minsk highly appreciates the work of the iaea, especially at the stations that are now effectively in the combat zone. we are talking about the kursk and zaporozhye regions. this is a matter of global security in the region. a project to build a nuclear power plant with from the very beginning had many questions and many challenges, and belarus in this case is an example of how a country can atomic energy, i would like to note that to work with the agency, how closely it can interact with experts and missions of our organization and shows in particular. and returning to our peaceful atom, operational work at beloe fully complies with international norms and standards, this was stated by evich familiarized himself with the process of personnel training in the training center, and of course, visited the key facilities of the plant, including the control panel and the turbine section of the first power unit. from the very beginning of the conflict between russia and ukraine, we have been involved in its resolution. at the moment , iaea security experts are at the zaporizhzhya npp, as wel

on the other hand, of course, i would like a more active position from the iaea.e with the president of belarus that the iaea should be a much more significant actor, a significant subject in this process of peaceful settlement, that is, not just somehow record, to put it mildly, generally and impersonally, all these shellings, someone is shelling zaporozhye from somewhere, from somewhere. nuclear power plant, but to offer a roadmap on how to get away from these rather dangerous situations, the creation there, for example, of a zone free from shelling, from destruction, that is, from the deployment of heavy weapons, to which, by the way, the russian federation agrees, and russia has completely withdrawn any weapons not only from the territory of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, well, and practically nothing is located around energodar, except for systems of a purely defensive nature, this is what is needed, i believe, to use this experience in order to, to extend it to the status, to the position of such dangerous man-made nuclear facilities, well, the presid

rafael grossi noted that cooperation belarus and the iaea will continue their plans to build a storage facility for radioactive waste. from the very beginning of the conflict between russia and ukraine, we have been involved in its resolution. iaea security experts are at the zaporizhzhya npp, as well as throughout ukraine, including the chernobyl zone, which is not far from here. we maintain constant communication with both sides, and this is very important, since we are talking about military actions. it is very important to emphasize that we constantly inform the international community about the current situation and intend to continue this practice in the future. i have personally visited ukraine 10 times since the start of military actions, i have been to the front lines more than five times. at a meeting of the un security council, i voiced a number of basic principles that i gave. got acquainted with the production conditions, the range and quality of products, as well as the potential of the plant. its capacity allows it to produce 300,000 cans of condensed milk per day. this

to build documents, including iaea, she cannot say on black white or on white to say black.eed, the belarusian nuclear power plant is a station of generation 3+ - this is actually the first station with reactors vr. 1.200, which belongs to this generation, which was built outside the borders of the russian federation, given that the belarusian nuclear power plant has shown itself to be on the best side, that is, without any significant incidents related to operation, it consistently produces electricity, meets all safety requirements, which is extremely important for magate, well, what else could be said about a good, modern, wonderful... station, well, magate compiled, accordingly, a fairly positive report supporting the operation of this station, well, and the fact that there, the neighbors are still spitting some kind of poisonous saliva about the fact that they are not satisfied in some way with the safety or in general the presence of the belarusian nuclear power plant on the territory of sovereign belarus, these are their problems, that is, there are internationally re

history of nonproliferation — they had access to everything, it was an open nuclear programme, all iaeathey were there. therefore, it was impossible forfull, complete, correct implementation of the jcpoa without the consent and the satisfaction of the iranian supreme leader. now, when president trump withdrew, then we had a conservative administration led by the late president raisi. he also publicly said, "i am ready to come back tojcpoa, as is." he would never say something like this without the consent of the iranian supreme leader. well, i promise you, we'll come back... yeah, we'll come back to consider the future of this jcpoa agreement in a moment. but before we get there, we have to stick with what might happen next. now, there are signals — nothing more than signals — but signals that israel is not going to launch strikes directly at iran's nuclear facilities, that they seem, at the moment, according to the sources, coming out of israel, inclined to attack energy infrastructure and military targets inside iran. if that's what happens, what will the iranian response be? you can

