taliban one is the site where we know well, where the explosive bunker that iaea visited. to has not been visited by the inspectors. there's much more detail about iran's massive work on uranium metallurgy, including ample evidence of iran having all the equipment for all the work needed in a uranium metallurgy program. the information shows that iran made the uranium metal components with surrogate materials. iran did small-scale uranium processing for neutron initiator for a nuclear weapon, that was also not known. there is no direct evidence at the site which was exposed in 2009 was being built to make weapons grade uranium. there's an image of a device to assemble the central core of a nuclear explosive using a surrogate metal material, but to actually -- the briefing showed an animation of that, and subsequently the israelis found a picture of the actual assembly device. there's additional equipment that iran must declare under section t other the deal, and i could go on. i'm only representing a small fraction of the information, because much of the information would

here's the head of the iaea.continues to verify and monitor the nuclear commitments made by iran under thejcpoa requested by the united nations security council and authorised by the board of governors. as of today, we can state that iran is implementing this nuclear related commitment. the israelis say that they have new information. rana rahimpour now on what the new information is. they've talked about new evidence but we haven't had much detail about it but it's probably similar to the evidence that benjamin netanyahu revealed a few weeks ago, which many experts said that it wasn't new. it accused iran of further activities that went back at least a decade ago and it didn't convince the experts. clearly it did comment donald trump and he referred to that evidence when he announced he was pulling out of the deal but it seems that this is prior to his european tour, he's going to use it to put more pressure on the european signatories of the iran deal to leave it, although it doesn't sound likely. with every is

we think it is important, as chancellor merkel has said, that the iaea investigate iran based on thisel has now provided to the iaea as well, and it is important to prevent iran from getting a nuclear weapon. we commit andi getting a nuclear weapon. we commit and i commit again that we will not let that happen. translation: germany did not cancel this agreement, together with other european partners we stand by it, but we act as one in saying that this issue of regional influence is a very worrying one, the security of the state of israel, we feel that we ought to make every diplomatic effort we can in order to address the ballistic missile programme of iran and also its activities, for example, in yemen and the presence of the iranian army also in syria, and to exert our influence here in such a way that iran is pushed out of the region. joining us is thejerusalem post's intelligence and terrorism analyst, yonah jeremy bob. good to see you, thank you for being with us, what is the prime minister's ultimate aim? what is he trying to achieve? two main thing is, the iran nuclear deal, a

i can give you today and the statement by the iaea that it has had access to every site and its request. it is under the additional protocol. also director general just a couple of days ago and latest safeguards report. they got the message. they told ambassador haley they had 50 sites of concern. they have not visited all of the sites by any means. they've not visited any of the sites that have been named in the nuclear archives that were recently discovered to the iaea. and probably western intelligence. now it's time that they stopped. is it anything on that verification front that the other four would have have a chance to talk about. it's not true that it was fully verified. a lot of these things happened beyond the scene. one of the issues has been section t which is a ban on nuclear weapons development activity that is still not verified. they involve equipment that is known to exist in iran additional goal used equipment in the nuclear archives it should be declared by iran. and monitored by the international atomic agency. to say that this deal was fully verified it's the best

john kerry as secretary of state he hasn't read the side deals between the iaea and iran?ministration and anyone who has to go to committee of jurisdiction and it involves the treasury department, the energy department, this is more than just the state department. if they know they have to testify before congress and answer the questions to ensure this passes, then through the process, as ron just said, they will be working towards ensuring that we have not just the right agreement, but also the answers to those questions so they're not embarrassing themselves and they're not tanking their own deal. mark: don't the american people have a right to know what's in the deals too? our representatives need to know. you're funding some of these things, whatever, isn't that the whole point of the treaty provision. whole body politic has a right to know, our representatives have a right to know. the senate. you need a supajorityo pass it. what they did on the iran deal is flipped it on its head. corker-cardon deal was you needed a super majority in congress to stop the obama deal,

that meets, that comes up with the plan of how things will be certified, that reviews the iaea's report on how things have been checked, that deliberates and decides whether they accept this or reject this or want to follow up here, et cetera. you need a multilateral oversight of any kind of denuclearization agreement i would think in north korea and with keto, too. you have to built up institutional knowledge of what's been done already and coming down the pipe. so i would see japan potentially as pushing for and i think the u.s. should be pushing for, as well, a multilateral -- even if the deal is bilateral or trilaterally done, there should be a multilateral group that has that role. that's an opportunity i think. on the flip side, if things kind of fall apart, et cetera, and you have the sanctions, we need to re-increase maximum pressure. japan's playing a role on surveillance and reconnaissance, photos of ships, ship to ship transfers and sanctions evasions and could play a role in helping counter proliferation and in that realm. and then one thing i think abe could do that would g

