i would say that if i was him i would work on raising the bar civility office supporters want some of the fights back too and you're seeing that total war right now my way is to i'm a conservative i believe in making my case in a civil way. so i would i don't take it the same way by no a lot of supporters want someone who who fights back as one of the reasons you got elected peter weigh in a former adviser to george w. bush now at the ethics and public policy center here said we've never had a president who so relishes producing animosity and hate among americans and who does it so consistently so gleefully and so intentionally he's right as i would disagree with they are i think that they're somewhat tasteless and what this is doing it's it's totally one sided kind of comedy i think that we have to look at someone and or to tally that what i talked to exactly the way that will trump how the president trump does no it's not my style i would i wouldn't of probably would have done well as a commander speaking that way but he does have a large segment of support that wants him to fight b

on tactical nuclear weapons, i would still say the bar is high. extremely high for reintroduction, proliferation concerns, proximity concerns, your moral e e situation concerns. so i wouldn't hazard a guess because i can't predict the future, but i would say it's a high threshold. and you have seen ib creasing proximity to engage in secondary sanctions as well. that's something that both administrations, obama and trump, have been exercising judiciously because the issue at hand is if you do too much, one, you actually release all your leverage, and what you're trying to do is speed up the chinese clock. so you sort of implement the sanctions and that's all you have. but the second is that you risk turning the chinese the other way. as everybody here has said today, the chinese are a necessary part of this e equation. so i'll stop there. >> it's a hard question you raised. i think from my personal experience with president moon, he's more like resembles more he's such a pragmatist to me. he's very progressive in certain areas. especially north kore

[laughter] >> so i want -- i would -- laughter] >> i would -- i would like you us a sense of how our former first lady and secretary doing. is >> i think she's doing very well. semishell here with me tonight i know her 65 years. applause] we've been married 60 years. she's been my rock of gibralter. [applause]. she will not talk much but when she had something to tell me, it was very straight. talking too long. you know. or shut up. no. that.ever said [laughter] >> she was very good to keep me speeches, h my meeting people, and just make a g that i would speech and i love to go but i'm attention.too much and she will watch. know, when you said that, applaud and can not get up. neither the other guy. that, i said the two together after that. me.ch them, she would tell so, you know, what can i say? she's the mother of my three we have five grandchildren and four great grandchildren. too bad. nd in january, i put my great grandson on skis. 75 feet went down. put your dson said hand. yes. your name. >>> she had time to do a good hard and he worked so two young people on her campaign on he

i would -- i can't help but note that yesterday we marked up a bill that would allow, you know, hundreds of thousands, maybe even millions, of workers paid sub minimum wage come into the u.s. with no vetting whatsoever. so if i were a potential terrorist, i think i might look at that route instead of the extensive route that you are describing. but moving right -- >> -- how to do it. >> moving right along, i would like to ask you, mr. lloyd, about policies relative to the rights of asylees in your custody. we're all aware that so-called jane doe, a 17-year-old immigrant woman in orr custody was blocked from accessing an abortion and forced to continue a pregnancy against her will. now, she is a minor. but a court had decided that she had the maturity to make the decision on her own, and yet she continued to be blocked from this constitutionally protected health care. she wasn't asking the government to pay for her care or to transport her to a doctor, just to get out of the facility so that she could access a constitutional right that she had to terminate her pregnancy. obviously, as a 1

i would say, yes, s.i. and he would say, do you read it? i said yes, of course i read it. hat would you do with it? than it was very interesting. it went very fast from what would you do with it to win are you starting. my vision of the new yorker was of therent modernization magazine, which is what he thought it needed a theft point because the demographics have changed and it needed a new readership. is s.i. here. this is your wife. this is s.i.'s wife. >> that's me. charlie: that's you. and s.i. died of the same illness. >> yes, they did. they died of -- my wife was diagnosed in 2003 with dementia caused by degeneration of the frontal lobe. first to start having speech defects and we thought susie was maybe having strokes. went to gerontologist. he was an expert in the field, fortunately. diagnosed a dementia, a progressive dementia, which means it can only get worse. all dementias can only get worse. it affects your ability to speak and to understand speech. slowly. downhill i became her principal caregiver. in the seventh year -- he was 2010,sed in 2000 -- in she had a

