i think it's healthy. and i support him in it. >> was he not happy with the direction you were setting? >> look, i mean, i think bringing in fresh face, fresh people is a good thing. so, look, he has the best political instincts. he's -- hang on a second. >> yeah. >> he knows, i think, intuitively when things need to change. i've seen it now for a year and a half on this wild ride with the president that i loved being a part of. but he intuitively determined that it was time to do something differently. and i think he's right. >> but it's only been six months, not very long. when you say he wanted to do things differently, tell us precisely what he said to you, why he wants to do things differently and why you concluded that didn't include you. >> i'm not going to get into that personal stuff. the president is a professional, and i'm a professional and professional people don't discuss private conversations in public. but what i will tell you is this president has the hearts of all americans at the top of h

i don't think they would have published that without solid evidence so i don't think they can release the actual evidence because that could reveal sensitive sources and methods you know in the us system is as you've probably seen has had a lot of leaks many people in the u.s. government who are unhappy with things are going off and leak to the media so i think if there were any reason to doubt this conclusion there would likely be people within the u.s. system going to the media in terms of me lending my expertise to to russian propaganda i think i do think that r.t. is propaganda arm of the russian government and helps to spread. information that helps advance russia's interests and so that's why i think it's important for people like me to come on if it weren't me it would be somebody who was less capable who had maybe not do as good a job presenting the american point of view well and three are very grateful for you spending some time it does but since you mention decent for mation i just want to ask you ask you to give us one specific just one specific example of the dissent from

i was thinking -- >> do you want to -- no, i was thinking we order papa john's. >> the sensation i get from sex and eating pizza is interchangeable for me at this point. >> these issues may seem trivial, they need to be addressed. >> where do you think we go from here? >> i don't know. what if we turned all our fights into songs? let's start a band. >> great neighbor. hi, dave. i was in a band myself. what was it called? it was called myself, a solo percussive group. you know -- >> uh-huh. let's make a list, our top ten fights of all time. dishes is big, obviously. >> i think you can be a little judgmental. >> you being laysy. 're uptight. distracted. play a song. ♪ this wasn't meant to be a dude ♪ ♪ that you can aggravate ♪ you get so rude ♪ you've got to change your attitude ♪ ♪ . >> dave? unreal. i can't relate to the lyrics at all. >> i loved it. this is it. looks like you two are up. embarrassing. that's what every husband wishes their wife would do. >> i spent my childhood trying to save my parents' marriage, i don't want to spend my adulthood trying to save yours. >> we're just

i think there may be double jeopardy. i don't think i will get in trouble for saying it again since i messed up once. there was this wonderful moment during my presentation of credentials. i used to work in the internet industry. we talked about technology. i commented because i came in with a top hat and coat, unusual for an american, all these people snapping pictures. the queen said they always used to have cameras to take a picture, but now it is really different. they have these phones and they always stay over their eyes. she said i miss seeing their eyes. that really struck me. looking at that, you could think this is a one-way thing. the head of state and people snapping pictures. but there is a two-way connection happening and that connection matters. that really stuck with me. >> that is a wonderful memory. david, the leader of your former party -- >> it is not my former party. >> questioning the relevance of the monarchy, would it be a mistake to get rid of the monarchy? >> the remarkable thing about the queen i

and i think it was just great. i did it not to make any political statement, but to just bring home the point that government can be fun, it should be fun. and if it is fun, it can bring more people into the process, because a lot of the things that we discuss as elected officials or as policymakers are of great importance, but they tend to be dry and drawn-out conversations. there's nothing wrong with bringing a little levity to the process and making it entertaining as well as educational. >> but, lan, when you hear that people are saying, "he's not taking his job seriously," et cetera, does that make it discouraging at all? >> i do get that, but i think that i'm not taking myself too seriously. and i think we need more politicians who are able to laugh at themselves. and as long as people are laughing with me and i'm giving them the opportunity to engage, i think that's great, because for everybody who says that i'm not taking my job seriously, there are people who reach out to me to say that i'm a symbol of hope