the big talk was the iaea report. that china's gas demand will soar 35% in the next five years. that your impression that it was transferred fuel or permanent fuel? anastacia: the question is is there really a future for gas long-term over the next 50 years or so in the energy industry? alix: any answer? anastacia: this is the gas conference, so the answer is there has to be a role for gas. they are looking at making gas cleaner so it is sustainable for a low carbon future. they are looking at other sectors, such as transportation. there is a lot of innovation going on as to how to get gas to stick and where the new market might be. alix: the demand is great, but you have to get it there. which brings us to lng terminal. what was the talk about how quickly the new terminals could come online to meet the supply and demand? anastacia: it takes about four years to build a new lng terminal, and it looks like they will need more lng on global markets in the next five or six years, probably. so those terminals need to start construction soon. the big question there is can they get eno

try to judge them but they did ultimately correct it and i think everybody knows according to the iaea the iranians are living up to the spirit ofia the law so i want to repeat if the baseline was wrong andat now we have some evidence on the dossier it was wrong then the entire agreement is in question i'm less worried about has or has and whether or not we have the righthe baseline work we were deceived then this is not doing what it's supposed to do. >> referring to the baseline do you think they had more centrifuges? >> i think they had a robust program you may remember there was an issue just about to leave office whether or not they had stopped. and that is also at issue so how far have they gotten before this happened to make you raise an important question so now the administration is facing the potential of removing himself from the deal and negotiating with north korea at a time of unprecedented turnover in the white house a and a large percentage of physicians remain unfilled from the president was to tweet first intimate policy later. the question about process it proceeds o

the iaea said iran is sticking to enrichment limits under the deal.hammed dhabi said officials have been instructed to draw up plans within 90 days that include provisions for creating at least 10,000 new jobs. global news 24 hours a day on air and on tictoc on twitter powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries. i am jessica summers. this is bloomberg. that. thank you for i quick update on the markets. trading in new zealand underway. take a look at how we are sitting at the start of the asian trading session. we are seeing a little gain when it comes to stocks. sydney futures looking more positive. we also have the aussie dollar holding at that level. the rba staying on hold as expected. we getd-quartep today expected to show a marginal pickup in growth is supported by exports and household spending seeing some strength as well. looking at dollar-yen ahead of the tokyo session, 109.86, sterling flat at 1.399. the 10 yield at 2.93. a whipsaw session overnight, but generally u.s. stocks taking a sessi,eat in the just

from the iaea they think this may drop to a three-year low. this could come to 2.5 million.f this, the u.s. sanctions on iran, the economic crisis in venezuela. one interesting positive note is the iea says opec could boost output by 1.1 million barrels a day, so this might be a temporary blip if they need to increase supply. while weside because are talking about that we have had to talk about russia because last week russia said, we want to pump more. they are the ones along with tony arabia trying to get this proposal passed. -- saudi arabia trying to get this proposal passed. they want to get to 31 million. we see those three countries say not yet. not until we can all agree because we have to benefit proportionally. one other thing, with the last terminal chart, we want to take six years.ive or this is not the right one, but i will talk about you to it. when we are talking about oil, we have to talk about shale out of the united states because this rises and will impact prices. the white line is u.s. reduction. the blue line is saudi arabia. we have passed that at the s

country would start producing centrifugees use for uranium enrichment and then today iran informed the iaea the nuclear watchdog it would not cooperate with investigators until the state says the deal is resolved. the secretary of state was following the stability on twitter by saying iran plans to increase enrichment capacity, won't allow iran to develop a nuclear weapon. iran is aware of our results. another example of the rent foolishly squandering its resources as the us is out of the deal but remember france, britain and germany are all still in and this week officials from those countries asked the us for an exemption from sanctions on iran, billions of dollars in eu investments are at stake but so far the trump administration hasn't budged. >> back to the singapore summit, who are these potential summit crashers? it is pretty wild. everyone from south korea's pres. to dennis rodman, shaping up to be several many summits before and after the big singapore summit, the latest development is bashar assad is going to pyongyang at the same time, vladimir putin sent his top envoy to meet wi