he said he would have their back. i wonder if he would have the backs of the individual who climbed into a second floor window two weeks ago in a sanctuary city in new jersey and raped a six-year-old girl. i will have their back and i will keep them safe. >> those axing crimes are heinous. those people need to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. both all due respect, let's not tell half-truths or untruths about this. what happened to that little girl, is awful. heinous, let's call it out for what it is. it's a crime and the person should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. what you're doing is donald trump doing. you pit us against them. you can cast over entire communities of people. >> the next question we welcome man from new jersey, his question goes to mr. murphy. this is a question about unrealistic promises. you may promises for spending a policies and programs that you would need substantially to fu fund. and miss guadagno, you promised to cut taxes by spending one and half billion dollar

and i would just -- i would go back and listen, i would -- i would defer to the intensity of the chairman's remarks, both in his opening remarks and his question. you mess around with our election apparatus, and it is an attack on our country. and so, let me give you an example. it doesn't even have to be that the russians come in or the chinese or some third party that's not a nation-state. we already know that they're in 20 of our states. we know that from the reports that have been in the newspaper from the intelligence community. all you have to do is go into certain precincts. you don't even have to change the outcome of the actual vote count. you could just eliminate every tenth rege strant -- every tenth registered voter. so when mr. jones shows up on election day to vote, i am sorry, mr. jones, you are not a registered voter. you multiply that, every tenth voter, you have absolute chaos in the election. on top of it, you have the long lines that result. and as a result of that, people are discouraged from voting. because they can't wait in the long line. and so forth and so on. now,

i just would say there are options in election. i think a child neurologist, some who's been dealing with this issue over the years is much more qualified to do with the opioid crisis than is a d.c lobbyist. >> mr. gillespie. >> the fact is we got to crack down on dealers and we need to get everybody to the table. but at the same time we need to understand we're not going to arrest our way out of this epidemic. i have sat in the jails with addicts in recovery and our jails, our shares are running recovery centers all across the commonwealth. we need to support them. it's one of the reasons i was a bitterly disappointed and dismayed when the administration canceled the annual meeting with the virginia sheriffs association department issues just like this and that will help address the needs in terms of what they need to address this on the front lines and their budgetary requirements. that meeting was canceled because of politics because i'm proud to say a majority of sheriffs all across the commonwealth, 65 have endorsed my candidac

i would also remind members that we are in open session. therefore, questions should reflect that fact. the chair would recognize himself for up to five minutes. as the cia inspector general, you will be responsible for overseeing a large organization whose work us to be done in secret. .'s the work of the i.g office can provide that critical point o for this committee. how do you plan to continue efforts to continue -- to assure that all contractors and workers are aware of the cia i.g. and its function? mr. sharpley: within cia there is an awareness program. people are required to take training on an annual basis. the procedures and processes for making a complaint to the cia inspector general are incorporated in the training. we had a significant outreach effort that we speak with all incoming employees, new employees, and we give briefings whistleblowers whenever the opportunity arises. beyond that, we have an extensive and very mature and whistleblower program. i have had the opportunity to build to bank whistleblower hotline programs t

i would just do it. i wouldn't ask.ebody you know that you feel that way about? we need to get to where we feel about more people that way, and this, because this identity politics is going to dog as for a long time because we are being thrown together at a pace and in ways that we've never been thrown together in all of human history, and he's right. think about the future. and see people as people. those are the two keys. [applause] >> so i could do this all night. i'm having about as much fun as i can have, and i think seeing these two gentlemen together this evening gives you a sense of what a remarkably delightful opportunity i was given in life to work with the two of them, and to be a fly on the wall as they worked together. i would've done it for free, and action in the american system you almost do it for free, but i had a nice house. i do on all night. as president clinton would say we did come visit, he would say this is not bad for public housing. [laughing] if it were not for the clock police that better st