it's very dangerous to go that route and i do think this is a moment we need to see as i do i think. north korea there's it's dangerous but i think one can find a way to negotiate and you have a new leader in south korea who was just in washington at the end of last month very interesting who wants to find a way to engage north korea the hope is at some point to denuclearize that region but i don't think that's in the cards the new york times this morning concluded with its cover story on north korea that. he may be mad and use twitter too often and not have enough to do with his time the leader of north korea but he looks out and sees what happened to the libyan dictator moammar qaddafi after negotiations with the european union the united states he gave up his nuclear program do i need to tell you what happened to him he was deposed regime change we witness a failed state in libya now so i think i might conclude the turning point was when george w. bush came in the greatest debacle was the iraq war the second might have been and this is according to robert gallucci who was the stat

i think it's appropriate about our position is. expressed in that those demands are presented i guess i wouldn't suddenly be in favor of excluding anybody. the summit to not talking to them but it really is important to make sure that discussions are not just between the top reaches but between societies as a whole now america now has a very unusual president i mean donald trump would step out at any gathering but i think i've seen a number of experts m.p.'s critics suggest that for the first time in in a number of months they they saw him acting presidential at the g twenty summit would you give him credit for that i did he certainly capable of acting presidential a and we've found some movements in the post where many many people a wide range of commentators in the united states have said that those presidential but the problem is that his behavior is really rather inconsistent. there are really very very different messages that come out from day to day so that i think for that reason they're also it's really important not to just

i think the u.s. . russia relationship is very important and it has suffered and we need to make it better there's no question about it we need to cooperate on so many issues on nuclear weapons on syria on iran on energy on trade so how do you see her in relation. in this paradigm one you know there is so much antagonism against russia but yet americans feel like the relationship to improve what's the technical thing to do because of trauma goes on easing sanctions against russia so that is not going to be ok with that so what's going to play out well i think we're sanctions should be maintained because of russia's action in the ukraine. russia's involvement with. the election i think of russia changes its be a viewer. you change the sanctions now that does that mean there are other areas where you cooperate i think you're seeing maybe a little more cooperation on syria. i think the president has felt that the russian relationship is needs to be improved i think he should be supported on that at all as

hand to calm the waters i think just by necessi necessity. rankly by virtue of the fact that we've got troops on both sides and interests militarily on all sides of this. so i don't see it going that way and i don't think it's in anybody's interests including the parties who feel so aggrieved on both sides of this equation to move toward military escalation. in terms of the u.s. line, you know, one of the criticisms you've heard is there have been mixed messages coming out of washington. you have had the state department calling for a calming of the waters, resolution calmly, what seems to be from the white house a firmer embrace of the saudis and that side and a bit more of a tougher stance. so i think there has been a danger of mixed signals coming out of washington and i think it behooves us to have not only a common voice on this, but the role of peace maker not because we want to be the moral giants here, although i think we do, but because we've got real fundamental interests at play short and long-term. that means having the countries r

>> i don't think we will go there. say to the congressman that there are a lot of states in the country that would initiate, past, and execute an individual mandate. charlie: thank you very much. thank the panel. [applause] [indiscernible] ♪ >> we're in the middle of the asian trading day. welcome to bloomberg markets asia. the highs and lows of business, surging chips and a successful smartphone help samsung to a new record. the flipside is a collapse of noble shares plunging again on the profit warnings of 78% this year. the $10 billion ticket taking foxconn to america, terry gross saying it is a win-win. allident trump says it is down to him. treasuries a little mixed in the asia session after they climbed overnight. sank, thatthe dollar is all to do with the fed and what a lot of people thought was inflation outlook. inflation expectations have been driven a lot by the 10 year yield. this chart will show you exactly that, although since last month, since around may or the beginning of last month we've seen that rela

and i think i knew the 1%. [laughter] these are people who would never -- but they would never say that to a pollster. but there was this sense that george w. bush is supporting the first arab spring, which was happening in 2004, 2005. more people were protesting. there was a sense of optimism at least among elites. but these were also people who historically were very suspicious of the u.s. so they were like, wait, is george w. bush improving this? but then again we know the history. and again, so there's almost like internal struggle as people try make sense of what they feel about the u.s. tarun: i wanted to raise yesterday's supreme court decision to hear arguments regarding the immigration ban. this was covered in the survey. disapproval of the administration's immigration restrictions was quite pronounced, unsurprisingly. 77% opposed in turkey. 73% in indonesia. 96% for jordan from your perspective, what would be the impact of the decision to allow portions of the -- of the ban to stand? pending a full he

