i guess you've seen what she's proposing. maybe you can comment on that. i see you have, from what i understand, this unit is going to be a four bedroom unit with two bedrooms on the bottom level and then two on the top level. is that correct? >>> that's correct, that's the proposal. that's the intention. >> i guess what, you know, what she's saying is you're cutting -- she wants to you cut off a portion of the back of that bedroom, instead of having it at 45-degree angle it would probably go more or less straight down at 8 feet to some point where you'd have the entry from the hall. i think that's what i see as the difference between the two things. i don't know if that's acceptable or how big a bedroom you'd have if you did it that way. >> >>> well, i think that -- i don't know if it's possible to put on the overhead. i'm seeing this frankly for the first time with you or this page. and as an architect, there's problems. one is it's not clear to me, at least immediately, how an access of this bedroom without going into an intermediate room, the bathroom y

>> i guess it's up to you. what i was suggesting, if you don't want it in the document, that is fine and we don't have to go back and review. i suppose there is an option for essentially mr. hem abouts hemhemblig to put in that language and vote on that as amended. >> that would be fine with me. what i don't want is to hold up the proceedings. i do not want to do anything that would hold up these proceedings any further. >> okay. so the draft as currently amended and i'm sure there will be other amendments, contains a one-sentence concurence from commissioner hayon. do you have that language in mind. >> the language i have is commissioner had aon supports a finding that the official misconduct in this case merits the sheriff's removal from office. is that accurate? >> that is accurate. >> okay.lp >> there were some additional edits proposed by the mayor and i think that they are accurate. so i would propose that on page 2 lines 1 and 2 should now read, "this matter presents the first time that the ethics commiss

i just want to add -- [inaudible] i think you could see that this term sheet is fairly detailed, i guess, and this is as a result of a lot of conversations and discussions that the staff has had and i think some of the commission in terms of the direction we have given you and we are pleased to see where are at this step today and hopefully this project will move forward. so with that all in favor? >> aye. >> aye. >> resolution number -- sorry, i have to go back. resolution 1278 has been approved. and i see mr. orden and james madison in the back. congratulations. thank you. >> item 9d informational presentation regarding the sfpuc recycled water project and identification of port properties as potential sites. >> good afternoon commissioners. brad benson special projects manager. i am here representing port that is working on this project. byron rhett is helping me out and we have representing the san francisco public utilities commission today donna palassos and others. essentially the public utilities commission is in the process of diversing the public water supply and looking at rec

. >> well, i guess really -- i guess we really should jump over to coleman. but i have a very quick question. the work force issue, i know this past summer we had that summer jobs program that i think we had about four or 5,000 jobs. >> correct. >> that were provide today youth. the feedback i was hearing was that not all the young people from disadvantaged backgrounds, probably some of the folks we're talking about today that are in that percentage, were necessarily had the qualifications to obtain some of those jobs or succeed once they were placed. so, i just want us to -- at some point i guess i would like to have a better understanding of, you know, whether the match was there, you know, but yeah. >> sure, it's a very complicated circumstance. i think to quickly highlight within the 4 or 5,000 job opportunities, there is a range of opportunities. from entry level internship all the way to private sector placement. of course within that spectrum it has different levels of requirement. so, you're right at some level, some youth are not ready for the privat

so i guess this is the long way of saying that you have a difficult road to hoe here and i look forward to helping you and supporting you in that effort because this is very, very important. >> thank you. if there are no other comments, colleagues, can we move this forward with a positive recommendation without objection? [ gavel ] . thank you. thank you president chiu. thank you everyone. miss miller could you please call item no. 3. >> item no. 3 is an ordinance implementing san francisco's housing preservation and production polices and goals. and this and the sponsors are supervisor christina olague and co-sponsors supervisor kim, campos and myself. supervisor olague. >> this is a piece of, i guess, a policy that we have been working on or i have been working on since i was on the planning commission and working at senior action network. at that time we approached -- and sue hester has been working on and advocating for this for a long time, as has community council for housing organizations and others. and basically it's to try to set up a monitoring and reporting program within th