thing, as pompeo and others have said, is to have more americans on the ground, either as part of iaea inspection teams, which ought to be part of any real movement of denuclearization, or the event that we establish diplomatic relations, open an intersection or an actual embassy. you can be sure that job one is thinking, how do i get more information so i know what they've got? we have seen over past deck katsds the north koreans are very good a at hiding their weapons system over our intelligence collection. david ignatius on this father's day, happy father's day. >> thanks, same to you, david. >> thank you very much. >>> back to the border where the president's possible is having profound health effects on children. we'll talk with two people who have been inside. we'll also speak with the head of the american academy of pediatrics. both join me, next. alice is living with metastatic breastr, which is breast cancer that has spread to other parts of her body. she's also taking prescription ibrance with an aromatase inhibitor, which is for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-po

is it going to be as simple as allowing investigators and again from the iaea, is it going to be yes,n bring in mcdonald's, which would be a grand icon from the west, into north korea? what would be some of the indicators you'd look for? >> you've mentioned a couple of practical things. i think also, perhaps that the level of policy i think it would be some kind of statement that both parties favor denuclearize of the korean peninsula, that they would like to take steps to bring a formal end to the korean war and like to see progress towards normalization of relations. one specific thing i would really like to see the north koreans commit to -- i don't know if it's too early, but for them to commit to rejoin the nuclear nonproliferation treaty which they withdrew from in 2003, which kind of set the stage for the development of nuclear weapons. >> laying ow the potential plan that might work there. i appreciate it, ambassador. thank you. >> thank you. >>> let's bring in rolling stone senior writer and professor of korean studies. we're looking at the president and you heard the ambassa

they did ultimately correct it and i think everybody knows that according to the iaea iranians are living up to at least the spirit of the law and -- but i want to to repeat, if the baseline was wrong and we now have evidence on the israeli dossier then the entire agreement is in question and i'm less worried about had, has, hadn't, didn't than whether or not we had the right baseline and if we were deceived about the baseline then this agreement is not doing what it's supposed to do. >> you actually think when he was referring to baseline you think they had more centrifuges or robust program? >> i think they had a more robust program and that i think is also at issue here, how far have they gotten before this -- before this happened. >> andrea, you raise a really important question about process. so now the administration is raising potential of removing itself from iran deal and negotiating with north korea at a time when we've had unprecedented turnover in the white house and a time where large percentage of top positions remain unfilled and a time where the president likes to tweet an

we can't turn it over to the iaea who gets manipulated regularly by our adversaries. it's tough going. >> you think the north koreans have far more at stake than we do? >> yeah. he knows he needs some relief here. he has economic pressure on him and he has the potential of a military option coming where he loses everything. but that doesn't mean that he will not try to manipulate and get the best negotiated deal out of this he possibly can. i don't expect much from this letter at 1:00. i think it's just his willingness to go to the summit. i would be stunned if he makes any major concession in that letter. >> we appreciate your insight. thank you for being with us today. >> julie: it's all the buzz on social media still. samantha bee apologizing for her vulgar comment about ivanka trump. is that enough? why some conservatives say there is a double standard. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, or psoriatic arthritis, little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats differently. for p

we have nonproliferation re under the iaea, under the treat nonproliferation over the long term around the world and he's dismantling all of that. >> devil's advocate here. north korea is going ahead with the nuclear program, full steam ahead and you have the former director of the national intelligence who has been very critical of president trump saying, look, we are in a better place now than we were six or eight months ago post-summit. six or eight months ago we were still under president trump and it was fire and fury rhetoric time, but looking at where north korea was going, sam, are we better off than that trajectory? >> missiles aren't flying. so again, in the short terme have a de-escalation, but poppy, we have no idea if north korea has actually frozen its program. we know that they're not test, but again, they' not testing use they've achieved the nuclear capabity so we have no idea of knowing whether they stopped research and deopment, whether they turned their centrifuges off so they could re-start the maligned behavior really at the flip of a switch. >> defining denuclear

and that takes a lot of resources from the iaea. but the international atomic energy agency is able to increase its capacity. but you're quite right, andrea. this would be a declaration that would have to have all kinds of inspections to it. maybe even some any time, anywhere inspections, which no one has agreed to because north korea is a very mountainous country, and we're not sure where everything is. >> michael, we have known so little about kim jong-un up until now. yet he arrives in singapore and goes out on the town tonight, going sightseeing until about midnight, looking at the sites here in singapore. he's completely remade his image in the last couple of weeks, since agreeing to this summit with president trump. what do you make of it? >> i think this is -- kim jong-un has been, and north korea has been one of the targets for the u.s. intelligence community for decades. and i think that's one of the reasons why it's so hard to know, not just because of president trump's unpredictability, but it's hard to know where this al