i don't think that's fair. i don't think that makes sense. i'd much rather use direct taxpayer funds, let's use warren buffett's taxes and not some 30-year-old who is struggling and just beginning her career. don't double her premiums to cross subsidize other people. that's what obamacare does. it's wildly unfair. >> i think one of the issues is that people say you don't have enough money to subsidize middle class people. who would only be going to low income. i do have to move on. >> george, let me point out that that's not accurate. you have two different sources of federal taxpayer funds on the exchanges, number one, the tax credits that are key directly to premium prices but, number two, the senate bill has over 100 billion dollars in funds for the stabilization fund that are designed to stabilize those premiums. the objective has to be, and i think the way we get this done is focus on lowering premiums. if we're lowering premiums, it's a win/win for everybody. >> i think the question is would that be enough? what happens -- i know you ho

i think marriage is a sensitive issue. at the end of the day we have federal civil rights laws in place. >> we are past our time. i am sorry. thank you all for coming. i appreciate it. if you didn't sign in, if you could sign in on the sign-in sheet, that would be helpful for us. [ applause ] >>> hi, everybody. thank you for coming. we're going to get started. running a few minutes late. i think everybody is still trying to find the room. a couple housekeeping things. if you are tweeting, please use #ewa17. everything here is on the record. remember to use the sign-in sheet wherever that is, going around. please sign in. it's right here. i think. i don't know. should i pass it? i'll pass it down. >> yes. sign the sign-in sheet. awesome. we are here today to talk about the every student succeeds act and the state. i am a reporter at politico here in d.c. covering education policy. we are going to talk about this law that passed in 2015 to replace no child left behind and sort of where states are at right now. so we are going

so i think there's opportunity there. sk/reward to me at tj is better that be at pbh, where people have been kind of hiding and have been rewarded for it. >> i don't disagree. i'm fine with tjx being a bull story, as well i think with pbh, owning the brands is kind of becoming sexy again. when you look at amazon and with the threats are, the brands can sell into amazon and create growth through a new channel, whereas people will look at the announcements like that and they'll hit the specialty stores they'll hit the tjs, the footlockers, and so on, and so forth. but i -- look, we like it, too we're onboard, as well >> what's the name, before i let you run, that you least like on your coverage list >> we have an underperform rating on fossil you know, we think the traditional fashion watch market is in a secular decline. we think the traditional watch is taking shelf space in watch categories it's going to be tough sledding for them they're not creating any cash flow, the earnings are getting wiped away it's a tough story >

when i think of bernie sanders, i think of him supporting what you think about redescription? >> i am for restitution of power. i am for building social good. these process of building moneys necessary to get to the social good, we will have to redistribute. the redistribution of wealth is a byproduct of the policy. it is not necessarily the main goal. the project of building up the power of workers, these workers that have repressed demands, i figure it as secondary, not the main effect. i would agree with the concept. i would also say that this is the reason why i think the idea of a federal jobs guarantee is much more powerful and dangerous. also more politically palatable than ideas that are now a universal-based income. my ideal scenario would be a federal jobs guarantee plus a basic income for those engaged in cameras or other work or other were traditionally not valued by society. those were are unable to work, fundamentally i think that we are concerned about power. i think that if more people are employed, labor markets are tighter. that is 120 or 30 people can make de

i don't think that's who i am.on't think that's what keeps me going, keeps me trying, keeps me looking. and looking to the other actor and making sure i'm really, really giving them all that i can and -- i don't know. i think -- i don't know that i worked with that many people who i thought were roundly satisfied with themselves artistically who i thought were that -- that grew necessarily over time. you know? because i think that my performance is, if you as -- they often start off in one place. they keep working to the end. they're not finished. it's odd to me sometimes that critics come at the end. feel like sometimes people feel like it's over now, and it's the beginning of the run. >> getting started. >> a million things to -- i did this one play, and i -- i felt like i discovered the majority of the character of like six weeks in. and i think that's always true. it's so amazing, you know, just standing there in life. i mean, i imagine -- if you've been in rape a relationship -- g one, 20 years or something, s