when you see a potential mate they get excited i guess. i am skeptical of stuff like this.t we bought a pair. we are going to test them out tonight the we really got a pair. where is guillermo. [ applause ] >> jimmy: didn't think you could look any cuter, but i was wrong. what we are going to do, we have the ears, we are going to put pictures of different things up on a tv monitor. one at a time. let's start with the first image. see how it looks. here we go. oh. i dent know it i don't know if that means you are interested or what. let's look at the next thing and see what kind of reaction he has. wow. are you hungry? you are hungry. okay. let's see what else, yeah? oh, cute little kitty cats. you like kittens, guillermo? >> yeah. >> okay, let's see what else. oh, that's guillermo's son. look at that. kind of does work. not a remote control. all right. let's see what else we have here? ooh. the dreaded chupacabra, you don't believe in the chupacabra? >> no. >> no. >> i think we have one more, ricky martin. huh? huh? oh. he was always a big menudo fan. your ears have betraye

. >> well, i guess this is a discretionary review, of course. so, we have a project that under definition was compliant, but we have discretionary review. and i think what the key element here is in terms of this continuance request is are the changes that difficult to understand that we can't, you know, visualize them having studied the original ones? if these are huge and changes and the feeling of staff i could concur with commissioner sugaya. but if they are some condition changes that try to address some of the concerns of the dr requesters, then that's something we do all the time and i don't know why we can't consider it today and get it finished. >> let me ask a question. did the dr requesters also just receive this most recent? >> yes. so, basically on october 9th staff was informed that the project sponsor in consultation with the dr requesters made minor refinements to the plans. on october 16 the dr -- the project sponsor provided updated drawings to reflect those minor refinements and specifically they included a change in the guardr

i guess i approach land use and economic development from a different perspective. i'm not against development, but i want it to be equitable so we look at the lowest income populations or even middle income populations so that residents have a strong say as development moves forward, whether it is the park ridge said development in the southern, western part of the city or even treasure island with there's many low-income families that currently live there. but it is a strong voice for the residents that currently are there. we also want to see new people moving into the city, and hopefully, we focus also on families and housing that provides better homes and home opportunities for families, but i always say that i support equitable development. i also do feel that big business and downtown interests usually dominate the discussion on development. i want to see a balance of those forces, but also with residents and environmentalists and others that have an important say as we try to create more complete streets and better designed neighborhoods that make it more li

i guess we should take a break. >> i guess. more stuff when woman dabbing. >>> last topic of the night a new study claims that students who were popular in high school earned later more in life. i suppose that means money. the piece published by the national bureau of economic research suggests people popular in high school would have a 10% wage difference 40 years after graduation over the unpopular nerd trolls. remi, you had to have been popular in high school, right? >> it was the first nice thing you said. you are wrong by the way. >> were you persecuted? >> no, but i was a loner. >> i feel bad for that. >> i was friendly with anybody, but i didn't have real friends. >> how sad. >> don't feel bad. i don't agree with that study. i feel my experiences in high school are what made me stronger. >> enough. >> oh my goodness. clearly you were not a popular kid in high school. >> tom, i am certain you didn't go to high school. >> i had a great time. >> good for you. >> this study is wrong. they dude deed a 40-year period. tre are

. >> i guess i was getting at more opportunities for public outreach and have the public weigh in and even if you wouldn't mind investigating the issue whether it's been difficult for people to get access to the online survey. >> we only know of one person that had an issue and internet explorer -- i'm not technical but it was that issue and i thought it was resolved but we can try and address ms. wood's issues. >> in brief it's an old version of internet explorer and doesn't allow access to the site is my guess. >> we thought it was resolved. we emailed folks and the list was 1600. we have a email list of 1600 stakeholders and did that twice now. so we will have melissa come up and talk about the issues. >> thanks for taking the time and we have done emailing on the latest update on the five sites about 1600 people. we are doing another update to them in advance of the southeast health fair. we did a mailing as well which was a full scale eight and a half by 112 sided mailer and went out to 12,000 people and within approximately 500 feet of each site and more around the southeast sit

blind eye or thinking government is not paying attention, but every application, everything counts i guess is basically what i'm trying to say here. >> well, the next thing i'm going to talk about after i talk about our program for the last 10 years is a couple proposals how we can change it. maybe i can address that question. so it's confusing and it takes a long time and these are the reasons we're trying to change the process. so we also looked more broadly at our program over the years just to see what kind of interest we have had. we get on average 50 applications a year, that's what this bar is showing, and the green ones are the ones we accept. that's on average 20 a year, although there's a lot of fluctuation from year to year. we looked at how many devices we're actually putting in the ground every year and it ranges from 20 to 35, with an average of 26. all of these projects that we're implementing are chipping away at that backlog, those stacks of completed plans that we have had from all our community meetings over the years. each year within our budget for that year we're pick

