i would like to six sorry. i told them the wrong cave! i would like to say sorry as well. , and then later on ijust sneaked into the cave. i am sorry.” will like to say sorry to my parents because i told them that i went to play football. i did not tell them i was going into the cave. when i went into the cave, i was thinking my father would give me a good telling off. and i deserved it.” father would give me a good telling off. and i deserved it. i would like to say sorry as well, and i would like to tell them i love them. and that i know now that, if i did not tell them the truth from the start, it would disappoint me later.” would like to say sorry to them as well, because i knew when i was there, i thought i would get a good telling off from my mum. when you get home, what are you going to tell your parents? most of them in the cave, they said they would get a good telling off by the parents. because we had been in there for ten days. so when we got out, they would have to sleep in the house rather than get into the house. so from now on, will you still be sticking toge

i would like to see advocates for mentors for fosters of youth. and i think mostly, i would say i am not in favor of putting any money into that. i would say that i would like to emphasize is more housing subsidies and mental health services for homeless families. >> supervisor cohen: oh, k. that is fantastic. all right. it is just after one. let's take a one hour recess. that way the rest of our colleagues will be able to join us and grab some lunch, we will resume at 2:00 >> supervisor cohen: good afternoon. want to welcome you back frost budget and finance committee. we're coming out of our break. we're going to come back into session. i would like to recognize supervisor safai and tang have joined us. and i noticed that we have a majority of the board of supervisors in the chamber today. with that, we can continue. so supervisors, thanks for joining us. and joining this conversation. just doing some technical microphones. supervisor safai, we'll start with you. what we're doing right now is having conversations. i would like for you to share wi

autumn's story, and if i were a child i would want you to be my teacher. i want to find away for you to continue the serve in some capacity in the city. you have so much to offer. i would love to follow up with you and learn from your experience. at that point i would defer to supervisor yee's motion on this. >> i think you made your motion. i think we can do that without objection. that included the residency waiver. you you thank you. you and thank you for your service. all of you. >> please call item 10. >> ordinance anding the administrative code to prioritize the pro questioning of 1 -- possessing of 100% of affordable housing projects, require to provide quarterly status reports. >> i think we have amy. are we going to start with the mayor office of housing or the supervisor's office? do you want to start first? great, please come forward. >> if you can keep it brief as much as you can. >> keep it brief. >> good afternoon, supervisor ronen had to head off to another meeting. this meeting ran longer than we were expecting. >> the rules committee will b

i would like to put into it that we are able to look at it and i would like to be a part of that. it's somewhat my background. >> sure. >> commissioner vietor: so that would be the only thing that i would like to -- >> absolutely. they will create it, but we'll work hand in hand with them, so i'm sure we can provide the opportunities for review and touch points in that implementation process. >> commissioner vietor: good. >> so to ask the question, if we are going to work with the school district, they're creating a curriculum and it's the basic curriculum. teachers have liberty to make adjustments, correct? >> right. it's the building blocks that teachers take and adapt into the classroom. >> and the question i would -- or maybe direct staff, at what point do we have flexibility to add in more up-to-date topics? not only commissioner courtney may have an issue, but given this administration, we may want to highlight another component which is a lower level. i want to see what type of flexibility we have, because this is sort of the building block, but there may be an opportunity t

lot of things only or i would not even take them up with me i would i would just realize a weapon i would go to different places with. picture for. of the left. it's . somehow. the first the side of who i often fall into that's some musical idea so i arrive and. that is the. my vote should all give it or never before asked me what am i doing i would say a composer was just a thing and i was like five six years old and i would never respond with force pianist. but i sure thought of as a composer when john was just wonderful and which was. which was useful for that and a bunch of presidents just. i think after i mean to me i'm compassionate always a source of our. thoughts are so out that of course there are some pieces insurance in the low cost i phone and i should look well that's ok. you're. tune back in for him to sound tune to find out why mikhail pletnev wrote a new orchestration for show pounds piano concertos. i love this music. as in can bug locust tradition. if you add to that a. and b. to think. and what is russian the neutral front office fascination with new york also the highl

i would agree with him. i think it would be a public service to release these. that's why i demanded they be released. no good reason not to. and at this point, i think i'll yield back the balance of my time. >> inso, the chair wants to respond to the gentleman from rhode island. first of all, first of all, there was an agreement in the interview that it was private, confidential, and that it would not be released. so that is not going to take place under this set of circumstances. secondly, if the gentleman -- we're here investigating irregularities conducted in investigations by the fbi. if the gentleman wants to perpetuate that by creating irregularities here and releasing questions so that other potential future witnesses can read the questions before they're asked, that is in my opinion exactly what many on the gentleman's side of the aisle have been all about, attempting to disrupt this investigation and this hearing process. >> reclaim. reclaiming my time. mr. strzok -- >> would the gentleman yield? >> reclaiming my time. >> mr. chairman, i object. >> rele