sessions: i would be glad to. the transnational criminal organizations have been given to us as a priority by the president, especially ms 13, and we would these the please -- please to discuss it with you. was going to call on others and ask if you needed a few minutes away from the table. this is what is ahead of us. , andve senator blumenthal democratsve seven wanting five minutes, second round, so we have got at least 40 minutes for second round. if you just want to stay there, we will -- sessions: well, i would like to have a break at some point. chair grassley: we will take a 20-minute break. senator: make it half an hour. chair grassley: that is what senator feinstein asked, and that is what we will do. senator: it is good to see you again. this is the first time we had an your oversight ruling as attorney general, and i have appreciated this so far. you have publicly recused yourself all matters dealing with the ongoing russian investigation. want torney general, i focus on that, because i am concerned abou

i would hope you agree. if what we saw play out in the ukraine happened in the u.s., attacks on the grid, what would that trigger? what should that trigger? and do you think we have the plans in place now, or are we going to be building this airplane mid-flight when it's a little late? >> i guess i would start by saying it's probably not sufficient for me to speak to the adequacy of the plans. what i will say is, if you think about let's just think about the sony attack as a case study. and what was central -- and i would be curious about aaron's perspective, was first and foremost from an intelligence perspective, was a clear understanding and appreciation of attribution of that act in this case by a nation-state. and it is -- it's important to not trivialize how challenging that is. i would ask you to speak to some of the colleagues that are participating in today's discussion about the challenges associated with it. however, it is a necessary component for informing, one, whether the attribution of the act

i would just tell you, look at people's resumes. what did they do before they came to public service? i have had a life of public service. i served in the united states army. i took care of sick children and their families over 25 years. i have served in the virginia senate and as lieutenant governor. and i will tell you i look forward to serving in the next four years. we are all in this together, making sure we have access to health care, making sure our children have access to a world-class education system. make sure all of you have good paying jobs in virginia. we live in the greatest state in the greatest country in this world. i encourage all of you to vote on the election day. i would certainly be privileged and honored to have your vote on november 7. thank you for watching. thank you for being with us. have a great weekend . mr. gillespie: thank you for making time for this important debate. ralph, i wish you and pam the best as well. i believe this election is important. we have had three straight years where more people h

i would say no. speaking only for myself i was a little surprised that they didn't hide their hand as much as they did, and that made me suspect there could be a quid pro quo. there is no point poking a finger in somebody's eyes when you are responding to them poking it into your eye if you don't let them know it is you poking. so a strong hypothesis there has to be looked at, but another level strategically we have have shorter corporate memories than russians. our administrations and policies tend to turn over more rapidly and they do forget, where in russia they don't. are we at war with russia, again my view of the russians is that if they are going to go to war they want to weaken the opponent long before. so the distinction between war and not is not the same as the distinction we have. >> george. george: i think it is never a wise idea to tell your boss he is wrong. in this particular case i agree. i think it is not surprising what has gone on. it would be surprising, were the russians not to d

i would like to strike the last word. as i mentioned, and i take this out because it is the author's district, this is from the department of labor, office of foreign labor certification. 9.28 anel one wage is $ hour. 15% of the federal wage is $8.34 an hour, so it is not that much if you go to level one. if you take a look at what can be deducted, it is not just the issue,, if that is an but it is the tools and the notion of trimmers under the regulation. to provideand tools regular cutting of meat and seafood. the tools can be offset against the wage. es and transportation to the unitedes and transportationo the united states can be offset against the fees, to bring it below the federal minimum wage. if i could finish, i would be happy to do so. i understand the gentleman wants , butotect the meat cutters this amendment doesn't actually do it. i therefore think it should not be supported. i would be happy to yield to the gentleman from maryland. >> that was precisely my question. if i get the import of what you're saying

