what we found is the iaea in the last 15 years has developed routines for serving up those tips from national intelligence, including from the united states, and acting on those tips, going and looking at the site and egg what exactly is going on, while not advertising exactly who they got it from and how. so it is a kind of solution to this dilemma are how to share this kind of information wow giving away the store in terms of intelligence collection. there's relatively regular news stories about the u.s. deciding to share or not share information with the iaea about, say, iranian alleged noncompliance with the joint comprehend plan of action, the deal that it signed with the u.s. and other countries under the obama administration. the bad news that we found in our research is that this information, because it is so insightful and interesting, is a source of power. if the united states doesn't want to facilitate the iaea scrutinizing a country's program it doesn't provide that information. so what you 2010 is a kind of selectivity, which the glass is half full. well, know he more th

if the united states does not want to facilitate the iaea, it does not give the information. so it is selectivity. on the bright side, the glass is half full, and we know more than if we didn't have the group, but those countries that have the intelligence and the resources can choose who to provide it to, and about. and so one of the issues i want to bring to the table is that despite the social sciences on the 75th anniversary of the discovery and the application of this new technology, and the fusion of the new domain, science brings the technology of social and political imply case, butt is not pure science, and what we agree to and create the institutions that share the distribution of the technology and create soebl and political categories to help us to make sense and understand and manage the technology. and the political science perspective is particularly helpful, because it interjects power when you have information like intelligence and helps you the identify the spread of technology and who has it and what will they do it and when. and i am hoping this is going t

the european union, the russians, even the iaea, the nuclear watchdog authority, all believe the us isly mistaken in its current approach to the nuclear deal with iran which, of course, was struck by the 0bama administration amongst the other great powers with iran, and which donald trump 110w seems intent upon tearing up. well, let me offer that in the countries that i most often deal with — israel, the sunni gulf countries, saudi arabia, the emirates and others — there's no confusion at all. and in fact, they are greatly reassured by this administration's approach to iran, because they are living at the front line with the challenges that iran and its regional behaviour plays. from my interactions with the european union and western european countries, i would say that i have found great interest in trying to address some of the challenges of the iranian nuclear deal. surely what matters — if i may interrupt for a second — surely what matters most is the thinking in those partner countries that you did the deal with iran with. and of course, that is the europeans, the russians and to

this provides more insight than the iaea researchers looked at the conditions in which governments are willing to share the intelligence. on one hand they might want to say north korea has a nuclear site to develop nuclear weapons. on the other hand making it public makes it harder to gather the intelligence. now we know how you figured it out. we found is that in the last 1520 years we developed routines for receiving those tips including from the united states and seen what's going on. not advertising who they got it from her how they got it. it serves as a solution to the dilemma of how we can share the information that has implications for today. there's new stories about the u.s. sharing or not sharing information the bad news that we found is that this information, because it's so insightful and interesting as a source of power. if the united states doesn't want to scrutinize it doesn't provide the information. you get selectivity. but if the glass is half-empty the countries that have the resources can choose when to provide it to you to provide it to. a bigger lesson is in cont

there's also a comment about support to the iaea as well. that at least i think in many respects tempers what isn't, what is frankly something those expected in terms of not seeking ratification. the two other big issues on article six really get back to the change and emphasis on this npr and the lack of significant focus on further reductions or where the working to achieve zero, you know, with more emphasis on securing nuclear materials and making sure others don't continue with any terrorists or other development of nuclear weapons. so i am concerned about this but i think from a u.s. perspective the most important thing we can do is get that five year extension to new s.t.a.r.t. treaty. >> let me start by strong agreeing with metal that imports of extending the new s.t.a.r.t. treaty and then that should be an easy, straightforward decision for the trump administration. it should be a priority the united states has benefited not only from the reductions that we would have an russian strategic forces without a treaty but from the data exc

