united states sets the standard for moral behavior or we should and we have really lowered the standard. kennedy: if you were a senator when john brea brennan was confd to head the cia, would you have voted for him? >> i would like to think i wouldn't have. but i can't put myself in their place. but to those folks in kentucky who are upset with rand paul

with the call >> i disagree with the call. >> why couldn't you have just said that at the top kidding. jan, good stuff. we have to put a camera in that green room jan kniffen, thank you >>> let's get your mental wheels rolling a bit. seems like a good day for a mystery chart. jan, you're a smart guy. you're looking at the best performing retail stock in the past year. it's the only retail stock that has doubled in 12 months with any market cap of any size can you guess who this is? we'll reveal the answer later in the show >>> all right. still to come, political picks even if i don't care about politics, we'll show you three stocks to own and three stocks to avoid ahead of this year's midterm elections. ghd gas prices are moving hier how much more might they go? new numbers when we roll on. >>> let's check the other headlines outside the word of business including the latest on hawaii phillip has more >>> good morning cia director nominee gina haspel is facing a tough fight in her questioning. when directly asked whether she thoug thought -- >> it is a race against

look, i disagree with general kelly, but i have to push back on what something bakari said.sed the point of view that he's racist is absolutely -- >> that's not what i said. >> that's what you implied. >> he says it's the epitome of racism. >> that's the same thing. semantics -- >> let me finish talking. you were wrong. you actually said something i did not say. it's the definition of racism. i have not called general kelly a racist. >> he said the remarks are -- and people can make racist remarks. it doesn't mean they are racist. >> but his remarks -- okay, so the remarks are not even racist. he's expressing a point of view that i believe it's wrong. but if we're going to have a single debate about immigration it's time for both sides, the right and the left to just have a serious objective conversation and discuss our policy differences. but to say the remarks are racist, are absolutely -- >> that's got to be the last word. i've got to go. thank you. we'll be right back. hey shrimp fans - this one's for you. it's red lobster's create your own shrimp trios. pick 3 of 9 new

when i disagree, i'll disagree. they're children of god, too. >> have we turned against each other? >> we are reading that risk. >> i'm reading john meacham's book now. we run that sxriks we must not turn against each other. it was said a long time ago about this country. we all came over here on different ships but we're you a in the same boat now. >> let's talk about the royal wedding. i covered it. it was amazing. you talked about the power of love. your sermon was amazing. i want to play some of it. >> think about when you first fell in love have the whole world seemed the center around you and your beloved. well, there is power. power in love. not just in this romantic form but any form, any shape of love. there's a certain sense in which when you are loved and you know it, when someone cares for you and you know it, when you love and you show it, it actually feels right. there's something right about it. >> so a couple things here. have you had a chance to sit back and watch? >> no. i've seen footage but no. >>

mary lou: [ laughs ] mary ellen: i respectfully disagree. charlie: i have to...ear the brunt of a lot. mary ellen: i respectfully disagree. charlie: you -- mary ellen: no. sorry. charlie: okay. you can respectfully disagree. mary ellen: the boss is the person whose name is on the door. -charlie: that, luckily, it's my name, as well. lemonis: coming up... what do you think's gonna go wrong? mary lou: i don't want them to screw up so much. and i'm afraid. i'm afraid. -lemonis: listen, listen. listen. -mary lou: and i'm afraid. they don't understand. i'm afraid. -charlie: okay. -mary ellen: all right. at t-mobile, we're committed to keeping military families connected. then momma ninja asked her littlest baby ninja, did you finish your dinner? so in honor of military appreciation month... active duty and veterans get half off select samsung galaxy phones. anif you've got a lifee. you gotta swiffer it's just a burst pipe, i could fix (laugh) no. with claim rateguard your rates won't go up just beacuase of a claim. i totally could've... (wife) nope! switching to allst

i disagree with kushner and trump on so many things but here's the deal.h you on 99 issues important to me, trans'rights, immigrant rights, the whole deal, on 99 things but on one this eveningng i disagre you, should i do nothing and not do one thing to try to help people who don't have voices? and i said i've got to at least try. i think at the end of the day what we'll learn about this country, where we disagree, we're supposed to fight and fight hard but where we agree, we're supposed to work together and work hard, especially for people who don't have a voice. >> you have heard what steve bannon has just said to the bbc and donald trump and dr. king. hang on before you jump in, in case people haven't seen it, roll the tape. >> i said donald trump has the lowest black unemployment in history. donald trump has the lowest hispanic unemployment in 25 years. if you look at the policies of donald trump, okay, anybody, martin luther king would be proud of him of what he's done for the black and hispanic community for jobs. >> you think martin luther king woul

>> i disagree. more plausible but completely under mines what the stated goal is. they have heavily put their thumb on the scale in favor of israel. a great day for israel. it is but it is a terrible day for the middle east peace process or what is left of it or getting to the end. i think they have completely undermined effort to effectively act as a mediator between the two sides or as any credible obiter of the interest of both sides. i think the sets it back extremely far. >> christiane amanpour, before we get to break. >> i wanted to say it's not only taking the united states out in terms of mediator because as you know the palestinians have broken contact with the united states since the announcement was made. it's all very well saying yes we believe in a two state solution but when you create facts on the ground that is contrary it is difficult to see how that can happen. it is important to look at history. if you walk back to 2006, recent history, the then republican administration of george

