i think the p.c. is going to win i'm going to be i was going to say one one one one yeah so we also i think we're going to see i think we're going to see a more conservative guy yeah because i think both teams are terrified of going out a lot on the line let's impeach firepower out front line their one goal it's ridiculous i'm thinking virgil van dyke you know that is a very you know us right now yeah ok. ok so i mean we could sing and talk about this all day but we can't. that's it for us so we'll see you guys next time. nothing is quite as it seems at hamburg. exhibits challenge our perceptions. of the mind one look at the. moment if your eyes. you're wrong. thirty minutes past the. time for an upgrade. your close all by. office with. your design highlights. yourself. prince tips and tricks that will turn your whole discussion special. upgrade yourself with d. w.'s interior design channel on you tube. earth home to millions of species a home worth saving. google ideas tell stories of creative people

so for get president trump's performance at the press conference i think the team doesn't have the depth of the experience to understand what's coming their way with a wave of subpoenas i look at it like a pac twelve team playing alabama they may have a few exciting players that are fun to watch but they don't have the depth to handle what's about to come their way so you're going to they're going to be trying to govern run for reelection and deal with investigations a lot of my friends in the in the clinton white house and the bush white house a lot of my colleagues stuck around for the second term they said every morning they would get document request and document preservation request and it's a real grind every single morning trying to do your drive while you're getting investigated so that's the big story and does not the house now control a lot of the investigations they do that's the big story is that the truck white house is going to be getting a new document request every day for investigations it's not fun to deal with but i think a subplot of what happened is the seven governo

that's i think a little farfetched don't think i don't think that's credible now i really don't from your own. experience how well monitored this space station is i mean if that indeed happened what they'd be able to kind of go back and veto what happened have someone do something silly that whole i mean but they are not excluding that that is the kind of rates are different i agree with them i think. i don't know i think that. to do to do something right that is a little farfetched and i would be shocked if i mean they still have to investigate only possible i guess this is the first i've heard of that but. yeah i don't know if that's what they're suggesting about it that i haven't heard well i mean on the russian side they're saying that they specifically i think they retrieved one of the parts to see if there if there are any specks of alan minimum there to see if indeed it was drilled in space by that and that's a possible version then all the searching about it they don't know. but you don't think that psychological difficulties could be no not matter that extreme you know i thi

i think that spread. if i might say so, i think president trump has added to that. if my parents were alive, they could never imagine the kind of i to proration that is expressed by the president. including his former friends as well as his enemies. all of that, i think, has added up to the kind of deep division and divisiveness that i think we need to now address to overcome it. it is foreign to my experience on the ways and means committee. i just talked a couple months ago to him. he is in his 90's. a republican. he and i spent two days together meeting with the joint task many -- task committee staff years ago going into taxation. just the two of us. the republican and democrat. and then introduced legislation. that seems like so long ago. we need to return to that kind of feeling of some differences, but some sense of common purpose and decency. decency. host: two years into the trump presidency, clearly a lot can happen. when they write the history book -- books about this, the first two years of the president, what do you think they will write about, what will

never in history have been more women in parliament and right now i mean they've been i think combined house of representative and senators more than one hundred and one we have seen is that women are mobilizing i mean there are more women that are like gaining power and i think bad is something that was very optimistic about the election day and i think that is something very optimistic for the democratic party i think they should gain that momentum and try to. speak more to women who are leaning towards voting for democrats and i think that if the key for twenty trying to having go people go vote and i think the women is a key electorate and the democrats showed yesterday that they can appeal to those groups especially suburban women and urban women were key in this vote matthew were they pivotal do you think or were there other groups as well. i think they're absolutely pivotal split especially in these former republican suburbs that you know appear to have gone in the democratic direction and their women played a very important roles for the suburban mom that you know tends to be c

i think those things are well grounded in the u.s.-mexico bilateral agreement irrespective of administration. i like to think that the cooperation will continue, albeit changes and there's always we form for improvement. i think that the government elect of mexico has thankfully had a a series of meetings with u.s. authorities over the last two to three months that are helpful and that would allow both sides to get up going frequently as the new administration takes office. and i'm happy and i celebrate that. i think it's important that that has happened. i think there are also going to be aries and challenge. i think dealing with decriminalization of, whether it's marijuana or eventually talking about regularizing poppy cultivation in mexico, you know, are going to require a lot more explanation in terms of the benefits or not. i think that's an area to put attention into it. and i think that that will be the area that requires more attention to the other one just very -- the support of us who gets from the united states through the