i would like to argue it's probably something in between. but i will caution there's a lot we don't know about this, and we ought to be careful about drawing conclusions so early in this process. so i'd like to tell you why i think that's the case. before i get into that. i want to point out a common cognitive trap we can all fall into as we address questions like that, that's confirmation bias. it's very easy to start with a hypothesis, an explanation for what's going on. then go out and do research to see if you can find information that's consistent with that hypothesis, when you go about doing things like that, you usually finds evidence that's consistent with your hypothesis. the trap that you can run into is that you're not looking at alternative explanations that are also consistent with that very same evidence. and in this particular case, the hypothesis that the kremlin directed, an influence operation campaign in the united states that is designed to play upon disunity, to sow dissense within the united states, and ultimately to des

murphy: i would say we would be there on the ground.the governor, the executive branch working with the local elected officials to keep the progress we have seen and hopefully more. >> would you support gaming in north jersey? mr. murphy: gaming, i have supported strongly. it is a huge job creator. we are desperate for jobs. if it is not in north jersey it is going to be on the west side of manhattan. the projects had elements where they would send a significant amount of income to atlantic city. that is a big basis that i was supportive of it. one red cent to atlantic city. i'd rather those jobs created in that in new jersey. once atlanticgno: city's stabilized we should put on the ballot the question of whether or not, it has to be on the ballot, whether gaming should be north. if somebody is going to get the jobs, we should. i think we are the best position to get those jobs. on one condition. that we can afford to do business here in new jersey. phil murphy would eliminate tax credits. he would raise taxes on businesses -- businesse

high grade i guess i would. as the sun goes down and shows me some of his ways. i wrote you a few. projects a few sample from different quality to from various to this one is the last piece that they kept from the king my last bits from the king. and with this one know it's. centered on fell yeah yeah so this is sinking grades from indonesia it is called the sinking grade because it's sinking into what term because of the oil come to and there's a lot of pollen on it so this is supposed to be the best and it's not supposed it's the best grade off i got would it's smell a bit like. my grass like a mushroom also highly. has a different way of betting that. it's a make up plates. and japanese people use it too so the heat will not be too. too high. and it helps to burn the wood properly and slowly there's more nuances. yeah smell like grass you know i actually. it's very nice i mean. and that's made all so i can beat like that yeah i love seems to have the same knowledge and passion for food as a simile it does for

left i know this firsthand and would consider it an honor to return to serve with them. critical to our liberty that the investigators use every day. i look forward to working together with you and your colleagues to ensure that the intelligence community and prosecutors have the tools they need and that they keep up with the threats that face us. i also understand that the only way to keep the confidence is to use them lawfully and wisely. i look forward to forwarding the oversight and supporting the oversight. the threats we face are real. the objectives are plain. to weaken our culture, our demock six our values, and our resolve to lead to undermine the very idea of america. i appreciate you have always taken these threats seriously. i look forward to working with you to ensure this country continues to thrive and that all americans enjoy liberty and security under the rule of law. thank you for the opportunity to being here today. i look forward to answering your questions. >> thank you very much. the chair would rec

yes, i think it should be a part of what we do. and we would be pleased to work with you to evaluate what kind of legislation might be appropriate. >> well, withank you, and i wit you. just two weeks ago, you issued a memorandum detailing 20 principles of religious liberty, as well as guidance for executive departments and agencies in implementationing those principles. the very first principle is, with i think, the most important. quote, the freedom of religion is a fundamental right of paramount importance, unquote. and it, quote, is not a mere policy preference to be traded against other policy preferences. it is a fundamental right. now, general sessions, would you say this status of religious liberty is a fundamental and paramount right and poses the psalm obligation on the legislative branch as it does on the executive branch? >> i think it does. i would just say this, senator hatch. your legislation that you worked so hard and passed, the religious freedom restoration act, was a big part of the foundation of the principles that we set ou

and then i would see her go like this. and without ever having said anything i knew that that meant thank you david, you're done. and, so, i had a great relationship also with barbara bush. we had a lot of fun. and even after we left the white house and i went to head up photography for the walt disney company down in florida, she came to visit and speak at conventions in orlando several times. one time she came to our house for lunch, you know, i had to call my wife up and say, guess whose coming over for lunch. but that was a lot of fun. and then, and then former president bush for quite a few years did a bone fishing tournament down in the island in florida keys. i was invited to go down there many times and photograph that event, go fishing and have some fun. of course when he started doing his sky diving, i went to that a couple of times and got pictures of him sky diving as the former president. but, you know, i think it was that time working for the vice president that really solidified my relationship. i'll never fo

