prime minister, my question to you, is you spoke forcefully about the threats of extremist t idealogy at home and expressed there are hundreds of britain citizens learning to fight and kill in syria. with regard to extremist idealogy at home particularly in schools, don't you think it's not only unseemly, but wrong for members of your own government to engage in an arguments about whether pirates should be protecting british children against extremist idealogy? >> thank you. first of all, let me just say on the issue o of sanctions. i think it's been striking over the last few months how we've been able to stay as unified as we have, and i'd pay tribute to barack for his understanding of how important it is for us to try and work together and deliver these messages together. i think it surprised people and i hope it surprised president putin. in terms of tackling extremism, i set up the u.k. extremism task force which i chaired after the murder of lee rig by because i wanted to make sure the government was doing everything it could to drive extremism out of our schools, colleges, off

staff that's been working extra extra hours to keep my texts and phone calls alive to make sure idealogy with everyone in the room and more people that represented them and that's jason elliott thank you jason for the work you're doing here (clapping) and then i'd like to thank you for the opportunity to invite any of our elected officials or members of podium to express their viewpoints and get ready for - >> one minute. >> good and if i speak - >> (laughter). but again, we look forward to the discussion with the voting public this is an exciting discussion something that the entire city is proud of so again, thank you very much everyone thank you. thank you, everybody good morning. good morning. all right. well, thank you for joining me at the board of supervisors chambers everyone else thank you to supervisor chiu and supervisor farrell to the entire members of the board of supervisors thank you for being here our commissioners and department head and elected officials and labor and continuity leaders and welcome to our residents that are joining us at the chambers and certainly onlin

first of all, this idealogical, charles. as a government we defend the country and have a military to fight wars and defend us. and we have a similar government infrastructure to care for our veterans. that's the way we should do it, and yes, we do need more money. the doctors that work for the va on average make less than doctors elsewhere in the health care system. we should address that right away and raise their salaries, and pay them more because they are doing the most important work off physicians in our society, which is caring for the men and women who hurt themselves, candidly, defending us. >> it's funny that you would use the military and this administration, because they are trying to gut the military as an example of why we should be spending more money. we have to spend taxpayer money efficiently. >> let's be honest, charles! >> he knew it was wrecked, but instead he -- >> just let me make a quick point. you and charlie don want a veteran's administration, and you have no -- >> you have no idea what you are ta

but the core of isis is an extreme idealogical group. it is a group that wants to impose sharia law across the region. they want to take the middle east back to the time of the prophet mohammed because they really believe that it is only through an islamic state that this part of the world can rid itself of corruption. they are very idealogically driven organization. >> spencer, when you hear those kinds of estimates that there's a core of 3,000 to 4,000 fighters and 700 faced off, as driven as fighters might be, it does not seem plausible that this few could pose a serious threat to baghdad or frankly to all that much of iraq. the iraqi army has hundreds and thousands of fighters and many of them u.s. trained and armed. how is this group actually such a threat? >> this is what they can do. al qaeda and its brand when it acts in different countries aren't necessarily front line fighters. a lot of times they are facilitators and trainers and a lot of times they are experts and providing other fighters often indigenous fighters with inform

staff that's been working extra extra hours to keep my texts and phone calls alive to make sure idealogyith everyone in the room and more people that represented them and that's jason elliott thank you jason for the work you're doing here (clapping) and then i'd like to thank you for the opportunity to invite any of our elected officials or members of podium to express their viewpoints and get ready for - >> one minute. >> good and if i speak - >> (laughter). but again, we look forward to the discussion with the voting public this is an exciting discussion something that the entire city is proud of so again, thank you very much everyone [dog barking] [rocket whistles] [boom] >> good afternoon. welcome to the san francisco full board of supervisors tuesday, june 24, 2014. madam clerk call roll >> supervisor avalos. supervisor avalos?