>> i guess so. anthony you played this game. >> i love this game. there is a level on this game where you are an army ranger and you are undercover in a russian terrorist cell, and you go into an airport and you slaughter civilians. joy it is masacring the civilians. >> there was a big uproar, but ago tau vision left that and took this out. >> people are petrified about offending muslims in this day and age. it is not about a picture frame and writing on it. it is the fact that we can virtually murder millions of different cultures. >> it is important they be from different cultures. >> how they focus on that and the fact you are literally wiping out thousands of virtual people. it is a virtual bathroom. it is a virtual frame. it is not really in a bathroom. it could be in house . mine for instance. this is the part of the show i ask the question and i think about something else while you are answering. >> right. actually now that i am listening to this, i am thinking i have another million dollar idea. this one is we are watching the actual call of

i guess let's peel away sort of the the messaging and the fear mongering and let's try and get to the bottom of why these are then held in military courts i think by and large is the embarrassment over what we did in trying to keep that quiet i mean i was on a panel last week here in d.c. with one of the senior members of the prosecution team who said all these trials are going to be a new era in transparency but as you've seen today i mean if transparency is a forty second sound allay and reporters tweeting from guantanamo then these are extraordinarily transparent but the public can attend and like i said you know the government can pick and choose what it wants to blank out and i think that's the purpose of the military commissions is to try to avoid embarrassment over things that we did in some cases a decade ago i guess just last question for you is so what do you think will be the long term impact of this trial well assuming it eventually gets done i mean today is just a preliminary hearing on motions last i heard there were in excess of one hundred fifty motions. i think of any

so, overall the changes i guess would be considered relatively minor but they don't address all the dr requesterses' concerns. >> commissioner borden. >> i'll just ask a question to -- i know people have been sitting here and you probably have a feeling you don't want to have this item continued. i guess i'd like to ask the project sponsor and then -- and maybe a representative of each of the dr requesters. for less than 30 seconds, would there be an advantage to continue? ideally we love it when people work it out among themselves because the truth is people often don't like the solution that we come up with as often as somewhere between where the two parties lie and which makes everyone unhappy. and i'm not saying that's what's going to happen, but that often seems to be the case. if there is a chance dialogue and reach an agreement we don't have to hear this at all. but i guess that -- my only question would be is there a reason, would it be worthwhile to continue this week? i don't know what the schedule looks like. i'm saying it might be a week, two, might be three. i'd like to un

i guess getting back to the masonic fix, 18 million, i think 9 million has been identified. has the other 9 million been identified yet to fund the project? >> i'm getting a no. >> okay. >> so, we're expecting to see this project for the one bay area grant. so, that will be competing in that grant program and we'll be looking at that funding source and other possible local sources [inaudible]. >> good afternoon, commissioners. jonathan rivers with the mta. so, we've been working with the authority for a couple months on a full funding plan for masonic. it is a very significant project here in the city of san francisco and it's one of our major complete street projects where we want to come in and try to do everything. there is a component, the resurfacing component that is being funded through the proposition b bond. the $18 million project, though, is those additive complete streets streetscape improvements. we have funded the environmental phase and that's moving forward, just recently completed the mta board improved legislation associated with the project last tuesday. s