>> i think it's mardi gras. walter, i say that in jest, but if you think of it a little bit, we do have a different style here. we have a different culture and it's a very fun-loving culture here. and so while -- with republicans and democrats, we may disagree on policy, we do have fun and share time with one another. and whether it is a mardi gras celebration or jazzfest or washington mardi gras, we spend time together. it's not this situation where you're entirely tribal and spending time only with folks of like mind. and i think that's one thing about louisiana that really is amazing, is how that fun environment that we have here, it does transcend the politics of this area and the different ideologies. congressman cedric richmond represents this area and we have a good time together. he and i do a lot of legislation together. in fact have had the president sign a number of our bills into law in just the past few months. >> we've gone through a really horrible period recently with the pipe bombs and the temple

of course, what is happening in parliament now is shambolic, but i think in a way i relish it, and i ace up to the consequences of its actions, and that means leaving the eu, and i think it looks like no deal. you increasingly think, because of the particular model the prime minister has signed up to, that she can't get it through? i think people in westminster are saying that the deal can never pass, and the reality of these things, like in the financial crisis, the vote to save the us financial system fell, and then it it was passed. the numbers are so bad at the moment for the prime minister — 50 or 60 conservatives opposed, she has lost the dup. the tories do not have a majority, and they only govern because of the dup votes. then there is the question of the labour party. snp are opposed. she is 50 votes short, apparently. it's not impossible, but it will take something extraordinary. and the problem is that this is the withdrawal agreement — in a sense, one might think the slightly easier bit of the negotiation, because they still have to agree what relationship we have after we

i look at it as i think a plus wave, which i don't think is a high probability, and i think it's a very low probability, would be very negative for markets. markets are not priced for that. are markets priced for the house to be lost to the democrats? i'm not so sure, but the bottom line is that if markets actually do have a democratic house, that ultimately for stocks that's not a terrible thing and that means absolutely less fiscal, less pressure upward on rates, possibly an opportunity to see the fed step back a little bit, and i know, look, and we had massive numbers out today on the ism. this economy isn't even close to a recession so if you put a little just, you know, cool things down a little bit, which i think that all of that would, i think it's not bad. >> i think that's the point, right. the market, if you look at the economy, all numbers say, hey, everything is going great. now the stock market might tell you a different story, but if in terms of what's good for the stock market or what's good for the economy, it's basically a status quo you know, make sure nothing is unwou

what would it do to merican economy would it on the island i think very soon i mean this region i think the what we used to. well i'm not sure i'm not an economist i do know that what eisenhower president eisenhower used to call the industrial military complex is a very different thing today than it was when he when he discussed it or we thought of it in the in the cold war and i like to think our economy is very resilient and maybe they'll be will create new opportunities as a result of the shifting security landscape but i don't think fundamental relationships are going to change for example i don't think that president trumps. frankly divisive statements towards the europeans is going to leave the europeans and in a different direction i think ultimately they see the u.s. as a strong ally and it will outlast donald trump will it because they hear of that is last reliance on washington in terms of security is also arguably a europe that is less willing to play down its wishes and policy and european in is this a concern for washington could a more independent hero for instance be more

and i didn't use the word disaster because i think again that's an overstatement i think we should base our thinking on existing frameworks which provide some stability in order of the world so whether you're looking at nuclear agreements or nato or other security arrangements i think the basis for thinking how we change things should be leaving the things we have intact so if in the context of a strong nato europe feels it's in its interest to become more independent spend more money on defense of course that's a good idea we're right where i completely disagree with president trump's approach is the thinking that we have to destroy existing agreements some of the question a small one in the american economy and the. well would have ditched him merican economy would i am i let my thing resign a mystery engine i think the what we used to. well i'm not sure i'm not an economist i do know that what eisenhower president eisenhower used to call the industrial military complex is a very different thing today than it was when he when he discussed it or we thought of it in the in the cold war