anti-status rhetoric we hear pouring out of the mouths of right wing politicians and conservative idealogs and the kind of thing repeated here and look at the violent consequence. had there been a rapper saying such violent things and somebody acted on his words we'd beat up on it. >> if a hollywood actor said such things we'd beat up on the hollywood actor. it's time to hold conservative politicians and right wing idealogs accountable for the the deadly, deathly consequences of their vicious rhetoric. police say they are investigating any connection between the bundy standoff and the millers. >> as you all know, there was a convergence of not only militia, but white asupremacists and sovereign citizens to the bundy ranch. we continue to look at any connect activity that jarad or amanda miller may have to that previous action. >> the miller's neighbor went on to say jerad miller made threats against law enforcement. >> later on, he started talking about killing cops. and i told him, you can't be doing that. you know? that's not right, man. my mom is a retired police officer. you can't be d

staff that's been working extra extra hours to keep my texts and phone calls alive to make sure idealogy with everyone in the room and more people that represented them and that's jason elliott thank you jason for the work you're doing here (clapping) and then i'd like to thank you for the opportunity to invite any of our elected officials or members of podium to express their viewpoints and get ready for - >> one minute. >> good and if i speak - >> (laughter). but again, we look forward to the discussion with the voting public this is an exciting discussion something that the entire city is proud of so again, thank you very much everyone (music) >> herb theatre,open rehearsal. listen to the rehearsal. i think it is fun for them, they see our work process, our discussions, the decisions we make. it is good for us. we kind of behavior little bit when we have people in the audience. msk (music) >> we are rehearsing for our most expensive tour; plus two concerts here. we are proud that the growth of the orchestra, and how it is expanded and it is being accepted. my ambition when i came on a

the majority side really cracking down on what justice sotomayor said and accusing her of being idealogical. what does this tell you how fevered this debate on immigration is? >> i don't think it's idealogical because justice alito agreed with her result and said most of her reasons justice thomas agreed with every words she said except for one footnote, but a very technical fo footnote. it's a reminder that justices can disagree with each other, even pretty sharply and it's not necessarily all about partisan ideology. it's just sometimes good lawyers confronting a very complicated statute might have different interpretations. >> was the fact that this immigration process can take so long in this particular case it was over seven years on a wait list a factor in how the judges ruled? >> they in the end -- the majority deferred to the bureaucracy, complicated statute and all sorts of people get lost in the shuffle and drop through the cracks and the majority basically said we're going to let the bureaucrat sort it out and defer to the bureau -- the immigration bureau and that means that some

staff that's been working extra extra hours to keep my texts and phone calls alive to make sure idealogy with everyone in the room and more people that represented them and that's jason elliott thank you jason for the work you're doing here (clapping) and then i'd like to thank you for the opportunity to invite any of our elected officials or members of podium to express their viewpoints and get ready for - >> one minute. >> good and if i speak - >> (laughter). but again, we look forward to the discussion with the voting public this is an exciting discussion something that the entire city is proud of so again, thank you very much everyone >> this lodge is home to some of the best fly casting pools in the world. these shallow concrete pools don't have fish. this is just a place where people come to practice their fly casting technique. ith was built in the 1930's and ever since, people have been coming here to get back to nature. every year, the world championship of fly casting is held in san francisco and visitors from all over the globe travel to be here. >> we are here with phil, gene

i don't see where this was idealogical. you can disagree with it. >> i agree. >> i see it.e for one hero. five for this dip kid. we don't know everything. >> final word on the subject. i want to thank you. when we come back, looking at some of the latest developments now on investments, stocks hitting all time (mother vo) when i was pregnant... i got more advice than i knew what to do with. what i needed was information i could trust on how to take care of me and my baby. luckily, unitedhealthcare has a simple program that helps moms stay on track with their doctors and get the right care and guidance-before and after the baby is born. simple is good right now. (anncr vo) innovations that work for you. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. we all have a fundamental right to a healthy environment. earth justice defends that right in the courtroom. and we win. join our fight. earth justice. because the earth needs a good lawyer. >> stocks keep sending markets to new highs. >> they do all the metal fabrication construction work. big play going to be china next. >> how ab

staff that's been working extra extra hours to keep my texts and phone calls alive to make sure idealogy with everyone in the room and more people that represented them and that's jason elliott thank you jason for the work you're doing here (clapping) and then i'd like to thank you for the opportunity to invite any of our elected officials or members of podium to express their viewpoints and get ready for - >> one minute. >> good and if i speak - >> (laughter). but again, we look forward to the discussion with the voting public this is an exciting discussion something that the entire city is proud of so again, thank you very much everyone ♪ ? an incredible program because we take regular kids teach them the love of the game. we have no emphasis on winning we only have an emphasis on learning and trying as hard as they can that's it and the chips fall where they may. when students leave our program whether or not adults or kids they'll have a mechanical understanding of what they have. you don't have to be 7 feet tall or be super faster but you do need skwil. once you teach kids how to ha

