their willingness to allow for iaea inspectors to go in to that site? >> what i'd like is for your permission to leave any of the specific details of where we are in the negotiations including what they've expressed a willingness to do and not do to a classified briefing which we will be happy to bring you up to date. >> i think it's very important for the united states to understand exactly what will be the level of intrusiveness into each one of the sites. and finally, although there are so many things that we can talk about here, it has been reported that saudi arabia and jordan are interested in pursuing nuclear cooperation agreements with the united states. how will we be able to convince those countries to agree not to demand the right to enrich uranium as part of those agreements if we allow iran to continue to maintain its enrichment capability as part of a final agreement? and i put that in the context of the 123 agreement and the chairman already referred to this, the 123 agreement with the united arab emirates, which again i thought was a mis

their willingness to allow for iaea inspectors to go in to that site? is for your permission to leave any of the specific details of where we are in the negotiations including what they've expressed a willingness to do and not do to a classified briefing which we'll be happy to pri. >> i think it's very important for the united states to understand exactly what will be the level of intrusiveness into each one of the sites. and finally although there are so many things that we can talk about here it has been reported that saudi arabia and jordan are interested in pursuing nuclear cooperation agreements with the united states. how will we be able to convince those countries to agree not to demand the right to enrich uranium as part of those agreements if we allow iran to continue to maintain its enrichment capability as part of a final agreement? and i put that in the context of the 123 agreement and the chairman already referred to this, the 123 agreement with the united arab emirates, which again i thought was a mistake. as i think a mistake would be ma

and even though they're assuring the iaea that they are not taking it any more, they are not taking it past 5% enrichment people that know about the enrichment process know it's not that much of a step to go from 5% to 90%, have weapons-grade uranium that can be used for bombs. i think my friend, joel rosenberg, in his all-too realistic nofble -- novel, previously depicted iran as developing enough nuclear materiel to use, not just in one bomb, they wanted enough to use in several bombs so that when they got to that point in a secret facility in -- that even the iaea u.s., others didn't know about, according to the novel, they were able to prepare nuclear weapons, multiple nuclear weapons at the same time and immediately ship them out in different directions so that anyone trying to stop their nukes once developed would have to worry that if they attacked the -- if they attacked iran to stop their nuclear weapons they had several that would be unlikely they would get them all and that would mean that nukes would probably show up in israel and the united states. seems pretty realistic.

their willingness to allow for iaea inspectors to go in to that site?> what i'd like is for your permission to leave any of the specific details of where we are in the negotiations including what they've expressed a willingness to do and not do to a classified briefing which we will be happy to bring you up to date. >> i think it's very important for the united states to understand exactly what will be the level of intrusiveness into each one of the sites. and finally, although there are so many things that we can talk about here, it has been reported that saudi arabia and jordan are interested in pursuing nuclear cooperation agreements with the united states. how will we be able to convince those countries to agree not to demand the right to enrich uranium as part of those agreements if we allow iran to continue to maintain its enrichment capability as part of a final agreement? and i put that in the context of the 123 agreement and the chairman already referred to this, the 123 agreement with the united arab emirates, which again i thought was a mista

there will be an extensive iaea safeguard to ensure that there is no diversion. for the duration, we will have enhanced monitoring and access. that will allow us to understand better than ever before every note, every cranny, every person every place every document involved, so even beyond the duration, that knowledge will give us much greater ability to detect whether they are trying in any fashion to breakout. at the end of whatever the duration is, we retain the capacity we have today to take action if they do something that threatens our security. we will be no worse off, and indeed we will be infinitely better off, even the knowledge we will accumulate over time about their program. the idea that iran would be treated at the end of this kind of agreement as a non-nuclear weapons state was one that was first advanced by the previous administration. indeed, our partners around the world, and this goes to what senator flake said a moment ago -- the purpose of the sanctions has been to get iran to the table in order to negotiate something that gives the internat

about the iranian nuclear program of which they have lied for more than a decade according to the iaeaut how the american plan to engage them and negotiations for two years has not really borne a lot of fruit. that's indisputable. >> jeremy in this country you know if obama's for it i'm against it. if obama's against it i'm for it. all of a sudden now israel becomes an issue like so many others where people dig in and in a partisan realm. that's what i'm trying to express. >> i think you're right. that's the problem here. this is a cynical political ploy manufactured by don dermer two weeks before his election and kneecap the president of the united states in a domestic political sense here in the united states. and it doesn't play to israel's long term interests, in the face of all of the threats that the rabbi is correct are out there, whether it's iran whether it's the islamic state, other forms of islamic extremism, israel is under threat and its greatest ally and security interest is maintaining the u.s./israel relationship on a bipartisan basis and playing politics like this here

but most laws are not be made in a longer by congress or by the nlrb, sec, iaea ftc the officer production production management peabody revealing tidily says that an exclamation point. the other late in executive agencies in scare quotes. how well lawyers know this to be the case. to keep up with contemporary lot is the ruling of agencies that have cheaply to study how plainly it reflects in the enormous growth of the executive branch of government which is no longer simply executive but legislative and judicial as well in comparison with the other two branches. indeed, most important laws passed by congress have been lost to give up more sovereign powers to one or another agency largely outside of its control. end quote wolof. herbert description of the affordable care out for the dodd-frank law. let's not have any banks fail anymore. over to you agencies to figure out how. what is again distinctive about her and appreciation which is now widely perceived and talked about is he didn't reduce this as their friends at the federal society like to do to the decay of the non-delegation doctri

the iaea in it's november 2014 report reported that.nd the state department when asked the iranian regime about it iran then stopped feeding those sentrycentrifuges essentially an admission they've violated the interim agreement. my question is if they can't even abide by the terms of the interim agreement and freeze centrifuge activity, why would we believe they would honor longer term agreement? >> i don't think they can be trusted. and i don't think they will be. and i think the world -- my mother used to say, rue the day when they get ahold of those nukes. good to see both of you. thanks for being with us. >>> coming up tonight next here on "hannity". >> all right. so i got my swimming pool, i got my cereal and i'm going to put, um, you know, some milks in there. >> some milks and cereal and eat it in a bathtub. that woman was just chosen by the white house to interview president obama earlier today. and we're not kidding. that's coming up next. and later it's the story that mainstream media is ignoring. the "new york times" is repo

