what exactly did the iaea find? damaging in what way?>> the critical time before the march 24th deadline for a political agreement. so hence of course is not going to be good news for the negotiation. >> and what the iaea is saying is we can't get full transparency from iran correct? we're being stonewalled, not getting the answer he we're looking for? >> correct but there is a caveat and this is a caveat. this is a possible military dimension issues of pmds. >> pmds mean what? >> possible military dimensions. they predate these negotiation is. these are 2003 and before and they were brought up constantly throughout these years but what it requires for this access to happen for the iaea to happen for access to the iranian program, there needs to be a deal first to provide the mechanisms for the iaea to enter these sites. currently the iaea does have unprecedented access to the nuclear facilities. but what they're asking for is going beyond what is agreeable on any international agreement. >> what you're saying is there's in a sense nothi

per my conversations with the iaea i know those concerns are there. i want to just turn to broadcasting reform to discuss that with you because i know in an exchange you had yesterday in the senate you expressed your frustration that our effort to confront russian propaganda is simply nowhere near where it ought to be. it's an area where mr. engel and i also share frustration on that. we know that putin is dominating the essential information battle on the ground. that's not -- that's -- but this isn't just about resources. it is also about what we can do with an initiative that, for the broadcasting board of governors, to overhaul that institution, and make it effective, myself and mr. engel put that bill in to the senate last year. we were not able to get it up and passed. and the question i wanted to ask was, for your assistance on the senate side, in getting our legislation through this year, so that we can get reform that this troubled agency needs, and get up and running with the type of broadcasting that you and i, i think, want to see to offse

>> i think the one way to prove either way is to get the iaea to go and inspect the site.it's an young ground facility run by the defense ministry. there are four hallways and they're doing uranium enrichment and research and development and there are a number of major organizations and entities and individuals within the iranian regime which we named that were involved in this activity. these are the same individuals that were involved in the operations in natan in known enrichment sites. >> i'm sorry to interrupt you, but do you fear this is an example of an infrastructure that you say iran has hidden from the world powers? >> absolutely. this is did he have -- we've been working on it for five years, compiling informations from different sources and we were confident that this underground facility is involved in research and development in a secret way. this is a clear violation of the joint plan of agreement. so i think the best way to do is to say this is not true and this is fake and all of that. tehran can prove us wrong by accepting the iaea to go and inspect the s

per my conversations with the iaea i know those concerns are there. i want to just turn to broadcasting reform to discuss that with you because i know in an exchange you had yesterday in the senate you expressed your frustration that our effort to confront russian propaganda is simply nowhere near where it ought to be. it's an area where mr. engel and i also share frustration on that. we know that putin is dominating the essential information battle on the ground. that's not -- that's -- but this isn't just about resources. it is also about what we can do with an initiative that for the broadcasting board of governors, to overhaul that institution, and make it effective, myself and mr. engel put that bill in to the senate last year. we were not able to get it up and passed. and the question i wanted to ask was, for your assistance on the senate side in getting our legislation through this year, so that we can gets reform that this troubled agency needs and get up and running with the type of broadcasting that you and i, i think, want to see to offset

the iaea has been engaged in it. they've made some progress. also had a lot of frustration with iran not coming fully clean. that's something we want to see move forward over the coming months. and i think -- keep in mind, even if there is an agreement the actual relief that would come to iran in terms of initially the suspension of sanctions and then ultimately the lifting, the repeal of sanctions. they will have to make good on their commitments up front. and i think one of the things we would expect to see is some resolution of the issues with the iaea. >> do you think it's problematic that netanyahu's coming to speak to congress? >> so let me say a couple of things about that. first, prime minister of israel is always welcome in the united states. to speak any place, any time. i think what's unfortunate here is the way this came about. and because of the way it came about, it turned it into a political issue. and the relationship with israel should not be a partisan or political issue. the fact of the matter is over the course of the last s

there will be extensive iaea safeguards that are very significant. and during the process and during the agreement itself, for however long it lasts what we will be learning about the program, every person involved, virtually, if not every nook and cranny, that base of knowledge will exist beyond the duration of the agreement. and then, of course, we would retain the same capacity and probably a greater capacity than we have now to deal with any efforts by iran to actually go to some kind of nuclear weapon. the bush administration put on the table the proposition that iran would be treated as a nonnuclear weapon state after it complied for some period of time with any agreement. and that's exactly what we're doing. that is the purpose of this very, very challenging exerce.is -- challenging exercise. is at some point in the future, having demonstrated that it's making good on its commitments iran would be treated as a nonnuclear weapon state. but it is going to have a -- we're going to have a knowledge of what's going on that far exceeds what we have