i don't see where this was idealogical. you can disagree with it. >> i agree. >> i see it. five for one hero. five for this dip kid. we don't know everything. >> final word on the subject. i want to thank you. when we come back, looking at some of the latest developments now on investments, stocks hitting all time highs. are the largest targets in the world, for every hacker, crook and nuisance in the world. but systems policed by hp's cyber security team are constantly monitored for threats. outside and in. that's why hp reports and helps neutralize more intrusions than anyone... in the world. if hp security solutions can help keep the world's largest organizations safe, they can keep yours safe, too. make it matter. >> stocks keep sending markets to new highs. >> they do all the metal fabrication construction work. big play going to be china next. >> how about you? >> vanguard's russel 2000. when stocks are at all time highs, small cap stocks have been hit a little harder. >> you see this market momentum continuing. >> the economy is safe. >> my friday was worrisomworris.

i don't see where this was idealogical. you can disagree with it. >> i agree. >> i see it. one hero. five for this dip kid. we don't know everything. >> final word on the subject. i want to thank you. when we come back, looking at some of the latest developments now on investments, stocks now on investments, stocks hitting all time so i can reach ally bank 24/7 but there are no branches? 24/7 i'm sorry- i'm just really reluctant to try new things. really? what's wrong with trying new things? you feel that in your muscles? yeah...i do... drink water. it's a long story. well, not having branches lets us give you great rates and service. i'd like that. experience a new way to bank where no branches = great rates. ally bank. your money needs an ally. because you can't beat zero heartburn. woo hoo! [ male announcer ] prilosec otc is the number one doctor recommended frequent heartburn medicine for 8 straight years. one pill each morning. 24 hours. zero heartburn. >> stocks keep sending markets to new highs. >> they do all the metal fabrication construction work. big play going t

you know, you have to see the guys are in the twilight of their lives, advancing the idealogical agenda for decades. you point out that they are not putting money behind causes that benefit them monetarily. while it may in some cases, it's a philosophical choice. the guys have tremendous amounts of money, worth $41 million. >> they are free market purists. they are working on issues related to climate change, where na is in their economic interest. but the guys have an across the board anti-regulatory agenda. they don't want to see a solution to carbon or anything else or health care. >> and you think they have pushed the republican party to be libertarian. it is happening now and we are seeing it in candidates like - politicians like rand paul and people of that ilk. so the question now is really what are they going to do now this they amassed the power center within the party, will they moderate it on certain issues, like immigration, on which they are moderate. and some of these social issues that really combine to help the republicans lose a number of elections in 2012. >> it's fasc

on idealogical stuff we try to get involved in i never seen it go very well. we can't coordinate. we're a pluralist society. we have too many opinions. we don't understand it. we're reading it from afar in translation. we don't have enough experts. we don't have credible voices. i agree with her. i think there has been some success using other, you know, idealogical authorities to counter from that region or helping them or embracing them but for us to can do it, i don't think we do it very well. >> unfortunately this has to be the last question of the woman at the front table. >> kara foster, from university of southern california. you mentioned that sense of when bin laden was killed, the fragmentation of the jihadist world has escalated and that you mentioned we can't really tell which scenario is going to play out when but my question is, because the fragmentation has escalated, how do we respond and is that response going to be less and less viable as that fragmentation escalates? >> watch everything, listen to what they say and act very rarely but what, whatever you choose t

. >> i think that the news pages are not yell idealogical. opinion. john: give me a break, news page is too. for a year bill crystal was an op-ed columnnist for the times did you open their minds? >> i don't think so. john: you had a one year run, what was yr experience they don't overtly try to sell a . of view, they just think that everyone should think their way. >> yeah that is right, i was treated professionaly, i e-mailed my column, fact check it, get o it the next day it waa professional relationship. but in terms of times, they are blinkered almost more than bias, new york time is house organ of contemporary american liberalism, they see the issues, they focus on issues that american liberals focus and obsess on like global warming and they report from a certain points of view, they see some of the faxes, they don't know anyone who does not agree with them, that is a huge problem, they are in a bubble that i think those who work at fox news for example are not, you spend a lot of time told, you are not being fair and balanceed, what about this

men did not agree on many issues president clinton was struck by bush's integrity >> i wasn't an idealogehe voted for open housing bill to integrate housing in america i thought that showed he had character to be open to the facts and i liked him because i thought he was a very good man. i think he will go down in history to one of the positive things he did to improve security of the united states in his term which was in part reflection of the failure of communication and a reflection of the success of every american president from hairy -- harry truman. >> we celebrated the 200th anniversary of the white house in 2000 i invited all living presidents and former first ladies there. it was an amazing night of american history but after the 2000 election and before the supreme court awarded election to president bush, his son. so there they were, sitting in the white house, they had to be calm and try to enjoy this and try to realize the weight of the moment. they had no idea whether his son was going to be president or not. they handled it. they were amazing. >> former presidents gather f