>> ma'am, i would agree. i share your concern. i think over the course of the last several months we've had a truing up, and we have opened sort of a governance structure per each state. these are the states that need to be notified of activity. >> so how did one state get told one day and the next day told there hadn't been. how did that happen? >> i think the way i explained that is there was additional context provided to an individual state. so in one case perhaps the election system network may not have been scanned, targeted, whatever it was. it may have another state system. and i would analogize that to a bad guy walking down your street checking your neighbor's door seeing if they had a key to get into your house. so it's not always they're knocking on the network, they may be looking into other ways -- >> doesn't change the fact that the secretary of state should have been immediately notified in every state whether they were knocking on a neighbors door or their own door. good news is we have a different system in ourst

i would like to get your thoughts on the scenario i have just talked about. as far as terrorism, we deal with that regularly. --l me about north korea what happens if somebody knocks on the door and says mr. president, they have launched? i'm not going to ask you to give us anything classified here it --. >> the first step would be that our ballistic missile defense or sis would be feeding in -- defense systems would be feeding in and would be doing what they are designed to do as we make every effort to take them out. the response, if that is what you are referring to, would depend on the president's and laying out options -- a wide array of options -- in alliance with our allies, as many of them have roles to play because they will be with us. the action the president directed and i'm sure the president will be intimately involved. is a matter of minutes, not days. >> the president will be woken .p we have rehearsed this. i will tell you, routinely. i can leave it at that in this open session. secretary tillerson, do you have anything to add? >> we do have

you know, it might hurt us a little bit, but i think it would hurt us more to give in and pay what theyo, i'm going to do another show of hands here... i want to know, at the moment, the eu will not talk about trade until we offer more money. how many of you think that ultimately they are bluffing, that they will talk about trade if we hold out and do not offer more money? yeah, so there is a feeling here that that they are playing hardball. all right, give me your impression of the conservative party at the moment. there has been a lot of talk about boris this, philip hammond that... i'm interested in whether you think the tories are doing a good job of managing the brexit process? albert, what is your...? under the circumstances, i think the media are constantly dragging them down. and not giving them an opportunity. and you are a labour voter? that's right. subsequently, they've got to do this job. we are in a democracy, we voted to get out. i think everybody involved should do that but it is so frustrating. sheffield alone voted out 51—19. we have six labour candidates, mps, who rep

i can sigh why the committee would want to know. the numbers of questioneries that were being done, but i can't talk to how the computer systems work. senator: thank you, mr. chair. bureaucracy seeing no additional members here, the job is pretty easy. and matthew, it lasted a lot longer than i thought it would. [laughter] bureaucracy thank you for your family to come back into the government one more time and it's always a tough decision, but you have performed there in an exemplary fashion prior to this. the folks at boeing would like to keep you there. but to have you at the national security division as the chief there is advantageous to this country. we look forward to moving your nomination. at this point, this hearing is adjourned. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2017] nick nick nick -- captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org >> the house republican tax reform bill scheduled to be released on wednesday, tom mcclint

if ed gillespie would like to see abortion banned, i would like to see i would like to see i would likeo see that ed gillespie never becomes governor. ♪ >>> oh, hard to believe it's been 25 years since whitney houston declared her forever love in "the body guard." and keltie knight joining me now. the movie sound track is still the best-selling sound track of all time. >> not hard to believe. the first cd i owned, by the way. more music is coming with whitney houston, i wish you love, more from "the body guard." that is out november 17th. >> previously unreleased studio and live recordings. it will be good. >>> speaking of live, or lively, you don't get more lively than miley cyrus and "carpool karaoke" do you? >> no, you don't. we have the behind the scenes secrets. the first secret, the timing. a production source tells "e.t." miley filmed with corden about two weeks ago. 's instagram to do an a cappella rendition of "the climb." her first time in six years singing the track from her hannah montana movie. she also harmonized it with james. >> reporter: cyrus and corden belted out six