i think it really was i mean i think he like so many americans falls and his foreign in love with. monica and saudi arabia i don't know us being wired. money you know i mean it's only my money is part of it quite clearly but it is small amount they are three love it i mean you know. flattery sort of guilt sort of goes dancing around in the palaces i've just never understood but you know but then you know being british i have a sort of different view on it so i think i think it was a part of that he's had a good business relationship but it was all about and here where i do think he's always been serious about helping israel exactly it's been fact it's been been a constant think you know he's always said that he wants jewish tenants in these buildings and that he's employees are like that and when you looked at the ceremony for the handover of jerusalem the embassy mood when it was inaugurated the language. used by the american pastor who was very symbolic and talked about in the apocalyptic and in terms of intense religiosity and those was chosen by trump and his family in ivanka so

i don't really think so at all and i think that you know as it stands right now i think it's a better idea to leave. leave without a deal than the deal that's on the table i strongly contend that no deal is always better than a bad deal this this current deal right now would tie the u.k. into into the side and still into the customs union where the u.k. would be able to strike their own trade deals it would put northern ireland a century under dublin brussels rule so i think a better idea than this deal right now is frankly leaving without a deal i think that and i think the point about drax it here is running away from the negotiation table running away from responsibility i don't think that's fully accurate either they left the table and they left these posts because they were shut out they were either not given the opportunity of leadership contest or they were put in senior government officials positions such as brackets secretary they were sidelined in the negotiations their job was sell this to the british public it wasn't to actually negotiate the deal so they were leaving the

first i think. most. pilots personally i mentioned jamal was very good friend of mine and in fact they was with him in istanbul just one week before he became a victim of this sort of the sprite condones his story there is a. human side to it and we shouldn't forget it when we are focusing on the politics of it i think i don't think we need any evidence because first of all the saudi state owned the crime not in terms of admitting it but incidents of working full time to try to hide it in to try to was struck the investigation so if it is was said something which is not connected to the saudi state we wouldn't have seen this sending the cleaners not telling people about where the body is so they have the killers so they know where to put the body wherever they put it what they did with it so the simplest thing would have been for them to just say that so the saudi estate has inscribed the sodas to it said there is. nothing happens there without even small things like tweets i mean if a royal like. his name

i think that's another example. it doesn't have to be quite as discreet as chuck's thing, which i thought was terrific, too. i've been impressed by chris when he's stood firm for what the fbi does. i think broadly speaking, you know, it's a question of renewing our national faith in the rule of law and our respect for it, which means a lot of different things. it can mean doing certain thing finance could be refraining from different things and finding common ground where we can. i don't think either political party now, at least any party while they're in power with the ability to do it is going to voluntarily implement the rule in the senate, which is obviously a way of bringing people toward the center. one can imagine some kind of bargain in which we all agree that 12 years from now, regardless of who is in power, we'll have the 60-vote rule then. so that's an example of something that is i think harder to implement but one can imagine it having a centering effect. i think one of the things that we may find over

i don't think thatis theresa may's plan. i don't think that is entirely fair. certain things in the deal i think our unthinkable for a sovereign nation to agree to. the arrangement on customs union is almost unprecedented in international law. even lord faulkner, —— falconer says you cannot have an arrangement that either parties cannot give notice from. if the talks on the future relationship to not work, and i do not trust the british government to negotiate a positive outcome, if that happens. sale, britain falls into an endless —— if those clocks fail -- into an endless —— if those clocks fail —— talks fail, britain falls into a fail —— talks fail, britain falls intoa limbo. fail —— talks fail, britain falls into a limbo. all of this anger about the backstop this week, it is an insurance policy at the end of the day. it never has to be put in place. but it must say something about the lack of trust. and northern ireland requires some sort of solution and so far i have not heard any good solution from any brexiteer so the come up with a technological solution