belarus and the iaea have been cooperating for a long time, from 2012 to 22 all key missions recommended countries that are building a nuclear power plant for the first time were carried out. at all stages, specialists. nuclear energy, we will continue to develop it also in partnership with the iaea, in plans for the construction of a radioactive waste disposal site. interaction with the agency. we will continue, and this will be related to issues of operation of the belarusian nuclear power plant, we have already started preparation of the next iaea mission on operational safety, proposals have also been made for new projects within the framework of technical assistance, technical support, but we also plan to expand our cooperation in a new direction, so related to the handling of radioactive waste, and i hope that that experience, those accumulated and accumulated achievements of the world community as a whole, they will also be used in the implementation of this project. in the current conditions, when western countries have imposed sanctions on belarus and russia and do not want to h

this is the conclusion reached by the director general of the iaea after inspecting the first nuclearr plant in the republic so far. it was built according to a russian design. was recently put into operation. rafael grossi was also received by the president of belarus alexander lukashenko. details of the visit in the report by our correspondent maria temnikova. pezrokot, which almost drowns out the voices, and director general of the iaea rafael grossi is told about the operation of the turbine of the first power unit of the nuclear power plant. and if the reactor is the heart, then the turbine is called the skeleton of the entire mechanism. a characteristic feature of our machine is that a sixth stage is added to the high-pressure cylinder, magate employees, frequent guests of the agency monitored the progress of construction. with the participation of russia could not but irritate its western neighbors lithuania, from which the nuclear power plant is only 30 km away, sends protests to belarus almost every 2 months, the station was built with violations, rafael grossi has a differen

history of nonproliferation — they had access to everything, it was an open nuclear programme, all iaeaey were there. therefore, it was impossible forfull, complete, correct implementation of the jcpoa without the consent and the satisfaction of the iranian supreme leader. now, when president trump withdrew, then we had a conservative administration led by the late president raisi. he also publicly said, "i am ready to come back tojcpoa, as is." he would never say something like this without the consent of the iranian supreme leader. well, i promise you, we'll come back... yeah, we'll come back to consider the future of this jcpoa agreement in a moment. but before we get there, we have to stick with what might happen next. now, there are signals — nothing more than signals — but signals that israel is not going to launch strikes directly at iran's nuclear facilities, that they seem, at the moment, according to the sources, coming out of israel, inclined to attack energy infrastructure and military targets inside iran. if that's what happens, what will the iranian response be? you can be

belarus has been a member of the iaea since the organization's inception.exander lukashenko noted, the country has always attached and continues to attach great importance to cooperation with the organization. in turn, rafael grossi emphasized that belarus serves as an example of how a country can effectively work with iaea, demonstrating openness in discussing various issues. on the sidelines of the intergovernmental council in yerevan, the prime ministers of belarus and russia are discussing the prospects for developing union relations. roman golovchenko and mikhail mishustin held a bilateral meeting. as noted, trade turnover has grown by 8.5% since the beginning of the year. this is against the backdrop of record figures from last year, indicating significant mutual potential in the economies of the two countries. minsk and moscow are ready to actively develop new promising areas. despite all the difficulties that we face, these figures indicate that the course has been chosen correctly. gives its positive result in all areas. industrial cooperation, tec

cooperation with iaea continues. we will continue to interact with the agency, and this will be related to issues of operation of the belarusian nuclear power plant. we have already started preparation of the next mission of the itu on... operational safety, proposals have also been made for new projects within the framework of technical assistance, technical support, well, we also plan to expand our cooperation in a new direction so connected with the handling of radioactive waste. nuclear power plants are not only strengthening the country's energy security, they are a big step in the technological development of the national economy and improving the quality of life of people. it is not surprising that the world is experiencing a nuclear renaissance. more and more countries are looking into towards nuclear energy. new nuclear power plants are being built in france, china, and turkey. russia and belarus are open and ready to share competencies. energy security is certainly the basis of the economic sovereignty of t