there will be extensive iaea safeguards that are very significant. and during the process and during the agreement itself, for however long it lasts what we will be learning about the program, every person involved, virtually, if not every nook and cranny, that base of knowledge will exist beyond the duration of the agreement. and then, of course, we would retain the same capacity and probably a greater capacity than we have now to deal with any efforts by iran to actually go to some kind of nuclear weapon. the bush administration put on the table the proposition that iran would be treated as a nonnuclear weapon state after it complied for some period of time with any agreement. and that's exactly what we're doing. that is the purpose of this very, very challenging exercise. at some point in the future, having demonstrated that it's making good on its commitments, iran would be treated as a nonnuclear weapon state. but it is going to have a -- we're going to have a knowledge of what's going on that far exceeds what we have now. and again, there will

there will be extensive iaea safeguards that are very significant. and during the process and during the agreement itself, for however long it lasts what we will be learning about the program, every person involved virtually, if not every nook and cranny, that base of knowledge will exist beyond the duration of the agreement. and then, of course, we would retain the same capacity and probably a greater capacity than we have now to deal with any efforts by iran to actually go to some kind of nuclear weapon. the bush administration put on the table the proposition that iran would be treated as a nonnuclear weapon state after it complied for some period of time with any agreement. and that's exactly what we're doing. that is the purpose of this very, very challenging exercise. at some point in the future, having demonstrated that it's making good on its commitments iran would be treated as a nonnuclear weapon state. but it is going to have a -- we're going to have a knowledge of what's going on that far exceeds what we have now. and again, there will be

treaties regimes, conventions, things like the role of the nonproliferation treaty, the work of the iaea the conventions on the suppression of acts of nuclear terrorism and the convention on the physical protection of nuclear materials. counter-proliferation tends to be more unilateral, but they tend to be mow coercive, and the book, for example, cites the allied sabotage action during world war ii against hitler's heavy water reactor to interdictions on the high seas against shipments carrying wmd related materials 0 to mow recent allegations in the press of attempts as sabotage, like the virus reported. a second topic of the book is the lessons of of escalation between nuclear weapons powers. the atomic bomb is not new and there have been multiple instances it could have been used and the book goes the thinking and planning into the doctrine's of massive retaliation, flexible response, and considers how the capability of countries in terms of defense capabilities, the reputations the governments have for using those capabilities and the public statements threats and warnings of defense

and, on the iaea we are negotiating for the appropriate standards and process that the iaea needs to be able to annals appropriate questions. that's a critical part of compliance with any npt country. there is a process, as you know that's required to achieve that. >> new jersey chairman of the subcommittee? >> thank you very much, mr. secretary. i want to thank you for your service and your leadership. i certainly like the yugs of your phrase race to the top. we co-chaired that hearing just three weeks ago. we were all concerned about her welfare and well being going back and, of course she was arrested when she went back for speaking the truth. on friday, her case and that of all the disdents hopefully will be front and center. it has to with. also, a couple of years ago, i chair 49 hearings on human rights abuses in china. i can't even get a visa to go there anymore. we had five daughters who testified all of whom their fathers are political, democracy prisoners. and one of them -- all of them in unison as the hearing went on, asked to meet with president obama. they said he has t

negotiated in a very painstaking way to make sure that the rest of the international community have for the iaea, the kind of access that we need. you know, i think that there has been some sort of progress. charlie: tell me about the rivalry between saudi arabia and iran. obviously, two different branches of islam. two powers. one has cultural heritage. and they are essentially enemies. competitors, i believe. bill: there is a sunni and shia dimension and a persian and arab dimension that ad slayers of complication. charlie: but it's a competition to have the most influence in the region? bill: i think that's right. i think there has been a wider influence if not hegemony in the region. they see that as threatening and it's true of a lot of our other partners in the gulf. i think that kind of rivalry will be with us and the region for some time to come. however, the issue of the nuclear question is resolved. ♪ charlie: is there difference in terms of where the iranians are or is it safely how they measure the threat to them? bill: in terms of the analysis over the last few years, very intense c

and because it is so -- because a covert facility is the way they are likely to go, iaea inspectors havebe able to go anywhere they want. charlie: so the thought is, we don't have a deal. we don't get the deal but we get some kind of agreement. mike: here's the problem. i don't know to what extent people have thought about the implications of no deal. what happens? from the iranian perspective they unfreeze everything that they froze. what do we do? the sanctions never came off. a few of them came off. i would put those back on. do we put more sanctions on them? do we do anything else? do the israelis do anything? i don't think anybody's thought through the implications of no deal. better start doing that. charlie: so you already believe they could build a weapon. mike: if they want to, yes. charlie: so you don't have an interim agreement. you have no agreement. they start building. how long is the so-called breakout time? a month? mike: it depends. my analysts used to look at the declared facilities, look at the state of the declared facilities, how many centrifuges, what kind, how much

you iaea egypt and jordan opt in with their militaries because their people were attack recently withhe pilot set on fire jordanian pilot and 21 coptic christian egyptians. outside of that he has to build a coalition. i thought it was interesting. yesterday's speech not really different from todays except at the part at the end he took a long big pregnant cause, in closing i like to speak to the painful truth. most americans see muslims only in the news and it's a very bad news cycle. we have to remember young muslims among us, people doctors, people in businesses, educate americans what it is like to have diversity as communities. i'm here as tan as ever, tell you we get it. for him to end on that i thought it was interesting. is hoping to build the coalition by making rest of the world think he is trying to educate us how to love them? it was an interesting place to end. that is great question for you, kirsten. >> i asked you, you earlier said you are conflicted how the administration is handling that, how so? >> i am essentially with them but i take the point you need to identify t