i think that is really cool. when i was on the campaign trail in the election for 2016, i did vote for him and i voted with them and there was like a photo shoot. i remember reporters asking me, kind of joking if i voted for him. i did, but i didn't have to. and so, i think that's the cool thing about her family has or will he you definitely hover an opinion. although i can imagine feeling a little guilty now voting for your dad. you write that for me the hardest in the campaign trail was october 20, 2016. you talk about what happened. can you talk about the personal loss in your family and, you know, how that affected you. that's the home stretch of the campaign and you are dealing with. you can talk about it. but what happened for you. >> yeah, that was a long day actually anyway. we were doing like four states that they on the west coast. the first day we landed in, week out word for my grandpa that our dog had passed away. he was a beagle and a 16 years old and so he's definitely. we were traveling so much and

justice kagan: well, it sort of matters to me, i think. you know, you could be saying, if i understand your view of described in paragraph one, these aliens are described in paragraph one even though they've never been in criminal custody. mr. tripp: that's right. justice kagan: so that would suggest that c1 is authorizing their detention, and that's what you're saying? mr. tripp: no. sorry, c -- well, c1 is about arrest just like the first sentence of a is about arrest. this is a -- justice kagan: yes. how are you arresting these people? are you arresting them under c1? mr. tripp: i think actually, frankly, the answer is that we're arresting them under both a and c1. you know, the arrests, they have to be upon a warrant. that requirement comes from a. all of this is pending a determination of whether the alien is to be removed. that comes from a. justice kagan: well, when you say you're arresting them under both, are you saying that with respect to everybody under c1, you're also arresting -- mr. tripp: yes. justice kagan: them under a? ok

i think they are quite strong. terms of the corruption, so i don't hog the entire time, i'll just mention this and i'd be more than happy to discuss this with you at length. i think what happens with corruption is about, number one, if you don't tackle it, it's going to continue and get worse. but at the same time when you put pressure on the system that's already under extreme pressure and there is no clarity in terms of our we staying or are we leaving, corrupt people will go and eat more. they will gorge themselves because they think that they are limited amount of time and, therefore, it just becomes an even worse situation. that's what we are experiencing in some ways. there are some areas that have improved but in many predatory behaviors that are happening, i think it's probably not so positive when it comes to trending. afghan border management, actually, look, a very firm believer and admittedly this is a talk about afghanistan but he can't go without mentioning pakistan. i'd like to identify afghanistan a

>> i think he would. this is a level that richard nixon never went to where you went after somebody's personal well being by a criminal prosecution. i've listened to all the tapes that are relevant. i never heard him break the law by turning on his enemies and trying to put them in jail. this is really very, very heavy sledding. >> and carl bernstein, one thing i want to point out. the timeline in this is spring of 20 18. donald trump had been president of the united states for well over a year by this point. 14, 15 months. the excuse that you might hear from some supporters oh, that he didn't know what the job was. he doesn't know what a president should and shouldn't do. by 16 months into the administration, he should know what the justice department can and can't do and what he can and can't order. >> there are no excuses, and this is a defining moment in the history of the trump presidency, because this is a demonstration of his unfitness to be president of the united states, of his abuse of presidenti

i see what i think that just isn't here gassing a thousand of them i don't know why you think that most of them would qualify for asylum when we have reporters talking to them why do you believe otherwise because whenever we talk about why do you believe other moving here for economic reasons they're moving here for a better job they're moving here living here for asylum no but you can understand the entire international community we recognize them know and yes i do understand know how to not feel that you need to stop asking me how i am this that audience because i do why is it you don't want any and where you're twisting the meaning of the word asylum to cover a whole broad category of reasons people might want to come here when people have economic reasons for coming here or if people think their country has problems with law enforcement whatever what we have for that is called legal immigration you applied to come to this going yes i undergo on the border that's not asylum though there's an entirely no current process for people who are seeking asylum a b. i'm a little jon

i think the 17 are individuals who are putting their pen to paper, but i don't think that necessarily accounts for everyone. i know there are letters going around now, trying to box individuals into supporting one person or another, and when we have a caucus vote, it is supposed to be a secret. putting people, making them sign a letter now, i think, removes int we thought was important the caucus, that secrecy. i think people should leave their options open. host: the degree of pressure on these young democrats, how would you assess that? think it is unfair. it comes from lieutenants, others areof her and pressuring her. i think they are hearing in orientation, just getting their feet into washington, but i'm sure they've been pressured well before they came to washington this week. comes fromirst call chesapeake, virginia, calling on the republican line. , c-span.ood morning are you going to go after trump all the time? waste taxpayer money, just like pelosi? she said, you got to voted in before you see what is in it. would you buy a car before you test drive it? i don't knowaid, if

