icap in trade program would have a detrimental effect, i believe, on the americans some -- on the american consumer. i recognize the future of energy is cleaner engine she -- cleaner energy, including building at least 100 new nuclear power plants in the next 20 years to 25 years. i also believe we can meet our growing needs of energy while fulfilling our obligations to the environment. whether or not you believe in global warming, this should not be an excuse to enact a cab in trade system until we have an international agreement on co2 emissions. advocates of cap in trade argue that to implement the system, american take a global leadership position on climate change. i agree with that. they have argued other nations will voluntarily adopt emissions standards in the future. well, what good is it if you are leading if you are not assured that others will follow? i do not believe we should impose mandatory requirements on co2 emissions until we have an assurance from china, russia, india, and other nations that they will work with us on this issue. a proposed cap in trade system would prod

can take a school you find and measure horn tip to horn tip or you can get a sense of how old was. icap measuring those measurements and kept up with the fact that it might become super old so i took up the habit will of testing it. i will jump ahead and show someone here. this is at oxford university and this is a geneticist beth schapiro. she extracted, she took a gramma bone from a genetic line and ran a third test with a bunch of siberian yaks. she was optimistic that might be something really old. you can get the ancient dna were lively up to 80,000 years old and then gets a little sketchy. it is dead so does not have many jurassic park implications. she called me up to support it one day and said it was a modern version of the animal. look like-- i sent another graham of the bone and i had to give them $700. one day they rahm mia letter and said based on a lot of things the hard lender said that they could tell me with 99% probability that the animal died between 1660 and 1960. they knew it was thought after 1960 because it did not have been a carbon it from nuclear weapons testin