. >> so let me ask you this, the idealogical and spiritual climate in russia that a lot of folks in the u.s. have a hard time following because of the language, because we're preoccupied with our domestic issues, obamacare, we're preoccupied with china -- >> good for you. >> but to focus on what is happening in russia socially and idealogical, you really either have to live there or have to spend a lot of time doing that, like myself being addicted to the russian facebook. what i see is a quick change, a fast change from sort of lay za fair model that we had in the past decade and from the 2000 to 2004, then again maybe under medvedev. it was authoritarian bass not particularly harsh. actually the change started to happen even before ukraine with the ban on adoption of russian kids, with the ban on support of russian nonprofits by western funders, the gay, anti-gay propaganda law. all kinds of things that the state is increasing its interference in people's lives. how does ukraine affect that and where is it all moving? where is it going? >> ariel, i think that those changes, you know,

and the fact that almost the entire court was selected on the bases of idealogy and not training. i should not say anything more probably. so far i have been overly kind. the supreme court is probably staying in that mode today. >> what has been the lowest point in your congressional career? >> oh, boy. um, i saw my world come down around my ears when i had to get a divorce, get the custody of the kids, and raise four kids alone. and thank god i was able to do it with the help of a sister who is going to find the lord waiting for her waiting in heaven. and i was able to do that in a way which made by kids solid, successful citizens. it was tough. and at that time, we were having a huge battle over energy and energy prices, something we regularly do on the hill. but something which were the administration was putting out a publication entitled quote shove to it dingell. and so i was in the midst of this dog fight about whether they were going to shove it to dingell or i was going to surprise and by a narrow margin i did. some of the people in this room were there to help me through

, the united states faced a mortal threat, an enemy that was strategic, political, military and idealogical. washington had to keep together an alliance that faced up to the foe and persuade countries in the middle not to give in. this meant that concerns about resolve and credibility were paramount. but the world today looks very different, far more peaceful and stable than at any point in several centuries. the united states faces no enemy anywhere on the scale of soviet russia. america's military spending is about that of the next 14 countries combined, most of which are treaty allies of washington. the countries that have been aggressive or acted as washington's adversaries are facing a tough environment. look at russia, china and iran. in this context, what is needed from washington is not another heroic exertion of american military power, but rather, a sustained effort to engage with allies, isolate enemies, support free markets and democratic values and push these positive trends forward. the obama administration is, in fact, deeply internationalist, building on alliances in europe

you have to make a decision, what is more important the future of pakistan itself or these idealogicalups who have been doing the bidding for years by carrying out attacks against americans, indians, afghans. >> how is pakistan different today than it was say two years ago? >> well, i think unfortunately what has happened is the radicalization has been increasing, and gaining strength, and while many -- when i found -- when i interviewed a lot of taliban members there was a loyalty to omar, who is kind of like a pope. and almost uniformly i found that. however, with the increasing radicalization, there is real questions whether even omar can control the taliban out there, and there are a lot of different factions, there's increasing urbanization. there is occurred in carachi, so there is a problem that is growing, and this is a problem that i think real strategic decisions have to be made both by the pakistani government and the united states. we have given $20 billion to the pakistanny government since 9/11 with very little to show for it, and they used some of that money to support t

these are idealogical views that are clashing here and clashing hard up against the truth. we are watching the u.s. government facilitate in cooperation with central american government and government of mexico the transport by mules by drug cartels and human smugglers. the movement of children unaccompanied, 1800 miles and you're telling me the best the united states is to come up with this declaration humanitarian crisis and we would not urgently ship aid directly to those countries now? >> well, you know, you put your finger on a problem. and that is that we've got to look at those countries and see what we can do to -- >> they are our neighbors. >> you don't have the children fleeing to -- >> they are not exploited for political purposes, don't you agree? >> most children are not aware of the politics that are involved. >> i'm not saying they are. i'm saying to you point blank this president, his administration and activist groups are purposely exploiting them politically as strongly as they possibly can and they think they are going to get away with it. by the way, the