netanyahu opened his cabinet meeting saying he was shocked negotiations were continuing in the wake of the iaeaion. russia announced it plans to sell iran antiaircraft missiles after canceling an agreement to sell powerful missiles to iran after start of nuclear talks. >>> a young girl possibly no more than 10 years old blew herself up at a busy market in northeastern nigeria sunday. four people killed and 46 others seriously hurt. no group has claimed responsibility. similar attacks have been sponsored by boko haram. >>> next a house that sits in two states is now owned by two different people who do not get along. ♪ nineteen years ago, we thought "wow, how is there no way to tell the good from the bad?" so we gave people the power of the review. and now angie's list is revolutionizing local service again. you can easily buy and schedule services from top-rated providers. conveniently stay up to date on progress. and effortlessly turn your photos into finished projects with our angie's list app. visit angieslist.com today. ♪ meet the world's newest energy superpower. surprised? in fact, americ

they're not complying with the iaea, and yet5pçg we are changing our behavior vis-a-vis iran in orderill make a very cogent argument against this deal. the same way that we've seen law makers again on both sides of the politicalvÑ aisle make the same very strong case. >> thank you fordih insights on this with perspective on it. >> absolutely. >> we will see this in living color next week. >> yeah it should -- >> it should be quite an event. thank you. >> of course. >>> all right remember the beautiful í14gddpearl-covered calvin klein dress worn by lupita nyong'o, it was óld-q' by pretty stupid thieves=u5 apparently. they returned it. get this tmz is reporting the thieves tried to sell the dress but they were unsuccessful because, get why, the pearls were fakes. so, they actually brought it back to the hotel. brilliant. police still searching for whoever took the oscar winner's dress, kelly. >> wow. >>> and tonight on fox business network, jamie covey learns about thee inheritance that a rock n.cht rock 'n' roll legend left his sons. ♪ from you i should ♪ >> i'm crying. okay? ♪ i pray

iranians would be a very invasive and thorough surveillance and inspection capability on the part of iaea. i think that will be requisite to any kind of agreement. we have, i think, a reasonably capable intelligence capability, but i wouldn't want to rely on it only for verification. senator kaine: i agree with the last point you made. i would look at any final deal in analyzing its content and determining whether i supported it. the degree of inspections is how we guarantee to know if there is a problem. you indicated that your intel suggests iran is looking at the negotiation as separate from the whole question of iranian bellicosity. my sense is there is at least one connection between the two. this bears on my analysis of any deal. he needed if reached would involve sanctions relief to iran. --from what i have heard, some of the sanctions relief may have allowed them to invest more heavily in agents that are destabilizing governments outside of their own borders. as we look at any deal, if there is such a deal, there could be a connection between the deal and iranian bill cassidy. --

with the iranians would be a very into basis and federal surveillance and inspection capability of iaea. i think that would be requisite to any kind of agreement. we have i think a reasonably capable intelligence capability like i wouldn't want to rely on it only for verification. that, in fact the terms of the agreement were being lived up to. >> director clapper, i agree with the last point you made. as i would look at any final deal if one is reached in analyzing its content and determine whether i support it or not the degree of inspections to me is a key factor because that combined with existing intel is our guarantee of an ability to know if there's going to be a problem and take appropriate action target and appropriate action to eliminate the problem. you indicated in earlier testimony that your intel suggests that iran is looking at the nuclear negotiation as sort of separate from this whole question of iranian bellicosity and adventurism in the region, these are sort separate items. my sense is that at least one connection between the two and this also their so my analysis of

chip which in owe is administered through -- which in iaea isowe so administered through comid.see a family doctor preventing a costly ambulance ride in emergency room visit. chip means a bunch of things. it means vaccines, it means shots. it means dental coverage. it means better treatment if kids get sick and think about this. it is not just the heblg. it means they do better in school. they miss fewer days in school, so they don't fall behind their classmates who have better insurance perhaps. it means that they perform better in school because they feel better. we all know the stories of hungry children or sick children in the classroom simply can't focus on what they need to dovment chip means children will get the health care they need to become healthy active adults. we know that the current chip program today's 2015 version of chip works not just in the number of insured under the program but because of the flexibility it provides states, the quality of care children receive. ohio's conservative republican governor supports chip. it is called healthy start in ohio becaus

and i think one of the things we would expect to see is some resolution of the issues with the iaea. >> do you think it's problematic that netanyahu's coming to speak to congress? >> so let me say a couple of things about that. first, prime minister of israel is always welcome in the united states. to speak any place, any time. i think what's unfortunate here is the way this came about. and because of the way it came about, it turned it into a political issue.