i think the west a really suffers from icbc in case of amnesia um by the from previous misadventures or missteps. they were based to be american bankruptcy. if you look at their approach to was the region. the only thing that i use apparently know how to do it. remember, the lease is to use military force. and if you recall, this type of thing that takes me back to a comment which was made by former president obama, when he said, if you don't, if you don't need a hema to tackle every problem in an, in direct. this isn't of the american political mindset now, why don't thing called bomb i did very well. of course, in his administration, we did say a lot during that time. but that was an admission to get admitted to a very, very fundamental floor in the american policy. and i think that, um, yeah, the united states is in a states of bankruptcy. the simple reason is it's a pc that appears to be addicted to the whole traditional policy. usually it also appears to be addicted to standing with these allies, even if that means that firing against that you with interest itself. and i think t

c, j decided that the icbc decided that in order for the, you in to be above the fray, we can get involved in, in those types of, of judgments. it is political cowardice, and i'll tell you why the one that is capable and has in the past aligned its positions with its own norms and standards. think about apartheid in south africa. the u. n. maintained the principal law based position on behalf of equality international, human rights and international law until apartheid fell in south africa in palestine 30 years ago. they abandoned that position in favor of an amorphous political project. where somewhere down the road, there was a promise of a 2 state solution which became a smoke screen behind which we saw a continued persecution, dispossession, massive and systematic violations of human rights and leading now to genocide, it is true that only a court can determine whether or not, it is genocide in the final instance, but the convention of the un on genocide prohibits mandates, not just genocide, but also mandates. the prevention of genocide and the u. n. is willing to speak out when it se

and the son of the russian representatives recently plains, the icbc for intervening and monitoring the situation in sit down and thus undermining the effectiveness of the un bodies. what, what changes do you think should be implemented? and would you say that false and misleading are it saves it the main huddle and the way up a security council for making a real difference. well, if you ask about the eyes to see, you know that we are very critical of disorganization. there were some hoops link, so you to when it was created, it's uh, 20 years ago if i'm not mistaken. uh. and the one the resolution on that for specifically was taken but seems to them a lot of things happens and uh, a lot of situations where the eyes to see displayed absolutely. salinas selective hope road show when they failed to prosecute the war crimes by the us. bring it on . they told you not. you know, have dentist on the rock lead the that of course changed a lot in our relations thoughts. but as you see, where be puzzled, so we, the decision of the i see to all of a sudden display of interest to, towards a, towar