i.o.c. have a different sort of standard this isn't a legal definitive yes we have rory this is what happened we've got photos we've got cameras we can see people doing their bit this is all about exactly the idea is that effectively all different layers where they've looked at the balance of probability and started to go and put it together and that's where they say the presumption of guilt is the point here and that's what we are going to explain here . four years ago there was skepticism that russia's first winter olympics would go without a hitch due mongers predicted not enough flights not enough hotels and not enough snow concerns about socially squaller in sochi double toilets and missing door handles the water came out of the tower problem with the door of the house skaters went so well even critics had to admit they were it we think of an amazing it's running like clockwork and everything's just going really really well as i'm been really impressed and everything rush is on so far so much to care about. so far well organized and the people are really friendly here and having a good t

saying that infamous sample swapping system has finally been replicated but questions remain the i.o.c. standard of proof is not beyond any reasonable doubt but rather the balance of probability the presumption of guilt is enough it was rajan called who was the original and only source of so-called proof against russian fleets this evidence has been grossly overvalued we can see we are seeing the result of a proper legal process it's a question of faith to believe broaching court or not it looks more like a religious inquisition. west than full bottles had no visible scratches they were presumed tempered with as the russians must have perfected their technique and left no marks and no argument basis for an on mass ban to clean condemned without any guilt no presumption of innocence or team russia what we see here is actually a violation of the olympic charter which is. which stands against political national racial discrimination so it appears that in the name of protecting clean athletes they are actually taking away the rights of russian clean athletes and in my opinion the mclaren accusations

saying that infamous sample swapping system has finally been replicated but questions remain the i.o.c. standard of proof is not to be on the balance of probability the presumption of guilt is enough it was logic of who was the original and only source of so-called proof against russian fleets this evidence has been grossly overvalued we can see we'll see to believe roche in court or not this looks more like a religious inquisition was had no visible scratches on mass than to clean condemned without any guilt no presumption of innocence or team russia what we see here is actually a violation of the olympic charter which is. which stands against political national racial discrimination so it appears that in the name of protecting clean athletes they are actually taking away the rights of russian clean athletes and in my opinion the mclaren accusations are unfounded and they are very politically biased. surely any athlete should be denied a medal and banned from competition if he or she cheats it undermines others' lifetime's work as does abound slapped on the innocent who are simply presumed guil

saying that infamous sample swapping system has finally been replicated but questions remain the i.o.c. standard of proof is not beyond any reasonable doubt but rather the balance of probability the presumption of guilt is enough it was logic of who was the original and only source the so-called proof against russian fleets this evidence has been grossly overvalued we can see we are seeing the result of a proper legal process it's a question of faith to believe broaching court or not is looks more like a religious inquisition was less than full bottles had no visible scratches they were presumed tampered with as the russians must have perfected their technique and left no marks and no argument basis for an on mass ban to clean condemned without any guilt no presumption of innocence for team russia what we see here is actually a violation of the olympic charter which is. which stands against political national racial discrimination so it appears that in the name of protecting clean athletes they are actually taking away the rights of russian clean athletes and in my opinion the mclaren accusation

saying that infamous sample swapping system has finally been replicated but questions remain the i.o.c. standard of proof is not beyond any reasonable doubt but rather the balance of probability the presumption of guilt is enough it was rajan called who was the original and only source of so-called proof against russian fleets this evidence has been grossly overvalued we can see we are seeing the result of a proper legal process it's a question of faith to believe broaching court or not it looks more like a religious inquisition. less than full bottles had no visible scratches they were presumed tampered with as the russians must have perfected their technique and left no marks and no argument basis for an on mass ban to clean condemned without any guilt no presumption of innocence for team russia what we see here is actually a violation of the olympic charter which is. which stands against political national racial discrimination so it appears that in the name of protecting clean athletes they are actually taking away the rights of russian clean athletes and in my opinion the mclaren accusation

saying that infamous sample swapping system has finally been replicated but questions remain the i.o.c. standard of proof is not beyond any reasonable doubt but rather the balance of probability the presumption of guilt is enough it was logic of who was the original and only source of so-called proof against russian fleets this evidence has been grossly overvalued we can see we are seeing the results of a proper legal process it's a question of faith to believe broaching course or not is looks more like a religious inquisition. questionable bottles have no visible scratches they were presumed tampered with as the russians must have perfected their technique and left no marks and no argument basis for an on mass ban the cane condemned without any guilt no presumption of innocence for team russia what we see here is actually a violation of the olympic charter which is. which stands against political national racial discrimination so it appears that in the name of protecting clean athletes they are actually taking away the rights of russian clean athletes and in my opinion the mclaren accusations a

follow up with that decision why do you think there are two standards here the question many many will be asking and the certainly the both the i.o.c. and the i.p.c. have made very stringent demands of the russians or the russian olympic committee the paralympic committee as to what exactly they have to change for these bans and suspensions to be lifted i believe they were around twenty criteria the russian authorities met eighteen out of them they were formed the whole doping testing process they were formed a sort of a loud international actors to come in and participate in these testing schemes they made doping a criminal offense punishable by have to find by jail time as well they couldn't meet the final two because one of the conditions of water as far as i understand it perhaps correct me if i'm wrong i'll involve them actually acknowledging that there was a program which they refused to do because they of course the know this. now it seems in a way that whatever russia does is never enough. this presumption of innocence until proven guilty. due to this lack of evidence that as you say wouldn't perhaps start up in a court of