i think what will be some kind of limited inspection presence from the iaea in north korea following the summit. how intrusive is that? does it involve snap inspections? president trump will need a deliverable that he can say well, look, there's something tangible here which means this process must go on. bret: yeah. susan? >> you know, i think the issue is not only what the north koreans agree to do but what the u.s. gives up to achieve some kind of deliverable, something so president trump can say it is a success. we have already given up quite a bit. we have given this meeting which the north koreans wanted. we are going to have the picture which the north koreans have wanted of the two leaders shaking hands as equals. so i think one concern that some have is that the united states not give more ground on things without the north koreans taking tangible steps that actually lead to a reduction of the nuclear threat. >> one thing, molly, that the president said on friday before leaving was that he really wants congress in this whole thing. take a listen. >> i would only do a deal if

we would have to be there on scene and not depend on iaea and that's the second step.de a gesture in canceling august's military exercise the u.s. does with south korea. i haven't seen so far north korea make a comparable gesture militarily that would match that. what about them pulling back, agree to go pull back some of the services from the demilitarized zone. >> i think we have made the president's gesture, largely without troops, we practice war campaign at the headquarter's level and the national security team has set condition base, if we get some of the negative answers before that exercise, they will reschedule it. the major exercise is coming in the spring and that's still going. all the normal day in and day out training the south koreans and the united states do are all ongoing. south korea and north korea are negotiating and one of the things they are negotiate asking what you just put your finger on and that is to end korean war and then also hull back deployed forces that are facing each other in demilitarized zone. this could take time for all of this t

we would have to be there on scene and not depend on iaea and that's the second step.president made a gesture in canceling august's military exercise the u.s. does with south korea. i haven't seen so far north korea make a comparable gesture militarily that would match that. what about them pulling back, agree to go pull back some of the services from the demilitarized zone. >> i think we have made the president's gesture, largely without troops, we practice war campaign at the headquarter's level and the national security team has set condition base, if we get some of the negative answers before that exercise, they will reschedule it. the major exercise is coming in the spring and that's still going. all the normal day in and day out training the south koreans and the united states do are all ongoing. south korea and north korea are negotiating and one of the things they are negotiate asking what you just put your finger on and that is to end korean war and then also hull back deployed forces that are facing each other in demilitarized zone. this could take time for a

all the sites are, re the components that make up north korea's arsenal and to get in outside actual iaeactors. >> bret: was all the troubles with iran and iraq and all of the verification processes. josh, the administration is suggesting they are not getting enough credit for just being here, that already the critics are turning and saying what's not going to happen out of this meeting as opposed to what is happening currently. >> that's right, but one of the things that a lot of a lot of longtime north korean marchers have pointed out is that this is a summit that really would have been available to any u.s. president over the last several decades that wanted it. the north koreans have been very eager to have this type of meeting, but previous presidents thought that that was not wise because they didn't see the opportunity to have the kind of concrete progress emanate from it that they wanted. really the key question as we head into the summit is will it be more than a handshake? will there be something substantive, concrete that president trump is able to show and if not, how does he

the missiles they had of the commitment to tell him and the rest of the international community and iaea where they were to be verified and take stock of it. forget dismantling. take stock of it. he was asked specifically did they tell you about the nuclear stockpile. he said it is substantial. he didn't answer that question. that is a missed opportunity. again, the idea of not coming out with a declaration that the other side was willing to really denuclearize itself. again, i would ask joseph and jeff and you all. was what happens today any different than various declarations that have been issued in '92 or '93 by the united states or by south korea? it seems very, very much the same. specifically from the north korean perspective. >> in fact, you go baco the '9 framework which is what people talk about here. i looked at the language. it is remarkably similar to what we have seen today. on the issue of verification, which is one step, ambassador, to take it further. the president offered no specifics. he said we will verify it. we will have people on the grou. that is notspecific. >> i