i think your incumbent candidates that year probably used it. i was mainly focusing on two things, that was the iraq war and the problems with the bush administration, and the unfairness of the bush tax cuts. i was basically running on effectively a more shared prosperity, let the economy work for everybody, and also against the bush foreign policy. i can't -- my experience wouldn't tell you how much those things work or don't work. i know to talk about an aspirational message -- remember the 3 pillars of the better deal are better jobs, better wages and better future. i think the aspirational aspect of that narrative is something that is really important. we will flesh out that slogan with a lot of individual specific policies. we already have some and there will be many more to come. ultimately we are trying to introduce the concept of a better deal and a better future before we actually get into specifics. >> you will have discrete proposals that you will want democrat to vote on. the president has come the logo and given speeches. the have a

tim: well, i don't think about it very much. what would i say? i would point out that steve's dna will always be the dna of apple, or it will be as long as i am ceo. and i think as long as anyone is, honestly. i think it is deeply embedded in the company, and we celebrate it. and it should be like that and should stay like that. obviously, things evolve over time in some other areas, as they would have if he were sitting here interviewing with you today. there is clearly, i'm sure, some things, but that is probably a better question to ask somebody who worked for both of us. emily: you said cars are an area ripe for disruption. how important is it that apple not miss out on cars? tim: i think there is a major disruption looming there, not only for self driving cars, but also the electrification piece. if you have driven an all-electric car, it is actually a marvelous experience. it is a marvelous experience not to stop at the filling station or gas station or whatever you want to call it. plus, you have ridesharing on top of this. you've got kind

>> i think the jury is still out on that. but i know that generals don't believe in leadership by chaos. by definition they are asking young men and women to follow tactical commands made by a general, and those commands will not be followed fr they've been ordered in a climate of chaos. so i think the generals in particular understand how important it is tow a clear understanding of the strategic direction you're heading in and the tactical zigtsz that have to be made to get there. >> that's john kelly. >> that's john kelly. and he understands that. >> does the president believe that? that's the question. >>ible that john kelly is educating the president to the realities of how real leadership has to function. >> do you think he'll listen? >> i'm hoping that he will. now, it won't be perfect and i think the president will continue to reach out to the american people through his ability to tweet. i'm just hoping that he's very careful with the words that he uses and there's a decision to understand the consequence before the w

i think some reporters as well.ush it a little bit too far and injecting their own personal bias and opinions to what they're firing off in >>> there's a war between the president, and the oval office. >> guest: uh-huh. >> armstrong: that is unprecedented and there will be no winners and no good outcomes. >> guest: only casualties, it's been interesting to see how that war has played out. obviously this president and members of his communications team and the administration have a disdain for a number of reporters, and i'm not one to say whether or not he has a right to that to you know, have a dislike of the media. i think what we saw from the president in his tweets about the msnbc morning show hosts on thursday. >> armstrong: very personal. >> guest: took that war to another level that we haven't seen that before and it drew criticism from both sides. >> armstrong: it's sad. we're going to take a break. melissa quinn, breaking news reporter with the examiner. we will hear the words of wisdom with pastor bernard a

>> i think again as it relates to racial issues, i think another -- i guess you can call it the central thesis from the beginning is for us to think of where racist ideas come from, people are just ignorant and hateful and it's these people that black people are barbaric, these are the people who instituted policy -- racist policies like segregation and even now mass incarceration. well, i actually show that that popular folk tale is just not true. what actually happened in course of history is you had people who have created discriminatory policies because it benefits them economically, even culturally. i want to enslave people because it's going to make me money. these very people or sean spicers create -- [laughter] [applause] >> create, produce, defend racist ideas to justify, to defend, to rationalize the inequality that comes out as a result of those policies and then they circumstanculate the racist ideas like the voter fraud problem and then people believe them and they become ignorant and hateful and allows the policies continue and therefore those people who say in office, tho