>> i would not, i would not think were you a racist. but i certainly would think that you are racially insensetive. if you take a piece and not look at the genesis of that piece and place it into historical and literal i context. and do people watch your show, every piece -- >> tucker: is there something wrong with attacking people by their race. don't you see yourself always part of the problem of rate hatred? . no, no, that's not what the piece does. what i find troubling -- >> it does do that. >> i understand white brothers and sisters may not be aware of what they are doing. about the when people bring the situation to them, and they respond in an indignant way that, raises the question of morality that i think we have to wrestle with. >> tucker: my next question is, how much do you make at the university of wherever? you won't answer that, i'm sure. you aren't answering my questions. >> i don't make nearly as much as you are the race baiting that you do. i would trade my salary for yours any day. >> tucker: i would never say somethi

so i would be for the original proposal amendment. i wouldn't necessarily want to constrict this so much. i like -- excuse me, deputy attorney gibner said in response, if there's a necessitated need that gives some flexibility. if we are narrowing this down so much, it's three days right now, if it were to go up or down we have the flexibility to adjust. i know this is not just about the sfmta and not just about meeting s that are happening in committee, it's all notification for the city as i understand it. >> thank you. supervisor tang. >> i just want to say that i appreciated the original movement because we are expanding it. speaking from experience as we are dealing with projects where a lot of parking is being removed, small businesses are being impacted i'm pressing the agency to hurry up and install passenger loading zones, white, green, yellow, you name it and what is holding them up are these notifications to go to these meetings. those are some real life examples right now. i'm sure there's more. a committee chair, especiall

so i would put a finer point on it. i think they've obviously been a massive part of the problem in manipulation and i think that these blanket rules for you can't have this bought online doesn't make sense. their application bots who could do real-time updating or whether or news so there are positive applications for bots so it is not blanket spanning. it's advocating personas -- personas but we will never get to this level of detail so we have to err on the side of caution and give up our weather news for the bots who are doing that. >> i think, you're one of these people who is technically competent regarding this. good bots and bad bots?>> you mean under the surface before they are out there? in other words, you could make a distinction between a good bought.>> it's like police men.>> so, we've all heard the idea that technology could be used for good or ill which is how you evaluate this. it's how it's used. whether you could police it under the surface, i couldn't answer that. >> to determine which of the bots is

and i would go to different places with. picture of for. of the left. in my head it's. somehow. the first the psycho who i often fall that's some musical idea so i arrive and. that was the. mobo she had told me that whenever the four asked me what they were doing i would say a composer when justified it was like five six years old and i would never respond with force pianist. exercise who has a composer when piano was just an instrument which was. which was useful for a bunch of us are just. for myself i mean to me i'm conventional whole with a source of. thoughts are so out that of course there are some pieces mission rice in more. of an auction well that's ok. tune back in for a present to to find out why mikhail pletnev wrote a new orchestration for show pounds piano concertos. i love this music but as i think i'm boggled. if and of that a. and b. to feel. and what is russian dunoon true from false fascination with new york also the highlight of the recording session the grand concert in dortmund. it's virtually mature so

subcommittee communications and technology will come to order >> this panel will now come to order i would look to think our witnesses for being here i recognize myself five minutes for a comment. welcome to this hearing on oversight for federal communications commission. today's hearing marks the first time in 28 years that the ftc has appeared before this subcommittee having been reauthorized by congress. i am delighted to welcome the recently reauthorized commission here today. the reauthorization effort reflects bipartisan support of the ftc and the important work to enhance public safety, technologies and strengthen our national security increase broadband deployment and protect consumers while processing is mac posturing innovation and the medication and marketplace. i hope today demonstrates the importance of being reauthorized into each of the commissioners articulating how the action benefits the organization, i know we could deliver the same bipartisan accomplishment for your colleagues while the fcc is charged with many important tasks one of the most critical roles in place rev