tomorrow, iaea, about reprocessing within the confines of the jcpoa. apparently they had some room.'t bee m noteally a change. definitely not a strategic threat or even a military threat to the united states. it is not welcome but something we're definitely not concerned about militarily. melissa: interesting. lieutenant colonel, thanks for joining us. >> my pleasure. thanks for having me. melissa: meanwhile, i don't know if you saw this yesterday. this is one of the most startling story to me. israel using a meme from the hit movie, mean girls, to respond to a threatening tweet iran's top leader this is what iran said. our stance against israel is the same stance we have always taken. israel is a malignant cancerous tumor in the west asian region that has to be removed and eradicated. it is possible and it will happen. so they, you know, send off this fire. the embassy of israel, at first thought they had been hacked respond with the meme, from ""mean girls"," she says w are you so obsessed with me? for hours, they had to have been being had. can't be real. they haven't denied it w

previous agreements have committed north korea to allowing iaea inspectors back into the country to adhering to international arms control eaties and so forth. >> it's actually even less specific. >> it's less. now, the president's bet is that none of that matters. m that they builtis that the up some trust and that he's doing this from the t down now and that all previous presidents who tried to do it from the bottom up. maybe he's right. we don't know, but that means that mike pompeo, the secretary of state is now about to go down the line that john kerry spent two or three years doing with the iranians, which is to try to negotiate bit by bit from this very vague framework into what that really means and history with north korea suggests ts going to be really tough. it's going to hit a lot of bumps in the road. the president did get one additional thing from the north koreans. they began destroying last week a pretty important facility, a test stand for the engines that are used in the intercontinental continental missiles. these are big to kim jong-un. they were testing an old soviet des

they did ultimately correct it, and i think everybody knows that according to the iaea the iranians living up to at least the spirit of the law -- but i wants to repeat. if the baseline was wrong and we now have some evidence from the israeli dossier that the baseline may have been wrong, then the entire agreement is in question. and i'm less worried about hassed had, didn't, than whether or not we head the right baseline and if we were deceived about the baseline this agreement is not doing what is supposed to do. >> do you think when you refer to the baseline, you think they had more centrifuges and more robust program. >> probably a more robust program and there was an issue just as we were about to leave offers of whether or not they had stopped their design work, and that i think is also at issue here. it's how far have they gotten before this happened. >> let's me just say you raise a really important question about process. we're now -- the administration is facing both the potential of removing itself from the iran deal and negotiating with north korea at a time when we have had un

specific mentions of iaea inspectors, returning to the npt which involves a whole host of other commitments, you have none of that in this agreement. so when you look at what past presidents got and this president got in terms of north korea does not compare well. >> that's interesting because president trump will say, look, the north koreans broke that agreement. what's different this time is me. who is president and secretary of state and that might keep the north koreans from breaking it. one other piece of news the president announced, david, and you have information on this. he said that kim told him that he destroyed some kind of missile engine testing facility. what is it and is that significant? >> this engine testing facility is where they built the engines which have russian origin that powered those intercontinental ballistic missiles that they were setting off. they're very important because if you don't conduct the tests you can't build the intercontinental missile. now, it's possible that they've now solved most of the major problems, but as of last week, 38 north a group that

would they allow the iaea inspectors? >> no. absolutely. they can work towards denuclearization.happens next here? we know that pompeo is going to be sitting down with the north korean counter parts to draw out this deal even more, make it more subinstantive than it was with those four points presented last week. where do we see this going? >> if the trump administration wants this to work, it's going to have to unleash its technocrats. we have people fully capable of negotiating a deal. we have 60 years of experience of doing nonproliferation and arms control agreements. its going to take persistence and the processes tend to go off the rails. so the white house is going to need to accept the fact that the nat everythi not everything is going to work at once. we have to keep pushing. >> all right. sue, terry and josh, thank you for joining me. >>> that's going to do it thi week. joining me back here next sunday at 4:00 p.m. to break down the pl mar stories of the week. i want to wish a happy father's day to my husband and father-in-law and dad who is no longer with us. happy fat

promise to denuclearize completely, how do we know that they can follow through with that and that the iaeaan get their jobs. >> it's the country where we have the weakest human intelligence resources of any country in the world. we have no other allies or partners that have access to it as we do in other cases when we deal with the countries and so when we look at this, other than secretary of state pompeo, who do we think can go in there and convey a message and how would we ever enforce it? this is unlike any other situation that we have in the world, and so imagine when the summit happens, whenever says, both sides have some sort of victory and the real victory will be north korea. >> north korea is basically broke. >> kim jong-un can't pay for his own hotel bill in singapore. >> doesn't want to. >> they're desperate and when china leaned on them to put the sanctions that really put the squeeze on them and you have to look at them from another point of view that they need an influx of money. they need an economy that's going. so what -- even if they come to the table, north korea, kim j