>> reporter: yeah, i think they are. russian foreign minister, sergey lavrov, has been briefing his own media about what was discussed. i mean, obviously, they're putting a bit more of a russian spin on things. for instance, tillerson may have characterized the discussion about the hacking as a robust exchange. but what sergey lavrov, the sergey lavrov said is that the united states accepted the statements from vladimir putin that russia did not hack the election and indeed, they agreed to set up a joint committee to look into the issue of cyber security, something that russia has been calling for with the united states for some time. and so, yes, they're reporting what was discussed. they're very happy about it. their expectations were very low. they thought this was going to be a pretty cold exchange of pleasantries. it was obviously much, much more than that. that's why it lasted for nearly 20 hours, 20 minutes because it was a sort of far-reaching discussion about the whole range of issues at the heart of the very fr

>> i think on the reset we were pretty skeptical from the start. i remember getting yelled at by obama people who were upset at us for being so skeptical. you know, when we said, these are relatively minor policy concessions that russia has made that the trump team thought is the biggest thing since sliced bread, they would get mad at us back. i remember phone calls from the white house about a meeting with putin and st. petersburg and i mischaracterized and that in fact putin was never planning to have a genuine reset with obama, didn't respect obama. signing that we would see this president now going to meet with putin. you know, the press is appropriately skeptical because we have been through this before and seen it before and we understand that putin doesn't see the world the way america sees it. u. so i want to close this by getting back to obama and what you think his legacy will be. obviously, trump is setting out to undo both legislatively and by executive order what he can do of some of obama's accomplishments. what do you think will withs

>> i do think i can answer from my understanding, which is i do think we asked them to do it, but i do think it also goes back to the point that part of the reason we asked them to do it is because the taliban were operating there in some form or capacity already. >> all right. so there's some verification that perhaps the united states government did ask them to get involved with some of these -- what we consider to be terrorist elements. we know the deal for the taliban five leaders, terrorist leaders were traded for one traitor to our government, which i felt wawas the worst raw deal we could have possibly have gotten. that was something our administration did, and it happened via qatar. now, let me just ask this and i will be very pointed here. the clinton foundation has received millions of dollars of contributions we know from russian oligarchs. how much has the clinton foundation received from qatar? do we know of any -- or maybe qatar has not given any money to the foundation, is that right? >> none of us have those figures. i just want to correct one thing. there's some debate

i think we have two key points in this area. the first thing is china always think that reform, when it's necessary, indeed, in the practical level, we all know that there are some specific mechanism have some problems that many of them cannot cope with new emerging challenges. so, that's why sometimes we need to take some reform measures to improve its efficiency. and the other key point is that reforms based on the consensus. that means no one country, no one stakeholder can do all the reforms on its own. it needs cooperate and it needs the worldwide consensus. so i think maybe there are some differences between china and the u.s. and on the basis of analyze of the future challenges, both sides also keep focus on how to get the differences and how to enhance our cooperation on the global governance issues. both sides provide some basic suggestions or devices. i'd like to conclude then with four key words, two from the u.s. side and two from the china side. i think the most valuable key word from the u.s. side, one is the mutual

so i think again the president is rightly focused on how do we move forward from what may be simply an intractable disagreement at this point. as to the syria cease-fire, i would say what may be different this time, i think, is the level of commitment on the part of the russian government. they see the situation in syria transitioning from the defeat of isis, which we are progressing rapidly, as you know, and this is what really has led to this discussion with them, as to what do we do to stabilize syria once the war against isis is won. and russia has the same interest that we do in having syria become a stable place, a unified place, but ultimately a place where we can facilitate a political discussion about their future, including future leadership of syria. so i think part of why -- and again, we will see what happens as to the ability to hold the cease-fire -- but i think part of what's different is where we are relative to the whole war against isis, where we are in terms of the oppositions, as to their strength within the country, and the regime itself. in many respects, people

i think there are problems in both societies and i think both cities and countries are moving forward i really do believe that in comparison to other countries like india or countries in africa or singapore or other countries which are going backwards which are discussed crecy that annoys me but it. had the worst . well to play us out of this episode of going underground now is henry face c.u.z. p. entropy. is now streaming online hendry you busk outside the hotel i live in sorry about that it's fantastic that's why you're here exactly why you're here is twenty four days of the grenfell five tragedy one of the songs i listen to it's changed over the days if you've been playing it yeah i suppose its significance has changed not just for me but for the people i did change the title of the song to and i suppose it's small relevant now than it was before about it so it makes sense to play and if a.z. thank you will be back on monday the anniversary of the death of jelly roll morton of a hundred eighty five years to the day u.s. pro-slavery president or jackson vetoed a second federal bank