minsk highly values ​​the work of the iaea, especially at the stations that are now effectively in thebat zone. we are talking about the kursk and zaporozhye regions. this is a question of global security in the region. the atomic energy agency was also maximally involved. to answer, there is no such need either on the part of belarus or, believe me, on the part of russia, too, was not, is not, and will never be. i still remember my first visit to minsk, 12 years ago, when there was nothing on ostrovets. today, however , it is a pleasure to see that both power units of the nuclear power plant are in operation and... behind closed doors, much was said about the situation in the region, in particular about russia and ukraine. in this context , the president emphasized that magathe and grossi personally could make a great contribution to the peacekeeping mission between moscow and kiev. the pace of mobilization in ukraine has gone down sharply, the ukrainian army lacks manpower. the secretary of the verkhovna rada committee on national security complained about this. he blames the governm

at the moment, iaea security experts are at the zaporizhzhya npp, as well as throughout ukraine, includinghe chernobyl zone, which is not so far from here. we maintain constant communication with both sides. this is very important, because we are talking about military actions. very important. emphasize that we constantly inform the international community about the current situation and intend to continue this practice in the future. i have personally visited ukraine 10 times since the outbreak of hostilities and have been to the front lines more than five times. at a meeting of the un security council, i voiced a number of basic principles that must be strictly followed by all participants. whether this will be enough to resolve the conflict is still unknown. but one thing i can say for sure: magt has never been in the country, has actively participated in the process for in order to resolve the situation peacefully. as if a celebration at the highest level, and in order to interrupt it, some absurdity is thrown in, the point, of course, is not that smart people will believe it, in order

of the agency was personally at the ostrovets site back in 2012 as an assistant to the head of the iaeal remember my first visit to minsk 12 years ago, when there was nothing on ostrovets yet. today, it is with great pleasure that we can see that both power units of the nuclear power plant are in operation. and it is especially gratifying for me to hear that at the highest level, in this case at the level of the head of state, the most serious commitment to ensuring nuclear safety is expressed, and above all, it speaks of the professionalism that your country possesses on the long path to becoming the nuclear power producing state, we would like to... let us recall that the construction of the belarusian npp has become the most high-tech and large-scale joint project of minsk and moscow, its cost is more than 6 billion dollars, about 40 belarusian and russian organizations took part in the construction. the npp will provide more than 40% of the country's domestic electricity needs, reduces dependence on natural gas supplies and has a positive effect on the environment. greenhouse gas em

these are those who scored. dangerous holding of the next rotation of observers of the iaea mission athya nuclear power plant. on october 3 of this year , the armed forces of the russian federation ensured the safe holding, as i have already said, of this rotation, during the inspection of the road in the area of ​​the arrival of russian sappers , unexploded ammunition and debris in the pivi of foreign- made drones were recorded, which remained as a result of new systematic shelling from the ukrainian country. directly in the vicinity of the zaporizhia nuclear power plant. russian troops, the center group continue to move into the depth of the enemy's defense. they repelled eight attacks by the ukrainian armed forces. this was reported by the defense ministry. units of the southern and eastern groups improved their tactical position, and units of the west group took more advantageous positions, and also repelled three counterattacks. well, in addition, strikes were carried out on objects. in kiev, they realize that western assistance will be decrease, the minister of economy of ukraine

iranian nuclear program. plants for the production of low-enriched uranium research, in total, the iaea knows of at least 17 nuclear facilities in iran. in ardakan, for example, nuclear fuel is produced, in bushehr there is the bushehr nuclear power plant, in isfahan there are uranium conversion plants. what specific strikes can be carried out, either on the deposits directly, or on the port infrastructure, which is more. still struck at oil infrastructure. but at the same time, as the wall street journal writes, iran's oil facilities are also under threat. an important location for the entire world market is the omur strait, this amur strait. this waterway, shaped like an inverted v, connects the persian gulf with the indian ocean. the northern coast of the strait of armus belongs to iran, while the southern coast belongs to oman and the united arab emirates. the depth in the transport corridors generally exceeds 100, and this allows large tankers. the strait of armus is vital to the global oil trade. according to bloomberg, tankers transported 15.5 million barrels of oil per day throu