they knew i would never intrude where i was. it would be easier for me to describe to you how i worked rather than what they meant when they asked me to do it. it would be better and easier for me to tell you how i did it and tell you that is the way they wanted me to do it, i guess. what i did was, it was important to me to have them realize that i was trustworthy. that i was not going to go back and tell the writers at "time" what i heard. it was very funny because i had been there a long time by the time clinton was president. i knew a lot of people who worked in the white house because they had worked for carter. there is a continuation, wins, thearty players in the white house disappear. they go do something else, and then they come back the next time. i knew most of the players in the clinton white house and they knew they could trust me. it is funny because it was not totally my character. i do not hear when i am taking pictures. the picture of walter cronkite and ronald reagan, i do not know what they are saying. i do not

booker: i do not take issue with that at all. would i take issue with is you are saying we are trying to maintain our efforts of diplomacy and food support because that is not reflected in budget numbers. let me continue to the point i was trying to make. there is a lot of extensive research which i am sure you are aware that in addition to socioeconomic status, excessive force by police and military forces engenders deep grievances which lead to radicalization. and the heavy-handed responses from military drives recruitment and violent extremism and organizations that often lead to terrorist activity. you are aware of that research. sec. mattis: i am not aware of what we have done in may of 2014 276 nigerian when girls were kidnapped. i do not find the connection between our activities and the kidnapping of hundreds of girls. sen. booker: i was not making that connection. i am simply making the point that senator paul made about yemen. when we are engaged in counterterrorism activities, partnering with military operations like what we

i am on facebook and the idea that i would get my news on facebook is hysterical. i see people post all sorts of stuff and i get a kick out of it. the idea that you are upset because america isn't smart enough to figure out maybe this isn't real, so you're going to regulate a public slam book called facebook because you don't like the way things turned out is basically as a country we are not that smart anymore. >> host: width of the biggest response. >> guest: i went to high school in albuquerque new mexico and my folks still live there so i have a great fondness for new mexico. i want to note again, this caller,th what we are talking about here is not the posting or any of the interaction on facebook or any of the intelligence levels of the american people. what we are talking about is saying we have online paid political advertising. hohow do you use the appropriate standards so that the paid political advertising is treated in a very similar way to play paid political advertising is treated on television and radio and some degree of their public media? that is a

i would say would you describe to me saddens me. share some of the same sentiments but i would put it in as blunt terms as you have but i would say this. i grew up in the civil rights era. my mother taught me that we were to be as martin luther king said values and colorblind and to deal with the content of people with character. that's the way i choose to see things and i would hope the polarization on the left and the right and the african-american community in all communities can be dissipated. the right to criticize the democrats and i would dare say the republicans can be criticized for two but i would turn to where i started. we are americans first and unless we pull together inclusively we all fail. >> yes maam. xi right here. >> first of all i've always appreciated your levelheaded comments and on the scale of one to 10 i give you a six and my appreciation today you art and. for a democrat iowans liked her and now she's attended she a good thing to do book. >> she's attended you say? >> i met 10? >> you were a six to nine or

what i thought a perfect person would say it will be a perfect president. ealizing that is not the case and i don't think in the end, to me, the word disillusion gets thrown around washington and we all get disillusioned with whatever we do in life but the fact that our leaders are only human isn't ultimately disappointing. it's liberating but it also makes us comfortable and i wanted to try to write a book about how the end of president obama's eight years in office i felt more confident because i knew or had a sense of the humanity of even our most powerful leader. >> can you talk about the mechanics of writing a presidential speech? it's a picture you paint well but and i like how you convey two different approaches. the head approach and the heart approach. but that is getting the first draft. there's all this other stuff. >> mostly picking the right elton john strategy. i promise we wouldn't do too much top. but. [laughter] every white house is different. in the obama white house we would generally have one writer will depend on a speech. if i was for a