head of the international atomic energy agency who welcomed the joint statement and said, quote, the iaea stands ready to undertake any verification activities in north korea that it maybe requested to conduct by the countries concerned. okay. they're ready to go. but what about north korea? joining me now from new york is msnbc former secretary of state nightmares, securing the of world before its too late and bomb scare, the history and future of nuclear weapon he also happens to be pulling an all nighter. we're joined by wendy sherman, a formerundersecretary of state, wainvolved in iran's nuclear deal and a friend of the show. to you both welcome on this big morning. joe, let me start with you because i want to get your reaction to what you heard from president trump, what you saw in that brief statement that as we've been talking about didn't have too many specifics in it. what do you need to see to feel confident in what's coming out of the summit? >> you just heard the president say this is the complete denuclearization of the korean peninsula. well, that statement says that, but do

i think what will be some kind of limited inspection presence from the iaea in north korea followingtrusive is that? does it involve snap inspections? president trump will need a deliverable that he can say well, look, there's something tangible here which means this process must go on. bret: yeah. susan? >> you know, i think the issue is not only what the north koreans agree to do but what the u.s. gives up to achieve some kind of deliverable, something so president trump can say it is a success. we have already given up quite a bit. we have given this meeting which the north koreans wanted. we are going to have the picture which the north koreans have wanted of the two leaders shaking hands as equals. so i think one concern that some have is that the united states not give more ground on things without the north koreans taking tangible steps that actually lead to a reduction of the nuthreat. >> one thing, molly, that the president said on friday before leaving was that he really wants congress in this whole thing. take a listen. >> i would only do a deal if i get it through congres

the only organisation that can do that is the iaea.orth koreans haveis nuclear programme the north koreans have is far more complex than that which iraq had and involves more than just weapons, the fabrication process and a restaurant process. and of course the weaponization. there are literally hundreds of sites, many of them hidden deep underground and it would be a major undertaking and the north koreans, evenif undertaking and the north koreans, even if they agree to an outcome i'm sure would be pushing back against it in six months‘ time when inspectors arrive. the only real surprise concession if you like a from donald trump. when he said we will suspend military exercises, with south korea. war games. that ta ke with south korea. war games. that take everybody by surprise including some of his own us military commanders. the people who didn't ta ke commanders. the people who didn't take by surprise with the chinese. information this evening that the foreign minister seem to imply that the chinese knew about this yesterday. and t

few weeks ago i was highlighting the differential between what opec sees in the demand and what the iaeacaused the shift, economic slowdown, higher oil prices? >> a combination of both and more production coming from the u.s. remember, this is demand for opec production. if the u.s. is pumping more oil, there is less for the countries to produce. there is also a huge uncertainty on how it will be the second half of the year. we have the beginning of a potential trade war between the u.s. and several countries, and all of that is making opec more cautious on the outlook for the second half of the year. alix: if you come inside the bloomberg, this is a look at the russia supply and opec total production output. we also learned that saudi output was over 10 million barrels a day for the first time since october and there are reports that some russian companies are starting to cheat on the deal. >> we have seen rosneft telling higherrs it was testing production. they were able to put 75,000 back into the market. saudi arabia told opec this is their own production. 10 million barrels a day fo

the iaea says the u.s. could become the biggest supplier of all of their products go online.ns, do you have to lng,ce more, discount your do you have to get more price competitive in asia? growthf you look at the around the world, requirements for the cleanest fossil fuels around the world, whether fossil -- china, india, other countries , in addition to europe and other areas, there is the need for everybody to produce more gas to cope with the requirements of the future. i think there is enough to go around and we need everybody to , to and have a good supply cater for the demand everywhere in the world. alix: short term you are one of the largest exporters of lng to europe. in that report, they say the european nat gas market has no room to grow until the 20 20's. if they have no room to grow, where do you grow? saad: there is some slight growth that has appeared in europe. all the growth is really tied to economic growth. there is slight economic growth in europe, some slight demand. i think there is a diversity that is required by the buyers to have different suppliers o