hundreds of nuclear weapons, never declared, secretly held, illegally built, never inspected by the iaea or any international agency, why should israel be allowed to have nuclear weapons pointed at iran, but iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons to defend itself, wasn't that the whole thesis of those who believe in nuclear weapons? that they are mutually assured destruction, that they keep the peace, that's the talking points of the nato talking heads, well if that was true uh for the nato, uh and warsaw pact standoff, presumably it's also true uh between israel and iran. dr. rahana ali an old stamping ground of mine bradford. doctor, what would you like to say? thank you george, so um, a quick comment first of all, so um, informative um comments um by your guest speaker, now he obviously mentioned that this these attacks were you know via the united states and israel, but i think there's a... there's a kind of important uh nuance there, yes the us absolutely is involved in this genocide of the holocaust in palestan as i call it, um, but the us is also occupied, and i think this po

plants for the production of low-enriched uranium research, in total, the iaea knows of at least 17 nuclearilities in iran. in ardakan , for example, it produces. what specific strikes can be carried out either on ... deposits directly, or on port infrastructure, which is most likely, because after all, the mining facilities are scattered, in the end, everything comes down to several rather major ports, so that the oil simply had nowhere to go, uh, there was no infrastructure to receive tankers, so, accordingly, they will deprive iran of income, for the world market this will be a rather unpleasant story, so the united states is actively trying to calm down. both sides of the conflict, and the united states and the european union do not benefit from israel still striking at oil infrastructure. well, and, as the wall street journal writes, iran's oil facilities are under threat - an important location for the entire world oil market - this is the strait of armud. this waterway, shaped like an inverted v, connects the persian gulf with the indian ocean. and here the northern coast of the stra

russia uh prevented it, but the other hypocrisy of course is the uh nuclear peace treaty and the the iaea, the internet national atomic energy agency, which does not leave iran alone for more than few seconds before it wants to come back and inspect all peaceful nuclear facilities that iran has, they've been going on and on and on and they inspection upon inspection, problem upon problem, so basically even the ia was basically weaponized, used by the same anglozionist empire to basically put pressure on. uh to stop any kind of ability to make nuclear energy of any kind, so that was number two uh hypocricy that these institutions say nothing to israel uh for its 400 nuclear weapons, there's no accountability, and if they use them, would there be any any horror from the so-called international community or the united nations, the their security council? would anybody able to rain them in, stop them, do something, well... on record, they haven't been able to stop them from doing all all the rest of the genocides and what about the icc and the icj? that those great beacons of international la

hundreds of nuclear weapons, never declared, secretly held, illegally built, never inspected by the iaea or any international agency. why should israel be allowed to have nuclear weapons pointed at iran, but iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons to defend itself. wasn't that the whole thesis? of those who believe in nuclear weapons, that they are mutually assured destruction, that they keep the peace, that's the talking points of the nato talking heads. well, if that was true uh for the nato uh and warsaw pact stand off, presumably it's also true uh between israel and iran. dr. rahana ali an old stamping ground of mind bradford, doctor, what would you? like to say, thank you george, so um, a quick comment first of all, so um, informative um comments, by your guest speaker, now he obviously mentioned that this these attacks were you know via the united states and israel, but i think there there's a kind of important uh nuance there, yes the us absolutely is involved in this genocide of the holocaust in palestan as i call it, um, but the us is also occupied, and i think this point is

russia uh prevented it, but the other hypocrisy of course is the uh nuclear peace treaty and the the iaea, the international atomic energy agency, which does not leave iran alone for more than few seconds before it wants to come back and inspect all peaceful nuclear uh facilities that iran has, they've been... uh going on and on and on and they inspection upon inspection, problem upon problem, so basically even the ia was basically weaponized, used by the same angler zionist empire to basically put pressure pressure on.