the eye a -- the iaea report is notable because there is a shortage of information in terms of who is between the bulls and the bears. i recommend you read the latest gadfly article on the bloomberg. julian says opec's oil price nightmare is already coming true. side, itn the demand has yet to been serialized. am a supply side, extra oil is coming back online. other markets where watching, a mixed picture but overall, asian equity sessions, still pushing on with strength. the asia-pacific index, higher. old is makingand gains. that is all we have for this edition of bloomberg markets. this is bloomberg. ♪ >> the following is a paid program. the opinions expressed do not represent bloomberg. >> are you ready to break up with your makeup? >> keep watching. can skincare system that break up -- in as little as seven days. results get better after 30 days. innovator. >> age spots, sunday mitch, splotches.

he is one of the high ranks of the reigning government and they were lying to the iaea and the world, they were eating the world with false information about what they were trying and they were very close to making a breakthrough toward a bomb. now can israel, and again, i don't think they were just about to pull the trigger if they had the red button but can israel allow itself to let a country that publicly calls for its destruction to have the means to deliver such annihilation. in that sense, and maybe the only case, i agree with the prime minister. >> i'm a graduate student. you were talking about the success of the targeted killing but those success stories are technical. in the grand scheme of things we still have the nuclear threat still on the doorstep, we still have terrorism in israel, is that in the conversation when they talk about targeted killings that maybe it's time to take a further step or maybe they're not as successful in the long term as we think they are. >> it depends who's discourse you are inquiring about. surprisingly at the heart of the discourse of defense

the more widespread adoption of enhanced iaea safe guards. the more rigorous enforcement of export control, sanctioning countries that break the rulings. doing that required a political quid pro quo between disarmament and nonproliferation. let me talk about implementing that practice. the first is efforts to abolish nuclear weapons can be led by the u.s. but can't to be done by the u.s. solely. the obama administration was absolutely willing to continue negotiations with further reductions with russia. the russians had no interest in doing so. china won't even enter into a serious dialogue with the u.s. about nuclear weapons and further reductions. other barriers to disarmament here in the snus absolutely. are there barriers in other countries? yes. and secondly, i was really disappointed by the reception among many reception of the pr speech. not one single head of state, somebody of an equivalent stature of obama, stood up and welcomed that speech and pledged to work with him. not one. standing up alone opposed to in the security counsel.

the iaea co lab brateed with them to defeat the soviet occupation of afghanistan. itself was during the 1980s with american and saudi subsidies and with the guns and the technology and the power that came from supporting the afghan mujahadeen that isi grew into a state within the state, crosssive force in mosquito that influid politics and policy. and it's commanded by the army, the top general in pakistan is usually the most powerful person in the country, whether directly in power or indirectly. its service has 25,000 people working in it. some career military officers, some civilians. spies on politicians and foreign diplomats inside pakistan, collects intelligence from roped the work usually about india, and military threat, and divided into direct doorats, like the cia is. one for analysis, one for eaves dropping and the unit that is in charge of covert aid to islamist guerrillas, known as s inside pakistan. so, the war in afghanistan that is now in its 17th year, its began in 2001 as a sured improve vacation and counterattack to disrupt al qaeda in the midst

jillian: you don't like the iaea iaea -- yay. yay. steve: very unique. ainsley: saw her at concert.p. steve: in other news with the senate rejecting another immigration bill, daca is back on the mind of the americans and administration. brian: mike pence took a tour of the border with kirstjen nielsen and texas senator ted cruz. ainsley: after he sat down with us for for exclusive interview. thanks for being here. why is it important for you to come down to the bored. >> president trump made a priority of border security, building a wall, beginning process of reforming our immigration system. being here on the border, seeing the work that our border patrol does every day, it just underscores the need for the congress to come together to provide the funding for a border wall system that will enhance the security of our country and prevent the flow not only of illegal immigrants and individuals that represent danger in our communities. and the flow of illicit drugs. it is time for congress to act. i feel more convinced about that having been here today, received briefings that we rece