i enjoyed the chat. the tax reform measure that would pass. is contributing i think in our miceli record low unemployment. unprecedented facts that there are more than job openings. they revise the growth for the year. to now we are expecting 3.3 percent. our goal to eliminate the lack of effect. on foreign earnings by changing to a more tariff tutorial based service. on the scale of hundreds of billions of dollars. this is proving to be extremely beneficial but as you know there are still provisions that need rules for implementationpr and i would simply want to ask that you would commit to working with this committee and members of congress to ensure that as any ambiguities are address that you are taking into account the intent of those of us who wrote this legislation so that we get it right for our constituents. if confirmed they would follow the law with intent of what they have. and putting into putting into the law. i look forward to the opportunity. of providing clear concise timely guidance. they can get it right the first time. we al

and were those, or similar doors present at this building i would, i think the point would be much better taken. but what we have are garage doors that look to me as though they were installed in maybe the 1980s or the 1970s. they are not historic, so i don't find that replacing the, those garage doors with what is proposed is incompatible with the neighborhood at all. >> president wolfram: commissioner hyland. >> vice president hyland: i have several things. i want to thank the members of the public that came out today. i know you have a busy day and appreciate you taking the time to tell us your thoughts. 20, 25 years ago the conversation was adding garage doors to these historic buildings, and how to do that. and i have a slightly different take than commissioner pearlman, and that is that my concern is that we are erasing the garage doors and attempting to make them look like they had never been there. and in my practice, that's not what i had done and it is a design exercise, and we have had at least one, maybe two other similar projects come before us and i voiced the same concern t

and then i would be with her. and i felt guilty about not being out at your kid's eagle scout award. so when i got the opportunity -- which doesn't seem like a good idea at the time. to anchor a show on cbs which was supposed to be more political than it turned out to be and work three days a week. sort of keep your hand in it, but not really. it seemed like a good opportunity. and i just feel so strongly the need to say that was a decision i made, because of where i was in my life. i have had great friends who have raised their kids in the united states congress and their kids are great and they are great parents. you know this is not, i hate the tutorial of who's a better mom and the mom books and the mom wars, it was just what was right for me at the time. and so that's why i decided to leave. >> i want to ask you a legislation question, a a broad one. in all of your time in congress in the ' 0s, what do you think was the most important piece of legislation passed that had a direct impact on women? >> going back

i pray that we find that our president was not involved. that would being a great news for our country and if that's mr. mueller's finding, i will accept it. not investigate it. i hope that we can put our partisanship at the door, step back from the precipice that we're finding ourselves now and i would hope that this hearing, which i think serves no good purpose for our country could be brought to an end. i yield back. >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from tennessee, mr. duncan for five minutes. >> thank you. very quickly i would like to associate myself with the really outstanding opening statements made by chairman goodlatte and chairman gowdy which i think were two of the finest opening statements i've heard in my 30 years in congress and expressed my views completely. let me also say, mr. strzok, stubbornly will not admit want everybody knows is extreme bias. i find it amazing he can sit here and say that he was not biassed in a way that clearly colored and affected his investigations. if you don't agree with that, i want to read the words f

gregory: i don't think that they would. i don't think that they would. n: don't you have a reality course of how to get an amendment passed? gregory: i have that. but when you stop and think about it, how marketable is that? how many employers are looking for someone who got an amendment into the united states constitution? so it's a very sad dilemma and causes me tremendous misery. brian: let's go back to some video, back to 1992. your time in the box. by the way, what day, what moment did you find out that you had won this thing? gregory: a lady in the office of the clerk of the michigan house of representatives on may 7, 1992, very graciously placed the receiver of her telephone next to what we call the back in those days a squawk box, and we had those at the austin state capital. by her being so kind and gracious as to do that, i was an ear witness to the michigan house of representatives casting that final vote on the amendment. but of course, it turns out that a stinky wiki michigan was not in order michigan was not the state that put the amendment