. >> oh, cloud atlas, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, i guess that is coming out tomorrow. you know, stephen, i'm not here to talk about me or my movies or my legacy as a living legend. (laughter) >> stephen: i didn't actually say you were a living legend. >> actually, steve, i'm here for the kids with some great, inexpensive costumes that will make for a spook-tacular halloween. here's one now. >> stephen: okay, great. >> hey. >> trick or treat. >> hey, look at that, it's a cowboy. >> yup, just a hat, some jeans, a check shirt, a vest and you are ready to ride the range, pardonner. >> there's a snake in my boot. >> stephen: give the kid some candy there, tom. >> oh, yeah, sure there you go, pally. >> stephen: thanks, buddy. there is a snake in my boot. that's what woody says in "toy story". >> is it? there are so many great lines in that movie. >> stephen: oh, hey, here's another idea, yeah. >> trick or treat. >> stephen: oh, wow, an astronaut, tom, tell the folks how you did this. >> this is easy, get a puffy jacket and some oven mitts, some it uper wear and sky's the limi

and i guess i had jumped the gun a little bit in assuming you would want to

entity, in some ways like the redevelopment commission used to be. >> it is a city or state agency i guess within the city i think technically. maybe that is -- >> essentially, that is right. >> thanks. >> commissioner moore. >> does this pose for this particular city was probably one of the most physically active in the state of california. physical building, any problems as you see it? i find it unusual you would not be asked to be on the physical end but rather the financial end. that is a tough call. >> commissioners, director ram, we are in a discussion of this. of course it is not on your calendar. if it is your desire to discuss this, and this is a subject i would recommend you discuss, maybe we should calendar this for next week, for discussion next week. >> we have a memo coming. the question is whether you want to actually calendar it. >> when does the memo come out? >> you will get it today. >> is there interest for that? >> yes, there is. >> let's calendar an item for this particular topic. >> okay. thank you. >> ms. rogers. >> good afternoon, commissioners. anne rogers, planni

>> i guess i have always been passionate about civil rights and equality for everyone, and i have a 10ear-old daughter, so having a girl has made me much more sensitive to gender equality and other issues, but i guess i have always been someone that is vocal about my politics, but as a supervisor, and having to listen to many perspectives before making key decisions. as an activist in chinatown, i have always felt that working families and people who work in our neighborhoods need to have much more support. it is always about giving more voice to immigrants or the underserved and workers in the city. that is what drives my passion as a supervisor. >> tell me about the process of running for supervisor. what did you learn from the campaign process? was anything surprising? supervisor mar: i had to move from being a regular person that barely gets his kid to school on time and makes her a healthy lunch to having to go to a photo opportunities. i was on the school board for eight years, i had some training. and i was in the democratic party central committee for years before that and was

i guess my -- honestly i have concerns about how not this project or future projects could manipulate the height limit requirements in the planning code. the height limit requirements are one of the dearest requirements in the planning code. that is why no portion, in looking at this second, even though it is only a segment of the roof, they have one longer portion and one shorter portion, the shorter portion as measured by the planning code is above the height limit. i don't see how we can allow the roof at that point. >> so when you say the longer portion and the shorter portion, you are -- because i heard the appellant talk about your analysis use ago two-roof analysis. to what extent is the argument that if you were to fill in that sort of gap space could he have, could they use that one -- could they still operate with the height they would like to have without the gap? those are kind of two questions but i was trying to follow the argument and how you would respond to that. >> let me get to look at actually the roof plan. while more than half the width of the lot is dedicated to

i don't -- >> you seem kind of normal. >> i guess. ks. happy guy. i'm a lucky guy. >> these great. >> a sweet guy. give our love to jesse. you made quite the impression. >> i will. i will. >> i will tell them. >> thanks, sweetie. >> both two said hello. >> "chicago fire" airs tonight at 10:00/9 central time on nbc. >>> from eye cream, lipstick and shampoo, cosmo magazine has the best in beauty right after this. chances are, you're not made of money, so don't overpay for motorcycle insurance. geico, see how much you could save. prove it. enough is enough. d-con baits are specially formulated to kill in one feeding. guaranteed. d-con. get out. to volunteer to help those in need. when a twinge of back pain surprises him. morning starts in high spirits, but there's a growing pain in his lower back. as lines grow longer, his pain continues to linger. but after a long day of helping others, he gets some helpful advice. just two aleve have the strength to keep back pain away all day. today, jason chose aleve. just two pills for all day pain r