men did not agree on many issues president clinton was struck by bush's integrity >> i wasn't an idealogeopen housing bill to integrate housing in america i thought that showed he had character to be open to the facts and i liked him because i thought he was a very good man. i think he will go down in history to one of the positive things he did to improve security of the united states in his term which was in part reflection of the failure of communication and a reflection of the success of every american president from hairy -- harry truman. >> we celebrated the 200th anniversary of the white house in 2000 i invited all living presidents and former first ladies there. it was an amazing night of american history but after the 2000 election and before the supreme court awarded election to president bush, his son. so there they were, sitting in the white house, they had to be calm and try to enjoy this and try to realize the weight of the moment. they had no idea whether his son was going to be president or not. they handled it. they were amazing. >> former presidents gather for events on

officers, a bizarre and violent targeting of police officers apparently for obscure and fringe idealogical reasons. it was a couple moved from indiana. it was a 42-year-old man and 62-year-old woman. according to the report when they were arrested their sovereign citizen message was they actively wanted to wage war on the police in order to start a sovereign citizen revolution. quoting from the a.p. the couple spent hundreds of hours over four months plotting to abduct, torture and kill las vegas police officers as a way to attract attention to the anti-authority movement. the two attended training sessions and shopped for guns and found a vacant house and rigged it to bind suspects to cross beams during interrogations and recorded videos in order to explain actions and why in their words police officers had to die. they had an apartment about three miles east of the las vegas strip. they had unwittingly brought an officer in on their plans. the two were charged separately, both pled guilty to conspiracy to commit false imprisonment. there is no indication that the two sets of couples were

i mean, it doesn't necessarily -- i don't have any big idealogical stake in it frankly. that sounds like it might be a appropriate way to do it. it's just the balance of power question between each side of constitution avenue is fascinating there. >> alex, it could have gone worse for the president, pause the minority on the court wanted to hold to a stricter standard. their reading of the constitution provision, the constitution says the presidential have power to fill up all vacancies that may happen during the recess of the senate. and the lower court agreed with the scalia view that what that means is they can only do recess appointments in effect in december, a little bit of january, at the end of the year between the two senate sessions. not during these little breaks throughout the year, which is the way they've been doing it at least since eisenhower and maybe earlier. >> yeah. i mean, what i feel we're seeing is our incredibly shrinking democratic process and representative government here. the reason the supreme court is writing rules for the senate is because

that's the expected idealogical seismic shift in the nation's financial sector as they make their waythe corporate world and have striking attitudes. it's quite interesting and we'll be doing that just next week. we look forward to next week's under reported. first today, as we remember the historic battle that turned the tide of world war ii, 70 years ago, we honor those who gave their lives and those still with us. richard overton, the oldest living world war ii vote. he was a member of the 88th engineer battalion. [ male ann] whether it takes 200,000 parts, ♪ 800,000 hours of supercomputing time, 3 million lines of code, 40,000 sets of eyes, or a million sleepless nights. whether it's building the world's most advanced satellite, the space station, or the next leap in unmanned systems. at boeing, one thing never changes. our passion to make it real. ♪ how do i win?ight.everyone wins. because we're streaming the movie that you love. well, how do i win? because we ordered that weird thing that you love from the pizza place. how do you win, dad? because i used the citi thankyou card a

extremists will believe they have answer to all the problems that is being more idealogically proved. >> redistricting contributed to the loss, as best we can tell, an interesting political sidenote. steve, also to richard's point, what does it mean itch the reaction here to this is to put up new faces of the republican party in the house that are just like the old face sntz we know they are unpopular. and the base says, you are not listening. >> the house majority, such as it is, there is no policies, no agenda, no articulation of conservative principles, about helping, 100% of the am scan people. they're just totally -- an oppositional blocking force. so in the absence of an actual agenda, becomes very easy for you to be defined. but what i think is so remarkable about this, the notion that the chamber of commerce is now become -- has now become an epithet in primaries. the disconnect between the foundational institutions of the party, that have always been -- you know from the, from the beginning of the modern political era, just been deeply attached to the republican party. have n