>> i would beg to differ. think the tax bill encourage significant investment. >> but it did not happen. >> in wisconsin there is tremendous amount of jobs. as a result of the tax bill and as a result of new facilities. >> that could be a 4 billion-dollar cost to the taxpayers. that is what i call socializing the cost of privatizing. that's bigger than the state budget. what we are giving us incentive. that dog don't hunt. >> the math doesn't work out. >> i'm not going to comment on the state numbers. >> but my understanding is that the states analysis was quite well thought out. >> i read the state analysis. it is going to cost more than we will benefit. >> so, i am trying to understand why the president is surprised that this tax bill did not trickle down into wages. but just became a way to buy back shares. did not trickle down. >> again, will be happy to follow up with your office, which we have seen and anticipate more. >> the time of the gentle lady has expired. the chair now declares a recess for 15 min

i would love to reach out to you guys. am so happy that he introduces life of politics, of community building to me. that is what he built out of nothing. he was a 16-year-old single-parent. he knew he loved him. someday, i hope to return that back to the community. i want you to build me up as well. he had his elders and people who guided him. i want to follow in your path and get back to the community in some way in the long term. i am ready. thank you, everyone. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. >> i don't necessarily have anything prepared. for the past two days i have been free styling -- >> supervisor safai: -- >> supervisor cohen: please speak directly into the mic. >> i have been saying what comes to me. growing up i wanted to be like my dad. he was my role model. he was my hero. that was in a time when he was not necessarily doing the best. aas i grew, he grew with me. there was a lot of trial and error in terms of parenting. he was stubborn sometimes. he had a big pride and a big quito -- chico. this led to a lot of

i would agree with him. i think it would be a public service to release these transcripts. that's why i demanded they be released. there is no good reason not to. and at this point i think i'll yield back the balance of my time. >> so the chair wants to respond to the gentleman from rhode island. first of all -- >> i yield back the balance of my time. >> first of all, there was an agreement in the interview that it was private, confidential, and that it would not be released. so that is not going to take place under this set of circumstances. >> reclaiming. >> good day, i'm andrea mitchell in washington, while we watch this hearing. just to explain, they are now arguing, democrats versus republicans, over whether some of the lengthy transcripts from 11 hours of private testimony of peter strzok can be released as part of this hearing. so it is an argument over who controls those records and whether it is the republican chairs of these two joint committees or whether the democrats should have some say. the democrats wanting the transcripts to be released, the republicans obje

>> i would you say it is a team sport. it is not all about me. david: donald trump said in a tweet that your biggest product, the f-35 was too expensive. i have personally engaged in a dialogue with him. david: you were recently voted the 22nd must a woman in the world. marillyn: i get a note from my brother that said, well, why was oprah higher than you? [laughter] >> will you fix your tie please? >> well, people wouldn't recognize me if my tie was fixed, but ok. just leave it this way. alright. i don't consider myself a journalist. and nobody else would consider myself a journalist. i began to take on the life of being an interviewer even though i have a day job of running a private equity firm. how do you define leadership? what is it that makes somebody tick? since you have been the ceo, the stock has gone up roughly 330%. the market capitalization is up roughly 280%. another company you compete with, general dynamics, has a female ceo as well, and their stock is up 250% since she became -- [applause] david: -- the ceo. do you think that women

i would bring these values to xm. there's room for improvement to keep america on this road to prosperity and xm is no exception. if confirmed, i will work to insure xm faithfully implements all laws and reforms enacted by congress. i would launch a review to insure sha xm truly is the bank of last resort and not the other way around. there are now 109 foreign export credit agencies or ecas in other countries, up from 95 when i testified before you last november. xm recently reported the increasing weaponization of export trade credit by the word's ecas to increasingly nationalistic policies, particularly those by china. if confirmed i look forward to working with the administration and congress on an aggressive response to china's unfair trade policies. in a perfect world there would be no eca financing. if confirmed i will work with the u.s. government and as appropriate, the oecd, g20, wto, and other forums to move towards the ultimate goal of the eliminating all eca financing. on that, you have my pledge. until tha

i can tell you sir, i would love - >> you know what -- mr. chairman, may the witness be permitted to answer. >> if it is so frustrating, answer the question. >> if you allow him to, i am sure he will. >> he never answered the question. >> stop interrupting him. >> the gentleman from ohio stop badgering. >> we are about to move on. the gentleman from ohio time is expired. mr. strzok can answer questions. >> mr. chairman, before mr. gaddy start, may i respond? >> there is an appropriate time for over sight and you know it is at the end of the investigation once it is concluded. i am certain that congress will have the opportunity to look at any investigation once it is closed and ask all these questions and i would love to answer each and every one of your question. >> mr. strzok. we know the answer from you and you advised that you can't answer the questions. that's what he's not cooperating with and we should not do it. he is not cooperating with us. >> these questions are table setting questions regarding the formation of this and he can answ