the iaea said iran is sticking to uranium enrichment limits under the deal.he ecb is said to anticipate a pivotal discussion at next week's meeting and could produce a public announcement on when it intends to wind up qe. the governing council is likely to treat the gathering in lafayette as an opportunity to debate the in the bond buying. set to rungram is until september and the bank has declined to comment. global news 24 hours a day on air and on tictoc on twitter powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries. i am paul allen. this is bloomberg. haidi: facebook has disclosed data sharing partnerships with or bank chinese device makers, including while way and lenovo -- whil peter, why are people concerned about these revelations about one company in particular? facebook made these revelations as they were talking about how they shared data. in some deeplanded trouble recently because they were used data from cambridge analytic a that allowed interference in the 2016 presidential election. the united states government is con

ran deal -- iran accepted in perpetuity intensive monitoring, including putting all iaea monitors in all falities that are not military installations and they had allowed sort of a right to challenge inspection for facilities that we suspect are involved in covert activities. my point is, having called that al insane and it could be argued it's a flawed deal that it's a very, very bad deal, now whatever deal that has to come out with north korea has to be a lot better than that, right? i do think if he doesn't come away with declaration from kim jong un and absolutely what denuclearization means and the denuclearization of the korean peninsula, none of that that north korea was willing to unilaterally end their nuclear weapons program, it has to be permanent, no time limit and allow unlimited, no notice inspections. it has to include chemical, biological weapons as well as conventional forces. if we don't have this kind of agreement, then it's not -- you cannot call it a success. we talked about already how president trump isoing t call it a success, but then it's going to be -- all

we are not going to rely on iaea to do that as we have in the past because they have so miserably failed will start the stress test. >> bill: few people know this issue better than you do. how do you rate our chances of success as you lay out that case? >> i think we have a pretty good chance. i've always felt that what kim jong-un started way back in the olympics, his acceleration and urgency, it seems like his commitment to it, it just all felt differently. i'm not a polley anna kind of guy but i think this feels differently. i think we have some chance for success here. i'm elated that pompeo is involved in this. he opened up the back channel not well-known to the north koreans top security guy way before he went over there. so he has been engaged in this and getting inklings certainly that something is different from the north korean perspective. can they be manipulating us as they havesure, they can still be manipulating us but i think we have huge potential. >> bill: apologize for the interruption. i think the president said the north koreans are ready to come into a modern world.

were not going to turn into the iaea as has been down in the past. they have made false claims. that's another issue that has to drop. >> shannon: we know they have had mr agreements over numerous administrations and they've ended with a missile test or somether north korea had agreed they weren't going to do. we know it's a detailed, tedious process. this administration and president trump probably wanting a more expedited timetable on the denuclearation that what kim jong un would agree to. we'll have to see how they hammer out the details. general keane, thank you. stay with us. coming up in a few minutes, we'll head back to singapore life and hear from president trump as he and kim jong un begin their working lunch. there will be an expanded list of advisors in the meeting, bringing in state department officials and press secretary sarah sanders. getting a look at the menu in case you're curious. don't go anywhere. hey, no big deal. you've got a good record and liberty mutual won't hold a grudge by raising your rates over one mistake. you hear that, karen? liberty mutual doe

. >> i hope the trump administration is realizing at the department of state and iaea. this is something they haven't been great about in every issue. they have haven't found ways to use the civil service, but the engineering on a scientific basis, they need to be involved in the beginning to figure out what the right asks and how do we guarantee they're followed through. leland: we've heard at least anecdotally, secretary pompeo is trying to reengage some of what we've talked about. we appreciate it, liz. elizabeth: some headlines now, police say two vietnamese nationals were found stabbed to death at a room in circus, circus hotel in las vegas. they were from a tour group in california. their bodies were discovered after they missed a scheduled activity. a disturbance was reported in the hotel around 2 a.m. they believe this is when a crime may have occurred. and seniors at santa fe high school, walking across the stage two weeks after a fellow student opened fire at the texas high school, killing ten people. over 300 seniors received diplomas during a ceremony held o

are we getting iaea people in there, international inspectors. have we shut down the reactors?some of the other facilities? in a couple of years, you would be a long way toward a clear sign that -- it may take another 13 years. >> yes, that's right. and these scientists at stanford say near term, midterm, long-term, you freeze everything. there's no discussion about a freeze, about locking in the kind of commitments north korea has made. we hope there's more backup to come. >> i wouldn't want to tell the north koreans this will take 15 years, because they'll stay, we'll take it. >> we'll leave it there. our coverage continues as we are just minutes away from president trump delivering remarks, fielding questions from the press in singapore, just about an hour and a half after he signed a letter with the north korean leader, kim jong-un. but i'm not standing still... and with godaddy, i've made my ideas real. ♪ ♪ i made my own way, now it's time to make yours. ♪ ♪ everything is working, working, just like it should ♪ >>> welcome back. here with our special coverage of the nuclea