first amendment ramifications i disagree i think a broad interpretation the first amendment would cover wiki leaks so i would hope that news organizations would focus not on what leaks but rather on the principles that are at stake if this is a successful campaign against wiki leaks it would have ramifications for other news organizations news organizations should be concerned about that aspect of. the discussion other media stories that are on our radar today with one of our producers flo philips flow this past week unesco announced that it's giving its world press freedom award for two thousand and eighteen to an imprisoned egyptian photojournalist mahmoud but this hasn't gone down well with the authorities in cairo has it and they've made their own happiness not in egypt's foreign ministry says but in a shotgun was involved in terrorism and also warned us even before the award was announced but to recognize in this way involves contempt for the state of law but just on that point the law has been imprisoned now without charge when he is egyptian or stipulates no one can be held witho

i disagree. that's the best i could. go there. but when juries make decisions for him and for the things he's made for sex sure and. this is shipping city. not from canada. as you might well you know rush for is a massive country in terms of eleven time zones from east to west it's just unbelievable god is not in the baltic sea and i'm taking advantage of being here so today i decided to go fishing i absolutely love fishing going on here in the baltic sea i've got to lean in got out of the back and be straight for. it's going to take us two or three days to get there so. the problem is not do not fall while we are doing we are trying to catch my lunch and hopefully some style that it's going to be. salmon this size. not very big. puts out its own flood sometimes with paper. you know. the mold growing. most of all do i it's all eight. dollars. seventy four design submissions. seven thousand pilings. to join judges. and eight hundred sixty nonstop days of work. a russian w.b. a champion of it. and a russian mob stuff. show you how.

>> i guess i disagree with julia a little bit there.hat their relationship goes back so far, if cohen goes down then trump is going down with him. so they're intertwined and have a history that goes back years. they have money connections through family, through trump's businesses. to me it's all interrelated. it's all connected, and, you know, that's the key. that it's through cohen this money is coming into trump's world. >>> when we come back as the white house dodges questions about michael cohen, is the president's attorney on thin ice tonight? my family while i was overseas serving. it was my very first car accident. we were hit from behind. i called usaa and the first thing they asked was 'are you ok?' they always thank you for your service, which is nice because as a spouse you serve too. we're the hayles and we're usaa members for life. see how much you could save with usaa by bundling your auto and home insurance. get a quote today. hey, i'm curious about your social security alerts. oh! we'll alert you if we find your social

i fundamentally disagree with that. i'm happy -- i brought a list of the actions this administration's taken to push back against russian aggression of all forms. their cyber efforts, their election meddling efforts, the chemical attack that took place. the list is long. i think the record ought to properly reflect that it is far more than took place under the previous administration. indeed, most of this meddling took place during the previous administration. and this administration is now working to deter that from ever happening again. and i think our administration ought to be very proud of the work we have taken, sanctions and otherwise, against russia. sen. corker: senator johnson. senator johnson: thank you, mr. chairman. mr. secretary, thanks for your service. in your answers to senator menendez's questions, you sure seem to make clear what your definition of dismantlement really means. you said you made it also clear to chairman kim jong un. did you? sec. pompeo: did i make it clear to him? secretary johnson: ho

>> i would have to disagree with richard slightly. if anybody is, it is the president. e only crime that is going on here is blackmail. and this, this woman and trump engaged in an act that i would not want to engage in with her. it was consensual and she threatened to talk about it and they signed a nondisclosure agreement for 130000. and if one party breaks the agreement, in order to demonstrate to breach the nondisclosure. it is pointless and stupid. and in fact, this woman, i men it as a semiserious point here, tucker. this story is a lot of things, but it is not a crime. the guy going on the talk show and he plays a good bum shiesster before. the stormy and her lawyer are the shakedown artist. >> tucker: it took me. why is no one saying that. she got 130000 and why does that make her a hero. it is not the kind of behavior we are in favor of. >> she's an aging porn star which is not a good thing to be. i haven't seen her motion picture roles. and on saturday night live when she delivered that line porn stars aren't known for herabilitying. and even by porn star, she

putin will say different things that i might disagree with there might not be factually accurate. i think sanctions to have an impact. i think there are a lot of companies that want to business with russia so it is having an effect on their economy. we impose sanctions not because we want to hurt them, we want them not to interfere with ukraine or the united states, sovereign countries. is very clear of mr. putin changes course and does not interfere with the sovereignty of other countries we want talk about sanctions because they will not be there. >> today you say that you, congress is ready to increase pressure in russia, what did you mean? congress has already passed sanction regimes. you will find we will continue to use our oversight as we did during the pompeo hearing. the statements made by mr. pompeo were helpful. will be using appropriation bills and the things we can do to strengthen the hand. >> thank you. [inaudible conversation] [inaudible conversation] [inaudible conversation] >> tonight on c-span2, oral argument in the federal case challenging the trump administrati

i disagree with folks who think that -- that we should just completely scrap our trade agreements. i think that they do have a place. my hope is that they can be strengthened. it's been interesting to see donald trump now backpedal and talk about perhaps a tpp-like agreement. what's happening right now is that children is about to eat our lunch, whether it's with agreements with other asian countries or with latin america. the united states needs to make sure that it both benefits its employees, its workers first but that also it maintains its dominant position in the world when it comes to trade. we absolutely cannot leave our dominant position in the world, and that's what's happening under donald trump. >> two things related to that. the president sending out a tweet when it comes to trade with china saying this. the trade negotiations are continuing with china. they have been making hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the u.s. for many years. stay tuned, and then the papers highlighting the special position of the president concerning telecom giant zte. put that into per