and i think that, you know, i get chills even thinking about it because if i didn't believe that, i would not either. my kids were probably going to kids, who are probably going to watch this because it mebecause they always ask when c-span is going to cover this so to my kids that always , see me leave and not be around them as they're growing up, to my partner, to my mom, my dad, the rest of my family, all of them sort of believe that what i'm doing is important. so to that young wife of seven kids, it's not easy. i'm not downplaying it but i think there's an entire support mechanism that believes in what that person did and what he was going after, and, quite frankly, i do, too. and i think she does. the children will, and there will be all of us that will continue to remind them that their dad's sacrifice wasn't for nothing. tresha mabile: hamid, what happens if the u.s. leads afghanistan? addd arsalan: let me just -- and my deepest condolences on a personal level to the family of the fallen soldiers. but i just want to add one thing that the afghans alongside with their american frie

and i think our moral strength. i don't think that the president talks about that as much as he should, but i think that he is showing people around the world that america is going to stand for certain things and one of those things is true free markets. he believes that if americans are allowed to compete on an even playing field with anyone that we'll win, and i think he's right. and what he has said is that it's not been fair. trade has not been fair, he's right, over the course of the last 30 or 40 years at least. and so he's made that, at least the place where he's decided to make his stands on american exceptionalism and almost exclusively he said, this is where we're going to define it. we're going to define it as we are exceptional economic actors, we have better work ethic, we have better ingenuity than any other country in the world, and if i can level the playing field, the american economy will soar. and let's face it, everybody, we're looking at unemployment below 4%. we're looking at some really good re

i think we are going to get a slowdown. i actually think from equity markets, a slowdown is actually going to be a net positive because it's going to get the fed to maybe back off. i think the fed tightening too aggressively is the biggest risk to the recession outlook right now. charles: what do you make of the inverted yield curve that sent the market spiraling a few times this year as we got closer and closer? >> yeah, so i think there's two messages to kind of take away from the yield curve. one is that hey, growth is going to slow down. i'm not there yet. i'm more in the hey, inflation is low and it kind of goes back to i hope the fed actually listens to the message imbedded in the yield curve. inflation isn't out of hand. they don't have to tighten too aggressively. they have been tightening for in december it will be three years. let's see the lag effect. they are still going to be tightening through reducing the balance sheet. if i was advising powell, i would just say let's take a break. charles: you know, andy, yes

>> i think i try to answer my own question in there because i think to a degree they have been. i talk in one point how i became my own lore to myself. my own fable. you know, this is who i am. and having to write this and forcing myself to go to the places i didn't want to go, just as an actor, in really trying to do a character, i would go to places i didn't really want to go and unearth things. and so i think it forced me to look at the places i had been -- i had been culpable in really harmful activities. >> and finally, your life forced you to confront your mother as she was dying and you had all of these horrendous feelings about the abuse that you had suffered and her role in at least -- not only -- >> not knowing what it ever was. >> tell me, how did you make peace with that? >> the tail end of the book, the real reason i wrote it is to put all of that together, which culminates with the last conversation that i have with hersh the last real conversation where i tell her, and, you know, things that she had mentioned that i throughout the years that i wrote in my journal t

i must say i think i need to say that i'm an independent because in this age i think it adds some modicum of understanding about why i'm going to say what i'm going to say. and that is i agree with you, sir, i think a great amount of what our current president does is shtick. the only thing i've been able to determine that he's serious about is his own place in -- [ inaudible ]. i'm speaking. >> may not be picking up loud. apologies. i'll repeat it. go ahead and say it, admiral, and i will repeat it. >> test. test. >> there you go. >> so the only thing that i've been able to determine that the current president is serious about is his own position in life and liberty and his pursuit of happiness. that's an opinion. i'm an independent. but i'm very concerned about as many of you all are, as i think many of the nation are, the division that's in our country and i believe the shtick is creating a situation where it's polarizing that division. again, i don't think i've said anything that a thinking person hasn't noticed is obvious. i've had a chance to -- i'm sure there are people who are une