anyway, , that's what i would d. >> as i said i think our audience would put you into start. mbassador? >> i think what are the challenges of course we face is we are dealing with the legacy issue of deeply immoral cynical policy by the previous administration regarding syria which brought about a nuclear agreement floating on a sea of syrian blood. so we are not, we are limited. we have difficult challenge in the hand that we've been dealt now, but ambassador khalilzad talked about the land bridge to the mediterranee. that's going to be decided in the next few days as somebody drive towards the syrian iraqi border and if it's the syrian army then they will have a land bridge. we have a problem -- we have a challenge and a problem. the iranians of course have not only forces in syria but they have many proxies including the syrian regime. who are our proxies in the region? we have, in syria we have proxy which is powerful, important, and deeply problematic, which is the fdf/ypg, et cetera, which is militarily significant and militarily important and has all kinds of political

sessions: i would be glad to. the transnational criminal organizations have been given to us as a priority by the president, especially ms 13, and we would these the please -- please to discuss it with you. was going to call on others and ask if you needed a few minutes away from the table. this is what is ahead of us. , andve senator blumenthal democratsve seven wanting five minutes, second round, so we have got at least 40 minutes for second round. if you just want to stay there, we will -- sessions: well, i would like to have a break at some point. chair grassley: we will take a 20-minute break. senator: make it half an hour. chair grassley: that is what senator feinstein asked, and that is what we will do. senator: it is good to see you again. this is the first time we had an your oversight ruling as attorney general, and i have appreciated this so far. you have publicly recused yourself all matters dealing with the ongoing russian investigation. want torney general, i focus on that, because i am concerned abou

i would be one of those people and please you can question me and the question to cope but i am somebody steve bannon would call a globalist and when the president said we cannot do nation building, i guess it is unpopular with. unless we strengthen the institutions of democracy in the countries likcountries like afge will have a result likely have had in iraq where the forces of evil continue to undermine stable democratic government. in afghanistan we have the network go of television, isis. we have two strengthen governance to be competitive. we need to foster our global cooperation. i am disappointed with the withdraw. i'm concerned about the renegotiation of nafta even if they are short-term and economic benefits, but i think we need to recognize we have a serious issue in cybersecurity. we have the capacity to fight wars on that level as well as conventionally and i think that we need to be more aggressive and assertive then we were certainly during campaign 2016. look, i just think in terms of criminal justice at we can't attack america and american institutions for mass incarcera

want to consider so i wouldurge my colleagues to oppose the amendment. >> fotaxfor tax reform buildings requiring it to be deficit neutral would allow you to create a huge deficit and then spending cuts to cover the deficit. i would rather have a tax reform bill be revenue neutral and then we would do the hard work of dealing with both rates in the expenditure side and i think the bill is a commonsense bill and they recommended that already makes it an uphill battle but i would urge the adoption. >> all time is expired. the question is on the amendment [roll call] [roll call] [roll call] there are 11 nays and 12 yeas. >> please repeat that wrote. 12 yeas and 11 nays. the amendment is agreed to. the next one is sanders number 25 how often do you get a chance to vote for not one, but two of the top priority is that i have heard so many individuals on both sides of the i/o fight for that is to quit sending our jobs overseas and to invest in infrastructure here in america, two for one. time is expired for the reason

if ed gillespie would like to see abortion banned, i would like to see i would like to see i would like to see that ed gillespie never becomes governor. but the living room's pretty blank. it's really nice when clients come in and have done some of their own research. working with a bassett designer was really easy. just kind of ties in very well. we love it! nancy: take a look here. boston market in woodbridge becoming a driver threw this afternoon. aftermath after a car crashed through the window. no one was hurt but it's not clear how the car ended up out of control. jonathan: show you crazy video out of germany. this is a huge plane. the winds shove him to side. this is a handy piece of flying. that is a good landing. nobody was hurt. frightening landing in illinois that turned into hide-and-seek. the pilot crash landed when the plane conked out. he called for help, the firefighters couldn't find the small plane in the enormous corn field. so firefighters lifted the ladder on the truck to allow the pilot to see them and tell them how to get to them. nancy: army sergeant bowe bergdah