." >> what we saw earlier on in the morning wasn't and expect to announce that from the iaea. making it clear that back in the future we're going to see a degradation of output from non-opec suppliers. we started this pogrom 43 minutes ago oil was trading up around 1%. since then we are in the upside quite nicely. 2.6% for the nineymex contract. quite a closing of the gap. >> the gloom of following oil prices for bp is up over the last two months. what does it mean for bp? a u.s. judge has ruled that during the gulf of x co. rig disaster more all has built them believed. we will hear more from caroline. how much could bp have to pay? to settle it out with the u.s. government? >> about a quart or less than had been feared. $13.7 billion is the maximum amount it could be fined next week. but that in perspective. that is bigger than the entire market capitalization of [indiscernible] it is still a record fine. it is a quarter less than the u.s. government was pitching for. according to the judge it was a quarter less oil spilled into the sea during the 2010 oil spill. about 3.2 m

know this, and y'all have shared this with us in all kinds of meetings, they still are stiff-arming iaea relative to access to many of their facilities, which obviously continues to cause us to have great concerns about their trustworthiness. i think all of us know they are destabilizing the region. we watch what happened in yemen, hezbollah and iran. we watch what's happening with hamas. we know they are even with the minor amounts of money that has been lessened from the sanctions regime that senator menendez and senator kirk and all of us work together to put in place, even with that minor amount of money, we know that that has enhanced their ability to destabilize the region. we know that. you can imagine if we end up with a really bad deal that ends up creating a nuclear arms race in the region and makes the world less safe and yet much more money is released, they can even destabilize the region more. so obviously there's significant concerns. i'm proposing some legislation and i look forward to hearing from y'all today. we're vetting it with people on this committee that builds of

many disagree, including a former iaea official who says it appears that the prod of centrifuge components continues. no nuclear componente been installed, but it does not mean that the production of those came to a halt. for over a decade, the united states along with the rest of the u.n. security council has triebut failed to reach a deal with tehran on its nuclear weapon program. iran has defiantly marched toward developing nuclear weapons by refusing to negotiate with the united states in good faith. instead, its leaders have continued to cl for the destruction of israel and the destruction of the unes. now isn't that lovely. just as november in t of nuclear negotiations the iranian revolutionary guard corps released this statement. the united statess still the great satan and number enemy of islamic revolution and islamic republic and the islamic iranian nation. iran's actions over ths are not surprising. after all it is the world's largest state-sponsor of terrorism. using both its military and proxy hezz bowla, iran has -- hezbollah, iran has planned attacks around e world. hezbolla

these are verification measures that can be implemented by the iaea by an independent body of expertsto canberra fight that iran is living up to its promises and the president has said if iran does fail to live up to those commitments we will be in a place where we could slap sanctions back into place quickly to continue to ramp up the pressure on iran if they don't live up to the terms of agreement. congress will have a role to play but only after iran has clearly demonstrated its following through on its commitments in key parts of its nuclear structure. >> lastly the keystone bill passed through its last major hurdle in assigning committee today. as the white house have a reaction to that? >> our opposition on the keystone legislation is well-known and if in fact the legislation that passed the house also passes the senate president won't sign it. >> will veto it. >> that's correct. >> josh getting back to the homeland security budget continuing resolution that is going to expire by the end of february obviously republicans insisted on that as a form of leverage in the hopes that t

nuclear facilities and it has backed away from demanding full iranian cooperation with the ongoing iaea investigation into the possible military dimensions of its program. obtaining substantial sanctions really five minutes and make you come from the -- sanctions of the only reason that iran came to the table in the 1st place, and many of them were imposed over the objections of the administration. thanks to sanctions relief iran has increased its oil exports from 1 million barrels a day before the november 13 2013 interim agreement to about 1.4 million barrels a day and that has added about $10 million $10 billion to the iranian annual oil revenue. the economy growing estimated 4.6% at the beginning of the 1st quarter of the calendar year, and is the 1st time it has grown after shrinking the last two years under sections. it has reduced the incentives to negotiate in good faith and increased its willingness to engage in open and the diplomacy will continuing while continuing to advance nuclear program through research and development. congress can help to remedy the situation by puttin

to date, as the iaea continues to confirm, iran has made good on the commitments it has made under the interim agreement. going forward, if the power center changed as we've made very clear iran, if it violated the agreement in any fashion, would be subject to an intense reaction from us, and as the under secretary said, if we are able to preserve the unity of the international coalition you pointed out the beginning of your remarks, that would give us a much greater ability to respond effectively to any decision by iran to violate the commitments that it makes. >> thank you very much. >> senator rubio? >> secretary bullington, much of the debate has been about the role of congress and our need to trust and the ability of the administration to craft a good deal and the fact that we would be consulted. i want to take you back to the last time you were before this committee, and i asked you a question about whether there would be any changes in cuba policy. your answer -- "anything in the future that might be done in cuba would be done in full consultation with of this committee.' you to