so i would like to tell you what the motions are and i am happy to show you the proposals and tell you a little about each artist, if you would like. one of the projects was for waterfront plaza and the selected artist was antony gormley. the panel had some concerns just about the emotional quality of the work and its aloofness from the general public. i'm happy to report that the artist has agreed to not just modify but completely redesign the art work in response to the steering committee and panel's comments. additionally, pae white was another artist selected. again, the majority of the selection panel approved her work but had concerns about the visibility, views to and from building one of the art work and the artist was asked to redesign, reconfigure, rescale the art work so it's a substantial revision. those are two of the three motions placed before you today. we are asking the treasure island development authority to authorize the arts commission to enter into an m.o.u. with each of these two artists, pae white and antony gormley for specified dollar amounts so they could red

would you agree with that? >> sir, i appreciate that concern very much and let me explain a little bit about that comment. i have the utmost respect for congress, its role and oversight, for its role in passing laws and for any of the functions. what i was stating in that comment was the efforts by some to turn legitimate oversight activity into unwarranted -- >> we appreciate. >> criticism of the fbi and doing nothing but doing its job. >> there are a lot of us here that don't like congress particularly too and i'm sure that the vast majority of american people would agree with you on that. mr. strzok, you were removed from the mueller investigation, correct in. >> yes. >> but for the most part all the others that were there are still there, correct? >> i can't speak to the current staffing or personnel of. >> greg andrews who gave $1,000 to the democratic running to hold the senate seat previously held by barack obama and $2600 to a democratic senator and zero to the trump campaign, he is still there, and rush atkinson

i would like to see more interaction, interactive characteristics. i can see opportunities where, for example, the landscape budget is used toward preparing exhibits of art, local artists, school projects. i would like to see a lot of that. this is a tech city in the tech part of the world. we need to make the best of that in my opinion. i like the simplicity. i think you've done a wonderful job on creating the maintenance and the kit parts or whatever it's called. i have the same concerns about the landscaping. i had not thought about looking at it from above. so i respect that concept. i think the landscaping is the least important part of these. the kiosks and the toilets themselves are the most important. what will matter tremendously here, the materials. and i'm very worried about the scratch-resistance because i think that's the form of graffiti that will be the hardest to maintain. without seeing a materials board, it's hard to comment on that, but it will be critical. one final comment. i'm sure there's an historic district reason for this, bu

i would prefer since we had an incredible hearing today if we could mover this out and then we will have another hearing because we have no choice and i know the survivors want to be present at every hearing that this legislation is heard that we move it out of committee today and hear it at a budget committecommittee. >> supervisor safai: if there is still discussions that were going to happen i would going to maybe ask the department of public health and safety and if there were going to be continued conversations and i supportive of your path, your and i have had that conversation, we would be having a hearing on this if we continue before we made the amendments that we would have it before this time so this would not slow down the process at all. >> supervisor fewer: i understand it wouldn't slow down the process but failing to understand why we would need it again. right now i am not comp templating any amendments. >> supervisor safai: okay i will go to supervisor yee. >> supervisor yee: i just want to be clear about we actually could have a budget committee meeting on july 12. we w

susana: i would change the fabric and change the color. ed, a lot of it was based off of what i wanted, and i like the backs, and the backs sell. stephanie: i feel like you're afraid to change things because you have a certain set of customers. you feel like you've had success enough and that you're afraid to, like, rock the boat. maggie: i honestly have no fear of rocking the boat. lemonis: hearing from me about how maggie should change her designs or change her business is one thing, but hearing from susana, who has 20 years of experience in this same industry, should really change the way maggie is thinking. so this is the start of the collab? stephanie: this is it. lemonis: it needs to get tweaked. you need to go over everything, and then we need to weave in the susana monaco stuff. susana: yeah. stephanie: agree. maggie: mm-hmm. ♪ lemonis: hello. maggie: hi. lemonis: i wanted to check in on how the designs were working for the flywheel pitch, so i asked maggie to bring some of the garments over to my office in los angeles. so the meeti