. >> they just began to add idealogical anti-teacher amendments to this bill. >> including one to stripchers of due process. turning them into what state senate minority leader anthony hensley who has been a teacher himself for more than 30 years, describes as at-will employees. >> their employer, the principal, the superintendent, won't even have to give reasons as to why they were fired or nonrenewed, and they wouldn't have any ability to have a hearing in order to find out what those reasons were or to appeal those reasons. >> that amendment and others were quietly tucked into the must-pass funding bill over a single weekend early in april. >> the due process repeal was never in a bill form. never heard in committee. it came up as a floor amendment, jammed in there, and then rushed through. >> when teachers got word of what was happening, they flooded the capitol in topeka to protest, but it was too late. the bill passed in the early morning hours. the next few weeks, teachers and their advocated trailed governor brownback from event to event, calling on him to veto the bill. >> i ho

president, which means that unless there's a strong public will that cuts across partisan lines and idealogicalwith what the constitution arms congress with. >> all right. funding and impeachment. you talk about all of this laid out in your fascinating book. it provoke az very interesting conversation. one that a lot of people don't want to have. >> thanks so much. >> coming up, country music legend takes its final bow at dallas cowboys stadium. polar bears making a splash for science in never before seen views of the arctic. that's next. you, my friend are a master of diversification. who would have thought three cheese lasagna would go with chocolate cake and ceviche? the same guy who thought that small caps and bond funds would go with a merging markets. it's a masterpiece. thanks. clearly you are type e. you made it phil. welcome home. now what's our strategy with the fondue? diversifying your portfolio? e*trade gives you the tools and resources to get it right. are you type e*? ugh. heartburn. did someone say burn? try alka seltzer reliefchews. they work just as fast and are proven to tast

so, clearly, the idealogical prescriptions of both sides, they both get their turns, is not enough.ed to be looking at, for example, what are the 1 in 6 adult men do that don't have a job and many of them are not looking. part of the problem is the benefit structure. did discourages part-time workers to lose their benefits. i'm not saying throw all the benefits out of the window. jared would jump on me for that. we need to look at a way of structuring it so if we are going to help people, with he don't discourage them from working at the same time. we can jo every come that. >> peter, i don't know what you are talking about. with all these gears, you put it in drive and go. what's the big deal? >> jared, seattle has opted to raise its minimum wage to $15. highest in the nation. if consumers are job creators, empowering them is valuable. is this a good time given the current economy? is this a good time to raise the minimum wage that high? >> first of all, my short answer is, it is a good time to raise the minimum wage. in terms of that high, it is very important to realize they are

it was a very -- across idealogical lines. we all agreed that it was illegal, unconstitutional for the president to rely on signing statements to disobey the law. then the entire american bar association voted to uphold that statement. there is no -- there may be an argument that the president has the authority as the chief executive and commander in chief to make decisions regarding transfer of p.o.w.s. he doesn't have the authority, even by signing statements, to simply say i'm going to disregard the law. >> if there were a challenge to the validity of this signing statement, if he ultly rests his argument and people will say this doesn't have legal weight. how would such a challenge play out? would this end up in court? >> it could be. the courts are very reluctant to take up issues without granting standing saying that whoever files the charge, the case has standing to bring it. this would require actually some guts on the part of people like harry reid and the house too, people in both parties who say we don't work for th

i believe that thr just idealogically driven and they hate this president. and i think that they'll take any issue whatsoever, bergdahl just happens to be the story of the hour, story of the week and they're going the try to it up into something it isn't. i find it interesting that all of these members of congress are second-gaesing the military. the military doesn't know how to handle this guy if he was awall. and there's no confirmation that he was. what about that? >> i'm struck by the fact that and here i'm exempt mccain who did fight in war and served all those years as a prisoner of war. you got a lot of arm chair warriors in the gop who are going out and trashing this guy, you know, 20, 21 years old, fighting in afghanistan. we don't know the facts and we ought to find out these facts but no matter what the facts are, the idea that you would leave him behind in taliban hands for an indefinite period of time and it probably wouldn't have been indefinite because his health is clearly precarious. that idea is prepost rouse. if the president had followed

congressman desantis' comments with regard to iran and the suggestion by people, frankly, across the idealogicalor supseudo-alliae with them regarding iraq. your congressman across the aisle seemed to think that was a very bad idea. where do you stand on that? >> i think it's a very bad idea. i don't trust the iranians, i wouldn't want anything to do with them. they are bad players, they are the leading supporters of terrorism throughout the world. the reason why assad in syria who murders his own people is winning, it's because iran allowed its terrorist proxy, head b hezbollah, to fight on this side of syria. what we're seeing now in iraq is a spillover from the syrian civil war. so i think it's foolhardy to count on the iranians for anything. at a time when we're negotiating with them over their nuclear program, i don't want them having any kind of leverage where they're expecting any kind of quid pro quo. if they're helping us perhaps they'll have more leverage on the nuclear discussions. i don't think iran should ever be allowed to have a nuclear weapon, and i would not deal with the irania