i know the iaea, the international atomic energy agency has come up and say they would be -- they are ready to help should they come to that. >> thank you. >> thank you. senator coons. >> thank you, chairman corker, ranking member menendez for holding this important hearing and to our three distinguished witnesses and your families. we are blessed to have men of your experience and strength and character willing to continue serving our country. i'm grateful for the opportunities i have had to meet with you, admiral harris and ambassador nash thank you for our conversation yesterday, mr. chancre, i look toward to supporting your nominations. if confirmed which i expect you to be you will confront some of the greatest challenges the united states faces around the world from north korea, the endo pacific and strengthening and sustaining our vital partnership with our ally south korea to embracing the opportunity of the continent of africa while confronting terrorism and humanitarian crises, very real challenges and risk of iran, syria and the middle east. you have a full plate. the trump

negotiated the iran agreement all agreed military sites were subject to inspection at the request of the iaeathere was a mechanism in place never tested. the second thing i would say, with respect to iran, we had extrely good independent to activity working with allies in the u.k. and israel and france and germany, we had the ability, separate from the inspection regime, to have some sense of what was going on through intelligence systems. koreaunately in north collection of information i more difficult. we will be more heavily dependent upon a robust and strong inspection regime. the north koreans have always been resistant to any kind of inspections outside of the declared facilities because they claim it would jeopardize their military security. this would be one of the most difficult issues for the technical experts to work out in any nuclear agreement with north korea. talk with youn more about it later down the road. at the kennedy school of government, former white house court nader for arms control in weapons of mass distraction. we appreciate it -- mass destruction. we appreciate it.

the iaea warns iran an venezuela could lose 30% of their oil output next to because of u.s.heaval. the iea said that would require extra output from members. opec meets next week to debate whether to restore oil production cuts. a surprise from soccer's world cup in russia, spain has fired s begin.ger one day be spanish authorities were upset that he was just named the new coach at real madrid. today, we will learn the 2026 world cup will be awarded to the -canada-mexico joint bid. global news 24 hours a day on air and on tictoc on twitter powered by more than 2700 journalists and analysts in more than 120 countries. am taylor riggs. this is bloomberg. tom: thank you so much. david rubenstein with us with the carlyle group, his efforts with tim cook, look for tonight on bloomberg television. dennis gartman here. also, ira jersey is a true football/soccer expert is here. you are predicting morocco will win the 2026 festivities. with the expanded world cup, i'm sure they have the infrastructure to do it. surpriset would be a if the north american bid didn't wind up winning. to

inspectors and also with international inspectors, we will not rely on the iaea, that would be a failedy they'll be subsequent meetings, there's got to be. dagen: would you expect with history of north korea and even kim jong un's father and grandfather, we make promises but we want immediate economic sank's relief. we take a lot if we are north korea and we give very little? >> you're absolutely right about that. given that's been so successful for them in the past, as you mentioned, they are probably going put that on the table. the president team goes in very clear. they are not going give up on the sanctions that we have in place certainly. we can't do anything like that until the actual dismantling of the nuclear program is under way and it's a commitment to continue it. you know, at best, what kim jong un is hoping for is get rid of sanctions and possibly just do partial denuclearization but always hold onto something to guaranty the preservation of the regime and that's the key t that we have to put on the table, how are we going to guaranty his security indefinitely because he's

you need to draw on the iaea to inspect, to begin the process of verification.at i think mike pompeo understands. but he's going to need his president's support. i just say in conclusion, willie, to be cynical, this is the deal that john bolton was most afraid of. i mean, john bolton has been worried since the '90s that we've made a deal like this. and president trump has just done that. i wonder what john bolton is thinking today. what we saw today is how badly donald trump wanted this moment. you know, he didn't get the communique that we thought he would, that had more specificity and he took it anyway. now he's got to do the hard work. or somebody has to do it for him. >> there's a lot of day trading going on to get the pr moment, the ribbon cutting. but i wonder what is lost, gene robinson, that's a great phrase, precision of language, when you put a whole bunch of stuff forward that you have to pull back on. this is the risk one takes when donald trump is alone at the table. because he can't even follow the advice "do not congratulate" in bold letters in f