>> first off, i would like to really thank our inspectors reardon and duffy. when i had some situations for both housing and store fronts that were vacant how quickly they got out there, issued the citations, did the inspections. unfortunately the residential has been progressing to renovation and use. store front not yet. i was intrigued when you had page 6 with that slide how effective supervisor fewer's outreach to citizens was. and so when we see something like that, that is so incredibly successful. i know every supervisor would like this problem abated in their district, how proactive are we being in relaying those statistics to all the supervisors so they can make -- >> they all know about the program with the richmond district. 40 properties were already on the list. 28 properties were invalid addresses and we had 87 new complaints created. so far we visited 40 properties and we found another duplicate. >> okay. the graph is really compelling. it's a fascinating -- >> she got together with neighbors, concerned neighbors association and they canvassed he

i would argue that these -- there's more continuity than change between these two eras, at least in the sense that there's no sharp break in terms of protest tactics, in terms of issues, et cetera. i think we tend to look at the '60s that way for a few reasons, and one of those is that people really like simple binaries and are attracted to these kind of easy narratives that they can plot. and a second reason why i think that's true is, at least in the united states' case, it gets very overshadowed by the political wings of 1968 sort of messaging a shift towards a more conservative era and i think we sort of read that also into what's going on in sort of everyday protests in the streets of the united states to a higher degree than we should. i would say that if anything, protesters are gaining momentum by 1968 and perhaps drawing on a greater multiplicity of tools by that point. >> i would like to add that with respect to the civil rights movement, the black movement in its various phases, from civil rights to black power, that there may be a slight grain of truth in seeing a difference

so comfort which i would say. so close to in your i would i would say it's like anything. but that because it doesn't have a fixed it's like every note. goes to the new for me that. i wouldn't say much of in this particular i mean using a composer in france in his music we've been using use of such incredible mustering threads of course nice a little more being done of it from the caribbean. it would mean so. i think this time to make intermission for coffee. with bill's teeny. ok. let's have a just think of. a moment think of it if it is possible to keep a little bit edgy aborts look good you can little bit that you bought this like i mean again i because i mean it is it just has a little brilliance but i feel like a case of going out with a flair i just like not so much because it's so funny it's so instant i feel like if i go in in front of like you know i think that it's like i have a player first like the first but since i didn't understand it was like i saw that if he did live it i live with most i have little bit more moral you know. then you have to consume and also

>> i'm trying to help them out here. >> so i would -- is your testimony here saying you would agree to do that? >> yeah. let's get a permit for the rear stairs to get to the backyard. there is an issue on the roof deck, i told my client leave it alone, we have left it alone for years. they bring it up, we left it alone. i don't want to go down any promises for the roof deck but i haven't filed a complaint. there's no record for it. i've left that alone. but if they want to get a permit for the stairs off the deck, i absolutely support it. i wouldn't have stood up here and suggested it. >> but it's the appeal part equation. >> i won't be involved with any appeal of the stairs to the backyard off that deck as an interim solution. >> through the chair -- >> good afternoon, president and commissioners. my name is elizabeth gordon, it's my husband and i who are the next door neighbors and the complainant in this process. i think a memorandum of understanding is a great idea. if in fact some stairs could be worked out when that cat walk or bridge is removed, we would be comfortable if the st

i would like to encourage conversation. and you are the vice chair. if you would like to start, we will start with you. >> yes. i think we are really getting close to what we want to see here. but i think there are some needs that are outstanding still. please, jericho and, repeat what you said about homeless family subsidy. >> ok. -- please, chair cohen, please repeat what he said about homeless family subsidies. >> ok. >> i think what i would like to do is add to the pot instead. and in your original plan here, you did not include the family subsidies. i would like to add $450,000 a year to that. >> all right. please tell us why. >> i think there is an uneven boat that has been mentioned before and i mentioned it before in committee. this particular subset of people are especially vulnerable because they have children. most of them have school-aged children. and so i think that it still needed to have $1 million for the seniors and people with disabilities, and i think because there is this great need, and we have seen that and heard that today and t