i think that's how it started. but i don't think it's that way anymore. i think it's become more than that. i think it's -- and i think that largely has happened. and this is what makes me sad. but outsiders, more than insiders, i think we've kind of lost a lot of our ability of self-identity at this point. i mean, the salem witch museum is not owned by somebody that lives in salem. some of the largest businesses that are witch-related in salem are not owned by people that live in salem. we, we -- tv land put samantha there. you know? ted baker: and donna has tried to get them to remove it, without much luck. donna: no, i just take we have kind of have given up, it seems to me. and it's obviously economic. i mean, steve is exactly right. i would really like to see the numbers. every -- if you're critical of any of this -- everyone says, but it brings jobs to salem, it brings jobs to salem, such an important part of our economy. well, because of the cost of tourism, i don't know if you've been here in halloween, but there is so much security. it's also a v

i think that it is a very long process. you know, i didn't, i think first and foremost people, individuals, understand their world from their own very narrow vantage point, right? they don't know about that disinvestment. they don't know about the policies that are driving down the number of jobs in their community. they don't know about the number of jobs driving down resources for their schools. they don't know about policies causing police officers continue to get off when they abuse them. they don't know about those things. although they know about is the what they see, the violence they see. what i try to do, like i do for older people, for them to step out of their individual sort of circle, try to imagine their own circle from sort of a macrostandpoint which allows them to see how all of these greater forces are creating that circle, right? i also try to sort of hit home that, let's imagine for a moment, that the problem is not the people. let's just imagine for a moment that the problem is not the people. the problem

think the public education has been there? do we need to increase public education? >> guest: i do think we need to increase public education around the issue. the one point that conservatives keep coming back to is this thing that is never happened which is that trans gender woman we go into a woman's public restroom and sexually assault a girl or woman the venue. we don't have any evidence that has ever happened. it's a total misunderstanding about transgender identity and as you say, often sometimes you don't even know were sharing the restroom was someone who strands a nobody gives me a second look because i'm gender conforming and nobody seems to care. i think the education around the issue, the way that women's restrooms are built right now it's not a space place. so women have been in to get assaulted. my own feeling about that is that a lot of times it happens because someone who wants to commit such a crime knows there's likely only going to be women in this venue and its built in a way were it's secluded. so what we talked about earlier having gender-neutral bathrooms

i think what troubled me a little bit this time was h.r. mcmaster, national security adviser, who's somebody who i really do admire, i think is a real grown-up in the white house, that he seemed to defer to that and suggested that president trump didn't really have an agenda going into the putin meeting because, you know, putin is going to have an agenda. >> yeah. robin, i'm going to put up this poll because this is a pbs/npr/marist college poll, shows 54% of americans think trump's dealings with russia were unethical or illegal. if you're the president or someone advising the president, don't you look at those numbers, at that number, and think that you have to confront putin about it? even if it's a short meeting, as you said? >> well, i think it will be brought up but i think it will probably be in some nuanced way rather than a confrontation saying as president obama did, cut it out, that there will be an effort to diplomatically or kind of slide around it but make sure it's part of the discussion. it's going to be a very tricky part of

i don't think that's a far stretch. i don't know if we get to our logical conclusion of the arguments being presented that we wouldn't be adverse to the idea that foreign corporations get deduction and getting it abroad for activities abroad that ultimately i think some of my republican friends would find far more objectionable than what state and local municipalities are doing. let me ask you this, do you believe that the president should sign a tax reform bill that raises taxes on almost a quarter of all middle class families? i would open that to anybody. >> senator, i think that if that was all it did, then probably no. but you have to look at the totality of what the entire bill does. >> well, in my focus on this committee, part of what to do is help middle class families afford a home and education and retirement. and while on the campaign trail, the president promised to cut taxes on the middle class, what we see under his plan at least the schematic that we have, is that the top 1% of millionaires and billionaire

