iagree, he is looking tired. the real— the us. iagree, he is looking tired.is, i the us. iagree, he is looking tired. the real question is, is| the us. iagree, he is looking - tired. the real question is, is this going _ tired. the real question is, is this going to — tired. the real question is, is this going to impact _ tired. the real question is, is this going to impact on _ tired. the real question is, is this going to impact on his— tired. the real question is, is this going to impact on his election i going to impact on his election chances — going to impact on his election chances i_ going to impact on his election chances. i think, _ going to impact on his election chances. i think, there, - going to impact on his election chances. ithink, there, the . going to impact on his electionl chances. ithink, there, thejury going to impact on his election . chances. ithink, there, the jury is still very— chances. ithink, there, the jury is still very much _ chances. ithink, there, the jury is still very much out. _ chances. ithink, there, the jury is still v

iagree, yes. i understand it. i agree, yes. i wouldn't have settles for, everything is fine.at you produce. i cannot remember what the response was. but i wouldn't have been able to carry on without an investigation. and i think we saw during the course of my evidence that there was still quite a lot of activity going on sometime later. i believe that was the moment that the organisation started examining itself, but as we have come to learn, there were many people that wanted to just prove that it was ok. yes. that's my understanding is that you didn't actually leave post office until early the following year. office until early the following ear. �* ,., office until early the following ear. ~ ,., ., office until early the following ear. ., ., , office until early the following ear. �* ., . , . year. about the end of january, that is rihht. is right. approximately seven or eight months after you had instigated an investigation by mr maclean. forgive me if this sounds critical, and perhaps it is critical, that there doesn't appear to be any urgency on your part to get an answ

iagree, i ideally, you will see, whether it is palestinian or the kingdom ofjordan or egypt providingaid to the point of need. lets look at the wider military state of play, specifically at rafah. what is your assessment of where we are?— rafah. what is your assessment of where we are? last week, with the activation of— where we are? last week, with the activation of two _ where we are? last week, with the activation of two reserve _ where we are? last week, with the activation of two reserve brigades. activation of two reserve brigades that i believe the intent of those two brigades are going to be backfilling two of the more capable active duty brigades that are currently in gaza, to free them up to start rafah operations. i think, i don't know if it is days, but certainly weeks, as you mentioned, the fact that there have been some concerted dialogue on negotiations as recently as yesterday, and with the egyptian delegation in israel, we had seen that before, but that's positive, and that will potentially delete if any type of agreement is made. clearly, both conventionaland special

no, i do, iagree with you to a degree. of british empire upon india — i think that robs agency from indians who didn'tjust take it all, you know, they responded to imperialism in all sorts of ways, some of them did well out of it. it's a deeply paradoxical situation, hence my point that opposite things can be true at the same time. yeah. 0pposite things can be true, it can all be complex, nuanced and contradictory, and yet, you know, again, i come back to the point you've written something of a sort of polemical book. it's that mismatch in a way that you're saying much of the previous history of empire has lacked nuance. it's either been empire good or empire bed, it's been binary. you want the nuance, and yet there's one fundamental way in which you're not nuanced. you say definitely for good or ill the british empire mattered more than anything else. i don't think that's polemical. but, equally, i get told all the time i've been too negative about empire or too positive about empire. it depends on... who tells you you've

challenge. in terms of his purpose, his opening, yeah, i agree. terms of his purpose, his opening, yeah, iagreeelp us to| establish the steps that were taken to confirm — establish the steps that were taken to confirm the veracity of the information given to the members of parliament— information given to the members of parliament here? | information given to the members of parliament here?— parliament here? i wasn't involved so i don't know— parliament here? i wasn't involved so i don't know where _ parliament here? i wasn't involved so i don't know where the - so i don't know where the information has come from. i'm not actually sure who held the pen on the brief. . ~ actually sure who held the pen on the brief. ., ., , ., actually sure who held the pen on the brief. . ~' , ., ., the brief. thank you, i wonder if we can take a — the brief. thank you, i wonder if we can take a break _ the brief. thank you, i wonder if we can take a break there? _ the brief. thank you, i wonder if we can take a break there? i _ the brief. thank you, i wonder if we can take a break there? i think - the brief. th

opening, terms of his purpose, his opening, yeah, i agree. terms of his purpose, his opening, yeah, iagree. you terms of his purpose, his opening, yeah. i agree-— yeah, i agree. you can't help us to establish the _ yeah, i agree. you can't help us to establish the steps _ yeah, i agree. you can't help us to establish the steps that _ yeah, i agree. you can't help us to establish the steps that were - yeah, i agree. you can't help us to| establish the steps that were taken to confirm — establish the steps that were taken to confirm the veracity of the information given to the members of parliament_ information given to the members of parliament here? | information given to the members of parliament here?— parliament here? i wasn't involved so i don't know— parliament here? i wasn't involved so i don't know where _ parliament here? i wasn't involved so i don't know where the - so i don't know where the information has come from. i'm not actually sure who held the pen on the brief. ., ~ actually sure who held the pen on the brief. ., ,, , ., actually sure who held the pen on the brief. ., ~'

again, iagree should be expressing themselves. stands for. i not what the united states stands for. , ., ., , ,., ., for. ijust want to pick up on a olitical for. ijust want to pick up on a political point _ for. ijust want to pick up on a political point before - for. ijust want to pick up on a political point before the - for. i just want to pick up on a i political point before the finish. isn't there a danger forjoe biden in history, because in 1968, hubert humphrey, the incumbent vice president, lost to richard nixon who was regarded as being the peace candidate, so, ifjoe biden cannot get a grip on these protests, would you agree that is a greater possibility that donald trump might win? from a democratic standpoint, thatis win? from a democratic standpoint, that is a problem? there is a difficult balance that president biden has to reach. i think that he is not quite there yet. we must stand by our ally israel. we don't want to see the country attacked from others in the region. but we also want to change their behaviour. i

kelly, and the deputy leader of rejoin look, who do iagree. right. look, who do you agree with?ayor of brussels apologise for shutting down conference? down the nat kong conference? your verdict is now in. and i did see the way this was going on on. and you on twitter earlier on. and you do see it. this is do love to see it. this is democracy in action. 49% of you think mayor brussels think that the mayor of brussels should apologise nigel should apologise to nigel farage. say that he farage. 51% of you say that he shouldn't. it's closer, closer than the brexit referendum. well done to everybody. and i do mean everybody who took part in that poll. i know you are still to come. a just stop oil protester who chaos 4000 who caused chaos to 4000 motorists airport on motorists at heathrow airport on the m25, said that she'd do the same again. will quiz same again. i will quiz a supporter of the group and a climate activist, larson, climate activist, ben larson, shortly, plus a parliamentary punch . next i'll reveal what punch up. next i'll reveal what sparked that brawl in the next h