i would say, david, it is a team sport. sn't all about me on the performance of our company, but i am really proud of what our team has been able to accomplish over the last five years, six years. i'm in my sixth year as ceo. david: when you walk into shareholders' meetings, do they give you a standing ovation? they must be pretty happy. marillyn: we have some happy shareholders, yes, but they always keep a bead on us to make sure we are constantly creating value, so it is what have you done for me lately? [laughter] david: ok. during the transition of the president of the united states, donald trump sent out a tweet saying that your biggest product, the f-35, was too expensive. and i think you were out of the country at the time? marillyn: i was. i was in israel where we were delivering their first two f-35's. [laughter] david: so what was your reaction to the president of the united states tweeting that you were charging the u.s. government too much? marillyn: first of all, we needed to get those aircrafts delivered. one o

have asked me six years ago, would you sit in a room with the opera symphony, i would say no, why would we? but today, i've been in a room with them over three years, and we're talking about the same thing. it's how do we make our city together. that's why i'm really excited with the 2.5 million we're setting aside to be reactionary to the current needs of our city. thank you very much. >> -- as often, the role of art and community art, and that's why this is very important to have this type of funding, so that our communities can have a space and have resources to tell our stories, to share ideas, to have conversations about the issues that impact our community. so really about democratizing our resources. second as a cultural district representative, this funding can help the community efforts, the real grassroots efforts that many of our cultural districts have been, you know, coming up with to address in a holistic measures, our employment issues, our health issues, our housing issues, and other issues. so we really support this and hope that you'll do your part in

i would start with you. i want to let you know how much i appreciate the working relationship that you and i have had in your capacity here on the appropriations committee in the united states senate. as well as your work on the omb and i appreciate the responses you gave to me in both capacities. thee thoughtful and articulate way that yous communicated with me about responses and the lack of partisanship and issues that we were dealing with was clearly dplon straight demonstrated to me. i'm grateful for your approach and the way you conducted your work. my observation about the hearing today on your nomination reminds megi of the first piece of legislation that ien introduceds a united states senator related to a financial services and banking. and that's what among other things the belief that this entity should bee governed by board while there seems to be relish in having the opportunith to question you as a potential director of the consumer financial protection bureau, maybe we would enjoy it if we had

am sorry she would say. my baby, i am sorry. i would melt in her embrace longing to be hell. whether she was holding me closer harming me, there is no explanation for her reaction. i simply nestle closely to her kindness when it was available and obeyed her when it wasn't. she was my mother. as a child, i needed her. she was beautiful and passiona passionate, and over and over i found it easy to forgive her. on some level, even then i understood she love me the best she could. a child who never knows what will happen next will find some way, anyway to fleet the moment of trauma and pain. i remember sitting in the corner of the cave when they would hold their rituals by firelight. i would climb onto the stone table has their costumes and headstones. i kept my eyes on the glow of the fire. focusing on this. i was thinking asleep and my heirs became cushion or protection from the sound. as my mother and leader fell deep their eyes closed and voices hushed. i too began to disappear. in my mind i began to rise up out of my body and look down on myself so that i was no longer feelin

if something is notable or high level i might be involved but it would be rare if never that i would typically get out there and conduct interviews. first of all, second, you mentioned the use of the word impeachment. it was used in the context of my not knowing what this would lead to. i was not prejudging impeachment. when i used that term it was saying --. >> oh, agent strzok, please. >> are you kidding? >> the chair recognizes the gentleman from missouri. > thank you, m chairman. special agent strzok i continue to be amazed at my colleagues in the majority are more interested in your text messages than about the leader of the free world doing everything possible to undermine the western alliance. it just amazes me special agent, strzok, as a counterintelligence special know all too well the pervasive, constant, and growing danger nah that the russian federation poses to this country. our allies and democracy in general. itas paling my colleagues in the majority continue to 2016 election while the president does more damage in the western, to the western alliance than the sum total

i would just like to acknowledge charlotte again. the chief of protocol. ow, the other day i overheard a conversation between mayor willie brown and mayor -- the mayor of san jose. willie brown -- norman said, i have an airport named after me and willie brown said, i have a bridge named after me. charlotte has topped them all. she has the stairs on the rotunda of san francisco city hall named after her. how cool is that? also, since i am giving out some thanks. we should give great thanks to mark chandler. the director of international trade. without him, our sister cities would not be able to function. mark, thank you. and then, again, as the mayor said, the right hand man the does all the hard work, matthew. thank you. [applause] you know, i am so honored to represent the 19 sister cities that san francisco has. excuse me. as the mayor said, i am the cochair of the san francisco city association. the cochair with me is kathleen. [applause] and the heart and soul of the sister city, the hardest working person, the most important person is our executive dir