this company xaeb is is thinking about the next 20 years while i think t mobile is thinking about thew quarters here so to me,en i don't like, i don't like t mobile. it's down 15% of the year. the street hates it. eight buys, 25 holds and a bunch of sells on the thing here remember, this is a stock that has a yield, almost 5.5% when i think about that, versus where bond yields are, that's attractive i want to show you this chart here it looks like it made a new 52-week low today. it's got support, down about 15%. to my eye, if we can get this deal done in the next few months or some clarity on it. you're going to want to own this i see about 10%, that yield is a nice cushion, so here, at 36 buck, you'll buy at&t. >> may i ask dan a question? >> hi, dan >> i love your stuff, by the way. on fridays, wu but when does that yield which has been going up for the wrong reason, because the stock has been going lower, when does it scare you zbh it never does. here's the thing, guy. it's had some massive, massive moves over the last year i think it's hitting a a sentiment level. a valuation lev

i think what we should be watching is who's going to call the shots in syria i think i think trump definitely wants to feed isis i really believe i think you want to check off that a legit problem that i think he wants to do but we always have that deep state in the u.s. and they always sabotage any type of a deal that comes about between the u.s. and russia and trying to bring peace to syria so it's going to be interesting interesting to see how the deep state sabotages into this agree what do you know and what trumpery talks ranges actually if he can see it somehow make sure it doesn't happen i would love it's really don't i would love to see the tweet brokered a cease fire in syria but deep state torpedoed it wasn't really that you know we were given this binary is that you know can the americans and the russians actually work something out it really can trump lead the american side in dealing with foreign policy and this could be a very interesting litmus test six months not just the american side though that's part of the problem yeah i agree they're going to the dems in the o'connors th

i don't think we know. susan: i want to get everybody on this question. personally am perplexed everyday. people ask about trump's foreign policy. i don't know what it is. in particular, on russia. i think if you put a gun to the head of a trump white house official, they cannot tell you right now what our policy is toward russia. what do you think about that, karen? you have thought about trying to write about trump and foreign policy. do you think he has one yet? karen: i think there are pieces of policy, but i am not sure they come together in terms of a strategy. i think they would like to get rid of some of what they call the sort of minor issues, the housekeeping issues, in terms of -- we took over their compound under the obama administration in this country, they won't let us build a new consulate in st. petersburg. russian security under obama was harassing u.s. diplomats -- they would like to get rid of all that stuff, so you have had lower level talks that have dealt with those issues. susan: that is not really policy. karen: but they feel like

but i think... i fear that it's going the fail, and then should convenient a republican conference and say, what are we going to do? introduce a bill, say to the democrats, here's a by. it doesn't mean they control it. it means they can have consideration. even when they lose, then they're part of the process. that's what democracy is supposed to be all about. >> dickerson: let me go back overseas. i want to ask you about syria. let's listen to something that secretary of state tillerson said about the russians who have interests in syria and the united states. let's listen to the secretary. >> by in large our objectives are exactly the same. how we get there, we each have a view. maybe they've got the right approach and we have the wrong approach. >> dickerson: do the russians have the right approach? >> you can't make that up. you can't make that up. these are the same people that use precision-graded weapons to strike hospitals in aleppo where sick and wounded people are. this is just... you prepa

and i think kathy martin is there. 're talking about not disrupting the office further, don't bring in somebody new. let the team there carry it through to the end. >> well, i ultimately agree with jan. as long as nothing comes out of this sort of open process that she had any connections at all to anything that happened... >> this is philadelphia. you know that's the kind of thing that wouldn't happen until, like october. then you find out. >> which is why i think it is important that there are other candidates who are interested -- because if something comes up out of this and we don't have someone else in the process, then i think it continues to -- i mean, in the end, we need justice and so on being responsible for that in the city. >> right. >> i'll hold that thought. >> you hold that thought. [ laughter ] time for another commercial, and we will come back to "inside story." ♪ ♪ >> "inside story" is presented by temple university. remarkable change isn't easy, but for those who take charge, it comes naturally. expl

and i don't think it is a replacement. the reason i say that is because, you know, we paid for the aca with about a trillion dollars in various tax increases, you know, taxes on drug companies, on medical device companies and some spending cuts. and the republicans repeal most of it, right. the house is like 800 billion, the -- almost 900 billion. the senate is almost 800 billion. so there is no money left to pay for the subsidies for people to buy insurance or to pay for the medicaid expansion. and so it is not replacement at all. i don't even -- i'm not being offensive to you. but trump care implies that trump cares and if he does, you know, maybe he does theoretically, because i don't want to give him bad intentions, but he doesn't understand this is not a real replacement. but what was your question again? >> how does the repeal affect -- >> the essential benefits. >> -- affect access to prescription drugs. >> the reason i went on to that is because one of the things that got very little attention until the last six mon