olli heinan, a former deputy director of the international atomic energy agency (iaea) who once oversaw to monitor and curb iran's nuclear program, said that if iran hurries, it could have its arsenal ready by april next year. well, nuclear warheads. sanctions, which are the same as the korean people's democratic republic, yeah, because there is no difference, this is the independent production of nuclear weapons in the conflict zone. however, yesterday here kimchanyn immediately declared that if japan, the usa or south korea kick us, we will not think about using nuclear weapons, just in case, he warned. yes, therefore, therefore in this case we see exactly those same double standards. as for the publication in the times, well, the british, as we know, they always run ahead of this couple. britain and the united states of america in the most aggressive the position is taken by the pirate island kingdom, and it is interested in inciting all conceivable and inconceivable conflicts. this publication can be such an ideological justification, now israel is holding a discussion about a possi

iaea director general rafael grossi today visited the belarusian nuclear power plant, which was builtclear scientists, the second. the power unit of the plant in the grodno region was put into commercial operation 11 months ago, and international experts intend to assess the measures taken by the authorities to ensure nuclear security. before the trip to belaes, grossi discussed the situation in the region at a meeting with aleksandram lukashenko. report by sergei savin. a long cavalcade of black cars, a representative delegation of magat enters the belarusian npp. the members of the organization were last here in 2021. rafael grossina himself is visiting belos for the first time. magat's leadership visited minsk in 2016, when rafael grossi was the coordinator of the organization, but did not get to belarus, so after seven long years , top officials are making a return visit. before that, here on the site only experts of practice worked, and the launch of the second power unit in november last year, the management of magat demonstratively did not notice. but in october 2024, everythin

and kursk npps in light of possible ukrainian provocations, grossi noted the need support from all iaeacluding belarus, and expressed hope for a speedy resolution. we expect that as the situation develops, as we hopefully move towards stabilization , towards peace, there will be opportunities to expand our cooperation, to return to normal. dangerous driving, toughening penalties for concealing license plates, up to and including deprivation of rights for a year and a half. the state duma today considered a number of widely discussed bills, and the prospects for the emergence of a law on the organization of children's recreation were discussed with ministers within the framework of the government hour, which was held for the first time in a new, broader format. about how summer camps will be made more accessible to russian schoolchildren. from the lower house of parliament. anna semenova. law that would regulate all these issues, but the demand for a solution and a more effective system for organizing and improving children's health is huge. this year. only 28% of schoolchildren rested i

olli heinonen, a former deputy director of the international atomic energy agency (iaea), who in thet oversaw its efforts to monitor and curb iran's nuclear program, said that if iran hurries, it could have an arsenal ready by april next year. what amazes me is that we as a nation, iran is working on nuclear weapons, look at a map of iran, those little circles in yellow and black are nuclear facilities, when you look at that you realize that iran controls more of its allies in the region, it's very very dangerous, why doesn't biden want this to be addressed. threat to the us and israel is a legitimate goal. second, he is wrong when he publicly states that israel should not strike nuclear targets. iran, an enemy of the us and israel. the president publicly told our enemy that we are at odds with our ally. the conservative party conference is taking place in britain three months ago. it failed the election and retained a faction in the house of commons of only 120 mps. 411 representatives of the ulie boris. the tories still have not can choose a new leader. the sunday times newspaper c

and, so, you've seen the iaea back away, you've seen iran start to spin this up.n in six months or less, and so the question is, for israel, given the direct attacks that iran has made on israel itself, israel now, i think, is going to have to exercise its right to defend itself and eliminate the potential of an iranian nuclear weapon. so i think when you see the planes landing from russia on iranian airways and the iranians putting up the gps jammers, the advanced gps jammers that russia has developed, you know, joe, they're all working together. it's obvious that they're all working together. and i think it's important for our administration to start defining who our enemies are. we still don't outwardly say china is the enemy. during the cold war we all knew that russia was the enemy. we all saw movies where there were russian bad guys. we all knew what russia was after. we knew that we had to win the cold war. and here we are in maybe a much larger cold war, facing an adversary that is more capable than any adversary we've ever faced before, and yet we still d