i think that to remove it would be very cruel. i think it's an example if you remove it, it would be an example of ageism and prejudice against the disabled. so, you are -- it's a trade off here between a maintaining of stops and the speed of the l ter aville. this can be remedies by providing more trains on the line. basically, the speed has not changed significantly at all. so, it's very important to keep this stop and i speak this as my experience as a social worker, who has worked with the aged and disabled. again, i have to underline it to remove the stop would be very cruel. you would have it on our your conscience, thank you. >> thank you, intentio next spe. >> and rachel highden is the last person to submit a speaker card on this topic. >> again, the environmental net to file was not available here. i am starting to wonder if staff is trying to hide these things. there was some sort of general plan referral to the planning department, i'm not sure what triggered that and that reference note to file. the time saving from eli

and they would say terrible things to me. i was only 3. and they would tell me the things. mean, it was too much for my mind to handle. and then they would make me watch the trials. she need to know, it was little girls like this. >> sean: on tv? >> yeah, the trial. so that split me emotionally, deeply. it was a horror to me. it still is a horror to me. >> sean: a lot of evil in the world. >> that's what i was going to tell you, sean, but you were going through this trash. i love you, sean. >> sean: i want you to tell your story. >> i go outside now, i was so scared to go outside, what everyone thinks of my race. i live on an island where it's all brown people. hell, you know. my daughter says every day people come in and they are like we know who your mom is, all these things liken that. i go out on the street and people just rush up to me to tell me they love me and don't think what happened was balanced to the other people that do worse things and say mean things that aren't political, but just mean. and i will tell you, it blew my mind, and i have never felt this kind of

i would just turn up at people's houses. because i was young and enthusiastic, they generally took pity on me. david: you decided to start a record company. where did you get that idea from, and where does the name virgin come from? why not branson? richard: i was 15 years old, 16 years old -- we were sitting in the basement with a bunch of girls. we were throwing out ideas. we got down to either slipped disc records, or virgin. one of the girls laughed and said, we are all virgins, you are a virgin at business, why don't you call it virgin? david: did she get a finders fee or not? richard i would be delighted to : give her one. it is very fortunate because we have gone into so many sectors. slipped disc airlines -- david: you started a record company, and initially it is a retailer, right? richard: we sold records much cheaper than anyone else had done. there was a mail order strike for six weeks, so we went looking for a very cheap music store on oxford street. david: then you started filling virgin megastore's. you have a

i. love that r.c.s. for people would like your kids we love. the look i must most of them put up another team too so i'm looking. for you got to be making a study and to be able to prosecute a few. so . yes. thank you. about the nice long course of. the whole thing. if i mean. i had to throw something from cialis. for a magazine to sign. the real gavel the total cost. of own bus tour it is. no longer a part of course like a new home. sales model of the street but i would have the key say i want to fulfill our knowledge of the muscle mass and. the standing but over the meek a more plaintiff. in the south of those who for the most glimpse of a minister for the arts and while all. this in the past still a full us if we are who are looking you are holding off on for example smile. a little said so much of the market michel garlic will look. like some and the way that we love is first lot of things on the lamb but get along with us or with a little in a little tea but i sew on the principle of what i said with a little bit and then more telling for y

>> i guess i would fundamentally disagree. i think the intentions were correct in that the statute worked valiantly to get enacted. these political activities that occurred in my opinion the commission has not been effective. >> thank you mr. chairman. there are so many questions and loose ends. how much money have you spent on restoration in puerto rico? >> we are in the process of about $6 billion. >> do you believe -- and i've been there i believe the distribution system is in better shape now than it was before the hurricane? >> we put the equipment on where the fundamental design has not changed. >> $6 billion, and we have recently announced a -- >> some of it is yet to b has ye spent with its allocated on some of the work that was noted earlier. .. >> that you create losses in the system which creates inefficiencies from economic standpoint to drive the cost up. >> you are making investment. >> we have not made investments in a generation that is part developed and submitted to take advantage of the 2 billion-dollar fundi