and i think that leads me to my last question and alexandria i was thinking about you and amanda specificallywhen i had the question in mind, one because upon reading your book, i was like this is a lot of information and when you said that women of color, we own our own experiences, the feminist movement is an interesting movement, right, because it say that is we are all women and we have equity and when women of color say, well, we don't, then women who are not women of color are like, yes, you do, right, how do we have those experiences, in your book you talked a lot about intersectionalty and you gave buzz words for antiracism work which included red-lining and included the prison industrialization complex and things affecting people of color. how does that work when you talk amongst white activists and white allies and for amanda, this is a follow-up, how do you feel support bid folks who are intersectionly facing the same similar traumas but may not get where you're coming from, so i will start with you? >> you know, i think the interesting experience a lot of kids are having right now

>> i think a range of things. in the case of comey, i believe it would have been about handling of information when he was the fbi director in the case with hillary clinton, it was a range of things. there was the e-mail server issue and the constant being around the approval by u.s. officials of a uranium deal. officials with the company had given money to the clinton foundation. there's never been any evidence of impropriety. this has continued to be a thread that her critics have tried to poke. that was one of the areas. again, i think this went dark after he was warned against it. but it is a reminder that when donald trump wants to go ahead with something, he will keep going until there is some kind of cattle prod that shocks him. in this case, it appears to be his own future. >> don mcgahn taking evasive as you put it, that cattle product. >> don mcgahn wrote a memo making clear the parameters and also what could happen if you violate those parameters. i think on the one hand that was trying to warn donald tr

i think we tried to make it work and i think there were bad decision for the i think there were also decisions taken that we simply did not expect some of the effects the that came from them and put us on a path that it was hard to move off of the it ended up somewhere where we really did not wish to go if if there is a point where disagreements became sharper and more difficult for russia was as the e.u. and nato expanded and got into the near abroad and became more active in the near abroad from the very beginning the near abroad was especially important place for russia in the ninety's this found more acceptance in the west the western countries actually. accepted and cooperated with the russian peacekeeping operation for example enough. after two thousand and three two thousand and four you don't find this in the attitudes of nato e.u. countries towards russian involvement and up and so see shit so there's a change on on both parts russia become sharper and more defensive as the e.u. and nato become closer and more involved in this area and i think from my perspective of having w

what do you think? >> irate the concern they've had isn't the size of the plant. it's the line itself is made for a small vehicle. although the line is less of a problem in the paint booth now we have this opportunity over the next five years, general motors is saying for 20 new electric vehicle models. this is 20 new cars. one of those cars certainly will be small enough to fit into the same frame we have now for the cruz it's called a delta frame. we think it's perfect for the smaller electric cars that likely to come along so we're going to fight for it we're going to do everything we can to ensure general motors makes the decision to continue to invest in ohio. ohio's been good to general motors and general motors ought to stay in ohio. >> as you mentioned, you've had a lot of conversations with them have they told you anything that would lead you to think they may be leaning towards something like that? >> well, they are not making decisions right now about the production of these electric vehicles in t

i do think trump helped ron desantis. as the nominee of the republican party because of donald trump. i also think that he cost house races. there is no doubt in my mind that carlos crabello lost last night because of the health care vote, because of donald trump's tone. that means that, yes, there is going to be more democrats in the congress, but there is also going to be less republicans who speak up against donald trump's tones and abuses of power in congress. it is now a much more trump and much redder republican party that's going to be in congress with some very few exceptions like a mitt romney. >> i think that's exactly right. and that is a loss for the senate right which has been under siege and someone like carlos crabello, that voice gets lessoned. and mitt romney and ben sasse take up that mantle of that role he had been playing. we have a more polarized congress. i don't think this election says that the progressive wave is where democrats need to go, should go to win in 2020 going forward. but look at those