but, shoot, i would see that in congress. e of the most interesting points, i told you about this, usually at the state of the union address, where you sit in the balcony and you are watching the state of the union, like you do -- shonda: like you do. [laughter] mrs. obama: you see it on tv. but when you are in the room what you can see is the real dichotomy, that on one side of the room it is a feeling of color almost. on one side of the room it is literally gray and white, literally, that is the color palette on one side of the room. on the other side there is yellows, blues, white and greens, physically there is a different color and tone. because one side, all men. all white. on the other side, some women, some people of color, and whenever i was sitting i would always have a guest in the booth and i was only the most embarrassed at the beginning when people would say that, because i would say, is it just me? am i looking at how government works? and people would look down and go, that looks good, that looks right. we are

and i would say yes, si, and he would say did you read it. >> that's right. and i said yes, of course i read it and he said you know, what would you do with it? >> and then it was very interesting. as always with si, it went very fast from what would you do with it to when are you starting. cuz he was like that once he decided, he dead sided. >> bang bang. >> my decision at the new yorker was a very different sort of modernization of the magazine. which is what he felt it needed at that point typically because the demographics had changed and really needed a new swell of readership. >> rose: did he think it needed some of the glamor of "vanity fair." >> no, that wasn't the vision, actually. and nosh was it for me. i mean we-- the main thing that i felt it needed was a redesign which we were able to modernize without sort of spoiling in anyway the pristine beauty of the magazine and at the same time giving it headlines, giving it blushings giving it cover lines, introducing photography which it really hadn't very much of, i decided the foachy needed to be there

caller: i would. guest: first of all when players , protest during the anthem, they are not "protesting at work." there is nothing in the bargaining contract that says they need to stand for the anthem, so they are not protesting at work. they are there to play football. they are out there on a voluntary basis. they have only been going out there since 2009. i really think that argument kind of falls apart. the second thing is you have to take a big leap to say the national football league is somehow bowing and being shaped by leftist pressure. this is the nfl for goodness sake. there is a team in the nation's capital that is named after a racial slur. it, even not change though there is no way that team could be born today named after a racial slur. you look at issues from minority hiring to who is in the owner's box, the rights of players, and to call this a left-wing operation is the height of absurdity. the last thing i would say is to think players have brought politics into the nfl when they are

i think areas that would help the public kind of better understand what we are thinking here would be, as i mentioned earlier, having some better declaratory elements of that policy. i don't foresee, if we're talking about how we can evolve from the obama to trump administration, i don't foresee kind of any of the red lines. as the congressman mentioned, i think the strategic ambiguity has helped us to be a little bit more flexible in our response. i give the poker analogy. i feel like it always depends, right, depends on the situation, depends on your cards, depends on your opponent. that can help to form the calculus of what the response action should be. if it should be diplomatic discussions, indictments if it's criminal, or if it should be military action or otherwise. >> you brought up the indictments. i was an advocate for the pla indictments as well as some of the recent russia indictments. the likelihood of any of them seeing the courtroom is zero. i get that. but it signals the capability, it limits their ability to travel and demonstrates that we take some of these issues v

i am unaware of, that would be, i support a process in place that would protect the confidentiality of any one or the anonymity of anyone who wanted to bring a complaint forward on an acting ige or anybody else, any other official as an acting inspector general who works in the world of confidentiality, anonymity etc.. i think it is very important that we recognize these processes and that we honor them but i can't speak to the specifics. >> i would ask that the document be put in the record and so that we can take a look at it and in writing know what is fact and what is fiction. >> if i may take one moment with respect to the documents thatak you are referring to it is done in r assessment to a minimal number of people who've been retaliated against him after if you looked at in a timely fashion and is across. i can't speak for the rest of the inspectors general. i can't speak for the cia inspector general and i challenge the validity of the statements. i feel very strongly about the whistleblower retaliation program. the handle old concerns whether they are involving in potential