was perfectly acceptable and i think that was one of the strategic reasons why he went to warsaw first and again he's answering to his critics in a way but i thought the speech was very interesting because whose values was he talking about and what does the west mean according to donald trump well. i was expecting to get disappointed of course the last country where you go we want to improve relations with russia support the plan or. direct us was clear and he made a few phrases. skipper and after a few phrases that will come infuriated for example the soviet leadership russia is so patient now that he is a polka ball and you know soviets and non-si is in slave in poland putting up a sign over a quarter to between the novice and the communists it's not so much noticed here what was really astounding was he is praise that the board has never known a bet that can be unity of them all with a community of nations and he was not speaking about the present community about the e.u. in the united states he was talking about christianity so it wasn't in the rebellion because the west now is not

>> well, look, i think it is a mistake. i mean, i do think the ways and means committee has had a lot of hearings. one of the great problems republicans have is a passion for being boring. again, scaramucci clearly is not a guy who believes in being boring. i think he will liven it up. we should be talking about economic growth. we should be talking about jobs. we should get the tax rate down to 15% for business including a pass-through for small businesses. we ought to have a very substantial middle class tax cut, probably by doubling the deduction. we ought to get the money back from overseas with repatriation. there are three or four simple things we could do. if you went home and you said to people, say you met with your local small businesses and said if you were at 15% business tax, what would you do? how much better off would you be? >> right. >> you know, you would suddenly have people getting excited about something in washington and you would have positive pressure on congress including the democrats. i mean, let t

i really think that trump slammed it. i mean he confronted putin. they had a two and a half hour meeting. even melania tried to break it up. and, you know, he confronted putin with it. he said that you guys were meddling in our elections. this has got to stop. and, you know -- >> no, no, no. no, please -- >> he denied it. we knew he was going to deny it. >> did anyone expect a different answer there? >> no. but putin did say, he did say whether this is going to amount to anything, he did say that they were going to form some sort of a committee to look and investigate into cyber crimes. is that going to amount to anything? no. but the fact of it is that a lot of people didn't think trump was even going to confront putin and he did. >> we don't know that. we don't know any of that. using the word "confront," that neither participant, by the way, the report of the meeting was delivered on the u.s. side by tillerson, on the russian side by putin. >> putin said that he brought it up. >> no. those words are made up. there's no confirmation that there was

i don't think that necessarily tells you all that much, but i think for those who think this is the case that will finally recognize a durable, clean, i would say i'm not quite there yet. >> do you think they will find it significant that political meanderring is part of our nation? >> i think justice s kennedy joined it. so there's some reason to think that. but he has gone out of his way other times to say if you could find a durable standard, he might find the claim. i think what's unusual here is in the past these claims have come up when a minority of the voters in the case have such a big political control. i don't think that's fack actually true of wisconsin. it's a majority republican party has entrenched their political power. that's not quite the same thing of what's been going on in the past. >>> kyle, you have anything to add? >> i thought one of those redistricting cases was interesting for one reason will pointed out, that it was justice thomas joining up with the liberals. that's not something you often see. justice thomas on occasion does surprise. i think the last case w

i think every white house is hectic. ow that better than me. >> it was a well oiled machine. >> i want to talk about politics and your term as governor. you are so different in person -- >> thank you. >> -- from the image that you project as a politician. you project defiance and indifference to your public image. i know that that's -- i know you are not indifferent. you are not indifferent about a single person. to see your indifference projected in the wake of an image of you on a beach, it's hard to watch. i mean, i know you were trying to get the beaches open for the citizens of your state. >> by the way, all the beaches were open. >> they weren't all open. >> i don't want to spend a lot of time on this ridiculousness. >> i want to talk about your image, not beaches. why don't you care how you're perceived? >> i do care how i'm perceived, but i won't sacrifice my family for public perception. >> are they mutually exclusive? >> sometimes. sometimes they are. it depends. sometimes they are. in this instance they were. i