think you can do that and i don't think there's a chance of me becoming an astronaut but i really that's what i was passionate about and i wanted to restructure this if you're trying whatever it is you're interested in in general for people if you have that passion if you have something you think is really interesting but you think it might not be possible that doesn't matter just discovered to try to you never know where you might end up. welcome back to cross talk we're all things are considered on people about your money we're discussing the midterms. ok mark let me go back. do you hear after everything is said and. what's trump's position right now one of the interesting things he said right before the. voting stations opened he actually talked about. the importance of tony in politics maybe i'm reading too much into it what's his standing after the dust settles yet not good i think we can take of this lesson we call it three g.'s gerrymandering plus geographical polarization equals gridlock and that's what we're looking at going forward and if you think the miller investigation was

i think it have anything right now we are not there yet. eeds to be a more greater priority in terms of the u.s. engaging with the afghan partners. the bottom one i would suggest is don't have expectations. we are going into what is going to be a very contentious presidential election season. it's very difficult to sell those hard -- harding fighters who are trying to become neutral factors. the afghan government is going to be responsive and be there for you given that nobody knows what's going to happen here in the next 6-8 months. had to be cognizant of that. i would say that the military has to coordinate with the state department and the embassy. this is to more concertedly and constructively press the afghan political elite to have some of the tough conversations that they have not yet to build some sort of broad consensus on what they might be willing to live with or at least bring to initial negotiations with the taliban. those conversations to my view have not occurred in the two. out of the field, i think they need to articulate to

we might be looking at a canvas situation tomorrow i don't think this is going to be called tonight but i do think that it's looking better for scott than it is right now for for nelson the diamond order or about the governor. the governor's race looks does not look good for dylan right now as a matter of fact if you look at the numbers he's much more behind the nelson is it would be almost impossible for him to catch up i think there's a possibility larry that we might be looking at a call for for the for the for the democrat party for the republican in this case who by the way is pro term and well and that's a thing you got a rise for it could be two separate states as you well know larry and right both you do have you know miami but i know the panhandle the panhandle is normally outside of tallahassee very conservative but they definitely suffered a lot of damage a few weeks ago with the hurricane that came in a lot of people today had a hard time voting we still don't have precincts people don't know where to go so as they can tell downtown in just a minute i'm being told now tha

it was the iranians sell the news >> i think they opened the spigots. >> i think they did, but i also think -- >> because of the political pressure on them >> absolutely, 100%. >> i think it's a sell the news. >> that's a big drop you're down 20% just from october. >> i know, and it's disappointing honestly because i thought it would be tighter. i think this is a supply situation. i think there are quality names. chevron had a great quarter. oxi is up. you pick your spots within energy >> i want to get back to something you said you think the regime change is a 2019 story the big money will go into growth between now and the end of year but cycle back into value in 2019? do i have that right >> the majority of the market operates in a two quarter time frame. i don't think people play it until we're in the middle of it. >> the other thing is it's obviously election day all of you hopefully are going out and voting and no matter what happens tonight the markets will still have to deal with a number of critical issues, trade, the fed, the fact that, as we said, the s

i think you'll see something else happen there. i'm not happy about it their car is not selling well. they better put something else in >> john, go ahead. >> reporter: [ inaudible question ] >> i have seen it. i have read some of it it is fine >> reporter: [ inaudible question ] >> yeah. i don't believe it >> reporter: you don't believe it >> no. i don't believe it and here is the other thing. you'll have to have china and japan and all of asia and other countries that addresses our country. right now we are at the cleanest we have ever been. it is very important to me if we are clean but every our place on earth is dirty that's not so good. so i want clean air. i want clean water very important >> are you comfortable >> they are not. they had to use it because they were being rushed by very tough people they used tear gas and here is the bot btom line nobody is coming in unless they come in legally. go ahead >> well, i know her. i know she apologized and misspoke i have known her far period of time now she has been an excellent sen

>> i think i want inger to answer this. the problem is. >> tell us the secret. >> the problem with preparedness, there's only so much us type people can do. >> right. >> preparedness depends on the public responding to public health messages and doing the things they need to do. it's not easy because you might have to close schools, might have to close down businesses. there's pushback and you know, we're not so organized. this is not a police state. we depend on people's good will and trust in public health. we have to hope that the prevention or control of the pandemic like 1918 would be largely in the hands of the public decide and advised by us public health people. >> yeah, i mean, and for each -- any infectious disease that has pandemic potential, really the tools you use to prevent on ward ward disease transmission aren't going to be -- there will be some similarities across pathogens but there's going to be other areas that are very different. so social distancing and closing schools becomes a tool that will people

i think we should never lose it. and we have to make the investments in that regard. >> i noted that you did refer to it specifically in the report, and that's why, my conclusion from your report is that we will be falling short of that goal. >> that's correct. we are actually in a downslope, at the same time that other countries are investing heavily in their submarines, i mention the numbers that china is able to put out and there was a time when we questioned the quality of those submarines. that today that would be a mistake to question the quality of what they are putting out there. >> in fact, we are at great risk of losing that undersea dominance that we have enjoyed for quite a long time, as long as we have been involved i think , which is afare tremendous threat to our national security. >> i would say it is the precursor to the movement of reinforcement that we would require in the middle east, in asia or in europe, and upon which our allies would be able to continue the fight as well. seizing the undersea,

i think they are doing a great job. mike: i wanted to press you on a couple controversies that have emerged in the last few weeks. one is last week, you guys were in minnesota's first district, the tim walz district, after that featured george snores, after soares had been turned with a mail bomb. -- with an ad that featured soros hados, after been targeted with a mail bomb. you guys kept an ad up there. what was the thinking there? john: the whole soros thing was a sad thing from the other side, where they desperately tried to tie something to something that wasn't. that ad had literally nothing to do with religion. it talked about the fact that he has given a bunch of money -- he is liberal and gave a bunch of money to people. you could replace that with anybody who is liberal and has given a bunch of money. the dems, frankly, tried to take that and make something that it was not. the ad had nothing to do with that. they are the ones that are trying to incite people and interpret these things that have literally nothin

and ukraine had managed very successfully i think to get its version of the story out first. so their version which i mean it has essentially been disproved. was that there were two gunboats and a tug and that russian ship. crashed into the tugboat deliberately. there are two. the crews of the two gunboats have been taken prisoner. in what is. russian next crimea so i think there is the fact that but the question of why there's not married they're not even address those are not even the facts ok first of all if you look at the footage the tugboat was desperate to be hit by the russian ship i mean it with zigging and zagging and if you understand russian well enough you couldn't repeat those words in english because they were saying basically get out of the way all right ok let me go to michael here michael this all happened on sunday but saturday and the friday before and the week before and the month before ships were going under that bridge into that sea unimpeded why you got a call up and say hey we're coming through this is our type of boat this is the type of time this is

so i think there are bright spots. don't disagree that there are problems, but there are many, many things to applaud. >> i just wanted to say everyone is so busy patting each other on the back for the victory under the cold war that nobody actually saw the next hurdle coming. it was poland was treated as someone to was over reacting when we were talking about russia, it was the cry marion war, the takeover of crimea that made the world wake up. really, in the united states too there was a reduction in arms, we are only now -- everybody felt the cold war was over forever. i don't know, are we in a cold war now? we are certainly not in a friendly situation but we have not been able to prepare and that is the real problem. >> president klaus an important moment in the post-world war ii happened in 2009 when 22 european intellectuals and political leaders sent a message to the u.s. administration under the control of barack obama appealing for a greater u.s. commitment to central europe where as they said america had some

you define it chronologically and how was it different from what we see around us today right well i think i have to clarify and i am not an alarmist about where we're heading on human rights i think what's happened over the course of the seventy year history of the universal declaration is that there's been a global understanding of certain basic rights fundamental rights that all people have and that we've been working together over that period to try to implement them and i think globally we've made enormous progress and i always say that i'm very glad to be a woman today rather than a woman in my mother's generation or my grandmothers and i think my daughter will live in a world that's that's probably better off for women's rights than my generation was so it's that type of progress that we see during the human rights era and yet this was also during the period. wars were launched on false pretexts we saw legalized torture research secret prisons the. dehumanization of abu ghraib i mean all those abuses that were supposedly committed by human rights respect and actuaries abroad rather